Divorcing borderliner bulletin, 2016
For the list of top articles see Recommended Links section
- 20160922 :  6 Signs Your Spouse Has Checked Out Of Your Marriage Huffington Post    ( Mar 14, 2016 ,  www.huffingtonpost.com ) 
 
- 20160910 :  Surviving the Storm - Divorcing a Narcissist   ( May 02, 2016 , dalkeithpress.com ) 
 
- 20160910 :  Are BPD Drama Queens Manipulative, Sadistic, and Worse    (   www.psychologytoday.com ) 
 
- 20160910 :  Meet the Malignant Narcissist   ( Dec 09, 2015 ,  jessescrossroadscafe.blogspot.com ) 
 
- 20160910 : Love,  Sex, and Intimacy: Their Psychology, Biology, and History    ( softpanorama.org,  ) 
 
- 20160518 :  Less Than Artful Choices Narcissistic Personality Disorder According to Donald Trump  by Maria Konnikova   (   Big Think  ) 
 
- 20160518 :  Barack Obama – Narcissist or Merely Narcissistic?   ( lettingfreedomring.com ) 
 
- 20160518 :  10 Signs That Youre in a Relationship with a Narcissist  by Preston Ni M.S.B.A.   ( www.psychologytoday.com ) 
 
- 20160518 :  Obamas Malignant Narcissism    ( www.americanthinker.com ) 
 
- 20160518 :  Can Narcissists Change  by Dr. Craig Malkin  ( www.huffingtonpost.com ) 
 
- 20160518 : 5  Early Warning Signs Youre With a Narcissist    ( www.huffingtonpost.com ) 
 
- 20160518 :  Is Donald Trump Actually a Narcissist Therapists Weigh In!  by Henry Alford  ( www.vanityfair.com ) 
 
- 20160517 :  6 Warning Signs Youre Dating a Narcissist    ( Jan 17, 2015 ,  www.huffingtonpost.com ) 
 
- 20160517 :  Are You Dating a Narcissist    (   www.huffingtonpost.com ) 
 
- 20160517 :  10 Signs Youre In Love With A Narcopath    (   www.huffingtonpost.com ) 
 
- 20160517 :  7 Strategies for Dealing With the Narcissist You Love    ( Jun 23, 2014  www.huffingtonpost.com ) 
 
- 20160516 : Stockholm Syndrome  The Psychological Mystery of Loving an Abuser, Page 1    ( counsellingresource.com ) 
 
- 20160516 : https://www.reddit.com/r/raisedbynarcissists/comments/29dhay/good_movies_about_narcissistic/    ( www.reddit.com ) 
 
- 20160516 :  Barack Obama – Narcissist or Merely Narcissistic?    ( lettingfreedomring.com ) 
 
- 20160516 : Dr. Sam Vaknin - Barack  Obama Is a Narcissist    ( www.snopes.com ) 
 
- 20160515 : The Truth About Donald Trump's Narcissism  by Jeffrey Kluger  (  Aug. 11, 2015 , /time.com  ) 
 
- 20160515 :  10 Great Self-Absorbed, Narcissistic Movie Assholes The Playlist   ( blogs.indiewire.com ) 
 
- 20160515 : Famous  Narcissistic Movie Characters -    ( May 14, 2013 , The Narcissistic Life ) 
 
- 20160501 :  10 tactics for child custody battles with sociopaths   by Donna  Andersen  ( May 5, 2008 ,  Lovefraud.com ) 
 
- 20160412 :  When Evil Is a Pretty Face Narcissistic Females the Pathological Relationship Agenda  by Zari Ballard  (   www.amazon.com ) 
 
- 20160407 : Characteristics Associated  with Cultic Groups - Revised   ( csj.org ) 
 
- 20160407 :  The Confidence Game Why We Fall for It... Every Time  by Maria  Konnikova  (   amazon.com ) 
 
- 20160405 :  Catherine Zeta-Jones speaks out about her battle with manic depression    ( Nov 14, 2012 ,  Telegraph ) 
 
- 20160328 :  Splitting Protecting Yourself While Divorcing Someone with Borderline or Narcissistic Personality Disorder  Bill Eddy, Randi K   (  Splitting Protecting Yourself While Divorcing Someone with Borderline or Narcissistic Personality Disorder  Bill Eddy, Randi K, Mar 28, 2016 ) 
 
- 20160328 :     The Dance of Anger A Womans Guide to Changing the Patterns of Intimate Relationships   (   Amazon.com ) 
 
- 20160326 :        Divorce Movies Worth Watching  by Alison Heller   (        Divorce Movies Worth Watching, Mar 26, 2016 ) 
 
- 20160323 :        A Separation Peyman Moaadi, Shahab Hosseini, Sareh Bayat, Leila Hatami    (   Amazon  ) 
 
- 20160322 :  The Vampire's Bite Victims of Narcissists Speak Out  by  Leon F Seltzer Ph.D.  ( Apr 23, 2014 ,  Psychology Today ) 
 
- 20160322 :  The Secret to Spotting Subtle Narcissists    ( Mar 16, 2016 ,  Psychology Today ) 
 
- 20160322 :  The 5 Most Dangerous Myths About Narcissism (Part 2)    ( Feb 17, 2016 ,  Psychology Today ) 
 
- 20160322 :  9 Enlightening Quotes on Narcissists  by Leon F Seltzer Ph.D.  ( Apr 14, 2014 ,  Psychology Today ) 
 
- 20160322 :        Linda Taylor, welfare queen Ronald Reagan made her a notorious American villain. Linda Taylor's        other sins were far worse  by Josh Levin   ( Dec. 19 2013 ,  slate.com  ) 
 
- 20160319 : Are You High Maintenance  -   ( www.nationalmarriage.com ) 
 
- 20160316 :        Ending a Relationship With a Pathological Liar   (   Phoenix Rising ) 
 
- 20160315 : Seduction Stage        1    ( Seduction Stage        1 , Mar 15, 2016 ) 
 
- 20160315 :        Dangerous Liaisons How to Recognize and Escape from Psychopathic Seduction  by Claudia Moscovici         (   Amazon.com ) 
 
- 20160315 : Seduction Stage        1    ( Seduction Stage        1 , Mar 15, 2016 ) 
 
- 20160306 :        Stress relief from laughter Its no joke    (   Mayo Clinic ) 
 
- 20160306 :        Humor and Mental Health Using Humor to Cope With Stress (Part of Humor and Health Online CEU Course)   (        Humor and Mental Health Using Humor to Cope With Stress (Part of Humor and Health Online CEU Course), Mar 06, 2016 ) 
 
- 20150624 :        Advice for Protecting Elderly Relatives from Sociopaths and Gold Diggers   (   Lovefraud.com  ) 
 
- 20150202 :        Its All Your Fault! 12 Tips for Managing People Who Blame Others for Everything  by Bill Eddy  ( February 21, 2012 ,  Amazon.com ) 
 
- 20150202 :        BIFF Quick Responses to High Conflict People, Their Hostile Emails, Personal Attacks and Social        Media Meltdowns   by Bill Eddy  (        BIFF Quick Responses to High Conflict People, Their Hostile Emails, Personal Attacks and Social        Media Meltdowns , Feb 02, 2015 ) 
 
- 20150202 :        Recognizing High Conflict Divorce   (        Recognizing High Conflict Divorce,  ) 
 
Notable quotes:
"... Will you get dinner and pick up     the kids? Could you call the plumber about the kitchen sink?"  ..."
"... everything     -  ..."
"... "I'll be in bed in a little bit"  ..."
"... Do you want to be more mindful about eating healthy foods that'll keep your mind and body at     their best?         Sign up for our newsletter  and join our Eat Well, Feel Great challenge to learn how to fuel your     body in the healthiest way possible. We'll deliver tips, challenges and advice to your inbox every     day.  ..."
 
   When your spouse isn't interested in doing the "work" of marriage, it's easy to feel powerless. 
   But all isn't lost, said Jeannie Ingram, 
   a couples therapist based in Nashville, Tennessee. 
   "The relationship doesn't have to end," she told HuffPost. "The truth is, all relationships need 
   tuning up from time to time." 
   Below, Ingram and other experts share the most common signs a spouse has checked out of a marriage 
   - and what you can do to take matters into your own hands. 
   1. They spend a lot of time around you but not with you. 
   It doesn't count as quality time if one of you is
   
   distracted by your smartphone or checking work emails, said
   Aaron Anderson, a marriage and 
   family therapist based in Denver, Colorado. 
   "If you and your spouse spend a lot of time in the same room but they never do things with you, 
   they've likely disengaged from the relationship," he told us. "Nobody wants to spend the two hours 
   after work browsing social media." 
   Try planning new, exciting things to do together so hopefully "your partner will want 
   to shut down the computer and turn off their phone to be with you," Anderson said. 
   2. They never include you in their weekend or after-work plans. 
   Spending time apart (pursing your hobbies or seeing friends) is essential in a healthy marriage. 
   It keeps the mystery alive. But spend too much time apart and you're well on your way to 
   living separate lives, said Becky Whetstone, a 
   marriage and family therapist who works in Little Rock, Arkansas. 
   "If your S.O feels disillusioned with the marriage, they might cope by distracting themselves 
   with things they enjoy that that don't involve you," she said. 
   To figure out why they're disengaging, broach the conversation in a calm manner, at a time that 
   works for the two of you, Whetstone said. 
   "Therapists call this 'coming toward your partner,'" she said. "Watch the tone of your voice and 
   your body language and find the right time - not in the middle of something hectic. Ask, 'Hey, what's 
   up? I've noticed you pulling away lately.'" 
   Most importantly, don't lash out if their answer upsets you. "Make it safe for them to reply or 
   they're not likely to open up again after that," Whetstone said. 
   3. They never ask, "How was your day?" 
   If your conversations are limited to household logistics (" Will you get dinner and pick up 
   the kids? Could you call the plumber about the kitchen sink?" ) and your S.O. seems disinterested 
   in how you're doing, your marriage may be in trouble, Anderson said. 
   "When someone checks out of a relationship, they stop caring about their partner as much," he 
   said. "They don't ask you how work is going, how your family is doing or even if you got that promotion 
   you wanted." 
   To show that your marriage is still very much a priority - and that you, at least, care about 
   them - make it a point to vocalize that. 
   "Just because they've checked out doesn't mean you have to," Anderson said, "And after they see 
   how much you care, they might just start caring more, too." 
   4. They aren't interested in sex. 
   The thrill is gone - and your S.O. seems entirely OK with that. Why might that be the case? Oftentimes, 
   partners avoid physical intimacy after they've been hurt emotionally, said Ingram. 
   "In the beginning, couples in love are so intoxicated with each other that they share everything 
   - they allow themselves to be fully vulnerable," said Ingram. 
   But that same vulnerability also opens you up to hurt from your partner. 
   "If you're emotionally hurt, intimacy doesn't feel safe - it's just too vulnerable," 
   Ingram said. "Couples need to become conscious of this and be willing to talk about why they avoid 
   closeness, perhaps in the office of a qualified marriage therapist." 
   5. They're hyper-critical of your friends and family. 
   Your partner may not be as forgiving of your parents as you are, but they shouldn't take the liberty 
   to rag on them any chance they get, Whetstone said. 
   "It shows disinterest but it's also unacceptable behavior," she said. "Set a boundary and say 
   something like, 'Please, why so much venom? It hurts me when you throw so much negativity on to me 
   and my friends and family. What's going on? Obviously you're unhappy about something. Please, let's 
   talk about it.'" 
   6. They go to bed at different times. 
   "I'll be in bed in a little bit" is not as innocent a phrase as you might think, Ingram 
   said. 
   "Commonly, couples fall prey to what I call 'functional exits," she said. "These are behaviors 
   that are part of everyday life, but serve the dual purpose of avoiding intimacy. For example, work, 
   hobbies, or when you regularly say or hear, 'You go on to bed; I'll be along later.'" 
   The good news? Mismatched bedtimes and similar problems are easily fixed if you and your partner 
   are willing to make the effort. 
   "Exits like these are not necessarily a sign the relationship needs to end, but rather, an indication 
   that it's time for some work," she reassured. 
   Do you want to be more mindful about eating healthy foods that'll keep your mind and body at 
   their best?
   
   Sign up for our newsletter and join our Eat Well, Feel Great challenge to learn how to fuel your 
   body in the healthiest way possible. We'll deliver tips, challenges and advice to your inbox every 
   day. 
 
 
   Dalkeith Press
   You may have thought that living with your troubled spouse was hard. But now that you've reached 
   the point of divorce, you probably already know that this can be ever harder. Narcissistic behavior 
   can be labeled as borderline, sociopathic, narcissistic, or just intolerable, but it all derives 
   from one fundamental driving force: narcissists can't tolerate criticism, especially public criticism. 
   And divorcing them is about them most direct and public criticism you can make. You'll know you're 
   there when your soon-to-be ex spouse begins a campaign of destruction against you. And if you don't 
   know how to resond and deal with it, it can take a terrible toll.
   Surviving the Storm offers practical strategies that can help you reach a settlement with 
   your soon-to-be ex, in spite of his or her seeming determination to scorch the earth. The key is 
   understanding that narcissists fear, above all, critical judgment by others. Your decision to divorce 
   sets these fears in motion. To counter them, you need to know how to split the battlefield, offering 
   on the one hand a safe alternative in which you get what you need, and on the other a continuing 
   stream of criticism, judgment, and shame heaped on your soon-to-be ex. In essence, you trade the 
   safety of silence for the things you need in the settlement. 
   Surviving the Storm also offers practical boundaries on what you can and can't expect to 
   do. It explains the impact of divorcing a narcissist on your children, and offers strategies and 
   tactics to help achieve a custody arrangement that is best for your kids. It explains what parental 
   alienation is and where to get more help with it. It offers some reflection on the moral issues we 
   face in divorce, including the Catholic Church's surprising position holding that marriage to a narcissist 
   is a moral impossibility. Finally, it offers a perspective on healing and the need for new experiences 
   to move on.
   Richard has been helping people deal with the trauma and pain of abusive relationships for nearly 
   ten years. His other books are
   Tears and Healing 
   , Meaning from 
   Madness , In Love 
   and Loving It - Or Not! ,
   Tears and Healing 
   Reflections , and
   the Way of Respect    
   If you've read them, you know his style, and this book is also short and to the point, giving you 
   the information and insight you need without wading through hundreds of pages you don't need.
 
Notable quotes:
"... Often described as "drama queens" or "abusive,"  	they too frequently create chaos in situations where others would smoothly deal  	with the normal differences and disappointments that arise from time to time  	for all of us.  ..."
"... These habits now would suggest to me comorbid diagnoses, that is, a combination  	of borderline personality emotional hyper-reactivity with narcissistic and/or  	psychopathic (conning) patterns.  ..."
"... manipulation is defined as deception used for personal gain, without  	concern for victims."  	 ..."
 
	Women, and men, with borderline personality disorder seem not to know how 
	to stop arguing (link is external).
	Often described as "drama queens" or "abusive," 
	they too frequently create chaos in situations where others would smoothly deal 
	with the normal differences and disappointments that arise from time to time 
	for all of us.  
	... ... ...
	There may well be some individuals with BPD who are genuinely manipulative 
	or sadistic.
	These habits now would suggest to me comorbid diagnoses, that is, a combination 
	of borderline personality emotional hyper-reactivity with narcissistic and/or 
	psychopathic (conning) patterns.  
	In the Journal of Personality Disorders a 2006 an excellent article by Nancy 
	Nyquist Potter, PhD entitled
	
	"What is Manipulative Behavior Anyway?" (link is external) looked to define 
	the term manipulative. 
	In the Hare Psychopathy Checklist (cited in Bowers, 
	2002) ... manipulation is defined as deception used for personal gain, without 
	concern for victims."
	
	
Notable quotes:
"... A personality disorder characterized by grandiosity; an expectation that others  	will recognize one's superiority; a lack of empathy, lack of truthfulness, and  	the tendency to degrade others. ..."
"... Malignant narcissists not only see themselves as superior  	to others but believe in their superiority to the degree that they view others  	as relatively worthless, expendable, and justifiably exploitable.  ..."
"... This type of narcissism is a defining characteristic of psychopathy/sociopathy  	and is rooted in an individual's deficient capacity for empathy. It's almost  	impossible for a person with such shallow feelings and such haughtiness to really  	care about others or to form a conscience with any of the qualities we typically  	associate with a humane attitude, which is why most researchers and thinkers  	on the topic of psychopathy think of psychopaths as individuals without a conscience  	altogether." ..."
 
	"A personality disorder characterized by grandiosity; an expectation that others 
	will recognize one's superiority; a lack of empathy, lack of truthfulness, and 
	the tendency to degrade others.""Narcissism becomes particularly malignant 
	(i.e. malevolent, dangerous, harmful, incurable) when it goes beyond mere vanity 
	and excessive self-focus. Malignant narcissists not only see themselves as superior 
	to others but believe in their superiority to the degree that they view others 
	as relatively worthless, expendable, and justifiably exploitable.  
	This type of narcissism is a defining characteristic of psychopathy/sociopathy 
	and is rooted in an individual's deficient capacity for empathy. It's almost 
	impossible for a person with such shallow feelings and such haughtiness to really 
	care about others or to form a conscience with any of the qualities we typically 
	associate with a humane attitude, which is why most researchers and thinkers 
	on the topic of psychopathy think of psychopaths as individuals without a conscience 
	altogether."
	"There is nothing about the man that is service-oriented. He's only serving 
	himself." 
	
	https://www.youtube.com/embed/x54z2pRAvtg?rel=0"
	
	
   We counsel both men and women to take exactly that to which they are  entitled by law. In 
   most no-fault divorce states that is defined as child support (based on a formula that looks at salaries 
   and a few other variables) plus one-half of any assets the couple has accumulated. If married more 
   than 10 years, that often means one-half of all assets. We remind them that this will buttress them 
   against later feelings of bitterness based on feelings of having been cheated. When the mate later 
   tries to dictate what school the children should attend or what major the college student must select, 
   it may be helpful to have the resources to defend the interests of the children. If clients believe, 
   after one year, that they were awarded too much in the divorce settlement, they can still return 
   the money to their husbands.
   Conversely, if someone wants to punish a mate by taking everything, we try to persuade them such 
   a Pyrrhic victory can produce only everlasting bitterness. More effective than moral persuasion may 
   be the reminder that such strategies very likely never get consummated. We have had clients, who, 
   against our advice, spent over $100,000 a year for three years on high-powered lawyers only to get 
   what we predicted at the beginning: type A visitation (she gets the children during the week; he 
   gets them Wednesday nights and every other weekend), normal child support, and one-half of all their 
   assets. Moral and ethical standards for who "deserves" what after a marriage can be a very sticky 
   business; the highest morality may be to give and receive that which the law, in its flawed wisdom, 
   mandates. 
   ... Today, if present trends continue, about 40% or more of American children will witness the 
   breakup of their parents' marriages before the children reach 18 (Bumpass, 1984). This represents 
   a significant increase over the 1951 to 1960 figures. 
   The Divorce Settlement
   Men and women are often quite clever and quite ruthless about getting the things they want after 
   a breakup. Sociologists Gerald Marwell and David Schmitt (1967) found that people employed 16 
   different techniques to get their way. In Table 14.1, using the preceding framework, we have indicated 
   the "tricks" that those who are divorcing often use to get what they think they deserve in a divorce 
   settlement (or far more than they know they deserve).
   ...Whichever parent (mother, father, or both) could take best care of the child should be awarded 
   custody. In the 1970s, more fathers began to seek sole custody. Sometimes they got it. More commonly, 
   courts began to award men and women sole custody but give the noncustodial parent visitation rights 
   that were so ample that it approached joint custody. (Children might be assigned to stay with the 
   noncustodial parent Wednesdays and every other weekend; or allowed to visit the noncustodial parent 
   during the Easter and Christmas holiday season plus perhaps six weeks during summer vacations.) Sometimes, 
   when the parents could get along, the arrangements would be left flexible and vague: providing for 
   "reasonable visitation."
   Today, however, mothers are still generally (90% of the time) granted sole legal and physical 
   custody; fathers are generally granted liberal visitation-they may get to spend every other weekend, 
   half of each holiday period, and four to eight weeks in the summer with their children (Bronstein, 
   1988). Today, legal scholars have begun to push couples toward joint legal and physical custody. 
   A more egalitarian spirit, the women's movement, the fact that both men and women are often involved 
   in child rearing, and that both are now in the labor force has led family judges and lawyers to encourage 
   many couples to share responsibility for their children.
   Sole Custody-Pros and Cons 
   Sometimes one parent should take sole custody of the children. One parent may be mentally 
   ill, an alcoholic or drug addict, irresponsible, or just plain unwilling to be a parent. Sometimes 
   couples hate one another so much that it is impossible to share custody. We mentioned earlier 
   the client who, in spite of our advice, squandered $100,000 a year for three years in a futile attempt 
   to secure sole custody of her children. Every waking moment with her children she filled them with 
   subtle to blatant indictments of her husband. She was like the Ancient Mariner, plucking strangers' 
   sleeves with a bony hand, telling "Her Story." Finally, the courts took the children away from both 
   parents. Their love of the battle with one another was far stronger than their love for their children. 
   They found a purpose in life in reviling and vilifying each other.
   Frequently, it is easier to raise children alone than to try to negotiate the shoals of a difficult 
   marriage (Kohen, Brown, & Feldberg, 1979). Single parents no longer are caught in the middle. They 
   can devise a consistent set of rules and do things their way. 
   Yet sole parenting is difficult too. Single parents sometimes report an overpowering sense of 
   responsibility. They are short of money. Eighty-five percent of divorced women received no alimony 
   at all. In 1985, although 82% of custodian mothers were awarded child support, only 54% received 
   any; on the average, mothers and children received $200 a month (Ellwood, 1988). When child support 
   is collected, it pays for less than half of the cost of raising a child (Mason, 1988). Single parents 
   may feel trapped. It is hard to date, work, or have much of a social life if you are always with 
   your children. Two mothers stated:
   
      [My major problem was] knowing I had four children on my own to be responsible
      for-drying to keep us together, raising two boys to be boys. That was hard. (Spanier
      & Casto, 1979, p. 222)
      I hate feeling totally responsible for the kids. They're mine completely. At least when
      I was married, I could mentally not feel responsible at times. … It gets lonely with
      the kids in bed by 8:00. It's an ambiguous role. [I want to go out but] I don't want the
      kids to be stuck with a babysitter three or four nights a week. (Spanier & Casto, 1979,
      p. 223)
   
   Parents without custody (generally this could read "fathers") suffer as well. Most noncustodial 
   fathers wish they could have a close relationship with their children. Most men feel guilty about 
   "deserting" their children. They miss them and long to see them regularly. They worry about how they 
   will turn out. Even so, visitation may be painful. It is painful to have to deal with an angry ex-mate; 
   to engage in humiliating power struggles. (Wives may think of the children as "theirs"; they assume 
   the fathers are incompetent; they may schedule their children's lives in ways that make visitation 
   difficult or impossible.) Fathers may hesitate to confront children who resent them or who are bored 
   with them. Fathers may not know how to entertain little strangers over a long weekend. In any case, 
   most fathers visit their children regularly for two years or so and then things begin to fall apart. 
   In the end, most fathers rarely see the children of divorce. In one national sample, it was found 
   that fewer than one-half of divorced fathers had seen their children even once in the preceding 12 
   months! Fewer than one-sixth of the fathers saw their children once a week. When fathers stopped 
   visiting, they generally stopped writing or calling as well (Furstenberg, 1983). Both parents and 
   children are the losers when visitation ends. Daughters may be left with a deep, lifelong yearning 
   for their fathers. Boys may begin to run wild; their school achievements plummet (Loewen, 1988). 
   Divorce may cause fathers and children to lose touch with one another permanently. In one study, 
   most older fathers (53% of fathers 50 to 79 years of age) reported they "frequently" saw their sons 
   and daughters; few divorced fathers (only 11%) saw their adult children as frequently. Normally, 
   fathers never lost contact with their adult children; 33% of divorced fathers did (Uhlenberg, 1991).
    
Notable quotes:
"... So, without further ado, Trump's quotable illustration of the hallmarks of NPD, defined according     to DSM-IV as, "A pervasive pattern of grandiosity (in fantasy or behavior), need for admiration,     and lack of empathy." The disorder is indicated by at least five of the following:  ..."
 
   Donald Trump was born in 1946. 34 years later, in the third edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical 
   Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), the American Psychiatric Association's hefty volume of mental disorder 
   classifications, the term "Narcissistic Personality Disorder" (NPD) first appeared as a diagnosable 
   disease – Trump would doubtless say it was created in his honor (characteristic #1 of NPD: An exaggerated 
   sense of self-importance). After all, the newly-minted personality disorder made its debut only nine 
   years after he took the helm of his father's company… and renamed it from Elizabeth Trump & Son to 
   The Trump Organization. 
   The most recent DSM, DSM-IV, is currently under extensive revision, with DSM-V scheduled for publication 
   sometime in 2013, and both its listed diseases and their definitions are undergoing extensive scrutiny 
   and contentious debate. On the chopping block are five of the ten or so so-called personality disorders, 
   including NPD. Among the reasons for the cut are the frequent overlap between disorders, the general 
   lack of stability of symptoms, and the range of those symptoms in reality, as compared to the either/or 
   approach of the manual (either you have a disorder or you don't). So, before NPD becomes a thing 
   of the past, at least in its current form, I thought we'd take a moment to reflect on some less than 
   artful choices – or the things that make Trump look like he just stepped out of the fourth edition, 
   symptom by symptom. 
   A caveat: I am obviously exaggerating, both Trump and narcissism. But debate on personality disorders, 
   classifications, diagnoses, and treatments is well worthwhile, and a colorful spokesperson never 
   hurts. 
   So, without further ado, Trump's quotable illustration of the hallmarks of NPD, defined according 
   to DSM-IV as, "A pervasive pattern of grandiosity (in fantasy or behavior), need for admiration, 
   and lack of empathy." The disorder is indicated by at least five of the following: 
   1. An exaggerated sense of self-importance (e.g., exaggerates achievements and talents, expects 
   to be recognized as superior without commensurate achievements) 
   A sense of one's own importance, a grandiose feeling that one is alone responsible for any achievement 
   is a hallmark of the narcissist. Grandiosity is one of the central tenets of a narcissistic personality. 
   Narcissists tend to take credit for everything, as if no one else contributed to the end product. 
   Witness Trump's declaration that, "When people see the beautiful marble in Trump Tower, they usually 
   have no idea what I went through personally to achieve the end result. No one cares about the blood, 
   sweat, and tears that art or beauty require." What do you know: not only is Trump a developer and 
   an artistic visionary, but he seems to be a stellar architect and construction worker as well.
   
   And history will agree (naturally). "Anyone who thinks my story is anywhere near over is sadly 
   mistaken," says Trump. Sadly, indeed. 
   2. Preoccupation with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty or ideal love
   How many presidential runs does it take for the process to be defined as a preoccupation rather 
   than an occupation? 
   I'd leave it at that, except for the existence of this little gem: "My fingers are long and beautiful, 
   as, it has been well documented, are various other parts of my body." Not only all-powerful, but 
   all-beautiful, too. The man has it all. 
   3. Believes he is "special" and can only be understood by, or should associate with, other 
   special or high-status people (or institutions) To narcissists, the "little people" or anyone 
   beneath them (which is mostly everyone) don't matter. Trump's lambasting of Rosie O'Donnell is a 
   good case in point: "Rosie O'Donnell called me a snake oil salesman. And, you know, coming from Rosie, 
   that's pretty low because when you look at her and when you see the mind, the mind is weak. I don't 
   see it. I don't get it. I never understood – how does she even get on television?" 
   Clearly, Rosie lacks the power to understand the dazzling intellect that is Donald Trump. Trump 
   needs someone of equal status to appreciate his immensity. But it can't be Larry King, because as 
   he told King, "Do you mind if I sit back a little? Because your breath is very bad. It really is. 
   Has this been told to you before?" 
   4. Requires excessive admiration No matter the sincerity, as long as the praise comes frequently 
   and at a high enough volume. Says Trump, "All of the women on The Apprentice flirted with me – consciously 
   or unconsciously. That's to be expected." Clearly. Admired, wherever he may go, even when he's talking 
   about himself in the third person, as in, "Love him or hate him, Trump is a man who is certain about 
   what he wants and sets out to get it, no holds barred. Women find his power almost as much of a turn-on 
   as his money." 
   As he puts it, "Nobody but a total masochist wants to be criticized." 
   5. Has a sense of entitlement The world owes the narcissist everything; he, in turn, owes 
   it nothing. I think Trump's attitude can be summed up with this approach to marriage: "I wish I'd 
   had a great marriage. See, my father was always very proud of me, but the one thing he got right 
   was that he had a great marriage. He was married for 64 years. One of my ex-wives once said to me, 
   'You have to work at a marriage.' And I said, 'That's the most ridiculous thing.'" 
   6. Selfishly takes advantage of others to achieve his own ends I don't have a quote for 
   this one, but perhaps we can talk to one of his ex-wives. 
   7. Lacks empathy Narcissists don't sympathize with the feelings of others. Who are these 
   "others," anyway? No one matters except for me. I won't recreate the Rosie rampage in full, but sentiments 
   like, "I'll sue her because it would be fun. I'd like to take some money out of her fat ass pockets," 
   capture the spirit. 
   8. Is often envious of others or believes others to be envious of him Here, it seems like 
   Trump is dominated by the second sentiment, the expectation that everyone is envious of his success. 
   Everyone wants to be Trump. As he puts it, "The old rich may look down their noses at me, but I think 
   they kiss my ass." 
   9. Shows arrogant, haughty, patronizing, or contemptuous behaviors or attitudes Again, 
   other people don't matter. They can be treated like nothing, because who are we kidding – nothing 
   is the closest description of what they are. 
   Clients don't matter. As Trump puts it, "When I build something for somebody, I always add $50 
   million or $60 million onto the price. My guys come in, they say it's going to cost $75 million. 
   I say it's going to cost $125 million, and I build it for $100 million. Basically, I did a lousy 
   job. But they think I did a great job." Take them for the suckers they are; that's the ticket.
   
   The media doesn't matter. According to Trump, "You know, it really doesn't matter what (the media) 
   write as long as you've got a young and beautiful piece of ass." The piece of ass doesn't matter, 
   either; any will do. 
   Other businesses don't matter. As Trump says, "If you want to buy something, it's obviously in 
   your best interest to convince the seller that what he's got isn't worth very much." 
   But it's ok. Trump doesn't have to be nice. After all, it's not like he wants to run for office 
   or anything: "I'm not running for office. I don't have to be politically correct. I don't have to 
   be a nice person. Like I watch some of these weak-kneed politicians, it's disgusting. I don't have 
   to be that way." 
   Too bad. We need a good candidate. Because according to Trump, "One of the key problems today 
   is that politics is such a disgrace. Good people don't go into government." 
Notable quotes:
"... Narcissism  is a defense     mechanism whose role is to deflect hurt and trauma from the victim's "True Self" into a "     False Self  "     which is omnipotent, invulnerable, and omniscient. This False Self is then used by the narcissist     to garner narcissistic supply from his human environment. Narcissistic supply is any form of attention,     both positive and negative and it is instrumental in the regulation of the narcissist's labile sense     of self-worth.  ..."
"... Many narcissists are over-achievers and ambitious. Some of them are even talented and skilled.        But they are incapable of team work because they cannot tolerate setbacks. They are easily frustrated        and demoralized and are unable to cope with disagreement and criticism. Though some narcissists        have meteoric and inspiring careers, in the long-run, all of them find it difficult to maintain        long-term professional achievements and the respect and appreciation of their peers. The narcissist's        fantastic grandiosity, frequently coupled with a hypomanic mood, is typically incommensurate with        his or her real accomplishments (the "grandiosity gap"). ..."
"... An important distinction is between cerebral and somatic narcissists. The cerebrals derive        their Narcissistic Supply from their intelligence or academic achievements and the somatics derive        their Narcissistic Supply from their physique, exercise, physical or sexual prowess and romantic        or physical "conquests".  ..."
"... Subtly misrepresents facts and expediently and opportunistically shifts positions, views,        opinions, and "ideals" (e.g., about campaign finance, re-districting). These flip-flops do not        cause him overt distress and are ego-syntonic (he feels justified in acting this way). Alternatively,        reuses to commit to a standpoint and, in the process, evidences a lack of empathy.  ..."
"... Narcissism is regarded by many scholars to be an adaptative strategy ("healthy narcissism"). ..."
"... Pathological narcissism is the art of deception. The narcissist projects a False Self and manages     all his social interactions through this concocted fictional construct.  ..."
"... When the narcissist reveals his true colors, it is usually far too late. His victims are unable     to separate from him. They are frustrated by this acquired helplessness and angry at themselves for     having they failed to see through the narcissist earlier on.  ..."
"... The narcissist instantly idealizes or devalues his interlocutor.     This depends on how the narcissist appraises the potential his converser has as a Narcissistic Supply     Source. The narcissist flatters, adores, admires and applauds the "target" in an embarrassingly exaggerated     and profuse manner or sulks, abuses, and humiliates her.  ..."
"... In general, the narcissist always prefers show-off to substance. One of the most effective methods     of exposing a narcissist is by trying to delve deeper. The narcissist is shallow, a pond pretending     to be an ocean. He likes to think of himself as a Renaissance man, a Jack of all trades. The narcissist     never admits to ignorance in any field yet, typically, he is ignorant of them all. It is surprisingly     easy to penetrate the gloss and the veneer of the narcissist's self-proclaimed omniscience.         ..."
"... In general, the narcissist is very impatient, easily bored, with strong attention deficits unless     and until he is the topic of discussion. One can publicly dissect all aspects of the intimate life     of a narcissist without repercussions, providing the discourse is not "emotionally tinted".      ..."
 
   Barack Obama appears to be 
   a narcissist . Granted, only 
   a qualified mental health diagnostician (which I am not) can determine whether someone suffers from
   Narcissistic 
   Personality Disorder (NPD) and this, following lengthy tests and personal interviews. But, in 
   the absence of access to Barack Obama, one has to rely on his overt performance and on testimonies 
   by his closest, nearest and dearest.
   Narcissistic leaders are nefarious and their effects pernicious. They are subtle, refined, socially-adept, 
   manipulative, possessed of thespian skills, and convincing. Both types equally lack empathy and are 
   ruthless and relentless or driven. 
   Perhaps it is time to require each candidate to high office in the USA to submit to a rigorous 
   physical and mental checkup with the results made public. 
   I. Upbringing and Childhood 
   Obama's early life was decidedly chaotic and replete with traumatic and mentally bruising dislocations. 
   Mixed-race marriages were even less common then. His parents went through a divorce when he was an 
   infant (two years old). Obama saw his father only once again, before he died in a car accident. Then, 
   his mother re-married and Obama had to relocate to
   Indonesia : a foreign land with 
   a radically foreign culture, to be raised by a step-father. At the age of ten, he was whisked off 
   to live with his maternal (white) grandparents. He saw his mother only intermittently in the following 
   few years and then she vanished from his life in 1979. She died of cancer in 1995. 
   Pathological narcissism is a reaction to prolonged abuse and trauma in early childhood or early 
   adolescence. The source of the abuse or trauma is immaterial: the perpetrators could be dysfunctional 
   or absent parents, teachers, other adults, or peers. 
   II. Behavior Patterns 
   The narcissist: 
   
      - Feels grandiose and self-important (e.g., exaggerates accomplishments, talents, skills, 
      contacts, and personality traits to the point of lying, demands to be recognised as superior without 
      commensurate achievements); 
 
      - Is obsessed with fantasies of unlimited success, fame, fearsome power or omnipotence, 
      unequalled brilliance (the cerebral narcissist), bodily beauty or sexual performance (the somatic 
      narcissist), or ideal, everlasting, all-conquering love or passion; 
 
      - Firmly convinced that he or she is unique and, being special, can only be understood 
      by, should only be treated by, or associate with, other special or unique, or high-status people 
      (or institutions); 
 
      - Requires excessive admiration, adulation, attention and affirmation or, failing that, wishes 
      to be feared and to be notorious (
      Narcissistic Supply
      ); 
 
      - Feels entitled. Demands automatic and full compliance with his or her unreasonable 
      expectations for special and favourable priority treatment; 
 
      - Is "interpersonally exploitative", i.e., uses others to achieve his or her own ends;
      
 
      - Devoid of empathy. Is unable or unwilling to identify with, acknowledge, or accept 
      the feelings, needs, preferences, priorities, and choices of others; 
 
      - Constantly envious of others and seeks to hurt or destroy the objects of his or her frustration. 
      Suffers from persecutory (paranoid) delusions as he or she believes that they feel the same about 
      him or her and are likely to act similarly; 
 
      - Behaves arrogantly and haughtily. Feels superior, omnipotent, omniscient, invincible, 
      immune, "above the law", and omnipresent (
      magical thinking ). 
      Rages when frustrated, contradicted, or confronted by people he or she considers inferior to him 
      or her and unworthy. 
 
   
   Narcissism is a defense 
   mechanism whose role is to deflect hurt and trauma from the victim's "True Self" into a "
   False Self " 
   which is omnipotent, invulnerable, and omniscient. This False Self is then used by the narcissist 
   to garner narcissistic supply from his human environment. Narcissistic supply is any form of attention, 
   both positive and negative and it is instrumental in the regulation of the narcissist's labile sense 
   of self-worth. 
   Perhaps the most immediately evident trait of patients with Narcissistic Personality Disorder 
   (NPD) is their vulnerability to criticism and disagreement. Subject to negative input, real or imagined, 
   even to a mild rebuke, a constructive suggestion, or an offer to help, they feel injured, humiliated 
   and empty and they react with disdain (devaluation), rage, and defiance. 
   From my book "Malignant Self Love – Narcissism Revisited": 
   
      "To avoid such intolerable pain, some patients with Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) 
      socially withdraw and feign false modesty and humility to mask their underlying
      grandiosity . Dysthymic 
      and depressive disorders are common reactions to isolation and feelings of shame and inadequacy."
      
      Due to their lack of empathy, disregard for others, exploitativeness, sense of entitlement, 
      and constant need for attention (narcissistic supply), narcissists are rarely able to maintain 
      functional and healthy interpersonal relationships. 
      Many narcissists are over-achievers and ambitious. Some of them are even talented and skilled. 
      But they are incapable of team work because they cannot tolerate setbacks. They are easily frustrated 
      and demoralized and are unable to cope with disagreement and criticism. Though some narcissists 
      have meteoric and inspiring careers, in the long-run, all of them find it difficult to maintain 
      long-term professional achievements and the respect and appreciation of their peers. The narcissist's 
      fantastic grandiosity, frequently coupled with a hypomanic mood, is typically incommensurate with 
      his or her real accomplishments (the "grandiosity gap"). 
      An important distinction is between cerebral and somatic narcissists. The cerebrals derive 
      their Narcissistic Supply from their intelligence or academic achievements and the somatics derive 
      their Narcissistic Supply from their physique, exercise, physical or sexual prowess and romantic 
      or physical "conquests".  
      Another crucial division within the ranks of patients with Narcissistic Personality Disorder 
      (NPD) is between the classic variety (those who meet five of the nine diagnostic criteria included 
      in the DSM), and the compensatory kind (their narcissism compensates for deep-set feelings of 
      inferiority and lack of self-worth). 
      Obama displays the following behaviors, which are among the hallmarks of pathological narcissism:
      
      
         - Subtly misrepresents facts and expediently and opportunistically shifts positions, views, 
      opinions, and "ideals" (e.g., about campaign finance, re-districting). These flip-flops do not 
      cause him overt distress and are ego-syntonic (he feels justified in acting this way). Alternatively, 
      reuses to commit to a standpoint and, in the process, evidences a lack of empathy. 
 
         - Ignores data that conflict with his fantasy world, or with his inflated and grandiose self-image. 
      This has to do with magical thinking. Obama already sees himself as president because he is firmly 
      convinced that his dreams, thoughts, and wishes affect reality. Additionally, he denies the gap 
      between his fantasies and his modest or limited real-life achievements (for instance, in 12 years 
      of academic career, he hasn't published a single scholarly paper or book). 
 
         - Feels that he is above the law, incl. and especially his own laws. 
 
         - Talks about himself in the 3rd person singluar or uses the regal "we" and craves to be the 
      exclusive center of attention, even adulation 
 
         - Have a messianic-cosmic vision of himself and his life and his "mission". 
         
 
         - Sets ever more complex rules in a convoluted world of grandiose fantasies with its own language 
      (jargon) 
 
         - Displays false modesty and unctuous "folksiness" but unable to sustain these behaviors (the 
      persona, or mask) for long. It slips and the true Obama is revealed: haughty, aloof, distant, 
      and disdainful of simple folk and their lives. 
 
         - Sublimates aggression and holds grudges. 
 
         - Behaves as an eternal adolescent (e.g., his choice of language, youthful image he projects, 
      demands indulgence and feels entitled to special treatment, even though his objective accomplishments 
      do not justify it). 
 
      
   
   III. Body Language 
   Many complain of the incredible deceptive powers of the narcissist. They find themselves involved 
   with narcissists (emotionally, in business, or otherwise) before they have a chance to discover their 
   true character. Shocked by the later revelation, they mourn their inability to separate from the 
   narcissist and their gullibility. 
   Narcissists are an elusive breed, hard to spot, harder to pinpoint, impossible to capture. Even 
   an experienced mental health diagnostician with unmitigated access to the record and to the person 
   examined would find it fiendishly difficult to determine with any degree of certainty whether someone 
   suffers from a full fledged Narcissistic Personality Disorder or merely possesses narcissistic traits, 
   a narcissistic style, a personality structure ("character"), or a narcissistic "overlay" superimposed 
   on another mental health problem. 
   Moreover, it is important to distinguish between traits and behavior patterns that are independent 
   of the patient's cultural-social context (i.e., which are inherent, or idiosyncratic) and reactive 
   patterns, or conformity to cultural and social morals and norms. Reactions to severe life crises 
   or circumstances are also often characterized by transient pathological narcissism, for instance 
   (Ronningstam and Gunderson, 1996). But such reactions do not a narcissist make. 
   When a person belongs to a society or culture that has often been described as narcissistic by 
   scholars (such as Theodore Millon) and social thinkers (e.g., Christopher Lasch) how much of his 
   behavior can be attributed to his milieu and which of his traits are really his? 
   The Narcissistic Personality Disorder is rigorously defined in the DSM IV-TR with a set of strict 
   criteria and differential diagnoses. 
   Narcissism is regarded by many scholars to be an adaptative strategy ("healthy narcissism"). It 
   is considered pathological in the clinical sense only when it becomes a rigid personality structure 
   replete with a series of primitive defence mechanisms (such as splitting, projection, projective 
   identification, or intellectualization) and when it leads to dysfunctions in one or more areas of 
   the patient's life. 
   Pathological narcissism is the art of deception. The narcissist projects a False Self and manages 
   all his social interactions through this concocted fictional construct.  
   When the narcissist reveals his true colors, it is usually far too late. His victims are unable 
   to separate from him. They are frustrated by this acquired helplessness and angry at themselves for 
   having they failed to see through the narcissist earlier on.  
   But the narcissist does emit subtle, almost subliminal, signals ("presenting symptoms") even in 
   a first or casual encounter. Compare the following list to Barack Obama's body language during his 
   public appearances. 
   These are: 
   - "Haughty" body language. The narcissist adopts a physical posture which implies and exudes an 
   air of superiority, seniority, hidden powers, mysteriousness, amused indifference, etc. Though the 
   narcissist usually maintains sustained and piercing eye contact, he often refrains from physical 
   proximity (he is "territorial"). 
   
The narcissist takes part in social interactions, even mere banter, condescendingly, from a position 
   of supremacy and faux "magnanimity and largesse". But he rarely mingles socially and prefers to remain 
   the "observer", or the "lone wolf". 
 
    - Entitlement markers. The narcissist immediately asks for "special treatment" of some kind. Not 
   to wait his turn, to have a longer or a shorter therapeutic session, to talk directly to authority 
   figures (and not to their assistants or secretaries), to be granted special payment terms, to enjoy 
   custom tailored arrangements – or to get served first. 
   
The narcissist is the one who vocally and demonstratively demands the undivided attention of the 
   head waiter in a restaurant, or monopolizes the hostess, or latches on to celebrities in a party. 
   The narcissist reacts with rage and indignantly when denied his wishes and if treated equally with 
   others whom he deems inferior. 
 
    - Idealization or devaluation. The narcissist instantly idealizes or devalues his interlocutor. 
   This depends on how the narcissist appraises the potential his converser has as a Narcissistic Supply 
   Source. The narcissist flatters, adores, admires and applauds the "target" in an embarrassingly exaggerated 
   and profuse manner or sulks, abuses, and humiliates her.  
   
 - Narcissists are polite only in the presence of a potential Supply Source. But they are unable 
   to sustain even perfunctory civility and fast deteriorate to barbs and thinly-veiled hostility, to 
   verbal or other violent displays of abuse, rage attacks, or cold detachment. 
   
 - The "membership" posture. The narcissist always tries to "belong". Yet, at the very same time, 
   he maintains his stance as an outsider. The narcissist seeks to be admired for his ability to integrate 
   and ingratiate himself without investing the efforts commensurate with such an undertaking. 
   
For instance: if the narcissist talks to a psychologist, the narcissist first states emphatically 
   that he never studied psychology. He then proceeds to make seemingly effortless use of obscure professional 
   terms, thus demonstrating that he mastered the discipline all the same, as an autodidact, which proves 
   that he is exceptionally intelligent or introspective. 
   In general, the narcissist always prefers show-off to substance. One of the most effective methods 
   of exposing a narcissist is by trying to delve deeper. The narcissist is shallow, a pond pretending 
   to be an ocean. He likes to think of himself as a Renaissance man, a Jack of all trades. The narcissist 
   never admits to ignorance in any field yet, typically, he is ignorant of them all. It is surprisingly 
   easy to penetrate the gloss and the veneer of the narcissist's self-proclaimed omniscience. 
   
 
    - Bragging and false autobiography. The narcissist brags incessantly. His speech is peppered with 
   "I", "my", "myself", and "mine". He describes himself as intelligent, or rich, or modest, or intuitive, 
   or creative but always excessively, implausibly, and extraordinarily so. 
   
The narcissist's biography sounds unusually rich and complex. His achievements incommensurate 
   with his age, education, or renown. Yet, his actual condition is evidently and demonstrably incompatible 
   with his claims. Very often, the narcissist lies or his fantasies are easily discernible. He always 
   name-drops and appropriates other people's experiences and accomplishments. 
 
    - Emotion-free language. The narcissist likes to talk about himself and only about himself. He is 
   not interested in others or what they have to say, unless they constitute potential Sources of Supply 
   and in order to obtain said supply. He acts bored, disdainful, even angry, if he feels that they 
   are intruding on his precious time and, thus, abusing him. 
   
In general, the narcissist is very impatient, easily bored, with strong attention deficits unless 
   and until he is the topic of discussion. One can publicly dissect all aspects of the intimate life 
   of a narcissist without repercussions, providing the discourse is not "emotionally tinted". 
    
   If asked to relate directly to his emotions, the narcissist intellectualizes, rationalizes, speaks 
   about himself in the third person and in a detached "scientific" tone or composes a narrative with 
   a fictitious character in it, suspiciously autobiographical. Narcissists like to refer to themselves 
   in mechanical terms, as efficient automata or machines. 
 
    - Seriousness and sense of intrusion and coercion. The narcissist is dead serious about himself. 
   He may possess a subtle, wry, and riotous sense of humor, scathing and cynical, but rarely is he 
   self-deprecating. The narcissist regards himself as being on a constant mission, whose importance 
   is cosmic and whose consequences are global. If a scientist, he is always in the throes of revolutionizing 
   science. If a journalist, he is in the middle of the greatest story ever. If a novelist, he is on 
   his way to a Booker or Nobel prize. 
   
This self-misperception is not amenable to light-headedness or self-effacement. The narcissist 
   is easily hurt and insulted (narcissistic injury). Even the most innocuous remarks or acts are interpreted 
   by him as belittling, intruding, or coercive. His time is more valuable than others' therefore, it 
   cannot be wasted on unimportant matters such as mere banter or going out for a walk. 
   Any suggested help, advice, or concerned inquiry are immediately cast by the narcissist as intentional 
   humiliation, implying that the narcissist is in need of help and counsel and, thus, imperfect and 
   less than omnipotent. Any attempt to set an agenda is, to the narcissist, an intimidating act of 
   enslavement. In this sense, the narcissist is both schizoid and paranoid and often entertains ideas 
   of reference. 
   These, the lack of empathy, the aloofness, the disdain, the sense of entitlement, the constricted 
   sense of humor, the unequal treatment and the paranoia render the narcissist a social misfit. The 
   narcissist is able to provoke in his milieu, in his casual acquaintances, even in his psychotherapist, 
   the strongest, most avid and furious hatred and revulsion. To his shock, indignation and consternation, 
   he invariably induces in others unbridled aggression. 
   He is perceived to be asocial at best and, often, antisocial. This, perhaps, is the strongest 
   presenting symptom. One feels ill at ease in the presence of a narcissist for no apparent reason. 
   No matter how charming, intelligent, thought provoking, outgoing, easy going and social the narcissist 
   is – he fails to secure the sympathy of others, a sympathy he is never ready, willing, or able to 
   reciprocate. 
 
   IV. Narcissistic and psychopathic Leaders 
   The narcissistic or psychopathic leader is the culmination and reification of his period, culture, 
   and civilization. He is likely to rise to prominence in narcissistic societies. 
   The malignant narcissist invents and then projects a false, fictitious, self for the world to 
   fear, or to admire. He maintains a tenuous grasp on reality to start with and this is further exacerbated 
   by the trappings of power. The narcissist's grandiose self-delusions and fantasies of omnipotence 
   and omniscience are supported by real life authority and the narcissist's predilection to surround 
   himself with obsequious sycophants. 
   The narcissist's personality is so precariously balanced that he cannot tolerate even a hint of 
   criticism and disagreement. Most narcissists are paranoid and suffer from ideas of reference (the 
   delusion that they are being mocked or discussed when they are not). Thus, narcissists often regard 
   themselves as "victims of persecution". 
   The narcissistic leader fosters and encourages a personality cult with all the hallmarks of an 
   institutional religion: priesthood, rites, rituals, temples, worship, catechism, mythology. The leader 
   is this religion's ascetic saint. He monastically denies himself earthly pleasures (or so he claims) 
   in order to be able to dedicate himself fully to his calling. 
   The narcissistic leader is a monstrously inverted Jesus, sacrificing his life and denying himself 
   so that his people – or humanity at large – should benefit. By surpassing and suppressing his humanity, 
   the narcissistic leader became a distorted version of Nietzsche's "superman". 
   But being a-human or super-human also means being a-sexual and a-moral. 
   In this restricted sense, narcissistic leaders are post-modernist and moral relativists. They 
   project to the masses an androgynous figure and enhance it by engendering the adoration of nudity 
   and all things "natural" – or by strongly repressing these feelings. But what they refer to as "nature" 
   is not natural at all. 
   The narcissistic leader invariably proffers an aesthetic of decadence and evil carefully orchestrated 
   and artificial – though it is not perceived this way by him or by his followers. Narcissistic leadership 
   is about reproduced copies, not about originals. It is about the manipulation of symbols – not about 
   veritable atavism or true conservatism. 
   In short: narcissistic leadership is about theatre, not about life. To enjoy the spectacle (and 
   be subsumed by it), the leader demands the suspension of judgment, depersonalization, and de-realization. 
   Catharsis is tantamount, in this narcissistic dramaturgy, to self-annulment. 
   Narcissism is nihilistic not only operationally, or ideologically. Its very language and narratives 
   are nihilistic. Narcissism is conspicuous nihilism – and the cult's leader serves as a role model, 
   annihilating the Man, only to re-appear as a pre-ordained and irresistible force of nature. 
   Narcissistic leadership often poses as a rebellion against the "old ways" – against the hegemonic 
   culture, the upper classes, the established religions, the superpowers, the corrupt order. Narcissistic 
   movements are puerile, a reaction to narcissistic injuries inflicted upon a narcissistic (and rather 
   psychopathic) toddler nation-state, or group, or upon the leader. 
   Minorities or "others" – often arbitrarily selected – constitute a perfect, easily identifiable, 
   embodiment of all that is "wrong". They are accused of being old, they are eerily disembodied, they 
   are cosmopolitan, they are part of the establishment, they are "decadent", they are hated on religious 
   and socio-economic grounds, or because of their race, sexual orientation, origin … They are different, 
   they are narcissistic (feel and act as morally superior), they are everywhere, they are defenceless, 
   they are credulous, they are adaptable (and thus can be co-opted to collaborate in their own destruction). 
   They are the perfect hate figure. Narcissists thrive on hatred and pathological envy. 
   This is precisely the source of the fascination with Hitler, diagnosed by Erich Fromm – together 
   with Stalin – as a malignant narcissist. He was an inverted human. His unconscious was his conscious. 
   He acted out our most repressed drives, fantasies, and wishes. He provides us with a glimpse of the 
   horrors that lie beneath the veneer, the barbarians at our personal gates, and what it was like before 
   we invented civilization. Hitler forced us all through a time warp and many did not emerge. He was 
   not the devil. He was one of us. He was what Arendt aptly called the banality of evil. Just an ordinary, 
   mentally disturbed, failure, a member of a mentally disturbed and failing nation, who lived through 
   disturbed and failing times. He was the perfect mirror, a channel, a voice, and the very depth of 
   our souls. 
   The narcissistic leader prefers the sparkle and glamour of well-orchestrated illusions to the 
   tedium and method of real accomplishments. His reign is all smoke and mirrors, devoid of substances, 
   consisting of mere appearances and mass delusions. In the aftermath of his regime – the narcissistic 
   leader having died, been deposed, or voted out of office – it all unravels. The tireless and constant 
   prestidigitation ceases and the entire edifice crumbles. What looked like an economic miracle turns 
   out to have been a fraud-laced bubble. Loosely-held empires disintegrate. Laboriously assembled business 
   conglomerates go to pieces. "Earth shattering" and "revolutionary" scientific discoveries and theories 
   are discredited. Social experiments end in mayhem. 
   It is important to understand that the use of violence must be ego-syntonic. It must accord with 
   the self-image of the narcissist. It must abet and sustain his grandiose fantasies and feed his sense 
   of entitlement. It must conform with the narcissistic narrative. 
   Thus, a narcissist who regards himself as the benefactor of the poor, a member of the common folk, 
   the representative of the disenfranchised, the champion of the dispossessed against the corrupt elite 
   – is highly unlikely to use violence at first. 
   The pacific mask crumbles when the narcissist has become convinced that the very people he purported 
   to speak for, his constituency, his grassroots fans, the prime sources of his narcissistic supply 
   – have turned against him. At first, in a desperate effort to maintain the fiction underlying his 
   chaotic personality, the narcissist strives to explain away the sudden reversal of sentiment. "The 
   people are being duped by (the media, big industry, the military, the elite, etc.)", "they don't 
   really know what they are doing", "following a rude awakening, they will revert to form", etc.
   
   When these flimsy attempts to patch a tattered personal mythology fail – the narcissist is injured. 
   Narcissistic injury inevitably leads to narcissistic rage and to a terrifying display of unbridled 
   aggression. The pent-up frustration and hurt translate into devaluation. That which was previously 
   idealized – is now discarded with contempt and hatred. 
   This primitive defense mechanism is called "splitting". To the narcissist, things and people are 
   either entirely bad (evil) or entirely good. He projects onto others his own shortcomings and negative 
   emotions, thus becoming a totally good object. A narcissistic leader is likely to justify the butchering 
   of his own people by claiming that they intended to kill him, undo the revolution, devastate the 
   economy, or the country, etc. 
   The "small people", the "rank and file", the "loyal soldiers" of the narcissist – his flock, his 
   nation, his employees – they pay the price. The disillusionment and disenchantment are agonizing. 
   The process of reconstruction, of rising from the ashes, of overcoming the trauma of having been 
   deceived, exploited and manipulated – is drawn-out. It is difficult to trust again, to have faith, 
   to love, to be led, to collaborate. Feelings of shame and guilt engulf the erstwhile followers of 
   the narcissist. This is his sole legacy: a massive post-traumatic stress disorder. 
   DISCLAIMER 
   I am not a mental health professional. Still, I have dedicated the last 12 years to the study 
   of personality disorders in general and the Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) in particular. 
   I have authored nine (9) books about these topics, one of which is a Barnes and Noble best-seller 
   ("Malignant Self-love: Narcissism Revisited"). My work is widely cited in scholarly tomes and publications 
   and in the media. My books and the content of my Web site are based on correspondence since 1996 
   with hundreds of people suffering from the Narcissistic Personality Disorder (narcissists) and with 
   thousands of their family members, friends, therapists, and colleagues. 
Notable quotes:
"... the narcissist is someone who has "buried his true     self-expression in response to early injuries and replaced it with a highly developed, compensatory     false self."  ..."
"... In our highly individualistic and externally driven     society, mild to severe forms of narcissism are not only pervasive but often encouraged.  ..."
"... It is more accurate to characterize the pathological narcissist as someone who's     in love with an idealized     self-image  , which     they project in order to avoid feeling (and being seen as) the real, disenfranchised, wounded self.     Deep down, most pathological narcissists feel like the "ugly duckling," even if they painfully don't     want to admit it.  ..."
"... Some narcissists have an exaggerated sense of self-importance,     believing that others cannot live or survive without his or her magnificent contributions.  ..."
"... "Some people try to be tall by cutting off the heads of others" - Paramhansa Yogananda     ..."
"... Making decisions     for others to suit one's own needs. The narcissist may use his or her romantic partner, child, friend,     or colleague to meet unreasonable self-serving needs, fulfill unrealized     dreams  , or cover up     self-perceived inadequacies and flaws.  ..."
 
   Be on the lookout for these, before you get manipulated. 
   "That's enough of me talking about myself; let's hear you talk about me" 
   ― Anonymous 
   "It's not easy being superior to everyone I know." 
   ― Anonymous 
   Psychologist Stephen Johnson writes that the narcissist is someone who has "buried his true 
   self-expression in response to early injuries and replaced it with a highly developed, compensatory 
   false self." This alternate persona to the real self often comes across as grandiose, "above 
   others," self-absorbed, and highly conceited. In our highly individualistic and externally driven 
   society, mild to severe forms of narcissism are not only pervasive but often encouraged. 
   
   Narcissism is often interpreted in popular culture as a person who's in
   love with him 
   or herself. It is more accurate to characterize the pathological narcissist as someone who's 
   in love with an idealized
   self-image , which 
   they project in order to avoid feeling (and being seen as) the real, disenfranchised, wounded self. 
   Deep down, most pathological narcissists feel like the "ugly duckling," even if they painfully don't 
   want to admit it. 
   How do you know when you're dealing with a narcissist? The following are some telltale signs, 
   excerpted from my book (click on title): "
   How to Successfully Handle Narcissists 
   (link is external) ". While most of us are
   guilty of some of the 
   following behaviors at one time or another, a pathological narcissist tends to dwell habitually in 
   several of the following personas, while remaining largely unaware of (or unconcerned with) how his 
   or her actions affect others. 
   1. Conversation Hoarder . The narcissist loves to talk about him or herself, 
   and doesn't give you a chance to take part in a two-way conversation. You struggle to have your views 
   and feelings heard. When you do get a word in, if it's not in agreement with the narcissist, your 
   comments are likely to be corrected, dismissed, or ignored. As in: "My father's favorite responses 
   to my views were: 'but…,' 'actually…,' and 'there's more to it than this…' He always has to feel 
   like he knows better." ― Anonymous 
   2. Conversation Interrupter. While many people have the poor communication habit 
   of interrupting others, the narcissist interrupts and quickly switches the focus back to herself. 
   He shows little genuine interest in you. 
   3. Rule Breaker. The narcissist enjoys getting away with violating rules and 
   social norms, such as cutting in line, chronic under-tipping, stealing office supplies, breaking 
   multiple appointments, or disobeying traffic laws. As in: "I take pride in persuading people to give 
   me exceptions to their rules" ― Anonymous 
   4. Boundary Violator. Shows wanton disregard for other people's thoughts, feelings, 
   possessions, and physical space. Oversteps and uses others without consideration or sensitivity. 
   Borrows items or money without returning. Breaks promises and obligations repeatedly. Shows little 
   remorse and blames the victim for one's own lack of respect. As in: "It's your fault that I forgot 
   because you didn't remind me"― Anonymous 
   5. False Image Projection. Many narcissists like to do things to impress others 
   by making themselves look good externally. This "trophy" complex can exhibit itself physically, romantically, 
   sexually, socially, religiously, financially, materially, professionally, academically, or culturally. 
   In these situations, the narcissist uses people, objects, status, and/or accomplishments to represent 
   the self, substituting for the perceived, inadequate "real" self. These grandstanding "merit badges" 
   are often exaggerated. The underlying message of this type of display is: "I'm better than you!" 
   or "Look at how special I am-I'm worthy of everyone's love, admiration, and acceptance!" as in: "I 
   dyed my hair blond and enlarged my breasts to get men's attention-and to make other women
   jealous " - Anonymous. 
   Or "My accomplishments are everything" ― Anonymous executive Or "I never want to be looked upon as 
   poor. My fiancé and I each drive a Mercedes. The best man at our upcoming wedding also drives a Mercedes." 
   ― Anonymous. 
   In a big way, these external symbols become pivotal parts of the narcissist's false identity, 
   replacing the real and injured self. 
   6. Entitlement. Narcissists often expect preferential treatment from others. 
   They expect others to cater (often instantly) to their needs, without being considerate in return. 
   In their mindset, the world revolves around them. 
   7. Charmer. Narcissists can be very
   charismatic and persuasive. 
   When they're interested in you (for their own gratification), they make you feel very special and 
   wanted. However, once they lose interest in you (most likely after they've gotten what they want, 
   or became bored), they may drop you without a second thought. A narcissist can be very engaging and 
   sociable, as long as you're fulfilling what she desires, and giving her all of your attention.
   
   8. Grandiose Personality. Thinking of oneself as a hero or heroine, a prince 
   or princess, or one of a kind special person. Some narcissists have an exaggerated sense of self-importance, 
   believing that others cannot live or survive without his or her magnificent contributions. As 
   in: "I'm looking for a man who will treat my daughter and me like princesses" ― Anonymous 
   singles ad. Or: "Once again I saved the day-without me, they're nothing" ― Anonymous 
   9. Negative Emotions. Many narcissists enjoy spreading and arousing negative 
   emotions to gain attention, feel powerful, and keep you insecure and off-balance. They are easily 
   upset at any real or perceived slights or inattentiveness. They may throw a tantrum if you disagree 
   with their views, or fail to meet their expectations. They are extremely sensitive to criticism, 
   and typically respond with heated argument (fight) or cold detachment (flight). On the other hand, 
   narcissists are often quick to judge, criticize, ridicule, and blame you. Some narcissists are emotionally 
   abusive. By making you feel inferior, they boost their fragile ego, and feel better about themselves. 
   As in: "Some people try to be tall by cutting off the heads of others" - Paramhansa Yogananda
   
   10. Manipulation: Using Others as an Extension of Self. Making decisions 
   for others to suit one's own needs. The narcissist may use his or her romantic partner, child, friend, 
   or colleague to meet unreasonable self-serving needs, fulfill unrealized
   dreams , or cover up 
   self-perceived inadequacies and flaws. As in: "If my son doesn't grow up to be a professional 
   baseball player, I'll disown him" ― Anonymous father. Or: "Aren't you beautiful? Aren't you beautiful? 
   You're going to be just as pretty as mommy" ― Anonymous mother 
   Another way narcissists manipulate is through guilt, such as proclaiming, "I've given you so much, 
   and you're so ungrateful," or, "I'm a victim-you must help me or you're not a good person." They 
   hijack your emotions, and beguile you to make unreasonable sacrifices. 
   If you find yourself in a relationship with a difficult narcissist, there are many strategies 
   and skills you can utilize to help restore
   health , balance, and 
   respect. In my book (click on title): "
   How to Successfully Handle Narcissists 
   (link is external) ," you'll learn how to maintain composure, ways to be proactive instead of 
   reactive, seven powerful strategies to handle narcissists, eight ways to say "no" diplomatically 
   but firmly, keys to negotiate successfully with narcissists, and seven types of power you can utilize 
   to compel cooperation
   . 
   For more on dealing with difficult people, see my publications (click on titles):
   
   
   Follow me on Twitter 
   (link is external) , Facebook (link 
   is external) , and LinkedIn 
   (link is external) ! 
   Preston Ni, M.S.B.A. is available as a presenter, workshop facilitator, and private 
   coach. For more information, write to [email protected] 
   (link sends e-mail) , or visit www.nipreston.com 
   (link is external) . 
   
   
   Old News ;-) 
   
   
   
   4 Warning Signs You're Dating a Narcissist World of Psychology 
   
   
   
That is what a relationship with a narcissist is like. In the beginning there's flash and excitement. 
      Their presence is magnetic and he or she seems larger than life. They are intelligent, charming, 
      and popular, and when they're the center of attention, some of the spotlight shines on you, too, 
      leaving you glowing with pride, importance, and accomplishment. Yet after a while, you discover 
      that under the surface the relationship is hollow. Soon, the excitement and status wear thin.
      
      This is because a true narcissist lacks inner qualities necessary for a healthy bond: empathic 
      perspective-taking, a moral conscience, stable confidence, and the ability to be intimate and 
      genuine with another human being. Being in a relationship with a narcissist (especially if you 
      don't realize they are one) can leave you feeling worthless, emotionally exhausted, and unfulfilled.
      
      So how can you know if you are in this kind of "hollow chocolate bunny" relationship before 
      it crashes and burns in heartache? Do you have to wait until your relationship sours to find out? 
      Not necessarily. Spotting the signs early means being able to avoid getting entangled in a narcissist's 
      web, and could spare you from doing the challenging, messy work of digging yourself out later.
      
      Here's a few signs to look for in your partner, which may signal that the person you are dating 
      has narcissistic tendencies, and the negative effects those behaviors can have on you: 
      1. He poses as "The Most Interesting Man in the World." 
      A narcissist may initially intrigue you with his or her apparent confidence, swagger, or audacity, 
      regaling you with stories about accomplishments, rubbing elbows with influential people, or their 
      innumerable talents and gifts. He or she may seem fun and magnetic, always the center of attention 
      and the life of the party, but this may actually be a facade - a ploy to satisfy the narcissist's 
      pathological need for praise and reassurance. You may come to find out that the stories are exaggerated 
      (or altogether false), their confidence is artificial and fragile, and his or her need for attention 
      may trump good judgment or others' needs. 
      2. You feel talked down to. 
      Because narcissists deeply lack self-esteem, almost everything else in their lives is orchestrated 
      to hide their weaknesses and give them a temporary sense of power and success. This can take the 
      form of subtle insults that cause you to question your worth, such as a dismissive sneer when 
      you make an observation, a condescending "that's nice" when you share an accomplishment you're 
      proud of, or demeaning comments about your behavior or appearance. 
      When you look to a partner who is a narcissist, it can feel like you're looking into a funhouse 
      mirror and getting back a distorted view of yourself. Your flaws seem to be highlighted and your 
      strengths diminished - a careful ruse constructed to ensure the narcissist holds themselves in 
      a more flattering light. 
      3. She acts like the victim. 
      Narcissism also is characterized by extreme self-centeredness. Anything that is outside the 
      narcissist's experience or that contradicts his or her beliefs is wrong, foolish, or crazy. For 
      this reason, a conflict with a narcissist is almost certain to end with all the blame being directed 
      to you. This, combined with the funhouse mirror effect, can make even minor arguments emotionally 
      exhausting. 
      Nothing you say can convince the narcissist that you're not making intentional and irrational 
      attacks against him or her. In the narcissist's eyes, you're somehow responsible for their sadness, 
      anger, or even immoral behavior. 
      4. Your relationship feels one-sided and shallow. 
      When it's time to move from casual to committed, this is where the "hollow chocolate bunny" 
      effect of narcissism really shows through. A relationship with a narcissist is unlikely ever to 
      reach greater depths of sharing, emotion, and intimacy. 
      A narcissist is likely to spend time with you when it suits his or her emotional, physical, 
      or sexual needs, and dismiss or ignore your needs, desires, and preferences. Your time together 
      is likely to be marked by a lack of genuine interest in anything other than him- or herself. For 
      example, you could get late-night calls when he or she is distraught, excited, or wants something 
      but similar calls from you may not even be answered. Attempts to share your deeper thoughts, beliefs, 
      or feelings may be given lip service, ignored, or dismissed. 
      If these seem to describe your current relationship, don't panic. In fact, seize the opportunity 
      to reflect and evaluate your twosome. These red flags may help shed light on the dysfunction you're 
      bearing and guide you away from further pain. If you want to make things work, there are ways 
      to cope with dating or living with a narcissist, including developing conflict-resolution skills 
      and bolstering your own confidence and self-esteem to shield you against narcissistic attacks.
      
      Ultimately, knowledge is power. Being aware of signs of narcissism (and some of the problems 
      that can arise from dating a narcissist) allows you to be prepared and to make informed decisions 
      about the relationship. 
      
   
   
   The Huffington Post | Brittany Wong | Posted 01.14.2016 |
   Divorce 
   Read More: 
   Narcissism, 
   Narcissist, 
   Dating a Narcissist,
   Relationship 
   With a Narcissist, 
   How to Spot 
   a Narcissist, 
   Relationship Problems,
   Toxic Personality,
   Toxic Relationships,
   Divorce News 
   
   
   
   It's easy to fall for a narcissist: they're charming, polished and quick to get in your good graces 
   with compliments and constant attention. Once you ... 
   
   Read Whole Story 
   
   YourTango | Posted 12.03.2015 |
   Divorce 
   Read More: 
   Narcissist, 
   Sociopath, 
   Narcopath, 
   Yourtango, 
   Signs He's a Narcissist,
   Signs You're 
   a Narcissist, Narcissist 
   Signs, Dating 
   a Narcissist, Divorce News
   
   
   
   
   What do you get when you cross a sociopath with a narcissist? 
   
   Read Whole Story 
   
   Lena Aburdene Derhally | Posted 07.07.2015 |
   Women 
   Read More: 
   Narcissism, 
   Narcissistic 
   Personality Disorder, 
   Dating a Narcissist,
   Dating Advice, 
   Relationship Advice,
   Women News 
   
   
   
   There are definitely fairy tale stories out there of two people falling madly in love with each 
   other right at the get go and spending their lives happily ever after, but that is generally not 
   the norm. Keep your guard up the more intensely the person is into you and the earlier on it occurs.
   
   
   Read Whole Story 
   
   Divorced Moms | Posted 03.19.2015 |
   Divorce 
   Read More: 
   Narcissistic 
   Personality Disorder, 
   Divorce a Narcissist,
   Dating a Narcissist,
   Nancy Kay, 
   Divorce News 
   
   
   
   Could you be dating a narcissist and not even know it? 
   
   Read Whole Story 
   
   Melissa Schenker | Posted 09.22.2014 |
   Women 
   Read More: 
   Dating a Narcissist,
   Narcissism, 
   Women, 
   Relationships, 
   Men Women Relationships,
   Love, 
   Women News 
   
   
   
   A narcissist can seem to love you. A narcissist can make it look like love. A narcissist can say 
   the words of love. A narcissist can think it's love. Unfortunately, when involved with a narcissist, 
   you are enmeshed but not in love. You can be enmeshed and mistake that for love. But enmeshment and 
   love are not the same thing. 
   
   Read Whole Story 
   
   Melissa Schenker | Posted 08.13.2014 |
   Women 
   Read More: 
   Women's Empowerment,
   Narcissism, 
   Self-Esteem, 
   Am I Dating 
   a Narcissist, 
   Is My Boyfriend 
   a Narcissist, 
   Dating a Narcissist,
   Signs of Narcissism,
   Relationship 
   Advice, Women News 
   
   
   
   If you are still involved with a narcissist, you may not realize how completely your attention 
   has been diverted from your self and your own life. 
   
   Read Whole Story 
   
   Dr. Craig Malkin | Posted 06.23.2014 |
   Healthy Living 
   Read More: 
   Healthy Relationships,
   Attachment, 
   Narcissist, 
   Relationships, 
   Dating a Narcissist,
   Narcissism, 
   Unhealthy Relationships,
   Insecurity, 
   Narcissists, 
   Emotional Intelligence,
   Healthy Living News
   
   
   
   
   If you've tried a more loving approach to sharing what hurts in your relationship, and the narcissist 
   in your life still won't soften, you truly have done everything you can. 
   
   Read Whole Story 
   
   Dr. Craig Malkin | Posted 11.10.2013 |
   Healthy Living 
   Read More: 
   Narcissism, 
   Healthy Relationships,
   Narcissists, 
   Unhealthy Relationships,
   Attachment, 
   Narcissist, 
   Relationships, 
   Dating a Narcissist,
   Emotional 
   Intelligence, Insecurity,
   Healthy Living News
   
   
   
   
   As a therapist, I've seen firsthand that changing relational patterns often transforms even the 
   most inflexible "trait" into something softer, gentler -- not a fixed feature, but a protection that 
   eventually yields to touch and intimacy in all the ways one would hope. 
   
   Read Whole Story 
   
   Dr. Craig Malkin | Posted 07.30.2013 |
   Women 
   Read More: 
   Attachment, 
   Narcissism, 
   Insecurity, 
   Relationships, 
   Emotional Intelligence,
   Tina Swithin, 
   Narcissist, 
   Video, 
   Healthy Relationships,
   Unhealthy 
   Relationships, 
   Dating a Narcissist,
   Narcissists, 
   Women News 
   
   
   
   The most glaring problems are easy to spot -- but if you get too hung up on the obvious traits, 
   you can easily miss the subtle (and often more common) features that allow a narcissist to sneak 
   into your life and wreak havoc. 
 
   Here's a
   
   partial checklist . You decide.
   1. "Common to malignant narcissism is
   narcissistic rage . 
   Narcissistic rage is a reaction to narcissistic injury (when the narcissist feels degraded by another 
   person, typically in the form of
   criticism
   )." 
   2. "When the narcissist's grandiose sense of self-worth is perceived as being attacked by another 
   person, the narcissist's natural reaction is to rage and pull down the self-worth of others (to make 
   the narcissist feel superior to others). It is an attempt by the narcissist to soothe their internal 
   pain and hostility, while at the same time rebuilding their self worth." 
   3. "Narcissistic rage also occurs when the narcissist perceives that he/she is being prevented from 
   accomplishing their grandiose fantasies." 
   4. "Because the narcissist derives pleasure from the fulfillment of their grandiose dreams (akin 
   to an addiction), anyone standing between the narcissist and their (wish) fulfillment ... may be 
   subject to narcissistic rage. Narcissistic rage will frequently include yelling and berating of the 
   person that has slighted the narcissist, but if strong enough could provoke more hostile feelings."
   
   5. "Individuals with malignant narcissism will display a
   two faced personality. Creation 
   of a 'false self' is linked to the narcissist's fear of being inadequate or
   inferior to others 
   and this mask becomes ingrained into their personality so as to project a sense of superiority to 
   others at all times." 
   6. "The narcissist gains a sense of esteem from the feedback of other people as it is common for 
   the malignant narcissist to suffer from extremely low levels of self-esteem." 
   7. "The ... false self of the malignant narcissist is created because the real self doesn't meet 
   his or her own expectations. Instead, the narcissist tends to mimic emotional displays of other people 
   and creates a grandiose self to harbor their internalized fantasies of greatness." 
   8. "The [false self] is used by the narcissist to present to the outside world what appears to be 
   a normal, functioning human being and to help maintain his or her own fantasies of an idealized self. 
   The narcissist constantly builds upon this false self, creating a fictional character that is used 
   to show off to the world and to help them feed off the emotions of other people." 
   There's ongoing debate about "malignant narcissism" as a diagnosis, and some people prefer to use 
   the standard
   DSM-IV version
   . It doesn't make much difference in this case. 
   
   ... ... ... 
   It's possible that Obama may be a
   "fanatic type" of narcissist. 
   That could mean a world of trouble for the Democrats, for the nation, and given his position in the 
   world, for other countries as well. 
   Here is Theodore Millon's definition of the fanatic type: 
   
      fanatic type - including
      paranoid
      features. A severely narcissistically wounded individual, usually with major paranoid tendencies 
      who holds onto an illusion of omnipotence. These people are fighting the reality of their insignificance 
      and lost value and are trying to re-establish their self-esteem through grandiose fantasies and 
      self-reinforcement. When unable to gain recognition of support from others, they take on the role 
      of a heroic or worshipped person with a grandiose mission.
   
 
Notable quotes:
"... Trait labels like narcissist, or the admittedly less stigmatizing ones like extrovert and     introvert, merely provide a shorthand description. They're a stand-in for "this person scored high     on a trait measure of narcissism or extroversion or introversion." They can never hope to capture     the whole person. ..."
"... For more by Dr. Craig Malkin, click     here  .  ..."
"... For     more on emotional intelligence,     click here     .  ..."
 
 
 The author is a Clinical Psychologist, 
      Lecturer Harvard Medical School  
   At the end of May 2013, I wrote
   
   an article titled "5 Early Warning Signs You're With a Narcissist." It sparked a number of rich 
   conversations through comments, emails,
   Facebook and
   Twitter . Not surprisingly, the vast 
   majority of reactions came from people who feared they were currently in a relationship with a narcissist. 
   Nevertheless, some of them - often among the most heartfelt and desperate of messages - came from 
   people who'd either been diagnosed with Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD), or felt convinced 
   they met criteria for the diagnosis. From both sides, the same question surfaced again and again: 
   Is there hope for those with NPD and the people who love them? Is there anything we can do if we 
   see early warning signs or actual diagnostic criteria besides end the relationship? As simple as 
   they might seem on the surface, questions like these resonate with some of the deepest concerns in 
   psychology. Can we change our personalities? More to the point, can people who meet criteria for 
   personality disorders open themselves up to new and better experiences in relationships and in the 
   world? I'm going to go on record as saying, yes, I do believe it's possible for people to change, 
   even if they've been diagnosed with something as deeply entrenched and formidable as a personality 
   disorder.
   
   Trait labels like narcissist, or the admittedly less stigmatizing ones like extrovert and 
   introvert, merely provide a shorthand description. They're a stand-in for "this person scored high 
   on a trait measure of narcissism or extroversion or introversion." They can never hope to capture 
   the whole person. (Bear in mind that even Jung, who introduced the latter concepts,
   
   firmly believed we all possess both an introvert and an extrovert side , regardless of 
   how much we tend to one side or the other.) Nevertheless, when they become diagnostic labels, like 
   "narcissist" or "Narcissistic Personality Disorder," these stark descriptions imply something that 
   goes far beyond a tendency or a style - they suggest permanence and a set of stable enduring features. 
   I have more hope than this. I believe that rather than simply being "who we are," our personalities 
   are also patterns of interaction. That is, personality, whether disordered or not , has as 
   much to do with how (and with whom) we interact as it does with our genes and wired-in temperament.
   
So what pattern does the narcissist follow?
   
   Many have suggested that NPD emerges from an environment in which vulnerability comes to feel 
   dangerous, representing, at worst, either a grave defect, or at best, a stubborn barrier to becoming 
   a worthwhile human being - that's simplifying a great deal of research and theory, but it's a workable 
   summary - hence the correlation between NPD and
   
   insecure attachment styles , in which fears of depending on anyone at all engender constant attempts 
   to control the relationship or avoid intimacy altogether. If you devote yourself to directing interactions 
   or holding people at arms length, it's a lot harder to become vulnerable (needless to say, the "safety" 
   is largely an illusion). People with NPD have learned to ignore, suppress, deny, project and disavow 
   their vulnerabilities (or at least try) in their attempts to shape and reshape "who they are" in 
   their interactions. Change - allowing the vulnerability back in - means opening up to the very feelings 
   they've learned to avoid at all costs. It's not that people with NPD can't change, it's that it often 
   threatens their sense of personhood to try. And their failed relationships often confirm, in their 
   minds, that narcissism is the safest way to live. Put another way, narcissists can't be narcissistic 
   in a vacuum. They need the right audience in order to feel like a star, for example, so they often 
   cultivate relationships with people who stick around for the show, instead of the person. Over time, 
   as their perfect façade starts to slip, their constant fear that people will find them lacking becomes 
   a horrifying reality. The very people who stuck around for the show lose interest when it ends - 
   which merely convinces the narcissist they need to hide their flaws and put on a better show. Alternatively, 
   even when they fall for someone who could be more than just an adoring fan - someone who offers the 
   hope of a more authentic, enduring love - narcissists still live with the paralyzing fear they'll 
   somehow be deemed unworthy. Their terror is frequently out of awareness, and nearly always managed 
   with bravado and blame, but it's profound and palpable. Sadly, their anger at having their mistakes 
   and missteps exposed ultimately alienates their loved ones, and the demise of yet another relationship 
   prompts them to redouble their efforts to avoid vulnerability - in short, it pushes them towards 
   more narcissism. 
   The sad irony of the narcissistic condition is that, in an effort to protect themselves, 
   narcissists inevitably invite the very rejection and abandonment they fear in the first place. The 
   key then, to interacting with someone you suspect is narcissistic, is to break the vicious circle 
   - to gently thwart their frantic efforts to control, distance, defend or blame in the relationship 
   by sending the message that you're more than willing to connect with them, but not on these terms 
   - to invite them into a version of intimacy where they can be loved and admired, warts and all - 
   if they only allow the experience to happen. As a therapist, I've seen firsthand that changing relational 
   patterns often transforms even the most inflexible "trait" into something softer, gentler - not a 
   fixed feature, but a protection that eventually yields to touch and intimacy in all the ways one 
   would hope. Narcissism is a way of relating. Not everyone can shift into a more flexible form of 
   intimacy, but some can, and in the next post, I plan to share steps you can take to help you decide 
   whether or not the person you're with is capable of seeing themselves - and you - through a less-constricting 
   lens than the narcissistic worldview. If you like my posts, let me know! Let's connect on 
   facebook and 
   twitter. I frequently respond 
   to comments and questions there. And feel free to check out 
   www.drcraigmalkin.com for more 
   tips and advice, as well as information on my 
   book in progress .
   For more by Dr. Craig Malkin, click
   here . For 
   more on emotional intelligence,
   click here
   . 
   
Notable quotes:
"...   Feelings     are a natural consequence of being human, and we tend to have lots of them in the course of normal     interactions. But the very fact of having a feeling in the presence of another person suggests you     can be touched emotionally by friends, family, partners, and even the occasional tragedy or failure.     Narcissists abhor feeling influenced in any significant way. It challenges their sense of perfect     autonomy; to admit to a feeling of any kind suggests they can be affected by someone or something     outside of them. So they often change the subject when feelings come up, especially their own, and     as quick as they might be to anger, it's often like pulling teeth to get them to admit that they've     reached the boiling point - even when they're in the midst of the most terrifying tirade.      ..."
"... If you like my posts, let me know! Let's connect on     facebook  and     twitter.  I frequently respond to     comments and questions there. And feel free to check out     www.drcraigmalkin.com  for more tips and     advice, as well as information on my     book in progress  .  ..."
"...     For more by Dr. Craig Malkin,     click here  .  ..."
 
   Dr. Craig Malkin , Author, Clinical 
   Psychologist, Lecturer Harvard Medical School  
   At the beginning of April this year, I was tapped by the Huffington Post Live team for a
   
   discussion on narcissism . I happily agreed to appear, for a number of reasons, not the least 
   of which is that narcissism happens to be one of my favorite subjects. Early in my training, I had 
   the pleasure of working with one of the foremost authorities on narcissism in our field, and in part 
   because of that experience, I went on to work with quite a few clients who'd been diagnosed with
   
   narcissistic personality disorder . That's where I learned that the formal diagnostic label hardly 
   does justice to the richness and complexity of this condition. The most glaring problems are easy 
   to spot - the apparent absence of even a shred of empathy, the grandiose plans and posturing, the 
   rage at being called out on the slightest of imperfections or normal human missteps - but if you 
   get too hung up on the obvious traits, you can easily miss the subtle (and often more common) features 
   that allow a narcissist to sneak into your life and wreak havoc. Just ask
   Tina Swithin , who went 
   on to write a book
   about surviving her experience with a man who clearly meets criteria for NPD (and very likely, 
   a few other diagnoses). To her lovestruck eyes, her soon-to-be husband seemed more like a prince 
   charming than the callous, deceitful spendthrift he later proved to be. Looking back, Tina explains, 
   there were signs of trouble from the start, but they were far from obvious at the time. In real life, 
   the most dangerous villains rarely advertise their malevolence. So what are we to do? How do we protect 
   ourselves from narcissists if they're so adept at slipping into our lives unnoticed? I shared some 
   of my answers to that question in our conversation, and I encourage you to watch it. But there were 
   a few I didn't get to, and others I didn't have the chance to describe in depth, so I thought I'd 
   take the opportunity to revisit the topic here. Tread carefully if you catch a glimpse of any of 
   these subtler signs: 
   1) Projected Feelings of Insecurity: I don't mean that narcissists 
   see insecurity everywhere. I'm talking about a different kind of projection altogether, akin 
   to playing hot potato with a sense of smallness and deficiency. Narcissists say and do things, subtle 
   or obvious, that make you feel less smart, less accomplished, less competent. It's as if they're 
   saying, "I don't want to feel this insecure and small; here, you take the feelings." Picture the 
   boss who questions your methods after their own decision derails an important project, the date who 
   frequently claims not to understand what you've said, even when you've been perfectly clear, or the 
   friend who always damns you with faint praise ("Pretty good job this time!"). Remember the saying: 
   "Don't knock your neighbor's porch light out to make yours shine brighter." Well, the narcissist 
   loves to knock out your lights to seem brighter by comparison. 
   2) Emotion-phobia:  Feelings 
   are a natural consequence of being human, and we tend to have lots of them in the course of normal 
   interactions. But the very fact of having a feeling in the presence of another person suggests you 
   can be touched emotionally by friends, family, partners, and even the occasional tragedy or failure. 
   Narcissists abhor feeling influenced in any significant way. It challenges their sense of perfect 
   autonomy; to admit to a feeling of any kind suggests they can be affected by someone or something 
   outside of them. So they often change the subject when feelings come up, especially their own, and 
   as quick as they might be to anger, it's often like pulling teeth to get them to admit that they've 
   reached the boiling point - even when they're in the midst of the most terrifying tirade. 
    
   3) A 
   Fragmented Family Story: Narcissism seems to be born of neglect and abuse, both of which are 
   notorious for creating an insecure attachment style (for more on attachment, see
   
   here and
   
   here ). But the very fact that narcissists, for all their posturing, are deeply insecure, also 
   gives us an easy way to spot them. Insecurely attached people can't talk coherently about their family 
   and childhood; their early memories are confused, contradictory, and riddled with gaps. Narcissists 
   often give themselves away precisely because their childhood story makes no sense, and the most common 
   myth they carry around is the perfect family story. If your date sings their praises for their exalted 
   family but the reasons for their panegyric seem vague or discursive, look out. The devil is in the 
   details, as they say - and very likely, that's why you're not hearing them. 
   4) Idol Worship:
   Another common narcissistic tendency you might be less familiar with is the habit of putting 
   people on pedestals. The logic goes a bit like this: "If I find someone perfect to be close to, maybe 
   some of their perfection will rub off on me, and I'll become perfect by association." The fact that 
   no one can be perfect is usually lost on the idol-worshipping narcissist - at least until they discover, 
   as they inevitably do, that their idol has clay feet. And stand back once that happens. Few experiences 
   can prepare you for the vitriol of a suddenly disappointed narcissist. Look out for any pressure 
   to conform to an image of perfection, no matter how lovely or magical the compulsive flattery might 
   feel. 
   5) A High Need for Control: For the same reason narcissists often loathe the subject 
   of feelings, they can't stand to be at the mercy of other people's preferences; it reminds them that 
   they aren't invulnerable or completely independent - that, in fact, they might have to ask 
   for what they want - and even worse, people may not feel like meeting the request. Rather than express 
   needs or preferences themselves, they often arrange events (and maneuver people) to orchestrate the 
   outcomes they desire. In the extreme form, this can manifest as abusive, controlling behaviors. (Think 
   of the man who berates his wife when dinner isn't ready as soon as he comes home. He lashes out precisely 
   because at that very moment, he's forced to acknowledge that he depends on his wife, something 
   he'd rather avoid.) But as with most of these red flags, the efforts at control are often far subtler 
   than outright abuse. Be on the look out for anyone who leaves you feeling nervous about approaching 
   certain topics or sharing your own preferences. Narcissists have a way of making choices feel off-limits 
   without expressing any anger at all - a disapproving wince, a last-minute call to preempt the plans, 
   chronic lateness whenever you're in charge of arranging a night together. It's more like a war of 
   attrition on your will than an outright assault on your freedom. None of these signs, in isolation, 
   proves that you're with a narcissist. But if you see a lot of them, it's best to sit up and take 
   notice. They're all way of dodging vulnerability, and that's a narcissist's favorite tactic. 
   If you like my posts, let me know! Let's connect on
   facebook and
   twitter. I frequently respond to 
   comments and questions there. And feel free to check out
   www.drcraigmalkin.com for more tips and 
   advice, as well as information on my
   book in progress . 
   For more by Dr. Craig Malkin,
   click here . 
   
Notable quotes:
"... As Dr. Robert Klitzman, a professor of psychiatry     and the director of the master's of bioethics program at Columbia University, pointed out, the American     Psychiatric Association declares it unethical for psychiatrists to comment on an individual's mental     state without examining him personally and having the patient's consent to make such comments.     ..."
"... To degrade people is really part of a cluster-B personality disorder: it's antisocial and shows     a lack of remorse for other people. The way to make it O.K. to attack someone verbally, psychologically,     or physically is to lower them. That's what he's doing. ..."
"... Narcissists are not necessarily liars, but they are notoriously uncomfortable with the        truth. The truth means the potential to feel ashamed. If all they have to show the world as a        source of feeling acceptable is their success and performance, be it in business or sports or        celebrity, then the risk of people seeing them fail or squander their success is so difficult        to their self-esteem that they feel ashamed. We call it the narcissistic injury. They're uncomfortable        with their own limitations. It's not that they're cut out to lie, it's just that they can't handle        what's real ..."
"... Most narcissists don't seek     treatment unless there's someone threatening to take something away from them. There'd have to be     some kind of meaningful consequence for him to come in. ..."
"... They're aware; the problem is, they don't care. They     know how you'd like them to act; the problem is, they've got a different set of rules. The kind of     approach that can have some impact is confrontational. It confronts distorted thinking and behavior     patterns in the here-and-now moment when the narcissists are doing their thing in the session. It's     confronted on the spot; you invite them to do something different, then you reinforce them for doing     so. ..."
 
   
   
   Vanity Fair 
   As his presidential campaign trundles forward, millions of sane Americans are wondering: What 
   exactly is wrong with this strange individual? Now, we have an answer. 
   For mental-health professionals, Donald Trump is at once easily diagnosed but slightly confounding. 
   "Remarkably narcissistic," said developmental psychologist Howard Gardner, a professor at Harvard 
   Graduate School of Education. "Textbook narcissistic personality disorder," echoed clinical psychologist 
   Ben Michaelis. "He's so classic that I'm archiving video clips of him to use in workshops because 
   there's no better example of his characteristics," said clinical psychologist George Simon, who conducts 
   lectures and seminars on manipulative behavior. "Otherwise, I would have had to hire actors and write 
   vignettes. He's like a dream come true." 
   That mental-health professionals are even willing to talk about Trump in the first place may attest 
   to their deep concern about a Trump presidency. As Dr. Robert Klitzman, a professor of psychiatry 
   and the director of the master's of bioethics program at Columbia University, pointed out, the American 
   Psychiatric Association declares it unethical for psychiatrists to comment on an individual's mental 
   state without examining him personally and having the patient's consent to make such comments.
   This so-called Goldwater rule arose after the publication of a 1964 Fact magazine article in 
   which psychiatrists were polled about Senator Barry Goldwater's fitness to be president. Senator 
   Goldwater brought a $2 million suit against the magazine and its publisher; the Supreme Court awarded 
   him $1 in compensatory damages and $75,000 in punitive damages. 
   But you don't need to have met Donald Trump to feel like you know him; even the smallest exposure 
   can make you feel like you've just crossed a large body of water in a small boat with him. Indeed, 
   though narcissistic personality disorder was removed from the most recent issue of the Diagnostic 
   and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, for somewhat arcane reasons, the traits that have defined 
   the disorder in the past-grandiosity; an expectation that others will recognize one's superiority; 
   a lack of empathy-are writ large in Mr. Trump's behavior. 
   "He's very easy to diagnose," said psychotherapist Charlotte Prozan. "In the first debate, he 
   talked over people and was domineering. He'll do anything to demean others, like tell Carly Fiorina 
   he doesn't like her looks. 'You're fired!' would certainly come under lack of empathy. And he wants 
   to deport immigrants, but [two of] his wives have been immigrants." Michaelis took a slightly different 
   twist on Trump's desire to deport immigrants: "This man is known for his golf courses, but, with 
   due respect, who does he think works on these golf courses?" 
   Mr. Trump's bullying nature-taunting Senator John McCain for being captured in Vietnam, or saying 
   Jeb Bush has "low energy"-is in keeping with the narcissistic profile. "In the field we use clusters 
   of personality disorders," Michaelis said. "Narcissism is in cluster B, which means it has similarities 
   with histrionic personality disorder, borderline personality disorder, and antisocial personality 
   disorder. There are similarities between them. Regardless of how you feel about John McCain, the 
   man served-and suffered. Narcissism is an extreme defense against one's own feelings of worthlessness.
   To degrade people is really part of a cluster-B personality disorder: it's antisocial and shows 
   a lack of remorse for other people. The way to make it O.K. to attack someone verbally, psychologically, 
   or physically is to lower them. That's what he's doing." 
   What of Trump's tendency to position himself as a possible savior to the economy despite the fact 
   that four of his companies have declared bankruptcy? "It's mind-boggling to me that that's not the 
   story," said Michaelis. "This man has been given more than anyone could ever hope for," he added, 
   referring to the fact that Trump is not wholly self-made, "yet he's failed miserably time and time 
   again." Licensed clinical social worker Wendy Terrie Behary, the author of Disarming the Narcissist: 
   Surviving and Thriving with the Self-Absorbed, said, 
   
      "Narcissists are not necessarily liars, but they are notoriously uncomfortable with the 
      truth. The truth means the potential to feel ashamed. If all they have to show the world as a 
      source of feeling acceptable is their success and performance, be it in business or sports or 
      celebrity, then the risk of people seeing them fail or squander their success is so difficult 
      to their self-esteem that they feel ashamed. We call it the narcissistic injury. They're uncomfortable 
      with their own limitations. It's not that they're cut out to lie, it's just that they can't handle 
      what's real." 
   
   Indeed, the need to protect or exalt the self is at odds with the job requirements of a president. 
   Michaelis said, "He's applying for the greatest job in the land, the greatest task of which is to 
   serve, but there's nothing about the man that is service-oriented. He's only serving himself." As 
   Prozan sees it, "He keeps saying he could negotiate with Putin because he's good at deals. But diplomacy 
   involves a back and forth between equals." Dr. Klitzman added, "I have never met Donald Trump and 
   so cannot comment on his psychological state. However, I think that, in general, many candidates 
   who run for president are driven in large part by ego. I hope that does not preclude their motivation 
   to govern with the best interests of the public as a whole in mind. Yet for some candidates, that 
   may, alas, be a threat." 
   Asked what, if Mr. Trump were their patient, they would "work on" with him, several of the therapists 
   laughed. "I'd be shocked if he walked in my door," said Behary. "Most narcissists don't seek 
   treatment unless there's someone threatening to take something away from them. There'd have to be 
   some kind of meaningful consequence for him to come in." Simon concurred but added, "There is 
   help available, but it doesn't look like the help people are used to. It's not insight-oriented psychotherapy, 
   because narcissists already have insight. They're aware; the problem is, they don't care. They 
   know how you'd like them to act; the problem is, they've got a different set of rules. The kind of 
   approach that can have some impact is confrontational. It confronts distorted thinking and behavior 
   patterns in the here-and-now moment when the narcissists are doing their thing in the session. It's 
   confronted on the spot; you invite them to do something different, then you reinforce them for doing 
   so." 
   But for at least one mental-health professional, the Trump enigma, or should we say non-enigma, 
   is larger than the bluster of the man whose own Web site calls him "the very definition of the American 
   success story, continually setting the standards of excellence"-to this mind-set, Trump may be a 
   kind of bellwether. Mr. Gardner said, "For me, the compelling question is the psychological state 
   of his supporters. They are unable or unwilling to make a connection between the challenges faced 
   by any president and the knowledge and behavior of Donald Trump. In a democracy, that is disastrous."
   
Notable quotes:
"... By  Nancy  	Kay  from  DivorcedMoms.com 	  ..."
 
	By Nancy 
	Kay from DivorcedMoms.com
	Could you be
	
	dating a narcissist and not even know it? After starting to
	
	date again after divorce , I often found myself drawn toward highly successful 
	professional men who are competitive in business and strongly determined to 
	continue to build their own financial empire. Their determined, confident attitudes 
	and visible business successes appealed to my strong desires for security and 
	stability. A recent first date I went on was with this type of guy. My date 
	with a dentist turned into a three-hour marathon of misery for me when he insisted 
	that we sit in a back booth that he had reserved in advance with the hostess 
	by visiting the restaurant the night before and then he told our server that 
	he would leave an extra generous tip if she served our meals at a very leisurely 
	pace. Right away he launched into a one-sided brag fest about how he got elected 
	president of his college fraternity and why he easily scored highest in his 
	graduating class on the dental board exam. He then dropped names of all the 
	famous people he knows who live in our city and then went on to reveal the names 
	of all the famous people his dad knows too. By the time the pasta finally arrived, 
	I wanted to collapse into my plate from sheer boredom and exhaustion. After 
	that mind-numbing experience, I ran to my car and swore off dating for several 
	months. Unfortunately this was just one more very disillusioning
	
	date with a narcissistic man . I had already experienced many others. Several 
	times I dated a man exclusively for three to six months, expecting things to 
	become more serious over time, only to have them abruptly break things off with 
	very little explanation or distance themselves with vague excuses about why 
	they couldn't continue to spend time with me. After spending many frustrating 
	weeks trying to figure out how to get each of these men I had dated exclusively 
	to connect with me on an emotional level so that our relationship could continue 
	to grow, I finally discovered that there was a big disconnect between the type 
	of relationship I was expecting to unfold and what these narcissistic men were 
	able to contribute in terms of intimacy, emotional connection and respectful 
	two-way communications. I discovered that I was living on crumbs and pretending 
	it was a whole nutritious meal. Are you dating a narcissist? Here 
	are six warning signs: 1. He is pre-occupied with how 
	things around him appear and how he is perceived by others. He aggressively 
	pursues financial success and is not content with what he already has acquired 
	or achieved. He has a strong craving for admiration, praise and his home, car, 
	clothes and high status are a direct measurement of how successful he appears 
	to others. 2. He exploits or takes advantage of others to get what he 
	wants. Narcissists are highly skilled at using others' talents; taking 
	advantage of their desire to avoid conflicts and their good natured helpfulness 
	as a means to an end to achieve their own goals. 3. He does not appreciate 
	or even see your unique abilities and natural gifts. Highly self-absorbed, 
	narcissists are so driven by how they can use others to benefit themselves that 
	your own individual strengths, abilities and achievements are often ignored 
	or dismissed as inconsequential. 4. He resents authority and despises 
	correction or being told what to do. He is reluctant to accept any 
	blame or criticism and strongly prefers to be in control of things and those 
	around him at all times. Having his faults pointed out to him or even having 
	to admit that he made a mistake can set him off into a fit of rage. 
	5. Petty arguments often erupt into power struggles. The narcissistic 
	man thrives on being right so disputes are rarely resolved. Mediation and counseling 
	rarely helps to improve communications with a narcissist because this type of 
	person sees themselves as under attack and can't stand for their actions to 
	be subject to the opinions of others and held up to the light. 6. He 
	disregards your healthy needs for attention and affection. Since narcissistic 
	men often lack empathy and the self-examination necessary to create an intimate 
	relationship, you'll often find yourself running on empty. Attempts to get more 
	affection from him often leads to him creating a secret life to run to and evading 
	your questions about what is really happening or not happening in your relationship. 
	If you recognize these signs in a man that you are dating, it is helpful to 
	remember that narcissists have very rigid expectations (especially for themselves) 
	and so this type of man rarely changes his ways. Understanding or experiencing 
	intimacy and love within the context of a balanced and healthy relationship 
	is not on the agenda of a narcissist. Unfortunately, many times we keep trying 
	to change a narcissistic man into who we'd like them to become or the reverse 
	- trying to twist ourselves like pretzels into a perfect version of what he 
	wants instead of cutting our losses. Recognizing the traits of a narcissistic 
	man and realizing how deeply rooted they are is critical so that we can begin
	
	taking back control of our own life and start to move forward in a healthier 
	direction. 
 
	
	
		< Have you ever had a situation that goes something like this?: You meet 
		someone and it feels like the stars align. This person is so into you and 
		lavishes you with attention, romance and gifts. The relationship moves very 
		quickly and it feels like you have met "the one." Months down the road when 
		things have settled in comfortably, things start to change. The person who 
		used to adore and worship you now fluctuates between needing you desperately 
		and devaluing you. Perhaps as time goes on, the person who you thought cared 
		so much becomes more emotionally unavailable, distant and cruel. The "Jekyll" 
		part of the personality starts to overtake the "Hyde." How did this person 
		who used to be so wonderful and made such an effort to be with you all of 
		the sudden turn out to be so opposite than what you thought? This can leave 
		someone confused, hurt, angry and depressed. If this situation sounds similar 
		to something you have experienced, you may be or may have dated someone 
		with narcissistic tendencies. Here are some of the warning signs:
		1. They are madly in love with you right off the bat and the 
		relationship moves very quickly: People with narcissistic tendencies 
		use fantasy like projections when picking a mate. Usually it takes a certain 
		amount of time to fall in love with someone. Sure, you can feel chemistry 
		and a connection with someone but to fall in love with who a person truly 
		is (flaws and all) takes some time. A person with narcissistic tendencies 
		loves the intense feelings and the attention. Sadly, their intense interest 
		in you is more so about them and their needs than it is about you. 
		2. They fluctuate between adoring you and devaluing you:
		People with narcissistic tendencies are very hot and cold. They 
		can be mean and critical one second and then sweet and loving the next. 
		This becomes very confusing because you are still seeing glimpses of the 
		wonderful person you first fell in love with but you are also getting to 
		see another side that makes you feel bad about yourself. 
		3. They 
		have little ability to empathize and everything is on their terms:
		Someone with narcissistic tendencies doesn't really see things 
		from your world or from your point of view. Everything is about them and 
		what they want. They ignore your needs in the relationship and only focus 
		on getting what they want or what works best for them. They will always 
		be their number one priority and everyone else will always come after that.
		
		4. They cheat, lie or manipulate and don't feel remorse:
		Narcissists don't really empathize so when they do something to 
		hurt you, they don't really feel remorseful. This can actually be the most 
		hurtful part because it may make you feel like they never cared about you 
		at all. Moving on can be very hard because a lot of people feel that they 
		need closure or apologies that they will never get from narcissistic people.
		5. When it's all over, it's like you never mattered: A 
		classic case narcissist mostly uses people for their own gain and has very 
		little emotional connection to those that are in their lives. Because of 
		this, they discard people in their lives very easily. I recently watched 
		an episode of the new HBO show Girls and in this particular episode, one 
		of the characters who had broken up with her serious long-term boyfriend 
		2 weeks prior now finds he already has a new girlfriend. Shocked that he 
		could move on so quickly from something so serious she exclaims. "you're 
		a sociopath!!" and walks away. Even though she was the one who broke up 
		with him, she is shocked that it feels like their relationship meant nothing 
		to him at the end of the day and that she was easily replaceable. People 
		recovering from narcissistic relationships are often in shock that someone 
		who once claimed to love them so much has moved on so quickly and without 
		any sense of remorse.
		How to spot a narcissist: 
		I always tell my clients to take the time to really get to know the people 
		they are dating before getting too emotionally invested or putting all their 
		eggs in one basket. There are definitely fairy tale stories out there of 
		two people falling madly in love with each other right at the get go and 
		spending their lives happily ever after, but that is generally not the norm. 
		Keep your guard up the more intensely the person is into you and the earlier 
		on it occurs. Past relationship patterns are also very important to look 
		at. As mentioned above, people who are narcissistic are intense very quickly 
		and end up leaving a trail of shattered relationships and people who are 
		left to pick up the pieces (and often need quite a bit of therapy after 
		being in the destructive path of a narcissist). If you get an idea of the 
		dating history of someone and it follows a certain pattern, pay attention 
		to that. Yes, people can change, but past relationship patterns can raise 
		a lot of red flags. The reason people have a hard time of extricating themselves 
		from a narcissistic relationship is because it is hard to get past the fact 
		that someone who used to be so wonderful and loving can turn so cold, hateful 
		and lacking in remorse. These people hang on because of the glimpses they 
		get of the good side and hold out the hope that if they were only "good 
		enough" or "better", or unconditionally accepted and loved this person then 
		they could get the nice and kind person back.
		 It turns into a vicious cycle 
		and the more you get into a relationship, the harder it is to get out of. 
		Being in a relationship with a narcissist will make you feel crazy and most 
		narcissists actually don't actively leave relationships; they wait to be 
		left first. It can be really hard to get out of a relationship like this 
		and if you have never been in one, it's hard to know how. If someone makes 
		you feel worthless or crazy and you know they are not treating you with 
		respect, or empathizing with you, that might be hard to change. Learning 
		to spot negative patterns early and having the strength to know what you 
		deserve in a relationship is one of the best things to do if you find yourself 
		involved with one of these people. 
		Recovery after a narcissistic 
		relationship: 
		Recovery after a narcissistic relationship can be very difficult. Many 
		people are driven to therapy because they have been left completely shattered 
		and fragile after a relationship with a narcissist. The most important thing 
		to remember is that it's not about YOU. This has everything to do with the 
		flaws of the narcissist and their inability to make real, meaningful connections 
		with others. What they have done to you is what they have done and will 
		continue to do in all their relationships unless they recognize this within 
		themselves and get help. The problem is, most narcissistic people never 
		recognize that they need to change. Remember that you deserve a relationship 
		that builds you up, that makes you feel safe, and that brings you happiness 
		and warmth. A person who is narcissistic cannot give this to you, simply 
		because they are not capable of it.
		**This article originally appeared on
		
		Pamela's Punch 
	
Notable quotes:
"... "You're the prettiest.  	The sexiest. The skinniest. The best mom. The funniest."  ..."
"... "You have such a sexy voice. Not too high, nor too low; it's just  	perfect. My friend Courtney's voice is super high-pitched and she has this weird  	way of talking through her teeth. Annoying."  ..."
"... "You have a great  	body. I guess I'm used to having more to hug with my ex!"  ..."
 
	What do you get when you cross a sociopath with a narcissist? The least funny 
	joke and the worst kind of hybrid: a narcissistic sociopath, narcopath for short. 
	Both a narcissist and sociopath have an inflated sense of how important they 
	are, as well as a constant need for praise and admiration. One commonality between 
	the two is their ability to fool others in order to get what they want, without 
	remorse. But what sets them apart is that a narcopath is unable to handle criticism 
	or be viewed in a negative light, whereas a sociopath couldn't care less who 
	thinks what or how they're perceived. When you hear the word narcopath you may 
	picture a deranged, knife-wielding lunatic - at least that's what I pictured 
	before I met my own. Unfortunately, this couldn't be further from the truth. 
	Narcopaths are boogie men in disguise and wolves in sheep's clothing. Their 
	abuse is sometimes so subtle that you don't see it until the curtain closes 
	and your world is torn apart. Still unsure if you're in a relationship with 
	a narcopath? Here are ten telltale signs that you might be.1. 
	Things move from zero to one hundred in seconds. 
	From the beginning, nothing is normal with a narcopath. Things progress at 
	warp speed, hop-scotching over the usual stages of a relationship. Instead of 
	slowly getting to know one another, you go from the first date to planning your 
	future together within weeks of meeting. And when your gut warns you things 
	are moving too fast, you tell it to shut up because you've finally found your 
	soulmate.
	2. They're a broken record of compliments. 
	A narcopath will sweep you off your feet, place you on a pedestal, then worship 
	you from down below. They'll tell you the things you've always wanted to hear, 
	saying them over and over and over again. But listen closely and you'll notice 
	there's not much variation in these love monologues, and their sweet-nothings 
	sound more like a script than anything from the heart. "You're the prettiest. 
	The sexiest. The skinniest. The best mom. The funniest." If everything 
	feels staged and too good to be true, it probably is. 
	3. They flatter you with comparisons. 
	There's no period at the end of a compliment. Instead, a narcopath compliments 
	you by comparing you to someone else in their life. In my case, he'd say things 
	like, "You have such a sexy voice. Not too high, nor too low; it's just 
	perfect. My friend Courtney's voice is super high-pitched and she has this weird 
	way of talking through her teeth. Annoying." Or, "You have a great 
	body. I guess I'm used to having more to hug with my ex!" Praising you 
	by putting down others is a huge red flag, not to mention incredibly distasteful. 
	And while it's no doubt flattering to hear these praises, keep in mind that 
	one day they'll be offering them to someone else and using your name to fill 
	the second blank.
	4. Your chemistry between the sheets is off the charts.
	
	You've never felt this much passion with anyone else. Pushing all the right 
	buttons in just the right ways, it's like they're reading your mind and its 
	desires. The reason sex is so mind-blowing, at least in the beginning, isn't 
	because they know what to do with their hands; they know what to do with your
	mind . They'll make you feel like you're the only one who's ever existed 
	to them. Yes, narcopaths are indeed that great - at acting, that is. By mirroring 
	your every emotion they're able to make their own emotions seem genuine and 
	fool you into thinking yours are real. 
	5. Their eyes are windows to nothingness. 
	My Narc-in-a-Box would stare at me with such intensity I'd become nervous, 
	fidget, and quickly turn away. Speaking directly into my eyes with a deadpan 
	and unwavering stare, I don't think he blinked once during our four months together. 
	At times his gaze was so piercing that his pupils practically vanished. But 
	sadly, behind all that intensity lied a vast amount of dark nothingness. I turned 
	away from that stare because it made me feel uneasy in all the wrong ways.
	6. They always lead the conversation back to themselves.
	
	On the surface, a narcopath seems hyper-focused on you and genuinely interested 
	in learning all there is to know. Yet the moment you begin divulging this information, 
	they quickly interrupt with a story of their own. It's like a revolving door: 
	They ask you a question to gain the opportunity to talk about themselves. They're 
	quick to interject with their thoughts and opinions, and always have a similar 
	experience to share with you. Experiences that, once dissected, are nothing 
	more than sweetly camouflaged one-uppers and indirect ways to let you know that 
	they know better.
	7. They have a checkered relationship history. 
	
	I've never met anyone with such an odd and storied relationship history. 
	He traveled to Texas after meeting a girl online, then met his ex-wife online, 
	and later flew in another girl he met online (through a quiz website!) all the 
	way from Europe, before finally meeting me online. Narcopaths often leave long 
	trails of broken relationships behind them, but of course they were never the 
	ones responsible for breaking them. And no matter how long ago it ended, they'll 
	claim all their former flames still burn strongly for them from afar.
	8. They use big words that have little substance. 
	
	Have you ever read something that initially seems incredibly deep and profound, 
	until you reach the end and realize it's nothing but a nonsensical jumble of 
	fancy words? A narcopath craves superiority and thrives on being smarter than 
	everyone in the room. The only the problem is that often times they're not, 
	forcing them to fake it and pray no one catches on. On the surface, a narcopath 
	seems highly intelligent and cultured, but dig deeper and you'll discover it's 
	nothing but fluff. 
	9. They give because it makes them look better. 
	Give and you shall receive. Or, in the narcopath's case, give and tell everyone 
	within a thousand mile radius who you gave to and exactly how much. A narcopath 
	doesn't give because it makes them feel good on the inside; rather, they give 
	because it makes them look good from the outside. No kind deed goes unnoticed, 
	because they'd never allow it. Whether it's helping an old lady cross the street, 
	giving a homeless person a buck, or donating to their children's PTA, they'll 
	make sure someone knows about their generosity. 
	10. They're no stranger to the silent treatment. 
	Narcopaths love to dish it out. You may see glimpses of this passive-aggressive 
	form of punishment early on in the relationship, or it might come on suddenly 
	out of left field. Either way, the silent treatment is without a doubt the most 
	vile and abusive trait that narcopaths possess. Like a child, anytime they can't 
	get their way or feel threatened, they stomp away with their arms crossed and 
	punish you with a deafening silence. The harder you reach out, the more you 
	cry, and the angrier you become, the better they feel. It's normal for your 
	partner to get angry, sulk, or brood sometimes. What isn't normal is using silence 
	as a weapon to punish and control you, then sitting back and gaining pleasure 
	from your pain.
	This article originally appeared on
	
	YourTango . 
Notable quotes:
"... Need help? In the U.S., call 1-800-799-SAFE (7233) for the 	 National Domestic Violence  	Hotline  .  ..."
 
	Late last year, I wrote a
	
	piece where I shared a perspective, based on
	
	growing research , that
	
	narcissism isn't simply a stubborn trait, but a style of coping. The seeds 
	of that idea turned into a
	book , 
	scheduled for release in spring next year. Since I promised a follow up, I'm 
	taking a brief break from the larger project to deliver on my promise. Here's 
	a glimpse at what's to come. If you think your partner's a
	
	narcissist , you might want to try these seven strategies. Check For 
	Abuse : None of what I'm about to suggest is likely to help if the person 
	you love is physically or emotionally abusive. Not all narcissists, even those 
	diagnosed with
	
	Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) , resort to abuse. But some do - 
	and if you're on the receiving end, your first step should be to explore
	
	what makes it hard for you to leave . If you're facing abuse, it doesn't 
	matter whether it's driven by your partner's narcissism, chronic pain, or drug 
	addiction - the problem is the abuse, plain and simple. And the abuser is 100 
	percent responsible for his or her choice. Until that changes, you probably 
	won't feel safe enough - nor should you - to take the kinds of risks I'm recommending 
	here. Check for Denial: Most people recognize denial when they see it. 
	It's easily the most famous of all the defense mechanisms. The alcoholic who 
	protests, "I just enjoy the taste of fine wine!"; the terminally ill patient 
	who assures everyone, "It's just a cough"; and the narcissist who, despite having 
	alienated all her friends and lost her job, proclaims, "I'm just fine" - all 
	are exhibiting denial. The more denial a narcissist displays, the less hopeful 
	you should feel about change. How bad is denial? In
	
	adolescents , it
	
	predicts some of the most ruthless, demanding forms of narcissism - adults 
	who happily admit "I find it easy to manipulate people." Make sure your partner 
	can admit something's wrong, even if it's as simple as saying, "my life isn't 
	where I hoped it would be." Contrary to what you might think,
	
	some narcissists do seek therapy . Which kinds? The "vulnerable" ones, riddled 
	with shame and fear; they freely admit they have problems instead of 
	burying them beneath near-delusional denial. In fact, they're also
	
	more likely to stick with treatment once they start. Beware the Manipulator
	: 
	Across studies , narcissists who score high on measures of entitlement and 
	exploitation (or, EE, as researchers call it) have the highest levels of aggression, 
	a strong impulse to cheat, and even, when angered, a penchant for stealing or 
	sabotaging property at work. In fact, EE
	singlehandedly 
	accounts for most of the worst behaviors a narcissist can display. Manipulative 
	narcissists are also
	
	more likely to score higher on measures of Psychopathy and Machiavellianism. 
	The former is a cold callous personality linked to criminal behaviors, while 
	the latter, as you can guess from the name, describes a cutthroat, "do whatever 
	it takes" personality. Along with narcissism, these two traits comprise personality's
	
	dark triad . Not all narcissists are cold and manipulative. But the ones 
	who are pose the greatest threat because they're so practiced at play-acting 
	and deceit you'll have a hard time separating fact from fiction. Check Their 
	Willingness to Change: This one might seem obvious, but it's crucial enough 
	that it bears mentioning. The easiest way to test a partner's capacity to change 
	is to seek help from a couples therapist - or any therapist for that matter. 
	Even people who aren't narcissists can be leery of therapy, so this one shouldn't 
	be considered a litmus test. If your partner's willing to work with you, though, 
	your odds at improving the relationship have probably jumped by an order of 
	magnitude. Check Your Anger: "You've always been the paranoid, jealous 
	type," sneers your partner after you openly wonder about the amount of time 
	he's spending with his attractive coworker. Our natural tendency, when faced 
	with such shocking indifference to our fear of losing love or needing more closeness 
	and comfort, is to protect ourselves. For many people, this means donning battle 
	armor and launching an attack. "You're the most selfish person I know! I don't 
	know why I'm with you!" As understandable as the protective measures are, they 
	cut us off from crucial information: Can our partners hear our sadness and fear 
	and feel moved? If there's any way at all to reach through the detachment, it's 
	by sharing our feelings at a more vulnerable level. Try this: "You mean so much 
	to me; I hear you talking to her and I'm scared I'm not enough for you." Or, 
	"Your opinion means the world to me; when I hear you talk to me that way I feel 
	so small and worthless in your eyes." Most partners, if they can feel anything 
	at all, will melt when they hear comments like this. They don't just convey 
	your pain with greater clarity; they remind your partner why the behavior 
	hurts - because it comes from the one person who matters most. How effective 
	is this kind of communication? Across decades of studies,
	90 percent 
	of couples who learned to share the sadness and fear beneath the anger, 
	healed their broken bond and enjoyed happy, closer relationships. Likewise,
	in multiple 
	recent studies , narcissists who focused on caring and closeness ("communal 
	behavior") actually scored lower over time on several measures of narcissism; 
	those who saw their partners as communal (compared to those who didn't)
	even 
	said they'd be less likely to cheat . Check Your Silence: Say you 
	come home from a hard day at work, and your boyfriend, grumbling about the weekend 
	plans being up in the air, starts lecturing you about how indecisive you are. 
	"You sure take a long time to make decisions, don't you?" Condescending remarks 
	like this don't always enrage us. When our self-esteem is already crumbling, 
	they often shut us down completely; we crawl away, crestfallen, or slip into 
	hours of silence. But we have to find a voice again if we want things to get 
	better. Research suggests
	that silent withdrawal is just another way of coping with feeling sad or 
	fearful about our connection with people we love; your best bet, as with anger, 
	is to go beneath the impulse to shut down and share the upset. "I'm feeling 
	so put down right now I'm afraid you've stopped caring about me altogether." 
	Why is this so important? Though they appear to be universal ways of coping 
	with fears about the people we love, anger and withdrawal also
	ramp 
	up our partners' insecurities . The result? Our loved ones fall back on 
	their usual way of protecting themselves - like criticism or indifference - 
	instead of hearing our pain. If they're narcissists, that means they resort 
	to their favorite MO - narcissism. Be Honest with Yourself: If you've 
	tried a more loving approach to sharing what hurts in your relationship, and 
	the narcissist in your life still won't soften, you truly have done everything 
	you can. This might be the only hope for change. Those of you who wrote 
	in to say you already tried this and it didn't work have made a valiant effort; 
	you may have exhausted your supply of empathy from working so hard. If so, my 
	heart goes out to you. But staying in an unhappy relationship comes at a steep 
	price,
	
	including your self-esteem. Ask yourself, honestly - are you staying because 
	your partner's doing his best to change - or because it feels too hard to leave? 
	Even if the people we love want to change, none of us should be expected 
	to endure the same hurts over and over. Narcissistic arrogance and hostility
	
	elicit our worst behaviors ; they get beneath our skin, working away like 
	a thousand needles. The natural response is to pull away or lash back; but if 
	you do your best to share the pain openly, letting your loved ones see your 
	softer feelings, you're giving them their best - and only shot - at hearing 
	you. If they can't understand your pain then, perhaps they never will. As sad 
	and difficult as it feels, you might need to take care of yourself by leaving. 
	Because regardless of which habit steals their attention away from genuine love 
	and intimacy, if our loved ones can't risk change, their problems are here to 
	stay. Need help? In the U.S., call 1-800-799-SAFE (7233) for the
	National Domestic Violence 
	Hotline . If you like my posts, let me know! Let's connect on
	facebook
	and 
	twitter. 
	And be sure to
	
	sign up for my newsletter, for more tips and advice, as well as information 
	on my forthcoming 
	book , about understanding and coping with narcissism in all its forms, 
	in our friends, lovers, colleagues-and even ourselves. HARPERWAVE AND HARPER 
	UK, SPRING 2015 
	Follow Dr. Craig Malkin on Twitter:
	www.twitter.com/DrCraigMalkin
	
Notable quotes:
"... In the final analysis, emotionally bonding with an abuser is actually a strategy for survival     for victims of abuse and intimidation. The "Stockholm Syndrome" reaction in hostage and/or abuse     situations is so well recognized at this time that police hostage negotiators no longer view it as     unusual. ..."
"... Stockholm Syndrome (SS) can also be found in family, romantic, and interpersonal relationships.     The abuser may be a husband or wife, boyfriend or girlfriend, father or mother, or any other role     in which the abuser is in a position of control or authority.  ..."
"... In relationships with abusers, a birthday card, a gift (usually provided after a period of abuse),     or a special treat are interpreted as not only positive, but evidence that the abuser is not "all     bad" and may at some time correct his/her behavior. Abusers and controllers are often given positive     credit for not abusing their partner, when the partner would have normally been subjected to verbal     or physical abuse in a certain situation. An aggressive and jealous partner may normally become intimidating     or abusive in certain social situations, as when an opposite-sex coworker waves in a crowd. After     seeing the wave, the victim expects to be verbally battered and when it doesn't happen, that "small     kindness" is interpreted as a positive sign.  ..."
"...  During the relationship,     the abuser/controller may share information about their past - how they were mistreated, abused,     neglected, or wronged. ..."
"... Sympathy may develop toward the     abuser and we often hear the victim of Stockholm Syndrome defending their abuser with "I know he     fractured my jaw and ribs…but he's troubled. He had a rough childhood!"  ..."
"... Keep in     mind: once you become hardened to the "sad stories", they will simply try another approach. I know     of no victim of abuse or crime who has heard their abuser say "I'm beating (robbing, mugging, etc.)     you because my Mom hated me!"  ..."
"... In abusive and controlling relationships, the victim has the sense they are always "walking on     eggshells" - fearful of saying or doing anything that might prompt a violent/intimidating outburst.     For their survival, they begin to see the world through the abuser's perspective. They begin to fix     things that might prompt an outburst, act in ways they know makes the abuser happy, or avoid aspects     of their own life that may prompt a problem. If we only have a dollar in our pocket, then most of     our decisions become financial decisions. If our partner is an abuser or controller, then the majority     of our decisions are based on our perception of the abuser's potential reaction. We become preoccupied     with the needs, desires, and habits of the abuser/controller.  ..."
"... Controlling partners have increased the financial obligations/debt in the relationship to        the point that neither partner can financially survive on their own. ..."
"... The legal ending of a relationship, especially a marital relationship, often creates significant        problems.  ..."
"... The Controller often uses extreme threats including threatening to take the children out of        state, threatening to quit their job/business rather than pay alimony/support, threatening public        exposure of the victim's personal issues, or assuring the victim they will never have a peaceful        life due to nonstop harassment.  ..."
 
   While the psychological condition in hostage situations became known as "Stockholm Syndrome" due 
   to the publicity, the emotional "bonding" with captors was a familiar story in psychology. It had 
   been recognized many years before and was found in studies of other hostage, prisoner, or abusive 
   situations such as:
   
      - Abused Children 
 
      - Battered/Abused Women 
 
      - Prisoners of War 
 
      - Cult Members 
 
      - Incest Victims 
 
      - Criminal Hostage Situations 
 
      - Concentration Camp Prisoners 
 
      - Controlling/Intimidating Relationships 
 
   
   In the final analysis, emotionally bonding with an abuser is actually a strategy for survival 
   for victims of abuse and intimidation. The "Stockholm Syndrome" reaction in hostage and/or abuse 
   situations is so well recognized at this time that police hostage negotiators no longer view it as 
   unusual. In fact, it is often encouraged in crime situations as it improves the chances for 
   survival of the hostages. On the down side, it also assures that the hostages experiencing "Stockholm 
   Syndrome" will not be very cooperative during rescue or criminal prosecution. Local law enforcement 
   personnel have long recognized this syndrome with battered women who fail to press charges, bail 
   their battering husband/boyfriend out of jail, and even physically attack police officers when they 
   arrive to rescue them from a violent assault. 
   Stockholm Syndrome (SS) can also be found in family, romantic, and interpersonal relationships. 
   The abuser may be a husband or wife, boyfriend or girlfriend, father or mother, or any other role 
   in which the abuser is in a position of control or authority. 
   It's important to understand the components of Stockholm Syndrome as they relate to abusive and 
   controlling relationships. Once the syndrome is understood, it's easier to understand why victims 
   support, love, and even defend their abusers and controllers. 
   Every syndrome has symptoms or behaviors, and Stockholm Syndrome is no exception. While a clear-cut 
   list has not been established due to varying opinions by researchers and experts, several of these 
   features will be present: 
   
      - Positive feelings by the victim toward the abuser/controller 
 
      - Negative feelings by the victim toward family, friends, or authorities trying to rescue/support 
      them or win their release 
 
      - Support of the abuser's reasons and behaviors 
 
      - Positive feelings by the abuser toward the victim 
 
      - Supportive behaviors by the victim, at times helping the abuser 
 
      - Inability to engage in behaviors that may assist in their release or detachment 
 
   
   Stockholm Syndrome doesn't occur in every hostage or abusive situation. In another bank robbery 
   involving hostages, after terrorizing patrons and employees for many hours, a police sharpshooter 
   shot and wounded the terrorizing bank robber. After he hit the floor, two women picked him up and 
   physically held him up to the window for another shot. As you can see, the length of time one is 
   exposed to abuse/control and other factors are certainly involved. 
   It has been found that four situations or conditions are present that serve as a foundation for 
   the development of Stockholm Syndrome. These four situations can be found in hostage, severe abuse, 
   and abusive relationships: 
   
      - The presence of a perceived threat to one's physical or psychological survival and the belief 
      that the abuser would carry out the threat. 
 
      - The presence of a perceived small kindness from the abuser to the victim 
 
      - Isolation from perspectives other than those of the abuser 
 
      - The perceived inability to escape the situation 
 
   
   By considering each situation we can understand how Stockholm Syndrome develops in romantic relationships 
   as well as criminal/hostage situations. Looking at each situation: 
   Perceived Threat to One's Physical/Psychological Survival 
   The perception of threat can be formed by direct, indirect, or witnessed methods. Criminal or 
   antisocial partners can directly threaten your life or the life of friends and family. Their history 
   of violence leads us to believe that the captor/controller will carry out the threat in a direct 
   manner if we fail to comply with their demands. The abuser assures us that only our cooperation keeps 
   our loved ones safe. 
   Indirectly, the abuser/controller offers subtle threats that you will never leave them or have 
   another partner, reminding you that people in the past have paid dearly for not following their wishes. 
   Hints are often offered such as "I know people who can make others disappear". Indirect threats also 
   come from the stories told by the abuser or controller - how they obtained revenge on those who have 
   crossed them in the past. These stories of revenge are told to remind the victim that revenge is 
   possible if they leave. 
   Witnessing violence or aggression is also a perceived threat. Witnessing a violent temper directed 
   at a television set, others on the highway, or a third party clearly sends us the message that we 
   could be the next target for violence. Witnessing the thoughts and attitudes of the abuser/controller 
   is threatening and intimidating, knowing that we will be the target of those thoughts in the future.
   
   The "Small Kindness" Perception 
   In threatening and survival situations, we look for evidence of hope - a small sign that the situation 
   may improve. When an abuser/controller shows the victim some small kindness, even though it is to 
   the abuser's benefit as well, the victim interprets that small kindness as a positive trait of the 
   captor. In criminal/war hostage situations, letting the victim live is often enough. Small behaviors, 
   such as allowing a bathroom visit or providing food/water, are enough to strengthen the Stockholm 
   Syndrome in criminal hostage events. 
   In relationships with abusers, a birthday card, a gift (usually provided after a period of abuse), 
   or a special treat are interpreted as not only positive, but evidence that the abuser is not "all 
   bad" and may at some time correct his/her behavior. Abusers and controllers are often given positive 
   credit for not abusing their partner, when the partner would have normally been subjected to verbal 
   or physical abuse in a certain situation. An aggressive and jealous partner may normally become intimidating 
   or abusive in certain social situations, as when an opposite-sex coworker waves in a crowd. After 
   seeing the wave, the victim expects to be verbally battered and when it doesn't happen, that "small 
   kindness" is interpreted as a positive sign.  
   Similar to the small kindness perception is the perception of a "soft side". During the relationship, 
   the abuser/controller may share information about their past - how they were mistreated, abused, 
   neglected, or wronged. The victim begins to feel the abuser/controller may be capable of fixing their 
   behavior or worse yet, that they (abuser) may also be a "victim". Sympathy may develop toward the 
   abuser and we often hear the victim of Stockholm Syndrome defending their abuser with "I know he 
   fractured my jaw and ribs…but he's troubled. He had a rough childhood!"  
   Losers and abusers may admit 
   they need psychiatric help or acknowledge they are mentally disturbed; however, it's almost always 
   after they have already abused or intimidated the victim. The admission is a way of denying responsibility 
   for the abuse. In truth, personality disorders and criminals have learned over the years that personal 
   responsibility for their violent/abusive behaviors can be minimized and even denied by blaming their 
   bad upbringing, abuse as a child, and now even video games. One murderer blamed his crime on eating 
   too much junk food - now known as the "Twinkie Defense". While it may be true that the abuser/controller 
   had a difficult upbringing, showing sympathy for his/her history produces no change in their behavior 
   and in fact, prolongs the length of time you will be abused. While "sad stories" are always included 
   in their apologies - after the abusive/controlling event - their behavior never changes! Keep in 
   mind: once you become hardened to the "sad stories", they will simply try another approach. I know 
   of no victim of abuse or crime who has heard their abuser say "I'm beating (robbing, mugging, etc.) 
   you because my Mom hated me!"  
   Isolation from Perspectives Other than those of the Captor 
   In abusive and controlling relationships, the victim has the sense they are always "walking on 
   eggshells" - fearful of saying or doing anything that might prompt a violent/intimidating outburst. 
   For their survival, they begin to see the world through the abuser's perspective. They begin to fix 
   things that might prompt an outburst, act in ways they know makes the abuser happy, or avoid aspects 
   of their own life that may prompt a problem. If we only have a dollar in our pocket, then most of 
   our decisions become financial decisions. If our partner is an abuser or controller, then the majority 
   of our decisions are based on our perception of the abuser's potential reaction. We become preoccupied 
   with the needs, desires, and habits of the abuser/controller.  
   Taking the abuser's perspective as a survival technique can become so intense that the victim 
   actually develops anger toward those trying to help them. The abuser is already angry and resentful 
   toward anyone who would provide the victim support, typically using multiple methods and manipulations 
   to isolate the victim from others. Any contact the victim has with supportive people in the community 
   is met with accusations, threats, and/or violent outbursts. Victims then turn on their family - fearing 
   family contact will cause additional violence and abuse in the home. At this point, victims curse 
   their parents and friends, tell them not to call and to stop interfering, and break off communication 
   with others. Agreeing with the abuser/controller, supportive others are now viewed as "causing trouble" 
   and must be avoided. Many victims threaten their family and friends with restraining orders if they 
   continue to "interfere" or try to help the victim in their situation. On the surface it would appear 
   that they have sided with the abuser/controller. In truth, they are trying to minimize contact with 
   situations that might make them a target of additional verbal abuse or intimidation. If a casual 
   phone call from Mom prompts a two-hour temper outburst with threats and accusations - the victim 
   quickly realizes it's safer if Mom stops calling. If simply telling Mom to stop calling doesn't work, 
   for his or her own safety the victim may accuse Mom of attempting to ruin the relationship and demand 
   that she stop calling. 
   In severe cases of Stockholm Syndrome in relationships, the victim may have difficulty leaving 
   the abuser and may actually feel the abusive situation is their fault. In law enforcement situations, 
   the victim may actually feel the arrest of their partner for physical abuse or battering is their 
   fault. Some women will allow their children to be removed by child protective agencies rather than 
   give up the relationship with their abuser. As they take the perspective of the abuser, the children 
   are at fault - they complained about the situation, they brought the attention of authorities to 
   the home, and they put the adult relationship at risk. Sadly, the children have now become a danger 
   to the victim's safety. For those with Stockholm Syndrome, allowing the children to be removed from 
   the home decreases their victim stress while providing an emotionally and physically safer environment 
   for the children. 
   Perceived Inability to Escape 
   As a hostage in a bank robbery, threatened by criminals with guns, it's easy to understand the 
   perceived inability to escape. In romantic relationships, the belief that one can't escape is also 
   very common. Many abusive/controlling relationships feel like till-death-do-us-part relationships 
   - locked together by mutual financial issues/assets, mutual intimate knowledge, or legal situations. 
   Here are some common situations: 
   
      - Controlling partners have increased the financial obligations/debt in the relationship to 
      the point that neither partner can financially survive on their own. Controllers who sense their 
      partner may be leaving will often purchase a new automobile, later claiming they can't pay alimony 
      or child support due to their large car payments. 
 
      - The legal ending of a relationship, especially a marital relationship, often creates significant 
      problems. A Controller who has an income that is "under the table" or maintained through legally 
      questionable situations runs the risk of those sources of income being investigated or made public 
      by the divorce/separation. The Controller then becomes more agitated about the possible public 
      exposure of their business arrangements than the loss of the relationship. 
 
      - The Controller often uses extreme threats including threatening to take the children out of 
      state, threatening to quit their job/business rather than pay alimony/support, threatening public 
      exposure of the victim's personal issues, or assuring the victim they will never have a peaceful 
      life due to nonstop harassment. In severe cases, the Controller may threaten an action that will 
      undercut the victim's support such as "I'll see that you lose your job" or "I'll have your automobile 
      burned". 
 
      - Controllers often keep the victim locked into the relationship with severe guilt - threatening 
      suicide if the victim leaves. The victim hears "I'll kill myself in front of the children", "I'll 
      set myself on fire in the front yard", or "Our children won't have a father/mother if you leave 
      me!" 
 
      - In relationships with an abuser or controller, the victim has also experienced a loss of self-esteem, 
      self-confidence, and psychological energy. The victim may feel "burned out" and too depressed 
      to leave. Additionally, abusers and controllers often create a type of dependency by controlling 
      the finances, placing automobiles/homes in their name, and eliminating any assets or resources 
      the victim may use to leave. In clinical practice I've heard "I'd leave but I can't even get money 
      out of the savings account! I don't know the PIN number." 
 
      - In teens and young adults, victims may be attracted to a controlling individual when they 
      feel inexperienced, insecure, and overwhelmed by a change in their life situation. When parents 
      are going through a divorce, a teen may attach to a controlling individual, feeling the controller 
      may stabilize their life. Freshmen in college may be attracted to controlling individuals who 
      promise to help them survive living away from home on a college campus. 
 
   
   In unhealthy relationships and definitely in Stockholm Syndrome there is a daily preoccupation 
   with "trouble". Trouble is any individual, group, situation, comment, casual glance, or cold meal 
   that may produce a temper tantrum or verbal abuse from the controller or abuser. To survive, "trouble" 
   is to be avoided at all costs. The victim must control situations that produce trouble. That may 
   include avoiding family, friends, co-workers, and anyone who may create "trouble" in the abusive 
   relationship. The victim does not hate family and friends; they are only avoiding "trouble"! The 
   victim also cleans the house, calms the children, scans the mail, avoids certain topics, and anticipates 
   every issue of the controller or abuse in an effort to avoid "trouble". In this situation, children 
   who are noisy become "trouble". Loved ones and friends are sources of "trouble" for the victim who 
   is attempting to avoid verbal or physical aggression. 
   Stockholm Syndrome in relationships is not uncommon. Law enforcement professionals are painfully 
   aware of the situation - making a domestic dispute one of the high-risk calls during work hours. 
   Called by neighbors during a spousal abuse incident, the abuser is passive upon arrival of the police, 
   only to find the abused spouse upset and threatening the officers if their abusive partner is arrested 
   for domestic violence. In truth, the victim knows the abuser/controller will retaliate against him/her 
   if 1) they encourage an arrest, 2) they offer statements about the abuse/fight that are deemed disloyal 
   by the abuser, 3) they don't bail them out of jail as quickly as possible, and 4) they don't personally 
   apologize for the situation - as though it was their fault. 
   Stockholm Syndrome produces an unhealthy bond with the controller and abuser. It is the reason 
   many victims continue to support an abuser after the relationship is over. It's also the reason they 
   continue to see "the good side" of an abusive individual and appear sympathetic to someone who has 
   mentally and sometimes physically abused them. 
   Is There Something Else Involved? 
   In a short response - Yes! Throughout history, people have found themselves supporting and participating 
   in life situations that range from abusive to bizarre. In talking to these active and willing participants 
   in bad and bizarre situations, it is clear they have developed feelings and attitudes that support 
   their participation. One way these feelings and thoughts are developed is known as "cognitive dissonance". 
   As you can tell, psychologists have large words and phrases for just about everything. 
   "Cognitive Dissonance" explains how and why people change their ideas and opinions to support 
   situations that do not appear to be healthy, positive, or normal. In the theory, an individual seeks 
   to reduce information or opinions that make him or her uncomfortable. When we have two sets of cognitions 
   (knowledge, opinion, feelings, input from others, etc.) that are the opposite, the situation becomes 
   emotionally uncomfortable. Even though we might find ourselves in a foolish or difficult situation 
   - few want to admit that fact. Instead, we attempt to reduce the dissonance - the fact that our cognitions 
   don't match, agree, or make sense when combined. "Cognitive Dissonance" can be reduced by adding 
   new cognitions - adding new thoughts and attitudes. Some examples: 
   
      - Heavy smokers know smoking causes lung cancer and multiple health risks. To continue smoking, 
      the smoker changes his cognitions (thoughts/feelings) such as 1) "I'm smoking less than ten years 
      ago", 2) "I'm smoking low-tar cigarettes", 3) "Those statistics are made up by the cancer industry 
      conspiracy", or 4) "Something's got to get you anyway!" These new cognitions/attitudes allow them 
      to keep smoking and actually begin blaming restaurants for being unfair. 
 
      - You purchase a $40,000.00 Sport Utility Vehicle that gets 8 miles a gallon. You justify the 
      expense and related issues with 1) "It's great on trips" (you take one trip per year), 2) "I can 
      use it to haul stuff" (one coffee table in 12 months), and 3) "You can carry a lot of people in 
      it" (95% of your trips are driver-only). 
 
      - Your husband/boyfriend becomes abusive and assaultive. You can't leave due to the finances, 
      children, or other factors. Through cognitive dissonance, you begin telling yourself "He only 
      hits me open-handed" and "He's had a lot of stress at work." 
 
   
   Leon Festinger first coined the term "Cognitive Dissonance". He had observed a cult (1956) in 
   which members gave up their homes, incomes, and jobs to work for the cult. This cult believed in 
   messages from outer space that predicted the day the world would end by a flood. As cult members 
   and firm believers, they believed they would be saved by flying saucers at the appointed time. As 
   they gathered and waited to be taken by flying saucers at the specified time, the end-of-the-world 
   came and went. No flood and no flying saucer! Rather than believing they were foolish after all that 
   personal and emotional investment - they decided their beliefs had actually saved the world from 
   the flood and they became firmer in their beliefs after the failure of the prophecy. The moral: the 
   more you invest (income, job, home, time, effort, etc.) the stronger your need to justify your position. 
   If we invest $5.00 in a raffle ticket, we justify losing with "I'll get them next time". If you invest 
   everything you have, it requires an almost unreasoning belief and unusual attitude to support and 
   justify that investment.  
   Studies tell us we are more loyal and committed to something that is difficult, uncomfortable, 
   and even humiliating. The initiation rituals of college fraternities, Marine boot camp, and graduate 
   school all produce loyal and committed individuals. Almost any ordeal creates a bonding experience. 
   Every couple, no matter how mismatched, falls in love in the movies after going through a terrorist 
   takeover, being stalked by a killer, being stranded on an island, or being involved in an alien abduction. 
   Investment and an ordeal are ingredients for a strong bonding - even if the bonding is unhealthy. 
   No one bonds or falls in love by being a member of the Automobile Club or a music CD club. Struggling 
   to survive on a deserted island - you bet! 
   Abusive relationships produce a great amount on unhealthy investment in both parties. In many 
   cases we tend to remain and support the abusive relationship due to our investment in the relationship. 
   Try telling a new Marine that since he or she has survived boot camp, they should now enroll in the 
   National Guard! Several types of investments keep us in the bad relationship: 
   
      - Emotional Investment 
 
      - We've invested so many emotions, cried so much, and worried so much that we feel we must see 
      the relationship through to the finish. 
 
      - Social Investment 
 
      - We've got our pride! To avoid social embarrassment and uncomfortable social situations, we 
      remain in the relationship. 
 
      - Family Investments 
 
      - If children are present in the relationship, decisions regarding the relationship are clouded 
      by the status and needs of the children. 
 
      - Financial Investment 
 
      - In many cases, the controlling and abusive partner has created a complex financial situation. 
      Many victims remain in a bad relationship, waiting for a better financial situation to develop 
      that would make their departure and detachment easier. 
 
      - Lifestyle Investment 
 
      - Many controlling/abusive partners use money or a lifestyle as an investment. Victims in this 
      situation may not want to lose their current lifestyle. 
 
      - Intimacy Investment 
 
      - We often invest emotional and sexual intimacy. Some victims have experienced a destruction 
      of their emotional and/or sexual self-esteem in the unhealthy relationship. The abusing partner 
      may threaten to spread rumors or tell intimate details or secrets. A type of blackmail using intimacy 
      is often found in these situations. 
 
   
   In many cases, it's not simply our feelings for an individual that keep us in an unhealthy relationship 
   - it's often the amount of investment. Relationships are complex and we often only see the tip of 
   the iceberg in public. For this reason, the most common phrase offered by the victim in defense of 
   their unhealthy relationship is "You just don't understand!" 
   Combining Two Unhealthy Conditions 
   The combination of "Stockholm Syndrome" and "cognitive dissonance" produces a victim who firmly 
   believes the relationship is not only acceptable, but also desperately needed for their survival. 
   The victim feels they would mentally collapse if the relationship ended. In long-term relationships, 
   the victims have invested everything and placed "all their eggs in one basket". The relationship 
   now decides their level of self-esteem, self-worth, and emotional health. 
   For reasons described above, the victim feels family and friends are a threat to the relationship 
   and eventually to their personal health and existence. The more family/friends protest the controlling 
   and abusive nature of the relationship, the more the victim develops cognitive dissonance and becomes 
   defensive. At this point, family and friends become victims of the abusive and controlling individual.
   
   Importantly, both Stockholm Syndrome and cognitive dissonance develop on an involuntary basis. 
   The victim does not purposely invent this attitude. Both develop as an attempt to exist and survive 
   in a threatening and controlling environment and relationship. Despite what we might think, our loved 
   one is not in the unhealthy relationship to irritate us, embarrass us, or drive us to drink. What 
   might have begun as a normal relationship has turned into a controlling and abusive situation. They 
   are trying to survive. Their personality is developing the feelings and thoughts needed to survive 
   the situation and lower their emotional and physical risks. All of us have developed attitudes and 
   feelings that help us accept and survive situations. We have these attitudes/feelings about our jobs, 
   our community, and other aspects of our life. As we have found throughout history, the more dysfunctional 
   the situation, the more dysfunctional our adaptation and thoughts to survive. The victim is engaged 
   in an attempt to survive and make a relationship work. Once they decide it doesn't work and can't 
   be fixed, they will need our support as we patiently await their decision to return to a healthy 
   and positive lifestyle. 
   Family and Friends of the Victim 
   When a family is confronted with a loved one involved with a 'Loser' or controlling/abusive individual, 
   the situation becomes emotionally painful and socially difficult for the family. (See "
   Are You Dating 
   a Loser? Identifying Losers, Controllers and Abusers ".) While each situation is different, some 
   general guidelines to consider are: 
   
      - Your loved one, the "victim" of the Loser/Abuser, has probably been given a choice - the relationship 
      or the family. This choice is made more difficult by the control and intimidation often present 
      in abusive/controlling relationships. Knowing that choosing the family will result in severe personal 
      and social consequences, the family always comes in second. Keep in mind that the victim knows 
      in their heart the family will always love them and accept their return - whenever the return 
      happens. 
 
      - Remember, the more you pressure the "victim" of the Loser/Abuser, the more you prove their 
      point. Your loved one is being told the family is trying to ruin their wonderful relationship. 
      Pressure in the form of contacts, comments, and communications will be used as evidence against 
      you. An invitation to a Tupperware party is met with "You see! They just want to get you by yourself 
      so they can tell you bad things about me!" Increasing your contacts is viewed as "putting pressure" 
      on their relationship - not being lovingly concerned. 
 
      - Your contacts with your loved one, no matter how routine and loving, may be met with anger 
      and resentment. This is because each contact may prompt the Loser/Abuser to attack them verbally 
      or emotionally. Imagine getting a four-hour lecture every time your Aunt Gladys calls. In a short 
      time, you become angry each time she calls, knowing what the contact will produce in your home. 
      The longer Aunt Gladys talks - the longer your lecture becomes! Thus, when Aunt Gladys calls, 
      you want to get her off the phone as quickly as possible. 
 
      - The 1980's song, "Hold on Loosely", may be the key to a good family and friend approach. Holding 
      on too tightly produces more pressure. When the victim is out of the home, it's often best to 
      establish predictable, scheduled contacts. Calling every Wednesday evening, just for a status 
      report or to go over current events, is less threatening than random calls during the week. Random 
      calls are always viewed as "checking up on us" calls. While you may encounter an answering machine, 
      leave a polite and loving message. Importantly, don't discuss the relationship (the controller 
      may be listening!) unless the victim brings it up. The goal of these scheduled calls is to maintain 
      contact, remind your loved one that you are always there to help, and to quietly remind the controller 
      that family and loved ones are nearby and haven't disappeared. 
 
      - Try to maintain traditional and special contacts with your loved one - holidays, special occasions, 
      etc. Keep your contacts short and brief, with no comments that can be used as evidence. Contacts 
      made at "traditional" times - holidays, birthdays, anniversaries, etc. - are not as threatening 
      to a controller/abuser. Contacts that provide information, but not questions, are also not as 
      threatening. An example might be a simple card reading "Just a note to let you know that your 
      brother landed a new job this week. You might see him on a Wal-Mart commercial any day now. Love, 
      Mom and Dad". This approach allows the victim to recognize that the family is there - waiting 
      in the wings if needed. It also lessens the lectures/tantrums provided by the Loser as the contacts 
      are on a traditional and expected basis. It's also hard to be angry about brother's new job without 
      looking ridiculous. Also, don't invent holidays or send a reminder that it's Sigmund Freud's birthday. 
      That's suspicious…even in my family. 
 
      - Remember that there are many channels of communication. It's important that we keep a channel 
      open if at all possible. Communication channels might include phone calls, letters, cards, and 
      e-mail. Scheduled monthly shopping trips or outings are helpful if possible. The goal is to maintain 
      contact while your loved one is involved in the controlling/abusive relationship. Remember, the 
      goal is contact, not pressure. 
 
      - Don't feel the victim's behavior is against the family or friends. It may be a form of survival 
      or a way of lowering stress. Victims may be very resistive, angry, and even hostile due to the 
      complexity of their relationship with the controller/abuser. They may even curse, threaten, and 
      accuse loved ones and friends. This hostile defensiveness is actually self-protection in the relationship 
      - an attempt to avoid "trouble". 
 
      - The victim needs to know and feel they are not rejected because of their behavior. Keep in 
      mind, they are painfully aware of their situation. They know they are being treated badly and/or 
      controlled by their partner. Frequent reminders of this will only make them want less contact. 
      We naturally avoid people who remind us of things or situations that are emotionally painful.
      
 
      - Victims may slightly open the door and provide information about their relationship or hint 
      they may be considering leaving. When the door opens, don't jump through with the Marines behind 
      you! Listen and simply offer support such as "You know your family is behind any decision you 
      need to make and at any time you make it." They may be exploring what support is available but 
      may not be ready to call in the troops just yet. Many victims use an "exit plan" that may take 
      months or even years to complete. They may be gathering information at this point, not yet ready 
      for an exit. 
 
      - We can get messages to people in two ways - the pipeline and the grapevine. The pipeline is 
      face-to-face, telling the person directly. This seldom happens in Loser situations as controllers 
      and abusers monitor and control contacts with others. However, the grapevine is still open. When 
      we use the grapevine, we send a message to our loved one through another person. Victims of controlling 
      and abusive individuals are often allowed to maintain a relationship with a few people, perhaps 
      a sibling or best friend. We can send our loved one a message through that contact person, a message 
      that voices our understanding and support. We don't send insults ("Bill is such a jerk!) or put-downs 
      ("If he doesn't get out of this relationship he'll end up crazy!) - we send messages of love and 
      support. We send "I hope she/he (victim) knows the family is concerned and that we love and support 
      them." Comments sent on the grapevine are phrased with the understanding that our loved one will 
      hear them in that manner. Don't talk with a grapevine contact to express anger and threaten to 
      hire a hit man, and then try to send a message of loving support. Be careful what and how the 
      message is provided. The grapevine contact can often get messages to the victim when we can't. 
      It's another way of letting them know we're supporting them, just waiting to help if and when 
      needed. 
 
      - Each situation is different. The family may need to seek counseling support in the community. 
      A family consultation with a mental health professional or attorney may be helpful if the situation 
      becomes legally complex or there is a significant danger of harm. 
 
      - As relatives or friends of a victim involved with a controller or abuser, our normal reaction 
      is to consider dramatic action. We become angry, resentful, and aggressive at times. Our mind 
      fills with a variety of plans that often range from rescue and kidnapping to ambushing the controller/abuser 
      with a ball bat. A rule of thumb is that any aggression toward the controller/abuser will result 
      in additional difficulties for your loved one. Try to remain calm and await an opportunity to 
      show your love and support when your loved one needs it. 
 
      - In some cases, as in teenagers and young adults, the family may still provide some financial, 
      insurance, or other support. When we receive angry responses to our phone calls, our anger and 
      resentment tells us to cut off their support. I've heard "If she's going to date that jerk, it's 
      not going to be in a car I'm paying for!" and "If he's choosing that woman over his family, he 
      can drop out of college and flip hamburgers!" Withdrawing financial support only makes your loved 
      one more dependent upon the controller/abuser. Remember, if we're aggressive by threatening, withdrawing 
      support, or pressuring - we become the threatening force, not the controller/abuser. It actually 
      moves the victim into the support of the controller. Sadly, the more of an "ordeal" they experience, 
      the more bonding takes place, as noted with both Stockholm Syndrome and cognitive dissonance.
      
 
      - As you might imagine, the combination of Stockholm Syndrome and cognitive dissonance may also 
      be active when our loved one is involved in cults, unusual religions, and other groups. In some 
      situations, the abuser and controller is actually a group or organization. Victims are punished 
      if they are viewed as disloyal to the group. While this article deals with individual relationships, 
      the family guidelines may also be helpful in controlling-group situations. 
 
   
   Final Thoughts 
   You may be the victim of a controlling and abusive partner, seeking an understanding of your feelings 
   and attitudes. You may have a son, daughter, or friend currently involved with a controlling and 
   abusive partner, looking for ways to understand and help. 
   If a loved one is involved with a Loser, a controlling and abusing partner, the long-term outcome 
   is difficult to determine due to the many factors involved. If their relationship is in the "dating" 
   phase, they may end the relationship on their own. If the relationship has continued for over a year, 
   they may require support and an exit plan before ending the relationship. Marriage and children further 
   complicate their ability to leave the situation. When the victim decides to end the unhappy relationship, 
   it's important that they view loved ones as supportive, loving, and understanding - not as a source 
   of pressure, guilt, or aggression. 
   This article is an attempt to understand the complex feelings and attitudes that are as puzzling 
   to the victim as they are to family and friends. Separately, I've outlined recommendations for detaching 
   from a Loser or controlling/abusive individual, but clearly, there are more victims in this situation. 
   (See " Are You 
   Dating a Loser? Identifying Losers, Controllers and Abusers ".) It is hoped this article is helpful 
   to family and friends who worry, cry, and have difficulty understanding the situation of their loved 
   one. It has been said that knowledge is power. Hopefully this knowledge will prove helpful and powerful 
   to victims and their loved ones. 
   Please consider this article as a general guideline. Some recommendations may be appropriate and 
   helpful while some may not apply to a specific situation. In many cases, we may need additional professional 
   help of a mental health or legal nature. 
   
  
   
 
!--
 
!--
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
                        
 
 
                           
                           [–]
dopebojangles
ADoNM 
                           with BPD
3 points
4 
                           points
5 points
                           1 year ago
 
(0 
                           children)
                           
                           
                           
 
 
 
 
 
                        
 
 
                           
                           [–]
rammaam
1 point
2 
                           points
3 points
                           1 year ago
 
(0 
                           children)
                           
                           
                           
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
               
 
 
                  
                  [–]
[deleted]
4 points
5 
                  points
6 points
                  1 year ago
 
(0 
                  children)
                  
                  
                  
 
 
 
 
 
               
 
 
                  
                  [–]
[deleted]
3 points
4 
                  points
5 points
                  1 year ago
 
(0 
                  children)
                  
                  
                  
 
 
 
 
 
               
 
 
                  
                  [–]
Sub_Salac
3 points
4 points
5 
                  points
                  1 year ago
 
(0 
                  children)
                  
                  
                  
 
 
 
 
 
               
 
 
                  
                  [–]
throwaway98721214
ACoN 
                  now NC with the entire FOO.
2 points
3 points
4 
                  points
                  1 year ago
 
(3 
                  children)
                  
                  
                  
 
 
                        
 
 
                           
                           [–]
KissMyAspergers
NAunt, 
                           Parent(s) with FLEAS
1 point
2 
                           points
3 points
                           1 year ago
 
(2 
                           children)
                           
                           
                           
 
 
                                 
 
 
                                    
                                    [–]
1234567ate
Nmom, 
                                    Edad, SGsis
2 points
3 
                                    points
4 points
                                    1 year ago
 
(1 
                                    child)
                                    
                                    
                                    
 
 
                                          
 
 
                                             
                                             [–]
KissMyAspergers
NAunt, 
                                             Parent(s) with FLEAS
2 points
3 
                                             points
4 points
                                             1 year ago
 
(0 
                                             children)
                                             
                                             
                                             
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
               
 
 
                  
                  [–]
ArabRedditor
2 points
3 points
4 
                  points
                  1 year ago
 
(0 
                  children)
                  
                  
                  
 
 
 
 
 
               
 
 
                  
                  [–]
Dotdotbludot
2 points
3 points
4 
                  points
                  1 year ago
 
(0 
                  children)
                  
                  
                  
 
 
 
 
 
               
 
 
                  
                  [–]
PagingDrLector
2 points
3 points
4 
                  points
                  1 year ago
 
(0 
                  children)
                  
                  
                  
 
 
 
 
 
               
 
 
                  
                  [–]
modecat
forging 
                  a new path
2 
                  points
3 points
4 
                  points
                  1 year ago
 
(0 
                  children)
                  
                  
                  
 
 
 
 
 
               
 
 
                  
                  [–]
jm_kaye
1 point
2 points
3 
                  points
                  1 year ago
 
(1 
                  child)
                  
                  
                  
 
 
                        
 
 
                           
                           [–]
modecat
forging 
                           a new path
2 points
3 
                           points
4 points
                           1 year ago
 
(0 
                           children)
                           
                           
                           
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
               
 
 
                  
                  [–]
ArtichokeOwl
1 point
2 points
3 
                  points
                  1 year ago
 
(0 
                  children)
                  
                  
                  
 
 
 
 
 
               
 
 
                  
                  [–]
KissMyAspergers
NAunt, 
                  Parent(s) with FLEAS
1 point
2 points
3 
                  points
                  1 year ago
 
(0 
                  children)
                  
                  
                  
 
 
 
 
 
               
 
 
                  
                  [–]
DmKrispin
ADoNM
-1 points
0 points
1 
                  point
                  1 year ago
 
(0 
                  children)
                  
               
 
Notable quotes:
"... Narcissism   is a defense mechanism whose role is to deflect hurt and trauma                    from the victim's "True Self" into a "  False                    Self  " which is omnipotent, invulnerable, and omniscient. This False Self is                    then used by the narcissist to garner narcissistic supply from his human                    environment. Narcissistic supply is any form of attention, both positive and                    negative and it is instrumental in the regulation of the narcissist's labile sense                    of self-worth.  ..."
  Dr. Sam Vaknin, Ph.D 
   
 January 28, 2012 
   
               
                  Barack Obama
 appears to be a
                  
                  narcissist
. Granted, only a qualified mental health diagnostician (which I am 
                  not) can determine whether someone suffers from
                  
                  Narcissistic Personality Disorder
 (NPD) and this, following lengthy tests and 
                  personal interviews. But, in the absence of access to Barack Obama, one has to 
                  rely on his overt performance and on testimonies by his closest, nearest and 
                  dearest.
Narcissistic leaders are nefarious and their effects pernicious. They 
                  are subtle, refined, socially-adept, manipulative, possessed of thespian skills, 
                  and convincing. Both types equally lack empathy and are ruthless and relentless or 
                  driven.
                  
Perhaps it is time to require each candidate to high office in the USA to 
                  submit to a rigorous physical and mental checkup with the results made public.
                  
I. Upbringing and Childhood
                  
Obama's early life was decidedly chaotic and replete with traumatic and 
                  mentally bruising dislocations. Mixed-race marriages were even less common then. 
                  His parents went through a divorce when he was an infant (two years old). Obama 
                  saw his father only once again, before he died in a car accident. Then, his mother 
                  re-married and Obama had to relocate to
                  
                  Indonesia
: a foreign land with a radically foreign culture, to be raised by a 
                  step-father. At the age of ten, he was whisked off to live with his maternal 
                  (white) grandparents. He saw his mother only intermittently in the following few 
                  years and then she vanished from his life in 1979. She died of cancer in 1995.
                  
Pathological narcissism is a reaction to prolonged abuse and trauma in early 
                  childhood or early adolescence. The source of the abuse or trauma is immaterial: 
                  the perpetrators could be dysfunctional or absent parents, teachers, other adults, 
                  or peers.
                  
II. Behavior Patterns
                  
The narcissist:
                  
* Feels grandiose and self-important (e.g., exaggerates accomplishments, 
                  talents, skills, contacts, and personality traits to the point of lying, demands 
                  to be recognised as superior without commensurate achievements);
                  
* Is obsessed with fantasies of unlimited success, fame, fearsome power or 
                  omnipotence, unequalled brilliance (the cerebral narcissist), bodily beauty or 
                  sexual performance (the somatic narcissist), or ideal, everlasting, all-conquering 
                  love or passion;
                  
* Firmly convinced that he or she is unique and, being special, can only be 
                  understood by, should only be treated by, or associate with, other special or 
                  unique, or high-status people (or institutions);
                  
* Requires excessive admiration, adulation, attention and affirmation â€" or, 
                  failing that, wishes to be feared and to be notorious (
Narcissistic 
                  Supply
);
                  
* Feels entitled. Demands automatic and full compliance with his or her 
                  unreasonable expectations for special and favourable priority treatment;
                  
* Is "interpersonally exploitative", i.e., uses others to achieve his or her 
                  own ends;
                  
* Devoid of empathy. Is unable or unwilling to identify with, acknowledge, or 
                  accept the feelings, needs, preferences, priorities, and choices of others;
                  
* Constantly envious of others and seeks to hurt or destroy the objects of his 
                  or her frustration. Suffers from persecutory (paranoid) delusions as he or she 
                  believes that they feel the same about him or her and are likely to act similarly;
                  
* Behaves arrogantly and haughtily. Feels superior, omnipotent, omniscient, 
                  invincible, immune, "above the law", and omnipresent (
magical 
                  thinking
). Rages when frustrated, contradicted, or confronted by people he or 
                  she considers inferior to him or her and unworthy.
                  
                  
                  
Narcissism
 is a defense mechanism whose role is to deflect hurt and trauma 
                  from the victim's "True Self" into a "
False 
                  Self
" which is omnipotent, invulnerable, and omniscient. This False Self is 
                  then used by the narcissist to garner narcissistic supply from his human 
                  environment. Narcissistic supply is any form of attention, both positive and 
                  negative and it is instrumental in the regulation of the narcissist's labile sense 
                  of self-worth.
                  
Perhaps the most immediately evident trait of patients with Narcissistic 
                  Personality Disorder (NPD) is their vulnerability to criticism and disagreement. 
                  Subject to negative input, real or imagined, even to a mild rebuke, a constructive 
                  suggestion, or an offer to help, they feel injured, humiliated and empty and they 
                  react with disdain (devaluation), rage, and defiance.
                  
From my book "Malignant Self Love – Narcissism Revisited":
                  
                     
"To avoid such intolerable pain, some patients with Narcissistic Personality 
                     Disorder (NPD) socially withdraw and feign false modesty and humility to mask 
                     their underlying
                     
                     grandiosity
. Dysthymic and depressive disorders are common reactions to 
                     isolation and feelings of shame and inadequacy."
                     
Due to their lack of empathy, disregard for others, exploitativeness, sense 
                     of entitlement, and constant need for attention (narcissistic supply), 
                     narcissists are rarely able to maintain functional and healthy interpersonal 
                     relationships.
                     
Many narcissists are over-achievers and ambitious. Some of them are even 
                     talented and skilled. But they are incapable of team work because they cannot 
                     tolerate setbacks. They are easily frustrated and demoralized and are unable to 
                     cope with disagreement and criticism. Though some narcissists have meteoric and 
                     inspiring careers, in the long-run, all of them find it difficult to maintain 
                     long-term professional achievements and the respect and appreciation of their 
                     peers. The narcissist's fantastic grandiosity, frequently coupled with a 
                     hypomanic mood, is typically incommensurate with his or her real 
                     accomplishments (the "grandiosity gap").
                     
An important distinction is between cerebral and somatic narcissists. The 
                     cerebrals derive their Narcissistic Supply from their intelligence or academic 
                     achievements and the somatics derive their Narcissistic Supply from their 
                     physique, exercise, physical or sexual prowess and romantic or physical 
                     "conquests".
                     
Another crucial division within the ranks of patients with Narcissistic 
                     Personality Disorder (NPD) is between the classic variety (those who meet five 
                     of the nine diagnostic criteria included in the DSM), and the compensatory kind 
                     (their narcissism compensates for deep-set feelings of inferiority and lack of 
                     self-worth).
                     Obama displays the following behaviors, which are among the hallmarks of 
                     pathological narcissism:
                     
* Subtly misrepresents facts and expediently and opportunistically shifts 
                     positions, views, opinions, and "ideals" (e.g., about campaign finance, 
                     re-districting). These flip-flops do not cause him overt distress and are ego-syntonic 
                     (he feels justified in acting this way). Alternatively, reuses to commit to a 
                     standpoint and, in the process, evidences a lack of empathy.
                     
Ignores data that conflict with his fantasy world, or with his inflated and 
                     grandiose self-image. This has to do with magical thinking. Obama already sees 
                     himself as president because he is firmly convinced that his dreams, thoughts, 
                     and wishes affect reality. Additionally, he denies the gap between his 
                     fantasies and his modest or limited real-life achievements (for instance, in 12 
                     years of academic career, he hasn't published a single scholarly paper or 
                     book).
                     
– Feels that he is above the law, incl. and especially his own laws.
                     
– Talks about himself in the 3rd person singluar or uses the regal "we" and 
                     craves to be the exclusive center of attention, even adulation
                     
– Have a messianic-cosmic vision of himself and his life and his "mission".
                     
– Sets ever more complex rules in a convoluted world of grandiose fantasies 
                     with its own language (jargon)
                     
– Displays false modesty and unctuous "folksiness" but unable to sustain 
                     these behaviors (the persona, or mask) for long. It slips and the true Obama is 
                     revealed: haughty, aloof, distant, and disdainful of simple folk and their 
                     lives.
                     
– Sublimates aggression and holds grudges.
                     
– Behaves as an eternal adolescent (e.g., his choice of language, youthful 
                     image he projects, demands indulgence and feels entitled to special treatment, 
                     even though his objective accomplishments do not justify it).
                  
                  
III. Body Language
                  
Many complain of the incredible deceptive powers of the narcissist. They find 
                  themselves involved with narcissists (emotionally, in business, or otherwise) 
                  before they have a chance to discover their true character. Shocked by the later 
                  revelation, they mourn their inability to separate from the narcissist and their 
                  gullibility.
                  
Narcissists are an elusive breed, hard to spot, harder to pinpoint, impossible 
                  to capture. Even an experienced mental health diagnostician with unmitigated 
                  access to the record and to the person examined would find it fiendishly difficult 
                  to determine with any degree of certainty whether someone suffers from a full 
                  fledged Narcissistic Personality Disorder or merely possesses narcissistic traits, 
                  a narcissistic style, a personality structure ("character"), or a narcissistic 
                  "overlay" superimposed on another mental health problem.
                  
Moreover, it is important to distinguish between traits and behavior patterns 
                  that are independent of the patient's cultural-social context (i.e., which are 
                  inherent, or idiosyncratic) and reactive patterns, or conformity to cultural and 
                  social morals and norms. Reactions to severe life crises or circumstances are also 
                  often characterized by transient pathological narcissism, for instance (Ronningstam 
                  and Gunderson, 1996). But such reactions do not a narcissist make.
                  
When a person belongs to a society or culture that has often been described as 
                  narcissistic by scholars (such as Theodore Millon) and social thinkers (e.g., 
                  Christopher Lasch) how much of his behavior can be attributed to his milieu and 
                  which of his traits are really his?
                  
The Narcissistic Personality Disorder is rigorously defined in the DSM IV-TR 
                  with a set of strict criteria and differential diagnoses.
                  
Narcissism is regarded by many scholars to be an adaptative strategy ("healthy 
                  narcissism"). It is considered pathological in the clinical sense only when it 
                  becomes a rigid personality structure replete with a series of primitive defence 
                  mechanisms (such as splitting, projection, projective identification, or 
                  intellectualization) and when it leads to dysfunctions in one or more areas of the 
                  patient's life.
                  
Pathological narcissism is the art of deception. The narcissist projects a 
                  False Self and manages all his social interactions through this concocted 
                  fictional construct.
                  
When the narcissist reveals his true colors, it is usually far too late. His 
                  victims are unable to separate from him. They are frustrated by this acquired 
                  helplessness and angry at themselves for having they failed to see through the 
                  narcissist earlier on.
                  
But the narcissist does emit subtle, almost subliminal, signals ("presenting 
                  symptoms") even in a first or casual encounter. Compare the following list to 
                  Barack Obama's body language during his paublic appearances.
                  
These are:
                  
"Haughty" body language. The narcissist adopts a physical posture which implies 
                  and exudes an air of superiority, seniority, hidden powers, mysteriousness, amused 
                  indifference, etc. Though the narcissist usually maintains sustained and piercing 
                  eye contact, he often refrains from physical proximity (he is "territorial").
                  
The narcissist takes part in social interactions, even mere banter, 
                  condescendingly, from a position of supremacy and faux "magnanimity and largesse". 
                  But he rarely mingles socially and prefers to remain the "observer", or the "lone 
                  wolf".
                  
Entitlement markers. The narcissist immediately asks for "special treatment" of 
                  some kind. Not to wait his turn, to have a longer or a shorter therapeutic 
                  session, to talk directly to authority figures (and not to their assistants or 
                  secretaries), to be granted special payment terms, to enjoy custom tailored 
                  arrangements – or to get served first.
                  
The narcissist is the one who vocally and demonstratively demands the undivided 
                  attention of the head waiter in a restaurant, or monopolizes the hostess, or 
                  latches on to celebrities in a party. The narcissist reacts with rage and 
                  indignantly when denied his wishes and if treated equally with others whom he 
                  deems inferior.
                  
Idealization or devaluation. The narcissist instantly idealizes or devalues his 
                  interlocutor. This depends on how the narcissist appraises the potential his 
                  converser has as a Narcissistic Supply Source. The narcissist flatters, adores, 
                  admires and applauds the "target" in an embarrassingly exaggerated and profuse 
                  manner or sulks, abuses, and humiliates her.
                  
Narcissists are polite only in the presence of a potential Supply Source. But 
                  they are unable to sustain even perfunctory civility and fast deteriorate to barbs 
                  and thinly-veiled hostility, to verbal or other violent displays of abuse, rage 
                  attacks, or cold detachment.
                  
The "membership" posture. The narcissist always tries to "belong". Yet, at the 
                  very same time, he maintains his stance as an outsider. The narcissist seeks to be 
                  admired for his ability to integrate and ingratiate himself without investing the 
                  efforts commensurate with such an undertaking.
                  
For instance: if the narcissist talks to a psychologist, the narcissist first 
                  states emphatically that he never studied psychology. He then proceeds to make 
                  seemingly effortless use of obscure professional terms, thus demonstrating that he 
                  mastered the discipline all the same, as an autodidact, which proves that he is 
                  exceptionally intelligent or introspective.
                  
In general, the narcissist always prefers show-off to substance. One of the 
                  most effective methods of exposing a narcissist is by trying to delve deeper. The 
                  narcissist is shallow, a pond pretending to be an ocean. He likes to think of 
                  himself as a Renaissance man, a Jack of all trades. The narcissist never admits to 
                  ignorance in any field yet, typically, he is ignorant of them all. It is 
                  surprisingly easy to penetrate the gloss and the veneer of the narcissist's 
                  self-proclaimed omniscience.
                  
Bragging and false autobiography. The narcissist brags incessantly. His speech 
                  is peppered with "I", "my", "myself", and "mine". He describes himself as 
                  intelligent, or rich, or modest, or intuitive, or creative but always excessively, 
                  implausibly, and extraordinarily so.
                  
The narcissist's biography sounds unusually rich and complex. His achievements 
                  incommensurate with his age, education, or renown. Yet, his actual condition is 
                  evidently and demonstrably incompatible with his claims. Very often, the 
                  narcissist lies or his fantasies are easily discernible. He always name-drops and 
                  appropriates other people's experiences and accomplishments.
                  
Emotion-free language. The narcissist likes to talk about himself and only 
                  about himself. He is not interested in others or what they have to say, unless 
                  they constitute potential Sources of Supply and in order to obtain said supply. He 
                  acts bored, disdainful, even angry, if he feels that they are intruding on his 
                  precious time and, thus, abusing him.
                  
In general, the narcissist is very impatient, easily bored, with strong 
                  attention deficits unless and until he is the topic of discussion. One can 
                  publicly dissect all aspects of the intimate life of a narcissist without 
                  repercussions, providing the discourse is not "emotionally tinted".
                  
If asked to relate directly to his emotions, the narcissist intellectualizes, 
                  rationalizes, speaks about himself in the third person and in a detached 
                  "scientific" tone or composes a narrative with a fictitious character in it, 
                  suspiciously autobiographical. Narcissists like to refer to themselves in 
                  mechanical terms, as efficient automata or machines.
                  
Seriousness and sense of intrusion and coercion. The narcissist is dead serious 
                  about himself. He may possess a subtle, wry, and riotous sense of humor, scathing 
                  and cynical, but rarely is he self-deprecating. The narcissist regards himself as 
                  being on a constant mission, whose importance is cosmic and whose consequences are 
                  global. If a scientist, he is always in the throes of revolutionizing science. If 
                  a journalist, he is in the middle of the greatest story ever. If a novelist, he is 
                  on his way to a Booker or Nobel prize.
                  
This self-misperception is not amenable to light-headedness or self-effacement. 
                  The narcissist is easily hurt and insulted (narcissistic injury). Even the most 
                  innocuous remarks or acts are interpreted by him as belittling, intruding, or 
                  coercive. His time is more valuable than others' therefore, it cannot be wasted on 
                  unimportant matters such as mere banter or going out for a walk.
                  
Any suggested help, advice, or concerned inquiry are immediately cast by the 
                  narcissist as intentional humiliation, implying that the narcissist is in need of 
                  help and counsel and, thus, imperfect and less than omnipotent. Any attempt to set 
                  an agenda is, to the narcissist, an intimidating act of enslavement. In this 
                  sense, the narcissist is both schizoid and paranoid and often entertains ideas of 
                  reference.
                  
These, the lack of empathy, the aloofness, the disdain, the sense of 
                  entitlement, the constricted sense of humor, the unequal treatment and the 
                  paranoia render the narcissist a social misfit. The narcissist is able to provoke 
                  in his milieu, in his casual acquaintances, even in his psychotherapist, the 
                  strongest, most avid and furious hatred and revulsion. To his shock, indignation 
                  and consternation, he invariably induces in others unbridled aggression.
                  
He is perceived to be asocial at best and, often, antisocial. This, perhaps, is 
                  the strongest presenting symptom. One feels ill at ease in the presence of a 
                  narcissist for no apparent reason. No matter how charming, intelligent, thought 
                  provoking, outgoing, easy going and social the narcissist is – he fails to secure 
                  the sympathy of others, a sympathy he is never ready, willing, or able to 
                  reciprocate.
                  
IV. Narcissistic and psychopathic Leaders
                  
The narcissistic or psychopathic leader is the culmination and reification of 
                  his period, culture, and civilization. He is likely to rise to prominence in 
                  narcissistic societies.
                  
The malignant narcissist invents and then projects a false, fictitious, self 
                  for the world to fear, or to admire. He maintains a tenuous grasp on reality to 
                  start with and this is further exacerbated by the trappings of power. The 
                  narcissist's grandiose self-delusions and fantasies of omnipotence and omniscience 
                  are supported by real life authority and the narcissist's predilection to surround 
                  himself with obsequious sycophants.
                  
The narcissist's personality is so precariously balanced that he cannot 
                  tolerate even a hint of criticism and disagreement. Most narcissists are paranoid 
                  and suffer from ideas of reference (the delusion that they are being mocked or 
                  discussed when they are not). Thus, narcissists often regard themselves as 
                  "victims of persecution".
                  
The narcissistic leader fosters and encourages a personality cult with all the 
                  hallmarks of an institutional religion: priesthood, rites, rituals, temples, 
                  worship, catechism, mythology. The leader is this religion's ascetic saint. He 
                  monastically denies himself earthly pleasures (or so he claims) in order to be 
                  able to dedicate himself fully to his calling.
                  
The narcissistic leader is a monstrously inverted Jesus, sacrificing his life 
                  and denying himself so that his people – or humanity at large – should benefit. By 
                  surpassing and suppressing his humanity, the narcissistic leader became a 
                  distorted version of Nietzsche's "superman".
                  
But being a-human or super-human also means being a-sexual and a-moral.
                  
In this restricted sense, narcissistic leaders are post-modernist and moral 
                  relativists. They project to the masses an androgynous figure and enhance it by 
                  engendering the adoration of nudity and all things "natural" – or by strongly 
                  repressing these feelings. But what they refer to as "nature" is not natural at 
                  all.
                  
The narcissistic leader invariably proffers an aesthetic of decadence and evil 
                  carefully orchestrated and artificial – though it is not perceived this way by him 
                  or by his followers. Narcissistic leadership is about reproduced copies, not about 
                  originals. It is about the manipulation of symbols – not about veritable atavism 
                  or true conservatism.
                  
In short: narcissistic leadership is about theatre, not about life. To enjoy 
                  the spectacle (and be subsumed by it), the leader demands the suspension of 
                  judgment, depersonalization, and de-realization. Catharsis is tantamount, in this 
                  narcissistic dramaturgy, to self-annulment.
                  
Narcissism is nihilistic not only operationally, or ideologically. Its very 
                  language and narratives are nihilistic. Narcissism is conspicuous nihilism – and 
                  the cult's leader serves as a role model, annihilating the Man, only to re-appear 
                  as a pre-ordained and irresistible force of nature.
                  
Narcissistic leadership often poses as a rebellion against the "old ways" – 
                  against the hegemonic culture, the upper classes, the established religions, the 
                  superpowers, the corrupt order. Narcissistic movements are puerile, a reaction to 
                  narcissistic injuries inflicted upon a narcissistic (and rather psychopathic) 
                  toddler nation-state, or group, or upon the leader.
                  
Minorities or "others" – often arbitrarily selected – constitute a perfect, 
                  easily identifiable, embodiment of all that is "wrong". They are accused of being 
                  old, they are eerily disembodied, they are cosmopolitan, they are part of the 
                  establishment, they are "decadent", they are hated on religious and socio-economic 
                  grounds, or because of their race, sexual orientation, origin … They are 
                  different, they are narcissistic (feel and act as morally superior), they are 
                  everywhere, they are defenceless, they are credulous, they are adaptable (and thus 
                  can be co-opted to collaborate in their own destruction). They are the perfect 
                  hate figure. Narcissists thrive on hatred and pathological envy.
                  
This is precisely the source of the fascination with Hitler, diagnosed by Erich 
                  Fromm – together with Stalin – as a malignant narcissist. He was an inverted 
                  human. His unconscious was his conscious. He acted out our most repressed drives, 
                  fantasies, and wishes. He provides us with a glimpse of the horrors that lie 
                  beneath the veneer, the barbarians at our personal gates, and what it was like 
                  before we invented civilization. Hitler forced us all through a time warp and many 
                  did not emerge. He was not the devil. He was one of us. He was what Arendt aptly 
                  called the banality of evil. Just an ordinary, mentally disturbed, failure, a 
                  member of a mentally disturbed and failing nation, who lived through disturbed and 
                  failing times. He was the perfect mirror, a channel, a voice, and the very depth 
                  of our souls.
                  
The narcissistic leader prefers the sparkle and glamour of well-orchestrated 
                  illusions to the tedium and method of real accomplishments. His reign is all smoke 
                  and mirrors, devoid of substances, consisting of mere appearances and mass 
                  delusions. In the aftermath of his regime – the narcissistic leader having died, 
                  been deposed, or voted out of office – it all unravels. The tireless and constant 
                  prestidigitation ceases and the entire edifice crumbles. What looked like an 
                  economic miracle turns out to have been a fraud-laced bubble. Loosely-held empires 
                  disintegrate. Laboriously assembled business conglomerates go to pieces. "Earth 
                  shattering" and "revolutionary" scientific discoveries and theories are 
                  discredited. Social experiments end in mayhem.
                  
It is important to understand that the use of violence must be ego-syntonic. It 
                  must accord with the self-image of the narcissist. It must abet and sustain his 
                  grandiose fantasies and feed his sense of entitlement. It must conform with the 
                  narcissistic narrative.
                  
Thus, a narcissist who regards himself as the benefactor of the poor, a member 
                  of the common folk, the representative of the disenfranchised, the champion of the 
                  dispossessed against the corrupt elite – is highly unlikely to use violence at 
                  first.
                  
The pacific mask crumbles when the narcissist has become convinced that the 
                  very people he purported to speak for, his constituency, his grassroots fans, the 
                  prime sources of his narcissistic supply – have turned against him. At first, in a 
                  desperate effort to maintain the fiction underlying his chaotic personality, the 
                  narcissist strives to explain away the sudden reversal of sentiment. "The people 
                  are being duped by (the media, big industry, the military, the elite, etc.)", 
                  "they don't really know what they are doing", "following a rude awakening, they 
                  will revert to form", etc.
                  
When these flimsy attempts to patch a tattered personal mythology fail – the 
                  narcissist is injured. Narcissistic injury inevitably leads to narcissistic rage 
                  and to a terrifying display of unbridled aggression. The pent-up frustration and 
                  hurt translate into devaluation. That which was previously idealized – is now 
                  discarded with contempt and hatred.
                  
This primitive defense mechanism is called "splitting". To the narcissist, 
                  things and people are either entirely bad (evil) or entirely good. He projects 
                  onto others his own shortcomings and negative emotions, thus becoming a totally 
                  good object. A narcissistic leader is likely to justify the butchering of his own 
                  people by claiming that they intended to kill him, undo the revolution, devastate 
                  the economy, or the country, etc.
                  
The "small people", the "rank and file", the "loyal soldiers" of the narcissist 
                  – his flock, his nation, his employees – they pay the price. The disillusionment 
                  and disenchantment are agonizing. The process of reconstruction, of rising from 
                  the ashes, of overcoming the trauma of having been deceived, exploited and 
                  manipulated – is drawn-out. It is difficult to trust again, to have faith, to 
                  love, to be led, to collaborate. Feelings of shame and guilt engulf the erstwhile 
                  followers of the narcissist. This is his sole legacy: a massive post-traumatic 
                  stress disorder.
                  
DISCLAIMER
                  
I am not a mental health professional. Still, I have dedicated the last 12 
                  years to the study of personality disorders in general and the Narcissistic 
                  Personality Disorder (NPD) in particular. I have authored nine (9) books about 
                  these topics, one of which is a Barnes and Noble best-seller ("Malignant 
                  Self-love: Narcissism Revisited"). My work is widely cited in scholarly tomes and 
                  publications and in the media. My books and the content of my Web site are based 
                  on correspondence since 1996 with hundreds of people suffering from the 
                  Narcissistic Personality Disorder (narcissists) and with thousands of their family 
                  members, friends, therapists, and colleagues.
                  
                     
                        
| 
                        Sam Vaknin
 is the author of Malignant Self Love – Narcissism Revisited 
                        and After the Rain – How the West Lost the East as well as many other books 
                        and ebooks about topics in psychology, relationships, philosophy, economics, 
                        and international affairs. He served as a columnist for Central Europe 
                        Review, Global Politician, PopMatters, eBookWeb , and Bellaonline, and as a 
                        United Press International (UPI) Senior Business Correspondent. He was the 
                        editor of mental health and Central East Europe categories in The Open 
                        Directory and Suite101. Visit Sam's Web site at
                        
http://samvak.tripod.com
 
                        You can download 30 of his free ebooks in
                        
                        http://www.narcissistic-abuse.com/freebooks.html
.
 | 
                     
                  
               
 
Notable quotes:
"... His posture and his body language were louder than his empty                             words.  ..."
"... One must never underestimate the manipulative genius of pathological                             narcissists. They project such an imposing personality that it overwhelms                             those around them. Charmed by the charisma of the narcissist, people become                             like clay in his hands. They cheerfully do his bidding and delight to be                             at his service. The narcissist shapes the world around himself and reduces                             others in his own inverted image. He creates a cult of personality. His admirers                             become his co-dependents.  ..."
"... Narcissists have no interest in things that do not help them to reach                             their personal objective. They are focused on one thing alone and that is                             power. All other issues are meaningless to them and they do not want to waste                             their precious time on trivialities. Anything that does not help them is                             beneath them and do not deserve their attention.  ..."
 
   snopes.com
    
       
          
             
                
                  
                   
                      
                         
                           Dr. Vaknin states "I must confess I was impressed by Sen. Barack 
                           Obama from the first time I saw him. At first I was excited to see a black 
                           candidate. He looked youthful, spoke well, appeared to be confident - a wholesome 
                           presidential package. I was put off soon, not just because of his shallowness 
                           but also because there was an air of haughtiness in his demeanor that was 
                           unsettling. His posture and his body language were louder than his empty 
                           words. 
                           Obama's speeches are unlike any political speech we have heard in American 
                           history. Never a politician in this land had such quasi "religious" impact 
                           on so many people. The fact that Obama is a total incognito with zero accomplishment, 
                           makes this inexplicable infatuation alarming. Obama is not an ordinary man. 
                           He is not a genius. In fact he is quite ignorant on most important subjects. 
                           Barack Obama is a narcissist. Dr. Sam Vaknin, the author of 
                           the Malignant Self Love believes "Barack Obama appears to be a narcissist."
                           
                           Vaknin is a world authority on narcissism. He understands narcissism and 
                           describes the inner mind of a narcissist like no other person. When he talks 
                           about narcissism everyone listens. 
                           Vaknin says that Obama's language, posture and demeanor, and the testimonies 
                           of his closest, dearest and nearest suggest that the Senator is either a 
                           narcissist or he may have narcissistic personality disorder (NPD). Narcissists 
                           project a grandiose but false image of themselves.
....All these men had 
                           a tremendous influence over their fanciers. They created a personality cult 
                           around themselves and with their blazing speeches elevated their admirers, 
                           filled their hearts with enthusiasm and instilled in their minds a new zest 
                           for life. They gave them hope! They promised them the moon, but alas, invariably 
                           they brought them to their doom. 
                           When you are a victim of a cult of personality, you don't know it until it 
                           is too late. One determining factor in the development of NPD is childhood 
                           abuse. "Obama's early life was decidedly chaotic and replete with traumatic 
                           and mentally bruising dislocations," says Vaknin. 
                           
                              "Mixed-race marriages were even less common then. His parents went 
                              through a divorce when he was an infant (two years old). Obama saw his 
                              father only once again, before he died in a car accident. Then his mother
                              re-married and Obama had to relocate to Indonesia, a foreign 
                              land with a radically foreign culture, to be raised by a step-father. 
                              At the age of ten, he was whisked off to live with his maternal (white) 
                              grandparents. He saw his mother only intermittently in the following few 
                              years and then she vanished from his life in 1979. She died of cancer 
                              in 1995". 
                           
                           One must never underestimate the manipulative genius of pathological 
                           narcissists. They project such an imposing personality that it overwhelms 
                           those around them. Charmed by the charisma of the narcissist, people become 
                           like clay in his hands. They cheerfully do his bidding and delight to be 
                           at his service. The narcissist shapes the world around himself and reduces 
                           others in his own inverted image. He creates a cult of personality. His admirers 
                           become his co-dependents. 
                           Narcissists have no interest in things that do not help them to reach 
                           their personal objective. They are focused on one thing alone and that is 
                           power. All other issues are meaningless to them and they do not want to waste 
                           their precious time on trivialities. Anything that does not help them is 
                           beneath them and do not deserve their attention.  
 
                         
                      
                   
                
             
          
       
    
    
 
   Even as the comet that is The Donald continues to streak across the political sky-as babes peer in 
   wonder out their windows, dogs bay in fear in the night and scholars debate the source of the great 
   apparition-it's worth taking a moment to feel some compassion for the man who's causing all the mischief.
   The fact is, it can't be easy to wake up every day and discover that you're still Donald Trump. You 
   were Trump yesterday, you're Trump today, and barring some extraordinary development, you'll be Trump 
   tomorrow.
   There are, certainly, compensations to being Donald Trump. You're fabulously wealthy; you have 
   a lifetime pass to help yourself to younger and younger wives, even as you get older and older-a 
   two-way Benjamin Button dynamic that is equal parts enviable and grotesque. You own homes in Manhattan; 
   Palm Beach; upstate New York; Charlottesville, Virginia; and Rancho Palos Verdes, California; and 
   you're free to bunk down in a grand suite in practically any hotel, apartment building or resort 
   that flies the Trump flag, anywhere on the planet-and there are a lot of them.
   But none of that changes the reality of waking up every morning, looking in the bathroom mirror, 
   and seeing Donald Trump staring back at you. And no, it's not the hair; that, after all, is a choice-one 
   that may be hard for most people to understand, but a choice all the same, and there's a certain 
   who-asked-you confidence in continuing to make it. The problem with being Trump is the same thing 
   that explains the enormous fame and success of Trump: a naked neediness, a certain shamelessness, 
   an insatiable hunger to be the largest, loudest, most honkingly conspicuous presence in any room-the 
   great, braying Trumpness of Trump-and that's probably far less of a revel than it seems.
   Contented people, well-grounded people, people at ease inside their skin, just don't behave the 
   way Trump does. The shorthand-and increasingly lazy-description for Trump in recent weeks is that 
   he is the id 
   of the Republican party, and there's some truth in that. Trump indeed appears to be emotionally 
   incontinent, a man wholly without-you should pardon the expression-any psychic sphincter. The boundary 
   most people draw between thought and speech, between emotion and action, does not appear to exist 
   for Trump. He says what he wants to say, insults whom he wants to insult, and never, ever considers 
   apology or retreat.
   But that's not someone driven by the pleasures of the id-which, whatever else you can say about 
   it, is a thing of happy appetites and uncaring impulses. It's far more someone driven by the rage 
   and pain and emotional brittleness of narcissism, and everywhere in Trump's life are the signs of 
   what a fraught state of mind that can be.
   There is Trump's compulsive use of superlatives-especially when he's talking about his own accomplishments. 
   Maybe what he's building or selling really is the greatest, the grandest, the biggest, the best, 
   but if that's so, let the product do the talking. If it can't, maybe it ain't so great.
   There's the compulsive promotion of the Trump name. Other giants of commerce and industry use 
   their own names sparingly-even when they're businesspeople who have the opportunity to turn themselves 
   from a person into a brand. There is no GatesWare software, no BezosBooks.com; it's not Zuckerbook 
   you log onto a dozen times a day.
   But the Trump name is everywhere in the Trump world, and there's a reason for that. You can look 
   at something you've built with quiet pride and know it's yours, or you can look at it worriedly, 
   insecurely, fretting that someone, somewhere may not know that you created it-diminishing you in 
   the process. And so you stamp what you build with two-story letters identifying who you are- like 
   a child writing his name on a baseball glove-just to make sure there's no misunderstanding.
   On occasion, there is an almost-almost-endearing cluelessness to the primal way Trump 
   signals his pride in himself. He poses for pictures with his suit jacket flaring open, his hands 
   on his hips, index and ring fingers pointing inevitably groinward-a great-ape fitness and genital 
   display if ever there was one. After he bought the moribund Gulf+Western Building in New York City's 
   Columbus Circle, covered it in gold-colored glass, converted it into a luxury hotel and residence, 
   and reinforced it with steel and concrete to make it less subject to swaying in the wind, Trump boasted 
   to The New York Times that it was going to be "the stiffest building in the city." If he 
   was aware of his own psychic subtext, he gave no indication.
   It's not just real estate Trump seeks to own or at least control. There was his attempt to trademark 
   the words "You're fired," after they became a catchphrase on his reality show, The Apprentice. 
   There was his offer to donate $5 million to a charity of President Obama's choosing if Obama would 
   release his college transcripts to him, Donald Trump. In both cases, Trump wants something-possession, 
   attention, the obeisance of no less than the President-and so he demands it. The behavior is less 
   id than infant-the most narcissistic stage of the human life cycle.
   The petulance of Trump's public feuds-with Rosie ODonnell ("a total loser"), Seth Meyers ("He's 
   a stutterer"), Robert De Niro ("We're not dealing with Albert Einstein") and Arianna Huffington, 
   ("Unattractive both inside and out. I fully understand why her former husband left her for a man 
   . . .")-is wholly of a piece with the fragility of the narcissistic ego. In Trump's imaginings, it 
   is Fox News's Megyn Kelly who owes him an apology for asking pointed questions during the Republican 
   debate, not Trump who owes Kelly an apology for his boorish behavior and
   school-yard Tweets ("Wow,
   
    @  megynkelly  really 
   bombed tonight. People are going wild on twitter! Funny to watch"). As for his sneering misogyny-his 
   reference to blood coming out of Kelly's "wherever"? Nothing to see here. It's Jeb Bush
   
   who really should apologize to women for his comments about defunding Planned Parenthood.
   Trump was right on that score; Bush was indeed clueless to suggest that the annual cost of protecting 
   women's health should not be as high as $500 million-or just over $3.14 per American woman per year. 
   So Bush did what people with at least some humility do: He acknowledged his mistake and
   
   at least tried to qualify the statement. That option, however, is closed for the narcissist. 
   The overweening ego that defines the condition is often just a bit of misdirection intended to conceal 
   the exact opposite-a deep well of insecurity and even self-loathing. Any admission of wrong shatters 
   that masquerade.
   To call Donald Trump a narcissist is, of course, to state the clinically obvious. There 
   is the egotism of narcissism, the grandiosity of narcissism, the social obtuseness of narcissism. 
   But if Trump is an easy target, he is also a pitiable one. Narcissism isn't easy, it isn't fun, it 
   isn't something to be waved off as a personal shortcoming that hurts only the narcissists themselves, 
   any more than you can look at the drunk or philanderer or compulsive gambler and not see grief and 
   regret in his future.
   For now, yes, the Trump show is fun to watch. It will be less so if the carnival barker 
   with his look-at-me antics continues to distract people from a serious discussion of important issues. 
   It will be less still if Trump actually does wind up as the nominee of a major political party or 
   mounts an independent campaign and succeeds in tipping the vote one way or the other.
   But that kind of triumph is not the fate that awaits most narcissists. Their act becomes 
   old, their opponents become bold, and the audience-inevitably-moves onto something else. Trump the 
   phenomenon will surely become Trump the afterthought. He is a man who desperately hungers for respect 
   and attention and who, by dint of that very desperation, will likely wind up with neither. The pain 
   will be his; the relief will be ours.
   Adapted from 
   The Narcissist 
   Next Door: Understanding the Monster in Your Family, in Your Office, in Your Bed-in Your World
   by Jeffrey Kluger by arrangement with Riverhead Books, a member of Penguin Group (USA) LLC, Copyright 
   © 2015 by Jeffrey Kluger. 
    
    
    
    
   
    
 
   There's more than a few examples of the archetype doing the rounds at the moment, from the three 
   lovably awful kids in Amazon's brilliant "Transparent" to the title character of Alex Ross Perry's 
   brilliant "Listen Up Philip," which opened in limited release last Friday and will continue to expand 
   in the coming weeks. Said archetype is of course often complex, and "asshole" frequently doesn't 
   cover it. These characters often are masking deep pain, insecurity, self-doubt and or misplaced arrogance. 
   But we know these types and while often not likable, they're real and often quite hilariously awful.
    So, to mark the release of "Listen Up Philip," which features a deliciously prickly Jason Schwartzman 
   in the lead as a egocentric young writer who damages all his relationships, romantic or otherwise, 
   we thought we'd pick out ten of our favorite self-absorbed, unpleasant and yet curiously watchable 
   characters to go alongside his great turn in the aforementioned film. It should be noted that most 
   of our examples come from the last decade or two, but that's not entirely surprising, given that 
   we're arguably living in the most self-obsessed, insular age in human history (this is of course 
   the era of the selfie). Take a look at our picks below, and let us know your favorites in the comments 
   section.
   Sweet and Lowdown
   Sean Penn as Emmett Ray in "Sweet & Lowdown" (2000)
   Woody Allen is an obvious touchstone for "Listen Up Philip" ("Husbands And Wives" is named specifically 
   by Ross Perry, and Sydney Pollack's character in that arguably qualifies for this list too), and 
   Allen's certainly representative of self-absorption. But none of his creations have been more self-absorbed, 
   or more asshole-y, than Sean Penn's central figure in "Sweet & Lowdown." The role of Emmet Ray, a 
   reasonably well-known, heavy-drinking, scumbag of a jazz guitarist whose life is continually overshadowed 
   by that of his idol Django Reinhardt, was originally penned by Allen (under the original title of 
   "The Jazz Baby," back in the early 1970s) to be played by the writer/director, but after nearly thirty 
   years in a drawer, went to Penn (though Johnny Depp was also reportedly considered). And it's hard 
   to imagine anyone doing a better job. Penn brings a mix of swagger and deeply insecure neuroticism 
   that makes him very much a creation of Allen, but one that doesn't simply echo the filmmaker in the 
   manner of so many of his leading-men surrogates. As with the lead of another later film about a guitarist, 
   the Coens' "Inside Llewyn Davis," Ray is talented, but enough of a fuck-up (drunken, a sometime pimp, 
   kind of a coward, tight with money, and with a self-inflated view of his own "genius") that he'll 
   never make the kind of impact that he'd like to. And when potential redemption comes along in the 
   shape of Samantha Morton's sweet, mute Hattie, he throws it away in order to marry socialite Uma 
   Thurman. And when he's dumped by her, he's stunned when Hattie's moved on. He's almost irredeemably 
   awful, and yet Penn's performance, one of his very best, manages to find pathos, as well as a pleasing 
   level of comedy, in the character, the kind of thing the actor doesn't get to do enough.
    
   The Life Aquatic
   Bill Murray as Steve Zissou in "The Life Aquatic With Steve Zissou" (2004)
   Wes Anderson characters can generally be grouped under the banner of "self-regarding" to one degree 
   or another, from Max in "Rushmore" to even the animated Mr. Fox. But his prize asshole might just 
   be Steve Zissou, in Anderson's fourth film. An oceanographer and documentary maker modelled loosely 
   after Jacques Cousteau, Zissou is a man whose limited fame and prestige has gone very much to his 
   head, who drags his inexplicably loyal crew on an Ahab-ish revenge trip against the shark that ate 
   his long-time partner (Seymour Cassel). He has a certain affection for the people he travels with 
   (he does at least launch a rescue mission when even hated insurance company employee Bud Cort is 
   captured by pirates), but is resolutely unlovable otherwise, particularly in his relations with basically 
   everyone, from consistently hitting on pregnant reporter Jane (Cate Blanchett), treating Klaus (Willem 
   Dafoe) like a bullied lapdog, or feuding childishly with his maybe-son Ned (Owen Wilson), who's eventually 
   killed in a helicopter crash on the hunt for the shark. Anderson's characters, even cantankerous 
   assholes like Royal Tenenbaum, usually find some form of redemption, but there's surprisingly little 
   for Zissou: Ned, who turns out not to be his son anyway, dies, and Zissou is once again acclaimed 
   at a film festival for his finished picture. It's a decidedly sour note, and perhaps one of the reasons 
   that the lavish, lovingly made 'Aquatic' is possibly Anderson's least-loved picture.
   The Social Network
   Jesse Eisenberg as Mark Zuckerberg in "The Social Network" (2010) 
   "You're going to go through life thinking that girls don't like because you're a nerd," says Rooney 
   Mara's Erica to Mark Zuckerberg (Jesse Eisenberg) at the beginning of David Fincher's Aaron Sorkin 
   penned "The Social Network." "And I want you to know, from the bottom of my heart, that that won't 
   be true. It'll be because you're an asshole." And it's perfect introduction to the condescending, 
   snobbish, ambitious, narcisisstic founder of Facebook, the website that will eventually make him 
   a billionaire. 
   And as the film goes on, Zuckerberg never exactly improves: he creates an insulting 
   blog about Erica, hacks into Harvard's network to steal photos of women to let people rate their 
   attractiveness, possibly steals the idea for his site from a trio of other students, freezes out 
   best friend Eduardo Saverin (Andrew Garfield), and ends up rich but estranged, endlessly refreshing 
   his friend request to Erica. He's selfish, self-regarding, prickly and defensive, but in the hands 
   of Eisenberg's meticulous, brilliant performance, you can also see why.
   He embodies the true revenge 
   of the nerds, a twisted and bitter one, but he's only that way because that's what he thinks he has 
   to be. As his attorney, Marylin (Rashida Jones) tells him at the film's conclusion, "you're not an 
   asshole, Mark. You're just trying so hard to be."
   A Fish Called Wanda
   Kevin Kline as Otto in "A Fish Called Wanda" (1988)
   Self-absorption is often something that seems to come with intellect, as demonstrated by the characters 
   on this list. Many of these figures genuinely are the smartest person in the room and treat anyone 
   they deem not to be on their level with according levels of contempt. Otto, in "A Fish Called Wanda," 
   is something slightly different, and all the funnier for it: he's a moron who only thinks he's the 
   smartest person in the room. The result, unusually for a broad comedy like Charles Crichton's 1988 
   hit (penned by co-star John Cleese), won Kevin Kline a Best Supporting Actor Oscar. The character 
   is the film's secret weapon, a borderline psychotic, Limey-hating dimwit with a severe inferiority 
   complex, which manifests in his continual threats to those around not to call him stupid. But as 
   his lover Wanda (Jamie Lee Curtis) tells him, "I've known sheep that could outwit you. I've worn 
   dresses with higher IQs." Otto is a man who thinks "the Gettysburg Address was where Lincoln lived," 
   that the central message of Buddhism is "every man for himself," and that the London Underground 
   is a political movement. He's the ultimate Ugly American abroad ("you are the vulgarian, you fuck," 
   he tells Cleese's Archie when he calls him on his swearing), a terrible driver with the most hilarious 
   off-putting cum face in cinematic history, and a total tour de force from Kline that still remains 
   the actor's finest hour. He's the truly hateable kind of asshole in the best possible way. It says 
   it all that, after somehow surviving being run over by a steamroller, he becomes Minister of Justice 
   in apartheid-era South Africa…
    
   Young Adult
   Charlize Theron as Mavis Gary in "Young Adult" (2011)
   Arguably Jason Reitman's best film to date, a brilliant gender-swapped inversion of the arrested-development 
   theme that's dominated the comedy movie in the last decade or so, "Young Adult" revolves around a 
   titanic performance from Charlize Theron, playing one of the most unrepentantly unlikable, unchangeable 
   characters in recent cinema. Theron, arguably in a career-best turn, plays Mavis, a divorced writer 
   of the teen-aimed books whose series has just been cancelled. On a whim, she returns to her small 
   Minnesota hometown in an attempt to win back her high-school sweetheart (Patrick Wilson), who's just 
   a had baby with his wife (Elizabeth Reaser). Mavis is clearly having some kind of deluded break with 
   reality, but part of the brilliance of Theron's performance is how unquestioning she is of herself: 
   a Mean Girl grown up, chasing simpler times when she ruled the world, and prepared to do just about 
   anything to get there. Theron never courts your sympathy, but there's still a deep sadness in Mavis' 
   absolute lack of self-reflection, not least when she's comes close to a breakthrough, only to be 
   talked out of it by one of her few remaining admirers (a brilliant Colette Wolfe). People talked 
   about her bravery in changing her appearance for her Oscar-winning turn in "Monster," but there's 
   just as little vanity in her performance here, and the film simply wouldn't work without her.
 
    
   Baumbach Squid
   The Assorted Jerks Of Noah Baumbach
   Another obvious touchstone for "Listen Up Philip," Noah Baumbach is arguably, and we mean this in 
   the nicest way possible, the king of the self-absorbed asshole. In fact, we decided to amalgamate 
   his collected jerks into one selection, because otherwise it could have taken up half of the entire 
   list. The filmmaker's been interested in the archetype ever since his debut "Kicking And Screaming," 
   about chronically procrastinating recent college grads, but (after co-writing the script for two 
   of Wes Anderson's most self-absorbed characters with "The Life Aquatic" and "Fantastic Mr. Fox") 
   reached something of a zenith with what we like to call 'The Asshole Trilogy' : "The Squid & The 
   Whale," "Margot At The Wedding" and "Greenberg." 'Squid' is the best, as we gradually see the effects 
   of self-absorbed, generally toxic novelist Bernard (Jeff Daniels) on his son (Jesse Eisenberg) during 
   the parents' bitter divorce, ending movingly with Walt rejecting the Way Of The Jerk. 2007's 'Margot' 
   was disliked by many at the time, but has only grown in stature, with Nicole Kidman's brittle, sharp 
   turn proving to be a perfect fit for the filmmakers' world-view, appalling (but still human) as she 
   takes her frustrations in life out on her son. 2010's "Greenberg" is the least of the three, despite 
   a raw and uncompromising performance by Ben Stiller in the title role, a thwarted man-child who can't 
   see much beyond his own needs and worldview. The three films aren't the easiest watch (no wonder 
   that Baumbach's next film, the delightful "Frances Ha," felt like such a breath of fresh air), but 
   together do a pretty great job at encapsulating the era of mammoth selfishness.
   Roger Dodger
   Campbell Scott as Roger Swanson in "Roger Dodger" (2002)
   Jesse Eisenberg makes another appearance on this list (his more malevolent side in the recent "The 
   Double" could also have qualified), but for once, he's not the asshole. That would be Campbell Scott, 
   who is remarkably brilliant in Dylan Kidd's minor classic "Roger Dodger." Scott plays the titular 
   Roger Swanson, a New York ad-man who's asked by his 16-year-old nephew to help him learn how to seduce 
   women so he can lose his virginity. Roger's a self-described player and essentially a misogynist, 
   and attempts to induct his young relative in what he describes as essentially a war of the sexes. 
   A smarmy early '00s precursor to today's pick-up artist scumbags, Roger doesn't have the charm that 
   he thinks he does, particularly given that he's in an unacknowledged meltdown after being dumped 
   by lover/boss Isabella Rosselini. Like many such people, he hates almost everyone around him, but 
   no one brings out quite so much bile in him as himself, and it's this brilliant duality that makes 
   the performance one of Scott's best. Kidd's film is a woozy, witty examination of sex and masculinity, 
   and though it missteps a little towards the end in offering something of a redemption for the character, 
   it still gave us one of the more iconic cinematic douchebags of the last couple of decades.
   Rachel Getting Married
   Anne Hathaway as Kym in "Rachel Getting Married" (2008)
   We think of being an asshole as a specifically male trait, but we've already seen with "Young Adult" 
   and "Margot At The Wedding" that there's no gender divide. "Rachel Getting Married" is another great 
   example, one that's arguably sadder and psychologically richer than either. Jonathan Demme's film 
   stars a revelatory Anne Hathaway as Kym, who returns home from drug rehab to attend the wedding of 
   her sister (Rosemarie DeWitt), only for the family's long-brushed-over painful past to emerge, as 
   it tends to do in movies like this one. Kym initially seems like a comically awful person, a selfish, 
   up-staging drug addict who hijacks the rehearsal dinner to make twelve-step apologies, and who seems 
   to delight in deliberately upsetting almost anyone in her family and not accepting any blame for 
   her actions. But over time, Kym richens, as we learn that she killed her younger brother in a car 
   accident when she was high, and while that itself is clearly a terrible and selfish action, it's 
   only continued to haunt her, and Hathaway is superb in painting a picture of a woman who longs to 
   be forgiven by people who would like to, but might just find it impossible. Demme and the movie never 
   let her off the hook, but that whatever small progress she might make happens at all feels all the 
   more moving for being so hard-won.
   As Good As It Gets
   Jack Nicholson in "As Good As It Gets" (1997)
   Ol' Jack plays cantankerous assholes the way Tom Hanks plays nice guys or Tom Cruise plays people 
   who jumps off tall buildings: brilliantly, vigorously and frequently. In James L. Brooks' award-winning 
   rom-com, Nicholson builds on earlier performances like "Five Easy Pieces" "Carnal Knowledge" and 
   "Heartburn" to create something like a crown prince of unlikable fellas, OCD-suffering, racist, homophobic, 
   misogynist misanthrope novelist Melvin Udall, whose carefully controlled life is upended by the intervention 
   of gay neighbor Simon (Greg Kinnear), and single-mother waitress Carol (Helen Hunt). Nicholson might 
   be playing a slightly sitcom-ish, Archie Bunker-ish character, but the mix of his typical devilish 
   charm, smartly and sparingly used, and a detailed psychological realism that makes Melvin into more 
   than just an archetype, elevated the performance to Oscar-winning effect. Though of course it helps 
   that Nicholson is clearly relishing the lovingly and intricately-written speeches that he gets to 
   deploy ("never, never interrupt me, okay?," he tells Simon. "Not if there's a fire, not even if you 
   hear the sound of a thud from my home and one week later there's a smell coming from there that can 
   only be a decaying human body and you have to hold a hanky to your face because the stench is so 
   thick that you think you're going to faint"). There's a certain degree of cheesiness to the way that 
   Melvin softens up thanks to the love of a good woman, but Jack never makes you doubt it for a minute.
 
   Last Days of Disco
   The Many Assholes Of Whit Stillman
   Like Baumbach, Whit Stillman is a director who's made a career with characters who can't quite see 
   past their own bubble of existence (and, usually, privilege), up to and including his current Amazon 
   pilot "The Cosmopolitans." The pattern began with his debut "Metropolitan," in which Stillman favorite 
   Chris Eigeman plays arguably the platonic ideal of the director's favorite archetype, a big-mouthed 
   upper-class cynic who one can imagine going into Wall Street and essentially becoming Patrick Bateman 
   in years to come ('"the surrealists were just bunch of social climbers," he condescendingly says 
   at one point). Follow-up "Barcelona" sees Eigeman in a similarly smug role, the ugly American abroad, 
   while "The Last Days Of Disco" sees Kate Beckinsale (who's fantastic here) as a particularly callow 
   example of the type ("remember the Woodstock generation of the 1960s that were so full of themselves 
   and conceited? None of them could dance," she tells someone at one point with the naivety of youth). 
   If one was ungenerous, one could argue that the narrow worldview of his films makes Stillman and 
   his archaic language rather self-absorbed himself, but that's a misreading: Stillman is ultimately 
   a social satirist, a sort of cinematic heir to Jane Austen (whose influence is felt in his most recent 
   picture, "Damsels In Distress," more than ever), savagely poking at the ridiculous attitudes and 
   views of his characters without ever quite judging them.
   Honorable Mentions: There were various other possibilities that we dismissed as not quite being 
   quite the right brand of asshole for this specific theme: think of Kirk Douglas in "Ace In The Hole," 
   Tony Curtis and Burt Lancaster in "Sweet Smell Of Success" (too toxic), even William Atherton in 
   "Die Hard" and "Ghostbusters" (which veers closer to a simple villain). Among the ones who came closest 
   to qualifying were Ed Norton and Micheal Keaton in "Birdman" (we wrote about their self-absorbed 
   asshole-ish tendencies here), Rachel McAdams in "Mean Girls," Matt Damon in "The Departed," Paul 
   Reiser in "Aliens," Aaron Eckhart in "In The Company Of Men," and Tom Hulce in "Amadeus," along with 
   both Jason Schwartzman's villain, and arguably Michael Cera's hero, in "Scott Pilgrim Vs. The World." 
   Any others? Let us know below
 
 
   If you want observe people with narcissistic personality disorder (NPD) or strong narcissistic 
   traits, look no further than your TV set. There are many memorable movie characters who display the 
   basic characteristics of narcissism: the grandiose and overinflated sense of self, lack of empathy, 
   exploitation of others with no remorse, and excessive self-focus. Listed below are some of the more 
   well-known narcissists portrayed in the movies:
    
   Movie: The Devil Wears Prada
   Played By: Meryl Streep
   About: Now this is an NPD character that sticks with you.
    
   Movie: Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets
   Played By: Kenneth Branagh
   About: This is the definition of narcissism. Lockhart is hilarious. One of the comical moments from 
   the series is when Lockhart is talking to Harry during his detention and says "Fame is a fickle friend, 
   Harry. Celebrity is as celebrity does. Remember that." *turn and smile* He goes to such lengths as 
   to fake his fame and risk the deaths of many students just to keep his ego fed.
    
   Movie: The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
   Played By: Sam Rockwell
   About: Zaphod (and Sam Rockwell) is great and Rockwell plays him well- he's fun for the role he has.
    
   Movie: American Psycho
   Played By: Christian Bale
   About: Bale plays the role with what appears to be ease. He's a completely memorable character with 
   some very iconic scenes.
    
   Movie: Dinner for Schmucks
   Played By: Jemaine Clements
   About: Whether or not you liked the movie, most have agreed that Jamaine Clements was the best part.
    
   Movie: The American Pie Trilogy
   Played By: Seann William Scott
   About: Stifler thinks he's hot stuff, almost obnoxiously so. But he's not without his insecurities 
   underneath it all. He's probably not a true narcissist as the rest on this list–it's much more of 
   a front, at least partially. But there's no doubting he thinks highly of himself, and he's funny 
   while he thinks so.
    
   Movie: Zoolander
   Played By: Ben Stiller
   About: "I'm pretty sure there's a lot more to life than being really, really, ridiculously good looking. 
   And I plan on finding out what that is."
    
   Movie: Forgetting Sarah Marshall/Get Him to the Greek
   Played by: Russell Brand
   About: Russell Brand was hilarious in them–clearly the best part of the movies.
    
   Movie: The Princess Bride
   Played By: Wallace Shawn
   About: Vizzini: "I can't compete with you physically, and you're no match for my brains." Westley: 
   "You're that smart?" Vizzini: "Let me put it this way. Have you ever heard of Plato? Aristotle? Socrates?" 
   Westley: "Yes." Vizzini: "Morons."
    
   Movie: Anchorman: The Legend of Ron Burgundy
   Played By: Will Ferrell
   About: The narcissism is right there in the title of the film! He's a fun character, wrapped up in 
   his own little world.
    
   MOVIE: Gaslight
   Played by: Charles Boyer
   ABOUT: This classic movie is where the term gaslighting comes from, to indicate how an N (or other 
   abuser) lies to you to make you doubt your experience of reality. Although the film is a bit dated 
   now (it was made in the 1940s) it is still extremely gripping and terrifying. The narcissist in this 
   film, Gregory Anton, is trying to deliberately send his new wife insane in order to inherit from 
   her. An absolute must-watch for anybody interest in learning more about malignant NPD.
    
   MOVIE: Mommie Dearest
   Played By: Faye Dunaway
   ABOUT: A classic film. It's the real-life story of total narcissist Joan Crawford and her daughter 
   Christina. This is a chillingly accurate portrayal of the hell of being raised by a narcissist.
    
   MOVIE: White Oleander
   Played by: Michelle Pfeiffer
   ABOUT: Michelle Pfeiffer plays the narcissistic mother in this amazing film, and by all accounts 
   does a terrific job.
    
   MOVIE: Gone With the Wind
   Played by: Vivien Leigh
   ABOUT: Scarlett O'Hara is a total narcissist in this classic tale.
   Other Movies Portraying Narcissistic Characters
   • American Beauty (narcissistic mother)
   • East of Eden (narcissistic father)
   • Ordinary People (narcissistic mother)
   • Mermaids (Cher as Mrs. Flax)
   • Whatever Happened to Baby Jane? (narcissistic sister)
   • Sybil (narcissistic mother)
   • The Little Foxes (narcissistic mother)
   • Flowers in the Attic (narcissistic mother)
   • Matilda (both parents are narcissists)
   • Coraline (both "other" parents are narcissists)
   • Precious (narcissistic mother)
   • Girl Interrupted (Angelina Jolie)
   • Life or Something Like It (Angelina Jolie)
   References:
   http://www.narcissism101.com/NarcissistsinMedia/narcissistsinmov.html
   
   
   http://dementeddoorknob.blogspot.com/2010/10/top-10-favorite-narcissistic-characters.html 
   http://daughtersofnarcissisticmothers.com/movies-featuring-npd.html
   
   http://www.outofthefog.net/Movies.html 
 
   
   Last week Dr. Liane Leedom wrote about the tragic case Dr. Amy Castillo, whose children were murdered 
   by their psychopathic father after several judges issued rulings that failed to protect them. I hope 
   this terrible and extreme case will be a wake-up call for family courts.
   Lovefraud frequently receives e-mail from men and women involved in child custody disputes with sociopaths, 
   who hopefully, are not murderers. Here is one of them:
   I am involved in a custody case with a sociopath, however, my case is being fought in Europe where 
   I recently relocated to (I am American, he is European). After being the sole caregiver of my children 
   for five years, I had no choice but to leave them with their father and return to the States. When 
   we separated he took their passports and left the country for a year. It was NOT possible to obtain 
   new passports for children without BOTH parents' signatures. 
   By the end of that year my financial situation was desperate and I had no choice. I came back to 
   the States, got myself back on my feet and recently I started my own company as a Virtual Assistant, 
   allowing me to work anywhere in the world. While in the States I came back to Europe every six to 
   eight weeks to visit my children. Well one month ago, I relocated back to Europe to live and continue 
   my fight for custody of my children. 
   The court case had already been ongoing since January and in typical sociopath style he has lied 
   and forged documents. Even so, my ex was recently given sole custody (temporarily while custody is 
   decided) and that I must pay him 900 euros (around $1,300 USD a month!). As if that could not be 
   bad enough, he sends me on a regular basis (the most recent being today) faxes full of lies and accusations 
   that he then turns around and uses as evidence in his court case!!! Furthermore, I do NOT have 900 
   euros a month to give him. I just relocated and started my own business and this is a real slap in 
   the face with all of the financial damage he has done to me as well as my credit in the U.S. 
   I have fired my attorneys and hired the best Custody/Family attorney where I live. He has been in 
   practice for 30 years and not lost a case! Also he is known to be a very strong and tough attorney. 
   I wish I would have had him in the beginning. So with this I feel confidence.
   The reason I am writing is because although I have a very positive outlook and feel that I am a strong 
   person, as I know that most of you can agree, it is very difficult dealing with a sociopath. When 
   I receive these horrible faxes my stomach just drops and it can make me feel very anxious for hours 
   after. So now I have stopped reading them at all. I do not know what I am looking for by sending 
   this email. I think I just need the support of knowing there are others out there going through the 
   same things as me and that this is manageable and that I will make it through. I would greatly appreciate 
   hearing what others have done in a situation like this. Thank you.
   Like most parents fighting a custody battle with a sociopath, this woman faces a difficult times. 
   Below are some general suggestions about child custody and sociopaths.
   Get him or her to walk away
   If your ex is a sociopath, at best, he or she will be a lousy parent. At worst, he or she will intentionally 
   try to damage your children. Therefore, if at all possible, it may be best to cut the sociopath out 
   of your children's lives.
   You may want to consider offering the sociopath an incentive to walk away. Tell the sociopath to 
   give up parental rights, and he or she won't have to pay any child support. You may feel that you 
   need the child support payments, but chances are that you'll never get the money, or it will always 
   be a struggle to get it. The money isn't worth having the predator in your family's life. Figure 
   out a way to support your children without it.
   Sometimes this works-there are sociopaths who care more about money than kids. But many 
   times it doesn't, because the sociopath considers children to be possessions. Or, the sociopath just 
   wants to win the battle with you, and destroy you in the process. In those cases, you'll end up in 
   court.
   Tactics in custody battles
   I am forever grateful that I never had children with my sociopathic ex-husband. I avoided the 
   most tragic of circumstances involving these predators-a child custody battle. Therefore, the suggestions 
   I make below come from my research and what Lovefraud readers have told me.
   If you're fighting a custody battle with a sociopath, here are some tactics to follow:
   
      - Document, document, document. Keep a journal of everything that happens. Often, the 
      craziness is so intense that you don't want to remember what happens. Your journal will be important 
      when you need to tell a cohesive story of what has been going on with the sociopath, especially 
      if you need to tell it long after events have transpired. Save every scrap of paper, every e-mail, 
      every fax, every receipt. Develop a way of organizing the information, whether chronological, 
      or by topic. Keep copies in a safe place.
 
      - Have witnesses. It is best not to deal with the sociopath alone; every interaction 
      then becomes he said/she said. Have a trusted friend or relative present during child exchanges 
      or other interactions as much as you can. You may even want to consider tape recording and videotaping 
      some of what goes on.
 
      - Get your own information. Do not allow the sociopathic parent to control information 
      about your children. Make sure you get information directly from schools, doctors and others.
 
      - Hire an aggressive, competent attorney. Child custody cases with sociopaths are not 
      normal cases. The sociopath will not play by the rules. Your attorney must understand this. The 
      sociopath will lie in court, although his or her performance will appear heartfelt, like he or 
      she is "just concerned with the welfare of the children." The sociopath will make outrageous accusations. 
      The sociopath is also likely to retain an attorney who is also sociopathic. Therefore, your attorney 
      must be up for the challenge.
 
      - Do not allow lies to become part of the court record. Sociopaths lie. Sociopaths 
      lie convincingly. You cannot allow unchallenged lies to become part of the court records. 
      Once they are, they take on the aura of truth, and put you in a very bad position. Some lies, 
      like accusations of child abuse, may haunt you forever.
 
      - Be cautious in stating that your ex is, in fact, a sociopath. Unfortunately, many judges 
      really do not understand what this means to the welfare of a child. Like the general public, many 
      judges equate "sociopath" with "serial killer," and may consequently believe that you are overreacting. 
      So it may not be in your best interest to prove that he or she is a sociopath. Focus on proving 
      the behavior.
 
      - Stay calm in court. You must present a calm, professional image when you go to court, 
      even as the sociopath lies. Do not allow the sociopath to make you emotional. The sociopath will 
      accuse you of being unstable, and you will prove it by your behavior in court. Keep your emotions 
      in check, at least in front of the judge.
 
      - Make sure court orders are explicit. Insist on detailed court orders. The order should 
      not say, "parent has visitation every other weekend." It should specify exactly which weekends, 
      starting at what times, returning at what times, who is responsible for transporting children, 
      who is responsible for bathing and feeding them-everything must be spelled out in detail. If there 
      is any ambiguity, the sociopath will exploit it.
 
      - Make the sociopath abide by court orders. If the sociopath fails to honor the orders, 
      do not cut him or her any slack. Record any violation. Call the police if necessary. Continue 
      to document everything that happens, because you may need to go to court again. If you ever decide 
      that you need to cut the sociopath out of the child's life, you'll need evidence to do it.
 
      - Take care of yourself. You will need all your resources to deal with the sociopath. 
      Therefore, make healthy decisions in your own life. Eat right, avoid drugs and alcohol, get enough 
      sleep, exercise and develop a support network. In order to care for your children, you must care 
      for yourself.
 
   
   Post your suggestions
   I previously reviewed the book, Win Your Child Custody War, on the Lovefraud Blog. This book is full 
   of information that may help you, from how to gather documentation to how to hire an attorney and 
   private investigator. 
   If Lovefraud readers have any more suggestions that may be helpful to others involved in custody 
   battles with sociopaths, please post it in comments below.
   sfctommy, March 28, 2016 at 12:26 pm 
   
      Good advice, but what if the sociopath knows the ropes well enough to keep from getting caught? 
      Or better yet, when the sociopath is a woman, the court really doesn't care as long as she isn't 
      a danger to the child's safety. I know too many men in that situation. 
      http://yilieneth2.blogspot.com/2015/07/help-with-ex.html
      
   
   MomhasGod, March 30, 2016 at 1:14 am 
   
      I am about to go to the first Full Custody hearing in about 2 weeks. I was married to him for 
      15 years and have 2 children. He left me and he filed for full custody. Psychopathy was brought 
      to my attention and everything makes sense and falls into place. It's been about 3 months since 
      he moved out and the kids are a ton happier since we are not all walking around on eggshells. 
      I was shocked that he filed since he was not around much and hardly ever involved in their care. 
      He wasn't even excited when I was pregnant, didn't want to feel my belly, offer to help out, feel 
      the kicks, etc…like I said it makes sense now. In the 3 months he's been gone he's done some horrible 
      things, some dangerous, and has neglected the kids which I'm actually grateful for. He only asked 
      to see them 3 times and when I gave him option to meet at a public place he didn't even respond. 
      I ended up getting a temporary restraining order and we have to go back After the custody hearing. 
      His attorney is filing a motion this week for him to get visitation rights but my attorney is 
      going to fight for supervised visits. In the restraining order, issued a month ago, it was ordered 
      he could have 2 supervised visits a week but he never even tried to set it up with the people 
      that were supposed to be supervising. I'm trying to understand his current "game" and what my 
      concerns should be if he gets unsupervised visits in the meantime. I know he can be charming, 
      manipulative, and dangerous. 
      I'm fearful for the safety of my children and my attorney knows this. My kids had to testify 
      but not in front of us for the restraining order. My youngest, aged 8, picked up on how "dad's 
      lawyer is just like him and he's probably going to tell him what I said and dad is going to hurt 
      me". I had no idea the lawyers were going to question my kids and I do think he's going to tell 
      him. Has anyone been through something similar that they can offer words of advice? My oldest 
      son said he knows he's going to threaten him and he wants to record it. I told him I didn't think 
      that was a good idea because it would probably make him mad. I didn't tell him this but I think 
      it would make him so mad that my son would probably be hospitalized. I've done psychopath research 
      but I'm still in the beginning stages of realizing what's been happening to all of us. 
      My eyes are open now and I need to protect me kids. He knows they are the world to me which 
      is also my understanding that could be a risk factor of him wanting to hurt them more.
   
   jm_short, March 30, 2016 at 1:01 pm 
   
      You have a number of things going for you…
      
         - Your oldest son seem to be wise to him.
 
         - You have filed for a restraining order. And he has not complied with the visitation that 
         the court provided for him.
 
         - You understand what you're dealing with.
 
         - You seem to have a good attorney.
 
      
      About your son recording his threats. Just because you have the proof does not mean you'll 
      use it. So there's no downside to getting the proof. But there's a great deal of upside if you 
      end up needing it. You wanted to understand what he's all about…… control and harming you. And 
      he'll use your kids to do so. A lot of what they do is to position themselves as the victim in 
      an effort to minimize support. So try to keep the issues of visitation and support as separate 
      as possible. 
      If the judge leans toward non-supervised visits, ask for psychiatric evaluation of both parents. 
      Unfortunately, this does not always work out favorably, but you may have a good judge or a bad 
      judge. If you have a bad one, you can only hope to persuade him/her. 
      Your little guy is just a baby. Don't treat him like an ally or a confidante. He is neither. He's 
      a little boy whose parents are at war. Try not to discuss the issues with your ex in front of 
      him. Let him know you love him and that you're trying to settle the differences you have with 
      his father as quickly as possible, and that what happens will be decided by the court. 
      I know how difficult this can be, I've been there.
   
   MomhasGod, March 31, 2016 at 2:39 pm 
   
      Thank you for your advice and I'm sorry you had to go through it too. Psych evals are ordered 
      but it could be several more weeks. I've done research and know they can manipulate test givers 
      so it's supposed to be court ordered. My research also mostly comes up with the courts not understanding 
      how damaging psychopaths are. (He treated my oldest worse than my youngest, I've never told him 
      this and never will but the ex doesn't even think he's his…repeatedly refused a paternity test 
      to prove it…I assume it's coming from his own guilt???)My oldest, aged 13, just said yesterday 
      that the next time he has to see him he's going to tell him he wants nothing to do with him. Again, 
      I had no idea what to advise…this could be good and maybe he'd walk away, or bad and he'd have 
      a temper. This is a "man" that did 2 things that would have eventually caught my house on fire 
      knowing me and the kids are here just because I stood up for myself and didn't agree to what he 
      wanted. (I credit God with saving us by bringing it to my attention in subtle ways). I'm keeping 
      faith but I'm scared because I don't really know to what extent he'll go to. 
      I know he has a girlfriend, and honestly I do not care as I have no love for him at all, and 
      lots of people have said that's the best thing because he'll focus his attention on her. This 
      hasn't happened yet and I don't know when they met but she's been spending the night since the 
      2nd week of January. I feel sorry for her because she has no idea and I think he only got a girlfriend 
      because he's too lazy to do anything for himself like cook/clean/laundry/lawn/etc. Do you know 
      if they tend to back off once they get a new "victim"? Do you think it's a good idea if my son 
      told him to stay away or not? Thanks.
   
   jm_short, March 31, 2016 at 4:54 pm 
   
      Mom-
      Typically, a Psychopath will make one child a "Golden Child" and the other will be the "scapegoat." 
      and their roles may change over time. 
      As to your son telling his father he doesn't want to see him, this is not good timing to do so. 
      Your soon-to-be-ex will turn that into "parental alienation" and it will bolster his case for 
      custody.
      The custody action is to cause you pain and cost you money. Does he really want custody….probably 
      not. 
      What your son should do is to let the therapists know of his fears, and the bad behavior he witnessed. 
      He could also tell the same thing to the judge if he gets that opportunity. 
      You've likely read the relationship with the woman correctly. And the children will be used to 
      bolster his claims that he's Mr. Wonderful and you're the problem. Your children should always 
      be able to reach you while they are "visiting" with him. Do they have their own phones?
      Joyce
   
   MomhasGod, March 31, 2016 at 6:13 pm 
   
      Thanks again. We're waiting on a court appointed Guardian ad Litem so I will let him know to 
      just talk to them. I know he doesn't want custody, never had patience for them, easily annoyed, 
      neglected the few times they were in his care. He tried having family time maybe once a week but 
      always ruined it with his tantrums…literally tossing board games if he even thought he was going 
      to loose, etc. The boys have seen enough to tell. My oldest has a phone. If he ends up getting 
      them does he have to let me contact them or vice versa or does that have to be outlined in the 
      order?
   
   jm_short, April 11, 2016 at 11:27 am 
   
      MomhasGod-
      People in authority will often blame the mother for her children not wanting to see their father. 
      It is a very difficult phenomenon to deal with. If the custody hearing precedes the psych evaluations, 
      your attorney could ask that a determination be postponed until the psych evals are complete. 
      The less negative comments you make about him, the better. 
      Also, if he sees you struggling over his visitation, he'll put more effort behind this battle. 
      Be calm. Simply ask that the court review the psych evaluations before making a decision. 
      
      Don't get into a pissing match with him. In fact, don't speak to him at all. If he speaks 
      to you, turn to your lawyer. Say what you need to her and have her speak for you. 
      If there were any instances of child abuse in which the children were injured and photos were 
      taken, or hospital records exist, you have a better chance of persuading a judge that there is 
      a problem. Without those, characterizing him as abusive is a dangerously slippery slope. 
      
      One of the things you could ask for is that when he has visitation, there be a drop off point 
      and pick up point (friend/relative) so you do not have to interact with him, and that all communication 
      be made through your attorney, not with you directly. 
      He gets his jollies by making you miserable. If he can't get access to you about the kids, and 
      there are witnesses to his visitation conduct, he'll probably get tired of visiting. He'll know 
      he's under scrutiny. 
      I wish you the best of luck dealing with this. Stay strong. It will be in your rear view mirror 
      before you know it. This is a phase you need to go through to get to the other side. 
      Joyce
   
   NoMoreWool, April 13, 2016 at 12:56 pm 
   
      Many states now have a system of child exchange points so the parents don't interact with each 
      other at dropoff/pickup times. It also has the added benefit of documenting whether each parent 
      is following the custody schedule. I wish you all the best. 
      Joyce
   
   MomhasGod, April 20, 2016 at 8:14 am 
   
      There has been so much drama. Visits are still supervised for now. He was over an hour late 
      to the mediation and he semi-showed himself. It was voice recorded so I hope the judge listens 
      to it. The mediator warned him many times he could get a deputy to escort him out. Evals are ordered 
      but I don't know when they will start. My lawyer asked for it to stay supervised until later. 
      A guardian was appointed so hopefully they will have a say. The mediator scolded him to for not 
      asking for any visits so I guess his lawyer talked him into it so he had his first supervised 
      and first time he's seen them since mid January. He gave my youngest money and my oldest nothing. 
      My kids haven't had a chance to speak on their behalf yet…they were supposed to at mediation but 
      didn't have time since he was so late. When my lawyer finally got maybe 5 minutes to speak she 
      pulled out a piece of evidence he didn't know I had and he was ticked…the most evil eyes and he 
      started mouthing threats to me but nobody else saw. We were ordered to go through and pay for 
      a website for all communication/visits. Last night he put in for a visit today at his house…just 
      me and the kids! I called the supervisors and they haven't heard from him at all since the last 
      visit and aren't even available today. Found out Monday that the courthouse was holding the divorce 
      papers so he got served at the courthouse, I thought he was already served so he had another outburst 
      and walked out. There's a ton more but it's just too much. I'm hanging in there and he doesn't 
      realize he will not break me.
   
Kindle edition 
Notable quotes:
"... Society typically supports females, especially narcissistic women, as they 
are often the victims of stereotypical males (in real life and fictional portrayals). 
..."
"... In my case, I felt like a man who was for years playing on a stage and 
with a coreography designed by my ex wife. ..."
"... As a victim, narcissism makes you crazy, the more you delve into it to 
understand it, the more you get tangled in the lies, distorted views of reality, 
crazy nonsense "dialogues", etc. ..."
"... I've lived with a female narcissist for years and reading this made me 
fees as if the writer was right there with me for MY story! It's amazing how traumatic 
these people are. ..."
"... I also really enjoyed another similar book " Surviving Sara " by Brian 
Morgan. Very similar story and I can't help but few the pain these men went through. 
..."
	
	
	Todd L. Andrews on March 14, 2015 Format: Kindle Edition Verified 
	Purchase
	
		This book is a desperately needed wake up call to NS men needing fluorescent 
		illumination in the middle of "gaslight" and other 
		I really identified with the "role reversal" and truth that there are 
		men that suffer under a female N's tactics. The severity and persistence 
		of the female N is exposed brilliantly in this book. Having Zari identify 
		the male as a victim of the narcissist is crucial to helping men break free 
		of the craziness, while also helping men identify why they feel so stuck 
		loving the woman they have committed their souls to. Also crucial, is the 
		chapter that breaks out the difficulty of "no contact" when children are 
		involved. 
		While many N relationships share much in common, the male NS suffers 
		under societies prescribed male strengths, and serves to undermine the ability 
		of men to overcome being trapped. Society typically supports females, 
		especially narcissistic women, as they are often the victims of stereotypical 
		males (in real life and fictional portrayals). 
		Kudos to the Author for helping unlock the chains of this forbidden subject. 
		There are, not undeservedly, many explicatives used in this book. I believe 
		the strong words are approiate representations of the years of suffering 
		and pain inflicted by the narcissist on their supply. The author's insights 
		will likely help release many NS men from their prison within. 
	
	
	Man_under_female_attack on April 15, 2015 Format: Kindle Edition
	Verified Purchase
	
		Men under pain by narc women deserved to get a book like this. I 
		was married to a narc women for several years, and we share a daughter. 
		I thank Zari Ballard for this excellent account of how narc females move 
		around in society, mostly unknown to other people, friends and relatives 
		who judge them just as "weird" or "arrogant".
		In my case, I felt like a man who was for years playing on a stage 
		and with a coreography designed by my ex wife. Now, thanks to books 
		like this one, I can stand aside and *understand* what went on, and what 
		is currently going on. As a victim, narcissism makes you crazy, the 
		more you delve into it to understand it, the more you get tangled in the 
		lies, distorted views of reality, crazy nonsense "dialogues", etc.
		
		I spent years married with a woman with whom I had no real dialogue, 
		without noticing it. If you are a man in distress, and you feel some woman 
		makes you feel miserable, please read this book to go deep into the causes 
		of your pain. Thanks Zari for your book, thanks from the many men that suffer 
		the pain inflicted by narcissistic women. 
	
	
	Jonathan Thompson on March 3, 2016 Format: Kindle Edition 
	Verified Purchase
	
		Wow!! Amazing read.
		I've lived with a female narcissist for years and reading this made 
		me fees as if the writer was right there with me for MY story! It's amazing 
		how traumatic these people are. 
		Well written. I also really enjoyed another similar book "Surviving 
		Sara" by Brian Morgan. Very similar story and I can't help but few the 
		pain these men went through.
		
		
	
	
	
	Jack on December 11, 2015 Format: Kindle Edition Verified Purchase
	
		Need to get off the crazy train? This is your first stop! 
		Guys, if your life is one gigantic roller coaster ride of being seduced, 
		destroyed emotionally, and then kicked to the curb when you say anything, 
		then this is the place to start. 
		If you're looking at this review, then you know something in your relationship 
		is slowly poisoning you to death. It is NOT you! Wanna know why? Get the 
		book!!! 
	
	
	PowermanBillX on April 29, 2015 Format: Kindle Edition Verified 
	Purchase
	
		Absolute must read if you are in a relationship with a female N! 
		This book will give you the tools to end the roller coaster from Hell 
		ride once and for all. You have to summon the strength to end the dance 
		with crazy because if you don't, your life will NEVER be good or close to 
		normal! 
	
	
 
    Janja Lalich, Ph.D. & Michael D. Langone, Ph.D.
   Concerted efforts at influence and control lie at the core of cultic groups, programs, and 
   relationships. Many members, former members, and supporters of cults are not fully aware of the 
   extent to which members may have been manipulated, exploited, even abused. The following list of 
   social-structural, social-psychological, and interpersonal behavioral patterns commonly found in 
   cultic environments may be helpful in assessing a particular group or relationship. 
   Compare these patterns to the situation you were in (or in which you, a family member, or 
   friend is currently involved). This list may help you determine if there is cause for concern. 
   Bear in mind that this list is not meant to be a "cult scale" or a definitive checklist to 
   determine if a specific group is a cult. This is not so much a diagnostic instrument as it is an 
   analytical tool. 
   
      - The group displays excessively zealous and unquestioning commitment to its leader and 
   (whether he is alive or dead) regards his belief system, ideology, and practices as the Truth, as 
   law. 
 
      - Questioning, doubt, and dissent are discouraged or even punished.
 
      - Mind-altering practices (such as meditation, chanting, speaking in tongues, denunciation 
   sessions, and debilitating work routines) are used in excess and serve to suppress doubts about 
   the group and its leader(s).
 
      - The leadership dictates, sometimes in great detail, how members should think, act, and feel 
   (for example, members must get permission to date, change jobs, marry-or leaders prescribe what 
   types of clothes to wear, where to live, whether or not to have children, how to discipline 
   children, and so forth). 
 
      - The group is elitist, claiming a special, exalted status for itself, its leader(s) and 
   members (for example, the leader is considered the Messiah, a special being, an avatar-or the 
   group and/or the leader is on a special mission to save humanity).
      
 
      - The group has a polarized us-versus-them mentality, which may cause conflict with the wider 
   society.
 
      - The leader is not accountable to any authorities (unlike, for example, teachers, military 
   commanders or ministers, priests, monks, and rabbis of mainstream religious denominations).
 
      - The group teaches or implies that its supposedly exalted ends justify whatever means it deems 
   necessary. This may result in members' participating in behaviors or activities they would have 
   considered reprehensible or unethical before joining the group (for example, lying to family or 
   friends, or collecting money for bogus charities).
 
      - The leadership induces feelings of shame and/or guilt iin order to influence and/or control 
   members. Often, this is done through peer pressure and subtle forms of persuasion.
 
      - Subservience to the leader or group requires members to cut ties with family and friends, and 
   radically alter the personal goals and activities they had before joining the group.
 
      - The group is preoccupied with bringing in new members. 
 
      - The group is preoccupied with making money. 
 
      - Members are expected to devote inordinate amounts of time to the group and group-related 
   activities.
 
      - Members are encouraged 
or required to live and/or socialize only with other group members.
 
      - The most loyal members 
(the "true believers") feel there can be no life outside the context of 
the group. They believe there is no other way to be, and often fear reprisals 
to themselves or others if they leave (or even consider leaving) the group.
 
   
   
   This checklist will be published in the new book, Take Back Your Life: Recovering from Cults and Abusive Relationships 
by Janja Lalich and Madeleine Tobias (Berkeley: Bay Tree Publishing, 2006). 
It was adapted from a checklist originally developed by Michael Langone.
   
 
Hardcover: 352 pages, Viking (January 12, 2016)
Notable quotes:
"... I went back and saw ways I got conned in matters of the heart while dating; in buying things; 
in following certain leaders in church. ..."
"... As a former prosecutor of elder abuse crimes (both physical and financial), I have a lot of 
experience with people who "fall for it." But that certainly doesn't mean everyone does. Nor does it 
mean that the ones who don't "fall for it" are more cynical, less humane, less open to true friendship, 
etc. In fact, Konnikova's description of victims of con artists as being more open and in touch with 
their humanity sounds like the manipulation of a con artist. ..."
"... As a scientist, used to sorting through ambiguous evidence and well-meaning but underdetermined 
interpretations, I find this book excellent. The author no doubt has to cast speculations of her own, 
and overplay some connections and implications, but the connections between gullibility, optimism, cults, 
and scams strike me as well articulated. ..."
"... But you are not at all privileged to launch unsolicited attacks on the personal attributes 
of the author. (Your line "until she matures as a thinker and researcher....." was completely uncalled-for, 
and hints more at your feelings of insecurity and inadequacy than anything else.) ..."
"... Three-card monte gets some attention - but that's not that interesting to me...I know why they 
succeed, because people want to see if THEY can beat the game - it's not a con as much as a battle of 
wits, which the rube always loses (I was cheated on a rigged carny game years ago - they suck you in 
with a few easy wins, then it gets progressively harder to win the stuffed animal). ..."
"... as long as there's an advantage to fooling somebody, people will try to fool other people. 
..."
"... A confidence game starts with basic human psychology. The con identifies what the victim wants 
and how to play on that desire to achieve what the con-artist wants. Size someone up well, and you can 
sell them anything; it helps to have someone in the throes of some sort of life turmoil - the conman 
preys on what people wish were true, reaffirming their views of themselves and giving their lives meaning. 
Doing so requires the creation of empathy and rapport - laying an emotional foundation before any scheme 
is proposed. ..."
"... The con is an exercise in soft skills - trust, sympathy, persuasion. He doesn't steal - we 
give. We believe because we want to, and we offer whatever they want - money, reputation, trust, fame, 
support, and don't realize what is happening until it is too late. No one is immune to the art of the 
con - it is not who you are, but where you happen to be at the moment in your life (eg. undergoing misfortune). 
..."
"... The con is the oldest game there is, and it's likely to be entering a new age - thanks to new 
opportunities brought by increasing technology that make it far easier to establish convincing false 
identities (eg. LinkedIn), as well as identify those who might be more likely conned (dating sites that 
identify widows and divorcees). ..."
"... Con artists aren't just master manipulators - they are expert storytellers (eg. 'I'm supporting 
my mother, who now has AIDS,' 'I had PTSD from Iraq,' etc. Once we've accepted a story as true we will 
probably unconsciously bend any contradictory information to conform to the conclusion we've already 
drawn - it's known as 'confirmation bias.' Ultimately, what a confidence artist sells is hope. Many 
cases go unreported - most cases, by some estimates. AARP found that only 37% of victims over 55 will 
admit to having fallen for a con, and just over half those under 55 do so. Most con artists don't ever 
come to trial because they aren't brought to the authorities to begin with. ..."
"... The first commandment of the con man - 'Be a patient listener.' (Victor Lustig, con artist) 
Emotion is the primary hook used, much more powerful than logic. Cons tend to thrive in the wake of 
economic or natural disaster illness, personal travail. Sadness makes us more prone to risk taking and 
impulsivity - perfect for certain types of cons. Con artists love funerals and obituaries, divorces, 
layoffs, and general loneliness. He does everything in his power to bring our self-perceived better-than-averageness 
perceptions to the fore - eg. 'How intelligent you are, Professor Frampton.' And we believe it, because 
we want it to be. ..."
"... They recognize common traits, like our tendency to see others as similar to ourselves, our 
illusion of control, and our unwillingness to think badly about ourselves. These traits aren't weaknesses; 
without them, we'd be functionally paralyzed. Effective swindlers work by turning our best characteristics 
and human capabilities against us. ..."
"... Fraudsters prey on traits that open us to community, family, and fiscal reward. As Konnikova 
writes: "The same thing that can underlie success can also make you all the more vulnerable to the grifter's 
wares. We are predisposed to trust." With swindles, as with propaganda, those who think themselves most 
immune are, actually, most vulnerable. ..."
"... "It's not that the confidence artist is inherently psychopathic, caring nothing about the fates 
of others. It's that, to him, we aren't worthy of consideration as human beings; we are targets, not 
unique people." ..."
"... Konnikova suggests it's difficult to prevent con-games without isolating ourselves and descending 
into cynicism. In the later chapters, though, she reverses the trend, showing how skilled, self-aware 
people can resist flim-flam artists' techniques. Not hypothetically, either: she shows how real people, 
cult busters and cultural anthropologists and police, have maintained their sanity when confronted by 
seemingly insurmountable double-dealing. Resistance is possible. ..."
"... Even if we never vote for crooks, invest with Bernie Madoff, or buy salvation sellers' wares, 
the potential for confidence games still surrounds us. Konnikova provides needed tools for self-awareness, 
clear boundaries, and bold self-defense. Swindles are inevitable; victimhood isn't. ..."
   
   
   
   Dan E. Nicholas, February 4, 2016
   
      
      And some are not even bad people. She says it's when folks who lack ...I'm reading and 
      loving this book. I'll expand my review when I'm completely done in a couple days but just have 
      to say: get it. Read it. Learn about yourself; if you dare. (I gave it four stars rather than 
      five to protect myself!)
      I was shocked how well she documents that it is we the conned that want the con to be real. 
      The Grifter doesn't even have to always be that skilled. I went back and saw ways I got conned 
      in matters of the heart while dating; in buying things; in following certain leaders in church.
      Stunned to learned that 1% of the population is psychopathological in the way their brains 
      are wired, some folks just can't feel or give meaning to your pain or the pain of others. And 
      some are not even bad people. She says it's when folks who lack this "proper" wiring aim to use 
      it for financial gain or to win and break hearts? Awful. 
      I fell in love with a Man Eater once. Looking back I see how it was my fault in setting up 
      my own fall. I want things to look like they would work. The bad rests on me now. She's still 
      a Man Eater. But the wounds I earned with my stupidity. I went on to find success with love but 
      I've some scars for sure due to female cons running scams unwittingly online with dating sights.
      She shows we can be wise without being cynical. I like that. 
   
   
   
   Wild'n'Free 
   
      Disappointing but with some qualities, November 28, 2015
      Konnikova promises a lot in the titles to her books. I read Mastermind: How to Think Like Sherlock 
      Holmes and was disappointed. I did not learn to think like Sherlock Holmes; not by a long shot. 
      In this book, Konnikova has come closer to delivering the "Why We Fall for It . . . Every Time" 
      but I disagree with her observations and conclusions. 
      As a former prosecutor of elder abuse crimes (both physical and financial), I have a lot 
      of experience with people who "fall for it." But that certainly doesn't mean everyone does. Nor 
      does it mean that the ones who don't "fall for it" are more cynical, less humane, less open to 
      true friendship, etc. In fact, Konnikova's description of victims of con artists as being more 
      open and in touch with their humanity sounds like the manipulation of a con artist. 
      Not that I think Konnikova is a con artist. She is just a very ambitious young woman and a 
      self-promoter. I have read a lot of her magazine articles and have enjoyed many of them. Unfortunately, 
      her organizational and analytical skills as a writer do not make her a good writer of books. Viewed 
      as a series of magazine articles with the inevitable repetitions this book holds up fairly well.
      
      But as a book, it lacks a great deal. It certainly deserves 3 stars, but its failure to respond 
      to bigger questions with bigger answers makes it fall short. For me, it was an uneven, often repetitious, 
      fairly shallow approach to a fascinating subject. Until she matures as a thinker and researcher, 
      Konnikova does better when she sticks to the magazine articles that she handles so well. 
      
         SundayAtDusk says:
         
            "In fact, Konnikova's description of victims of con artists as being more open and in 
            touch with their humanity sounds like the manipulation of a con artist."
            Excellent observation and excellent review. 
         
         JohnVidale says:
         
            As a scientist, used to sorting through ambiguous evidence and well-meaning but underdetermined 
            interpretations, I find this book excellent. The author no doubt has to cast speculations 
            of her own, and overplay some connections and implications, but the connections between 
            gullibility, optimism, cults, and scams strike me as well articulated. The field of 
            psychology is messy, but this book was very interesting and enlightening, clear as is possible 
            (aside from chapters organized like magazine articles), and the connection between empathetic 
            people and people who get scammed seems completely reasonable, albeit with a less than perfect 
            correlation. 
         
         Joe Madison says:
         
            I have the same question as Ellis Reppo: If this book is only average, can you recommend 
            a good one? I have not read The Confidence Game, but I have a psych degree and a longstanding 
            interest in persuasion. I often find popular psych books to be like you describe The Confidence 
            Game (repetitive, without great breadth of understanding), and so your own book recommendations 
            would be of real value. Thanks! 
         
         pat black says:
         
            There's one called Eyeing the Flash: The Making of a Carnival Con Artist. A case study, 
            if you will, of a 17-year-old middle class math whiz who became a midway con man in 1960s 
            midwest 
         
         JLMK 
         
            I'd stick to making an unbiased appraisal of the merits of the book if I were you, and 
            cut out the ad hominem nonsense. As a reviewer you are privileged to make an opinion on 
            the book's attributes, how it answers the questions raised by the author, etc. 
            But you are not at all privileged to launch unsolicited attacks on the personal attributes 
            of the author. (Your line "until she matures as a thinker and researcher....." was completely 
            uncalled-for, and hints more at your feelings of insecurity and inadequacy than anything 
            else.) 
         
         Kirk McElhearn says:
         
            Read David Maurer's The Big Con. It explains how the cons work, rather than focusing 
            on lots of psychological studies that Konnikova looks at, trying to suss out why we respond 
            the way we do. 
         
      
   
   Nathan Webster TOP 1000 REVIEWER VINE VOICE on November 27, 2015 
   
      Entertaining and interesting look at conmen and the rubes who buy what they sell
      This is a fun book that covers a lot of ground about 'cons,' from the personalities of those 
      who can commit them, to the marks and rubes who get taken advantage of.
      You would think in our informed culture, we couldn't be fooled, but we know that's not the 
      case. Author Maria Konnikova does a good job presenting all sides of these stories and it's often 
      entertaining reading about the pure brazeness of it all. I had not heard of many of the conmen 
      (and women) that she describes and I always like reading new stories.
      I do wish there had been more recent accounts - there are so many cheaters like Lance Armstrong 
      that aren't exactly doing it for profit, and more attention to them would have been interesting.
      Three-card monte gets some attention - but that's not that interesting to me...I know why 
      they succeed, because people want to see if THEY can beat the game - it's not a con as much as 
      a battle of wits, which the rube always loses (I was cheated on a rigged carny game years ago 
      - they suck you in with a few easy wins, then it gets progressively harder to win the stuffed 
      animal).
      I think the book is not disorganized, but it does cover a lot of ground, and the different 
      names and situations can be difficult to follow at times. Interesting and entertaining, yes, but 
      just be ready to pay attention.
      Ultimately, it's an interesting sociological study - as long as there's an advantage to 
      fooling somebody, people will try to fool other people. I would not use this book as the 
      primary source - I think a reader should have interest in this specific topic first, and not use 
      this book to try to get interested. It's a little too specific to get a reader invested who comes 
      to the topic totally new.
   
   
   
   Loyd Eskildson
   
   HALL OF FAMEon January 12, 2016
   
      
      Rogues Regularly Triumph Over The MeekAuthor Maria Konnikova has a Ph.D. in Psychology 
      from Columbia, along with considerable experience researching topics in and writing about psychology. 
      This, her second book, is about conmen - elegant, outsized personalities, artists of persuasion 
      and exploiters of trust, not just your dime a dozen cheats and swindlers. Their 'bible' is Dale 
      Carnegie's "How to Win Friends and Influence People."
      A confidence game starts with basic human psychology. The con identifies what the victim 
      wants and how to play on that desire to achieve what the con-artist wants. Size someone up well, 
      and you can sell them anything; it helps to have someone in the throes of some sort of life turmoil 
      - the conman preys on what people wish were true, reaffirming their views of themselves and giving 
      their lives meaning. Doing so requires the creation of empathy and rapport - laying an emotional 
      foundation before any scheme is proposed.
      The con is an exercise in soft skills - trust, sympathy, persuasion. He doesn't steal - 
      we give. We believe because we want to, and we offer whatever they want - money, reputation, trust, 
      fame, support, and don't realize what is happening until it is too late. No one is immune to the 
      art of the con - it is not who you are, but where you happen to be at the moment in your life 
      (eg. undergoing misfortune).
      By the time things begin to look dicey, the victims tend to be so invested, emotionally and 
      often physically, that they do most of the persuasion themselves. The con-artist may not even 
      need to convince his victims to stay quite - they usually are more likely than not to do so themselves. 
      When we hear others talking about their unbelievable deal or good fortune, we realize at once 
      they've been taken for a sucker, but when it happens to us, it's simply because "I'm lucky and 
      deserving of a good turn."
      The best of cons are never discovered - we simply write our loss off as a matter of bad luck.
      Psychopaths make up an estimated 1% of male population; among women, they are almost nonexistent. 
      Grifters also are highly likely to be narcissist and Machiavellian. Narcissism entails a sense 
      of grandiosity, entitlement, an overly inflated sense of worth, and manipulativeness. Machiavellian 
      has come to mean a specific set of traits that allows one to manipulate others - employs aggressive, 
      manipulative, exploiting, and devious moves. They are also more likely to attempt to bluff, cheat, 
      bargain, and ingratiate themselves with others, and more successful at doing so.
      Leadership and high-profile roles, salesmen/marketers, and the legal profession are all more 
      likely to be populated by confidence men.
      Researcher James Fallon believes that certain critical periods in childhood can nudge one more 
      or less towards full-blown psychopathy - luck out, you become a high-functioning psychopath, get 
      the bad draw and you become a violent psychopath. Fallon believes the first three years of life 
      are crucial in determining one's psychopathic future.
      The con is the oldest game there is, and it's likely to be entering a new age - thanks 
      to new opportunities brought by increasing technology that make it far easier to establish convincing 
      false identities (eg. LinkedIn), as well as identify those who might be more likely conned (dating 
      sites that identify widows and divorcees). Since 2008, consumer fraud in the U.S. has risen 
      more than 60%, with online scams more than doubling. In 2012 alone, the Internet Crime Complaint 
      Center reported almost 300,000 complaints of online fraud, with over $500 million lost. Between 
      2011 and 2012, the Federal Trade Commission found that a little over 10% of American adults (25.6 
      million) had fallen victim to fraud. The majority of the cases involved fake weight-loss products, 
      second place went to false prize promotions, and in third place was buyers' clubs in which what 
      seemed like a free deal actually involves membership charges you didn't even know you'd signed 
      up for. Fourth was unauthorized Internet billing, and finally work-at-home programs.
      Con artists aren't just master manipulators - they are expert storytellers (eg. 'I'm supporting 
      my mother, who now has AIDS,' 'I had PTSD from Iraq,' etc. Once we've accepted a story as true 
      we will probably unconsciously bend any contradictory information to conform to the conclusion 
      we've already drawn - it's known as 'confirmation bias.' Ultimately, what a confidence artist 
      sells is hope. Many cases go unreported - most cases, by some estimates. AARP found that only 
      37% of victims over 55 will admit to having fallen for a con, and just over half those under 55 
      do so. Most con artists don't ever come to trial because they aren't brought to the authorities 
      to begin with.
      Most people require three things to align before going from legitimacy to con-artistry - motivation 
      (underlying predisposition created by psychopathy), narcissism, and Machiavellianism - along with 
      opportunity and a plausible rationale. In corporate fraud, for example, few choose to con in a 
      vacuum - they also perceive an aggressive sales environment (opportunity) and a feeling they must 
      do something to stand out. For a significant percentage of the conning population, surroundings 
      matter. About half those who commit fraud cite intolerable competitive conditions as justification. 
      They can rationalize away just about any behavior as necessary.
      In one study of 15,000, only 50 could consistently detect liars - they relied on detecting 
      incredibly fast facial movements as their clues. One of those 50 is now employed in law enforcement, 
      and she told the author that smart psychopaths are super liars and have no conscience, and are 
      very hard for her to identify.
      The first commandment of the con man - 'Be a patient listener.' (Victor Lustig, con artist) 
      Emotion is the primary hook used, much more powerful than logic. Cons tend to thrive in the wake 
      of economic or natural disaster illness, personal travail. Sadness makes us more prone to risk 
      taking and impulsivity - perfect for certain types of cons. Con artists love funerals and obituaries, 
      divorces, layoffs, and general loneliness. He does everything in his power to bring our self-perceived 
      better-than-averageness perceptions to the fore - eg. 'How intelligent you are, Professor Frampton.' 
      And we believe it, because we want it to be.
      Consistency plays a crucial role in our ongoing evaluations of a person we're helping - 'If 
      I've helped you before, you must be worth it.'
      Overall - some good points about con-men - but far too reliant on anecdotes. 
   
   
   
   Kevin L. Nenstiel
   
   TOP 1000 REVIEWER
   
   VINE VOICE. November 2, 2015
   
      
      
      Know How Crooks Think, So They Can't Outthink You
      Our world positively teems with swindlers, ripoff artists, and con-men. From ordinary curbside 
      Three-Card Monte to charming, narcissistic domestic abusers, to Ponzi schemers and Wall Street 
      market riggers, the confidence game exudes from society's very pores. Psychologist turned journalist 
      Maria Konnikova wants to unpack what makes us susceptible to con artists, a journey that leads 
      through all human psychology, sometimes vulnerable to diversions and cow paths.
      Konnikova's first book,
      
      Mastermind: How to Think Like Sherlock Holmes, dealt with how crime fighters organize thoughts, 
      observe reality, and undermine criminal mentality. This book essentially addresses the same issues 
      from the opposite angle: how criminals create situations that need busting. Konnikova's conclusions 
      may seem surprising, until we consider them further. Vulnerability to confidence artists and other 
      professional chiselers actually means our psyches are healthy.
      Confidence artists work with an encyclopedic understanding of human psychology with which research 
      scientists are only now catching up. They recognize common traits, like our tendency to see 
      others as similar to ourselves, our illusion of control, and our unwillingness to think badly 
      about ourselves. These traits aren't weaknesses; without them, we'd be functionally paralyzed. 
      Effective swindlers work by turning our best characteristics and human capabilities against us.
      We must recognize, therefore, that making ourselves insusceptible to cons isn't actually desirable. 
      Fraudsters prey on traits that open us to community, family, and fiscal reward. As Konnikova writes: 
      "The same thing that can underlie success can also make you all the more vulnerable to the grifter's 
      wares. We are predisposed to trust." With swindles, as with propaganda, those who think themselves 
      most immune are, actually, most vulnerable. 
      The answer lies in understanding ourselves and the swindlers better. They don't see us like 
      we see ourselves. They don't want to. We must cultivate complex understanding of different human 
      thought patterns, and a stronger sense of ourselves. Konnikova again: "It's not that the confidence 
      artist is inherently psychopathic, caring nothing about the fates of others. It's that, to him, 
      we aren't worthy of consideration as human beings; we are targets, not unique people."
      All isn't bleak. Throughout most of this book, Konnikova suggests it's difficult to prevent 
      con-games without isolating ourselves and descending into cynicism. In the later chapters, though, 
      she reverses the trend, showing how skilled, self-aware people can resist flim-flam artists' techniques. 
      Not hypothetically, either: she shows how real people, cult busters and cultural anthropologists 
      and police, have maintained their sanity when confronted by seemingly insurmountable double-dealing. 
      Resistance is possible.
      As Konnikova explains confidence artists' psychological techniques, her focus expands to include 
      much about recent discoveries in psychology and behavioral economics. She wants readers to emerge 
      with as thorough an understanding of human minds as the fraud merchants enjoy. This sometimes 
      makes her technique sprawling (this book runs over 300 pages plus back matter, unusually long 
      for its genre.) 
      Reading Konnikova sometimes requires especial concentration and focus.
      She richly rewards those who stick with her narrative, though. I've recently seen one friend 
      lose rafts to shady investments and two others get burned by charming, narcissistic romantic partners.
      Even if we never vote for crooks, invest with Bernie Madoff, or buy salvation sellers' wares, 
      the potential for confidence games still surrounds us. Konnikova provides needed tools for self-awareness, 
      clear boundaries, and bold self-defense. Swindles are inevitable; victimhood isn't. 
   
   
Notable quotes:
"... The 43-year-old actress said she wanted other sufferers to know that  	help was available, and claimed that being diagnosed with bipolar disorder had  	made her appreciate life all the more.  ..."
"... "The smartest thing I did was to stop going online," ..."
"... "I'm the sort of person who will just look for the negative. Michael  	really can't understand it, but that's the way I am. And, with my bipolar thing,  	that's poison.  ..."
 
	Welsh actress Catherine Zeta-Jones has spoken out about her battle 
	with manic depression after being admitted to a US rehabilitation clinic last 
	year, in an effort to lift the "stigma" of mental illness. 
	Catherine Zeta-Jones has spoken about her battle with manic depression in 
	an effort to lift the "stigma" of mental illness. 
	The 43-year-old actress said she wanted other sufferers to know that 
	help was available, and claimed that being diagnosed with bipolar disorder had 
	made her appreciate life all the more. 
	In April last year, Zeta-Jones was admitted to a US rehabilitation clinic 
	where doctors concluded she was suffering from bipolar II disorder, a form of 
	manic depression. 
	Her husband, fellow actor Michael Douglas, was recovering from treatment 
	for throat cancer at the time. 
	"I'm not the kind of person who likes to shout out my personal issues from 
	the rooftops but, with my bipolar becoming public, I hope fellow sufferers will 
	know it is completely controllable," Zeta-Jones told US InStyle magazine.
	
	"I hope I can help remove any stigma attached to it, and that those who don't 
	have it under control will seek help with all that is available to treat it."
	
	Describing the past 18 months as "an intense time in good ways and bad", 
	the Welsh actress said: "You find out who you really are and who are you are 
	married to. You find things inside yourself you never imagined were there.
	
	"I've gained an appreciation for little things, like tea outside on a terrace."
	
	Zeta-Jones admitted that, at the height of her illness, she Googled her name 
	to find negative comments about herself. 
	"The smartest thing I did was to stop going online," she said.
	
	"I'm the sort of person who will just look for the negative. Michael 
	really can't understand it, but that's the way I am. And, with my bipolar thing, 
	that's poison. 
	"So I just stopped. Cold turkey. And it's so liberating." 
	The couple have two children, Dylan and Carys, and Zeta-Jones claimed they 
	have a down-to-earth lifestyle. "We're country people, really, I garden and 
	knit. I golf. We ride horses," she said. 
	"I love clothes and, yes, we go out, but it's not like I'm walking around 
	all day in a negligee with fluffy mules." 
	
	
   ef on 
   July 17, 2011 
   
      
      
      If three of the last five words in this title have meaning to you, get this book, it WILL save 
      your life
      Does your partner have periods of uncontrollable rage? Bizarre behaviors? A truly astonishing 
      ability to twist words and reinterpret reality around you? Wild mood swings? Hair trigger temper? 
      Have you been desperate enough that you spend your free time surreptitiously Google-ing psychological 
      disorders to try to "poor mans diagnose" what you're dealing with?
      Clearly you have. If you're reading this, you're probably doing research Right Now in the vain 
      hope of getting an answer to the one question you've been asking yourself night and day for as 
      long as you can remember: What Do I Do?
      If that sounds like you, get this book, it will save your life.
      On second thought, clear your browser cache, erase cookies and search history, and beg a friend 
      to buy this book for you so it does not get shipped to your home address. I'm not kidding. Read 
      the title again. 
   
   MarkA, 
   September 10, 2011
      Helps educate you to lower risks of arrest, abuse investigations from false allegations 
      & help custody efforts
      After having gone through the first years of post separation & divorce, I can definitely agree 
      that PROTECTING YOURSELF is top priority when separating, especially if you have children. Educate 
      yourself while quietly documenting the spouse's behaviors, quietly and confidentially seek the 
      advice of a few family law attorneys who have experience with high conflict cases, carefully consider 
      your options and prepare accordingly.Decades ago the hot-button threats by disordered spouses 
      were claiming you were a closet homosexual or having an affair. These days such allegations are 
      ho-hum and ignored in most courts. What has replaced them? Claims of DV (against the spouse) and 
      child neglect, abuse or molestation. Why? To unfairly gain advantage or keep the upper hand in 
      the court's custody and parenting decisions. Those are extreme hot-button issues and agencies 
      are just waiting for a call to jump into action, this is the one time where the allegation is 
      presumed valid at first and the presumption of innocence is set aside at first. An innocent spouse 
      or parent (you) can be arrested and charged with some very serious offenses.
      If your spouse has threatened to make false allegations in the past, then that means it has been 
      contemplated and therefore you are at heightened risk. DO NOT FOOL YOURSELF THAT YOU ARE NOT AT 
      RISK! William Eddy presents information that will help you to avoid many common presumptions, 
      mistakes and pitfalls us Nice Guys and Nice Gals are likely to make when we first encounter the 
      judicial (not justice) system. Sorry, but normal common sense does not apply in court and the 
      truth does not always prevail. Courts, including family/domestic court, make decisions based on 
      written laws, case law which has modified the application of written laws, and the latitude allowed 
      for the case-by-case discretion by judges. That is why this book is so helpful, in addition to 
      your family law attorney's legal advice.
      To echo the excellent advice in another comment: If that sounds like you, get this book, it will 
      save your life. On second thought, clear your browser cache, erase cookies and search history, 
      and BEG a friend to buy this book for you so it does not get shipped to your home address or appear 
      on your credit card or bank statements. I'm not kidding. Read the title again. PROTECT YOURSELF.
   
   Holly O. 
   on January 2, 2013
   
      
      Splitting - Aint talking about an equitable divorce
      
      I read this book too late to fully be effective. The best advice that you can take is; show 
      absolutely NO mercy to these soul-sucking people. Sure, it is a behavioral disorder, but there 
      is no excuse and a great deal of choice-making that goes into the decisions that are made during 
      the divorce process. They will never own their own faults - ever.
      Borderlines will immediately begin with a character assassination and side-setting of as many 
      people as possible, and will split up all players in the game into black and white pieces. You 
      are black, WILL have the second move and will remain behind as long as your bank account holds 
      out because nothing is more important to the BPD than the process of proving to the world that 
      you are wrong, bad and probably belong in prison away from all of the white players, including 
      only those of your children that believe the stories. It might include a custody battle with accusations 
      of child abuse, when in fact the real abuse are the lies and deceit that are wielded upon your 
      impressionable and confused children. The narcissists are the worst because there is absolutely 
      no self reflection in the process. If a borderline is not narcissist, then there is a possibility 
      to change the game during one of the many "woe is me" moments.
      Absolutely DO NOT GIVE UP and do not do anything stupid. Truth does not matter in court; it is 
      only about going through the motions. Tell your attorney to go for the jugular and spare no expense 
      on getting your kids. However, do not fight dirty directly. Do not talk bad about your BPD ex 
      to your kids or ANY of your common friends. Only talk about truth, including his/her mental disorder. 
      Kids have automatic BS detectors. If you tell the truth, you will win. Period.
      Now, read this book. Own it. If you are smart enough to use this knowledge to your advantage, 
      you will win. After 5 years of pure hell from BPD people in my life, I have finally recovered 
      but it took everything including relationships, money, nearly all property and two jobs. BPD splitting 
      is war and reading this book is the first step in a good battle plan.
      
   
   
   
    
         
         Marcy L. Thompson 
         
            A large number of books on the topic of anger have recently come into my house -- how to 
            recognize anger, what it means, and how to "control" it. This is the only one of these books 
            that I liked. All the other books on this topic seem to treat anger as a loss of control, 
            which should be repressed. In fact, they seem to be about impulse control more than about 
            anger. (I have nothing against people learning to control their impulses, I just don't think 
            that it's the same topic as the topic of anger.) Luckily, I did not pay for any of these 
            books, so I can just be glad I read this one, and forget about the others.
            In this book, Lerner treats anger as a signal that something 
            is going wrong. She explains that only when we address the "something wrong" 
            in a useful way will the anger go away. Then she explores the "dances" we engage in, in 
            our attempts to make ourselves feel better. She suggests that most of our attempts to make 
            ourselves feel better focus on the person(s) we think made us mad, rather than on ourselves. 
            She compassionately and wisely shows how to disengage from the anger and the counter-productive 
            patterns, while staying connected and acting with integrity. However, she also acknowledges 
            the effect that this sort of change can have on other people in the dance, and she provides 
            guidance in maintaining oneself in the face of countermoves. 
            Fundamentally, this is not the kind of self-help book that provides 10 easy steps to 
            ridding oneself of anger. Instead, it describes a different way to think about anger, and 
            discussion of the ways in which one can respond to anger. No easy steps, just a way of thinking, 
            which can radically change the way one engages with the world. 
         
         Rev. Dr. Jude Arnold (Arkansas, USA) - 
         
            The Dance of Anger by Dr. Harriet Lerner, Kindle Version
            A BOOK REPORT BY REV. DR. JUDE ARNOLDI was happy to find the eBook version of Dr. Lerner's 
            1970's classic. I'm finding writing my first review of an eBook much more challenging, tho. 
            Dr. Lerner, a champion in women's psychology, offers us this awesome self help around anger. 
            I begin with the Epilogue in which Dr. Lerner talks about what she means by self help.
            "'Defining a self' or `becoming one's own person' is a task that one ultimately does 
            alone....In the end, I define what I think, feel and believe....Yet, this lonely and challenging 
            task cannot be accomplished in isolation. We can only accomplish it through our connectedness 
            with others and the new learning about ourselves our relationships provide."(Italics and 
            Underlining throughout are Dr. Lerner's.)
            In her books Dr. Learner always stresses "the importance of learning about the experience 
            of family members and sharing our own." She also adds her belief that it's "equally crucial 
            for us to connect with the family of womankind....This book [is] about personal anger and 
            personal change, but as feminism has taught us, `the personal is political.' This means 
            that there is a circular connection between the patterns of our intimate relationships and 
            the degree to which women are represented, valued, and empowered in every aspect of society 
            and culture.... "It is not sufficient for individual women to learn to move differently 
            in personal relationships. If we do not also challenge and change the societal institutions 
            that keep women in a subordinate and de-selfed position outside the home, what goes on inside 
            the home will continue to be problematic for us all....Whether the problem we face is a 
            marital battle or the escalating nuclear arms race, women and men both have a long legacy 
            of blaming people rather than understanding patterns. Our challenge is to listen carefully 
            to our own anger and use it in the service of change - while we hold tight to all that is 
            valuable in our female heritage and tradition."
            Dr. Lerner wrote The Dance of Anger "to help readers not only identify the true sources 
            of their anger, but also to learn how to change the patterns from which anger springs....The 
            challenge of anger is at the heart of our struggle to achieve intimacy, self-esteem, and 
            joy. Learning how to deal with it is worth the journey, even though there are no six-easy-steps 
            to personal fulfillment and relationship bliss. The Dance of Anger teaches readers to understand 
            how relationships operate and how to change our part in them. It encourages readers to go 
            the hard route."
            Anger is a signal that "can motivate us to say `no' to the ways in which we are defined 
            by others and `yes' to the dictates of our inner self. Women, however, have long been discouraged 
            {and condemned} for the awareness and forthright expression of anger....The taboos against 
            our feeling and expressing anger are so powerful that even knowing when we are angry is 
            not a simple matter. When a woman shows her anger, she is likely to be dismissed as irrational 
            or worse.... "Why are angry women so threatening to others? If we are guilty, depressed, 
            or self-doubting we stay in place. We do not take action except against our own selves and 
            we are unlikely to be agents of personal and social change. In contrast, angry women may 
            change and challenge the lives of us all, as witnessed by the past decade of feminism." 
            (I believe she refers, unfortunately, to the 1960's here.)
            "Anger is something we feel. It exists for a reason and always deserves our respect and 
            attention. We all have a right to everything we feel - and certainly our anger is no exception....Our 
            anger signals a problem, but provides us with no answers - not even a clue - as to how to 
            solve it." Dr. Lerner does not however advocate venting anger or letting it all hang out. 
            "Feelings of depression, low self-esteem, self-betrayal, and even self-hatred are inevitable 
            when we fight but continue to submit to unfair circumstances, when we complain but live 
            in a way that betrays our hopes, values and potentials....Those of us who are locked into 
            ineffective expressions of anger suffer as deeply as those of us who dare not get angry 
            at all."
            Dr. Lerner defines two styles of managing anger, the nice lady who avoids anger and conflict 
            at all cost, and the bitch who is easily angered and fights with no constructive resolution. 
            In reality, both these styles "serve equally well to protect others, to blur our clarity 
            of self, and to ensure that change does not occur....Anger is inevitable when [nice ladies'] 
            lives consist of giving in and going along; when we assume responsibility for other people's 
            feelings and reactions; when we relinquish our primary responsibility to proceed with our 
            own growth and ensure the quality of our own lives; when we behave as if having a relationship 
            is more important than having a self....Nothing, but nothing, will block the awareness of 
            anger so effectively as guilt and self-doubt. Our society cultivates guilt feelings in women 
            such that many of us still feel guilty if we are anything less than an emotional service 
            station to others." On the other hand, the nature of the hysterical bitch's "fighting or 
            angry accusations may actually allow the other person to get off the hook" protecting old 
            familiar patterns as surely as does silence. The end result in both these styles is we end 
            up feeling powerless. Our self-esteem suffers because we have not addressed the real issues 
            causing our anger.
            It is in our first family relationships that closeness often leads to stuckness. Dr. 
            Lerner teaches us to use our anger energy to get unstuck in our stickiest relationships 
            first, so these same issues will not fuel the fires in all of our other relationships. "The 
            ability to use anger as a tool for change requires that we gain a deeper understanding and 
            knowledge of how relationships operate....unresolved issues from our past inevitably surface 
            in our current relationships." We simply must learn to use our anger to change our own patterns 
            of relating rather than blame and try to change other people.
            Dr. Lerner identifies these four areas we need to learn to develop our skills and to 
            use our anger as a tool for change in relationships: "1. We Can Learn to Tune In to the 
            True Sources of Our Anger and Clarify Where We Stand. "2. We Can Learn Communications Skills. 
            "3. We Can Learn to Observe and Interrupt Nonproductive Patterns of Interaction....We cannot 
            make another person change his or her steps to an old dance, but if we change our own steps, 
            the dance no longer can continue in the same predictable pattern. "4. We Can Learn to Anticipate 
            and Deal with Countermoves and `Change Back!' Reactions from Others....In all families there 
            is a powerful opposition to one member defining a more independent self...The powerful emotional 
            counterforce (`You're wrong'; `Change back!' `Or else....') is predictable, understandable, 
            and to some extent, universal."
            Dr. Lerner adds, "It is never easy to move away from silent submission or ineffective 
            fighting toward a calm but firm assertion of who we are, where we stand, what we want, and 
            what is and is not acceptable to us....Not only can we acquire new ways of managing old 
            angers; we can also gain a clearer and stronger `I' and with it, the capacity for a more 
            intimate and gratifying `we.' Many of our problems with anger occur when we choose between 
            having a relationship and having a self. This book is about having both.....If two people 
            become one, a separation can feel like a psychological or a physical death. We may have 
            nothing - not even a self to fall back on - when an important relationships ends. We all 
            need to have both an `I' and a `we' that nourish and give meaning to each other....The more 
            we carve out a clear and separate `I', the more we can experience and enjoy both intimacy 
            and aloneness."
            Dr. Lerner demonstrates that all, and especially romantic, relationships can be like 
            a seesaw; "the underfunctioning of one individual allows for the overfunctioning of the 
            other....The more the man [i.e.] avoids sharing his own weaknesses, neediness, and vulnerability, 
            the more his woman may experience and express more than her share. The more the woman avoids 
            showing her competence and strength, the more her man will have an inflated sense of his 
            own. And if the underfunctioning partner starts looking better, the overfunctioning partner 
            will start looking worse....If the woman is further convinced that she herself cannot survive 
            without the relationship, she will vent her anger in a manner that only reinforces the old 
            familiar patterns from which her anger stems.... 
            "Whenever one person makes a move to rebalance the seesaw, there is a countermove by 
            the other party. There are few things more anxiety-arousing than shifting to a higher level 
            of self-assertion and separateness in an important relationship and maintaining the position 
            despite the countermoves of the other person....Countermoves are the other person's unconscious 
            attempt to restore a relationship to its previous balance or equilibrium, when anxiety about 
            separateness and change gets too high....What matters is the degree to which we are able 
            to take a clear position in a relationship and behave in ways that are congruent with our 
            stated beliefs....The woman who sits at the bottom of a seesaw marriage accumulates a great 
            amount of rage, which is in direct proportion to the degree of her submission and sacrifice....Sometimes, 
            to develop a stronger `I' is to come to terms with our deep-seated wish to leave an unsatisfactory 
            marriage and this possibility may be no less frightening than the fear of being left."
            Dr. Learners covers the subject of triangles in great depth. "Identifying the real issues 
            is not an easy matter. It is particularly difficult among family members because when two 
            adults have a conflict, they often bring in a third party to form a triangle, which then 
            makes it even harder for the two people involved to identify and work out their problems.... 
            Underground issues from one relationship or context invariably fuel our fires in another." 
            We detour "feelings of anger from one person to another....We reduce anxiety in one relationship 
            by focusing on a third party, who we unconsciously pull into the situation to lower the 
            emotional intensity in the original pair. Triangles can become rigidly entrenched blocking 
            the growth of the individuals in them and keeping us from identifying the actual sources 
            of conflict in our relationships....Triangles greatly increase the probability of escalating 
            aggression....The three essential ingredients of extricating oneself from a triangle are: 
            staying calm, staying out, and hanging in." It is never helpful to anyone to gossip or talk 
            about a third party. "In the best of all possible worlds we might envision separate person-to-person 
            relationships with our friends, coworkers, and family members that were not excessively 
            influenced by other relationships."
            Most of us put our anger energy into trying to change the other person. This, Dr. Lerner 
            repeatedly exclaims, is impossible. We "secretly believe that we have the corner on the 
            `truth' and that this would be a much better world if everyone else believed and reacted 
            exactly as we do. But one of the hallmarks of emotional maturity is to recognize the validity 
            of multiple realities and to understand that people think, feel, and react differently." 
            Closeness does not mean sameness. "We have a right to everything we think and feel - and 
            so does everyone else. It is our job to state our thoughts and feelings clearly and to make 
            responsible decisions that are congruent with our values and beliefs. It is not our job 
            to make another person think and feel the way we do or the way we want them to.... We are 
            able to move away from ineffective fighting only when we give up the fantasy that we can 
            change or control another person. It is only then that we can reclaim the power that is 
            truly ours - the power to change our own selves and take new and different actions on our 
            own behalf."
            Dr. Lerner gives example after example illustrating these same basic lessons: "First, 
            `letting it all hang out' may not be helpful because venting anger may protect rather than 
            challenge the old rules and patterns in a relationship. Second, the only person we can change 
            and control is our own self. Third, changing our own self can feel so threatening and difficult 
            that it is often easier to continue an old pattern of silent withdrawal or ineffective fighting 
            and blaming. And, finally, de-selfing is at the heart of our most serious anger problems."
            "Even rats in a maze learn to vary their behavior if they keep hitting a dead end. Why 
            in the world, then, do we behave less intelligently than laboratory animals? Repeating the 
            same old fights protects us from the anxieties we are bound to experience when we make a 
            change....Human nature is such that when we are angry, we tend to become so emotionally 
            reactive to what the other person is doing to us that we lose our ability to observe our 
            own part in the interaction....Self-observation is the process of seeing the interaction 
            of ourselves and others, and recognizing that the ways other people behave with us has something 
            to do with the way we behave with them." The form of this circular dance is universal in 
            which the behavior of each serves "to maintain and provoke the other. Once a part of an 
            established twosome - married or unmarried, lesbian or straight - the more each person tries 
            to change things, the more things stay the same."
            I am beginning to understand how my interaction had become a circular dance in which 
            my behavior maintained and provoked behavior in my significant other. "In the final analysis 
            it matters little who started it.... A good way to make this break is to recognize the part 
            we play in maintaining and provoking the other person's behavior. Even if we are convinced 
            that the other person is ninety-seven percent to blame we are still in control of changing 
            our three percent." Bottom line - "We do not have the power to change another person who 
            does not want to change, and our attempts to do so may actually protect him or her from 
            change. This is the paradox of the circular dances in which we all participate."
            "Opposites do attract, but they do not always live happily ever after. On the one hand, 
            it is reassuring to live with someone who will express parts of one's own self that one 
            is afraid to acknowledge; yet, the arrangement has its inevitable costs: The woman [i.e.]who 
            is expressing feelings not only for herself but also for her husband will indeed end up 
            behaving `hysterically' and `irrationally.' The man who relies on his wife to do the `feeling 
            work' for him will increasingly lose touch with this important part of himself, "and when 
            the time comes that he needs to draw upon his emotional resources, he may find that nobody's 
            at home....This is the `masculinity' that our society breeds - the male who feels at home 
            in the world of things and abstract ideas but who has little empathic connection to others 
            , little attunement to his own internal world, and little willingness or capacity to `hang 
            in' when a relationship becomes conflicted and stressful... . Doing the `feeling work' like 
            cleaning up has long been defined as `woman's work', and lots of women are good at it. As 
            with cleaning up, men will not begin to do their shares until women no longer do it for 
            them."
            "When a woman vents her anger ineffectively or expresses it in an overemotional style, 
            she does not threaten her man. If anything she helps him maintain his masculine cool, while 
            she herself is perceived as infantile or irrational. When a woman clarifies the issue and 
            uses her anger to move toward something new and different, the change occurs. If she stops 
            over-functioning [overinvolvement] for others and starts acting for herself, her underfunctioning 
            [underinvolvement] man is likely to acknowledge and deal with his own anxieties."
            Dr. Lerner goes on to identify two other types of dancers: "Emotional pursuers are persons 
            who reduce their anxiety by sharing feelings and seeking close emotional contact. Emotional 
            distancers are persons who reduce their anxiety by intellectualizing and withdrawing." No 
            matter the problem, these two styles of responding to stress eventually become at odds. 
            The common outcome of this classic scenario is that "after the escalating dance of pursuit 
            and withdrawal proceeds for some time, the woman [most often the pursuer] goes into what 
            therapists call `reactive distance', which only temporarily reverses the pursuit cycle or 
            has little effect at all....When a pursuer stops pursuing and begins to put her energy back 
            into her own life - without distancing or expressing anger at the other person - the circular 
            dance has been broken....A relationship becomes more `true' and balanced as the pursuer 
            can allow herself to acknowledge and express more of her own wish for independence and space, 
            and in turn, the distancer can begin to acknowledge more of his dependency and wish for 
            closeness."
            She repeats again, "Changing another person is a solution that never, ever works." The 
            power that is ours is only and always the power to change our own self. The only real power 
            we have is the power to act and make choices. However, to try to change the other person 
            is usually the first thing we do with our anger. The second thing we do is cut ourselves 
            off either emotionally or geographically. Such distancing does bring short-term relief but 
            there are long term costs - "the unresolved emotional intensity is likely to get played 
            out in other important relationships....When emotional intensity is high in a family, most 
            of us put the entire responsibility for poor communication on the other person....Always, 
            we perceive that it is the other who prevents us from speaking and keeps the relationship 
            from changing. We disown our own part in the interactions we complain of and, with it, our 
            power to bring about a change."
            OK! What do we do instead of trying to change the other person or their thoughts and feelings? 
            We clearly state our beliefs and convictions and we stand behind them. This includes identifying 
            within ourselves the true source of our anger, usually our independence from that person. 
            As we become less scared and guilty about showing our own strong and separate selves, in 
            a mature and responsible fashion, we become more ready to make a change in the relationship, 
            a change to being a separate and different person with our own unique way of being in the 
            world. With this change comes the experience of separation anxiety, most often "based on 
            an underlying discomfort with separateness and individuality that has its roots in our early 
            family experience, where the unspoken expectation may have been that we keep a lid on our 
            expressions of self."
            "Hit and Run confrontation does not lead to lasting change.... If serious about change, 
            she must show for her own sake as well as the other that at last she is declaring her separateness 
            and independence, but she is not declaring a lack of caring or closeness. Independence means 
            that we clearly define our own selves on emotionally important issues, but it does not mean 
            emotional distance....The work of negotiating greater independence may be so fraught with 
            mutual anxieties about rejection and loss that the person making the move must be responsible 
            for maintaining emotional contact with the other." Success will rest on her ability to share 
            something about herself in a straightforward, nonblaming way while maintaining emotional 
            contact throughout the process. It requires also that she "uphold her position with persistence 
            and calm, without getting emotionally buffeted about by the inevitable countermoves and 
            `change back!' reactions we meet whenever we assume a more autonomous position in an important 
            relationship. This is what achieving selfhood and independence is all about. And it requires, 
            among other things a particular way of talking and a degree of clarity that are especially 
            difficult to achieve when we are angry."
            Another important technique that Dr. Lerner teaches is to turn anger into an "I message," 
            a nonblaming statement about one's own self. She emphasizes that "if our goal is to break 
            a pattern in an important relationship and/or to develop a strong sense of self that we 
            can bring to all our relationships, it is essential that we learn to translate our anger 
            into clear, nonblaming statements about our own self .... The significant issue for women 
            is that we may not have a clear `I' to communicate about and we are not prepared to handle 
            the intense negative reactions that come our way when we do begin to define and assert the 
            self....Women often fear that having a clear `I' means threatening a relationship or losing 
            an important person. Thus, rather than using our anger as a challenge to think more clearly 
            about the `I' in our relationships we may, when angry, actually blur what personal clarity 
            we do have."
            We really fear rocking the boat. "Feeling fuzzy-headed, inarticulate, and not so smart 
            are common reactions experienced by women as we struggle to take a stand on our own behalf. 
            It is not just anger and fighting that we learn to fear; we avoid asking precise questions 
            and making clear statements when we unconsciously suspect that doing so would expose our 
            differences, make the other person feel uncomfortable, and leave us standing alone."
            "Why would any of us attempt to deny our anger and sacrifice one of our most precious 
            possessions - our personal clarity?" For one thing, "our very definitions of `masculinity' 
            and `femininity' are based on the notion that women must function as nonthreatening helpmates 
            and ego builders to men lest men feel castrated and weakened." This explains when a woman's 
            anger turns to tears; she's attempting to restore togetherness. Instead she probably needs 
            to work harder at the task of clarifying her separateness and independence within her first 
            family. She cannot control the other person's reaction. She should not allow herself to 
            be controlled by them either. "She can simply stay on course by listening to what they have 
            to say and then restating her initial position. There is nothing wrong with "sounding like 
            a broken record now and then.... She cannot change the other person's mind or ensure that 
            justice will prevail. She can state her position, recognize her choices, and make responsible 
            decisions on her own behalf."
            "Our problem is not the fear of clarity but the absence of it. That we are angry is obvious. 
            But we may have little perspective on the `I,' as a result of focusing exclusively on what 
            the other person is doing to us.... Using our anger as a starting point to become more knowledgeable 
            about the self does not require that we analyze ourselves and provide lengthy psychologically 
            explanations of our reactions....Anger is a tool for change when it challenges us to become 
            more of an expert on the self and less of an expert on others. Learning to use our anger 
            effectively requires some letting go - letting go of blaming that other person whom we see 
            as causing our problems and failing to provide for our happiness; letting go of the notion 
            that it is our job to change other people or tell them how they should think, feel, behave. 
            Yet, this does not mean that we passively accept or go along with any behavior. In fact, 
            a `live-and-let-live' attitude can signal a de-selfed position, if we fail to clarify what 
            is and is not acceptable or desirable to us in a relationship. The main issue is how we 
            clarify our position....We can simply say, `well, it may seem crazy or irrational to you, 
            but this is the way I see it.' Of course, there is never a guarantee that other people will 
            alter their behavior" to suit you and me.
            Dr. Lerner also counsels to not be in a hurry with this. It's ok to be uncertain. Sit 
            with it for a while! She says, "Slow Down! Our anger can be a powerful vehicle for personal 
            growth and change if it does nothing more than help us recognize that we are not yet clear 
            about something." What most of us do when we are angry is judge, blame, criticize, moralize, 
            preach, instruct, interpret, and psychoanalyze. She goes on to say, "If I persist in repeating 
            this point, it is because it is an extremely difficult concept to grasp, and hold on to 
            when we are angry. Conflicting wants and different perceptions of the world do not mean 
            that one party is `right' and the other `wrong.'"
            Some common communication mistakes we make are, for starters "not being particularly 
            tactful and strategic. Few people are able to listen well when they are being criticized 
            or told what's wrong with them." Second, we communicate as if to convey that we are an expert 
            on the other person's experience. "'Who has the problem?' is a question that has nothing 
            to do with guilt or culpability. The one who has the problem is simply the party who is 
            dissatisfied with or troubled by the particular situation....How many of us can distinguish 
            with confidence where our responsibilities to others begin and end? How can women trained 
            from birth to define ourselves through our loving care of others - know with confidence 
            when it is time to finally say `Enough!'?" Many woman devote themselves so exclusively to 
            the needs of others that they betray if not lose themselves.
            "If however, we do not use our anger to define ourselves clearly in every important relationship 
            we are in - and manage our feelings as they arise - no one else will assume this responsibility 
            for us. We are never the first in our family to wrestle with a problem although it may feel 
            that way. All of us inherit the unsolved problems of our past....We put our energy into 
            taking responsibility for other people's feelings, thoughts and behavior and hand over to 
            others responsibility for our own. When this happens, it becomes difficult, if not impossible 
            for the old rules of a relationship to change....As we learn to "relinquish responsibility 
            for the self, we are prone to blame others for failing to fill up our emptiness or provide 
            for our happiness - which is not their job." It is however our job to "allow others the 
            space to manage their own pain and solve their own problems. When we do not put our primary 
            emotional energy into solving our own problems, we take on other people's problems as our 
            own. When we overfunction for another individual, we end up very angry and in the process, 
            we facilitate the growth of no one." We must "acknowledge that we do not have the answers 
            or solutions to other people's problems." Even with children, "Change comes about when we 
            stop trying to shape up the other person and begin to observe patterns and find new options 
            for our own behavior."
            In closing, I'd like to thank Dr. Lerner for her tremendous contribution to women's psychology 
            and my emotional health, and for this "review of some basic do's and don'ts to keep in mind 
            when you are feeling angry.
            
               - Do speak up when an issue is important to you." 
 
               - Don't strike while the iron is hot. "
 
               - Do take time out to think about the problem and to clarify your position. "
 
               - Don't use `below-the-belt' tactics. 
 
               - Do speak in `I' language. 
 
               - Don't make vague requests.
 
               - Do try to appreciate the fact that people are different.
 
               - Don't participate in intellectual arguments that go nowhere.
 
               - Do recognize that each person is responsible for his or her own behavior. 
 
               - Don't tell another person what she or he thinks or feels or `should' think or feel. 
               Remember that one person's right to be angry does not mean that the other person is to 
               blame.
 
               - Do try to avoid speaking through a third party. 
 
               - Don't expect change to come about from hit-and-run confrontations. 
 
            
         
      
      
      
         1. Take This Waltz (tone-contemplative and quiet): This 2011 movie 
         starring Michelle Williams and Seth Rogen follows a young wife as she meets and becomes enchanted 
         with a handsome and rather forward stranger. She's been happy enough in her marriage, but the 
         stranger is suddenly everywhere: on her flight, in her cab, coincidentally living down the 
         street. Is it fate or something a little less magical? Although the story arc is a familiar 
         one - temptation, seduction, decision - director Sarah Polley goes a little deeper by extending 
         the movie past the wife's choice and exploring how the end of a relationship informs the beginning 
         of another. This is a thoughtful and lyrical examination of individuals in retrograde and whether 
         their patterns of behavior are ever broken. 
         2. The Good Wife (fast-paced and entertaining): Okay, so this 
         is a small screen offering that's also about a Chicago law firm, but TGW started out as the 
         ultimate separation story; the whole thing kicked off with Alicia Florrick rebuilding her own 
         life and career after the betrayal and broken promises of her husband, fallen politician Peter 
         Florrick. In recent seasons, there's been some not-so-neat rekindling between the two, in addition 
         to the extra-marital temptation - for Alicia - of Will Gardner. Because all three characters 
         are sensitively written and acted and complex and likable, the yo-yoing is more engaging than 
         annoying. TGW gets bonus points for divorce lawyer David Lee - hilarious, acerbic and manipulative 
         - in my opinion, one of the most entertaining characters on television (with interesting, high 
         profile cases to boot). 
         3. Blue Valentine (dark and depressing): Admittedly, this list 
         is a Michelle Williams fest, but only because she deserves it. (Full disclosure: I watched 
         Blue Valentine because I was blown away by her performance in Take This Waltz.) Blue 
         Valentine, and its well-publicized scene of Ryan Gosling (also excellent) threatening to jump 
         off the Manhattan Bridge, examines the demise of a relationship by interspersing the couples' 
         last moments together with scenes of their doomed start. It's a character study as much as 
         anything else, but it also sensitively shows how you know - and why - the end is the end is 
         the end. Sometimes two people are just... toxic. (This one is also the most depressing on the 
         bunch, though - if you're looking for even an ounce of hopefulness, a tiny little sprig of 
         a bud on a tree that might possibly signal spring somewhere, look elsewhere.) 
         4. It's Complicated (light and comedic; real estate porn): Nancy 
         Meyers uses all the standard rom-com tricks in this very watchable movie about a California 
         bakery owner who has an affair with her ex-husband You'll laugh, you'll feel good watching 
         Meryl Streep and Alec Baldwin - because it's impossible to feel bad watching Meryl Streep and 
         Alec Baldwin - you'll drool over everything from the food to the home décor. (Even the messiness 
         of getting back together with an ex and keeping it a secret from three grown children appears 
         kind of... fun and, in a way, not all that complicated.) It's Complicated examines 
         the issue of "closure" and its complications: how much of a relationship's demise is timing 
         or youth? Is there maybe always something - a little spark - remaining between two people who 
         have once been in love? So, there is some food for thought, but it's certainly not forced on 
         you. It's possible to watch the entire movie at face value, for the fun performances and that 
         house-my goodness - that amazing house and don't even get me started on the garden.
         
      
      
      A court drama
      
         
         Claudio Carvalho from Rio de Janeiro, 
         Brazil
         13 January 2012
         
         
            Mankind Is Flawed
            In Tehran, the teacher Simin (Leila Hatami) has requested the divorce from her husband, 
            the bank clerk Nader (Peyman Moadi). Simin wishes to live abroad to give a better life to 
            her eleven year-old daughter Termeh (Sarina Farhadi) and Nader, who is a family man but 
            very arrogant, wants to stay to take care of his father (Ali-Asghar Shahbazi) that has Alzheimer. 
            Simin moves to the house of her mother and Nader hires the religious Razieh (Sareh Bayat) 
            to take care of his father while he is working. 
            Razieh is pregnant but she does not tell her husband Hodjat (Shahab Hosseini), who owes 
            a large amount to the creditors, that she is working. When she arrives with her daughter 
            Somayeh (Kimia Hosseini)at Nader's house, she distracts and Nader's father goes to the street 
            and she goes and gets him back home. On the next day, when Nader arrives home with Termeh, 
            they find Nader's father tied up to his bed and Razieh and Somayeh are not at home. When 
            they arrive at home, Nader accuses Razieh of theft and expels her. Razieh feels offended 
            and argues with him, and Nader pushes her out at the front door. Razieh falls and has an 
            abortion. She goes to the court with her husband and the witnesses are summoned to testify.
            
            "Jodaeiye Nader az Simin" or the separation of Nader and Simin, is among the best Iranian 
            films I have seen and is a fantastic drama that shows how flawed mankind is, no matter in 
            Iran, Brazil, Europe or wherever. Despite the different values of the Iranian society comparing 
            with the Westerns ones, all the characters are flawed; therefore, the plot is realistic.
            
            Nader is a family man that loves his father and his daughter, but commits perjury, 
            is stubborn and arrogant and asks his acquaintances to lie. Simin uses the secret that 
            Razieh had told her to take advantage. Termeh lies to save her father from justice. Razieh 
            is religious and worried with Allah and sins, but she was capable to lie fearing the reaction 
            of her husband. Hodjat is a rude and impulsive man that is violent. 
            The direction is perfect and the acting is top-notch. The story is engaging and believable 
            and differences of cultures between Iran and Brazil are intriguing. I really recommend this 
            film for any cinema lover or people interested in learning a little about the Iranian culture. 
            My vote is ten.
            Title (Brazil): "A Separaçăo" ("The Separation") 
         
      
      
Notable quotes:
"... N would [even] lie when the truth would save his        neck ..."
"...  "I lie. Compulsively and needlessly. All the time. About everything. And I often        contradict myself. Why do I need to do this? To make myself interesting or attractive. In other        words, to secure narcissistic supply (attention, admiration, adulation,        gossip )." ..."
"... Because they're not genuinely interested in others, they're poor listeners ..."
"... They can be extremely mean-spirited (as in taking an almost perverse delight in raining        on another's parade). ..."
"... They're untrustworthy: As one discussant bluntly puts it: "Don't tell them  anything         you aren't prepared to get shoved up your butt later ..."
"... Despite their self- confident ,        better-than-thou exterior, they often betray feelings of weakness, insecurity, inferiority,        jealousy , and cowardice.        One commenter even sums them up as "emotional cripples." ..."
"... What I, and others on this board, have learned from        dealing with N bullies in our personal lives applies to terrorists. There can be no appeasement,        no attempting to reason with them, no attempt to "fix" them, to unseat their deep-seated hatred,        shame  and envy.        Sounds terribly harsh to the uninitiated, but not recognizing that can only lead to our own destruction. ..."
"... Looking back on ALL the Ns I've ever known and merged with, I see there WERE signs within        minutes of meeting the N that they were grossly selfish, immoral,        sex -addicted or [that]        something was definitely 'off' [about them]. I didn't honour my intuition,        gut feelings  and        instinct. The truth is that I had almost no experience setting healthy boundaries. ..."
 
   Of all the oppressive, crazy-making features of the narcissist, the one perhaps most frequently cited 
   is their exasperating dishonesty. And such untruthfulness has at times led their no-longer-so-gullible 
   victims to describe them as con artists. Here's a highly selective sampling of such complaints:
      - "The lies, the
      flirting, the lies, 
      the comparing, the lies, the ambivalence, the lies, the belittling, the lies, the teasing, the 
      lies, the built up promises, the lies, the setting up for disappointment. Did I mention the lies?"
      [!]  
       
      
 
      - "I had never known a real con man in my life. I thought only the stupid or elderly got 
      suckered." 
       
      
 
      - "They memorize
      body language 
      and can spot a person who might feel a little vulnerable a mile away." 
       
      
 
      - "My ex-husband used to tell HUGE lies about me. Lies that always made ME look bad and HIM 
      look like a martyr (when the opposite was true). I didn't realize this until AFTER we separated 
      and, Boy, was it devastating! I thought that I knew ALL the horrors, to find out there were even 
      more. . . . I didn't think I could take the pain!" 
       
      
 
      - [And, particularly, note this striking observation on the narcissist's incorrigible habit 
      of prevarication-which is in line with the substantial literature linking the so-called "pathological 
      liar" with the narcissist]: "N would [even] lie when the truth would save his 
      neck."
 
   
   The controversial Dr. Sam Vaknin, creator of this forum on narcissism and himself a self-confessed 
   NPD, has written profusely-at times, brilliantly-on the subject. In his article "Pseudologica Fantastica," 
   he freely admits:
   
      -  "I lie. Compulsively and needlessly. All the time. About everything. And I often 
      contradict myself. Why do I need to do this? To make myself interesting or attractive. In other 
      words, to secure narcissistic supply (attention, admiration, adulation,
      gossip)."
 
   
   ... ... ...
   Below, I'll summarize some other distressing characteristics of the narcissist regularly alluded 
   to by their victims:
      - Because they're not genuinely interested in others, they're poor listeners. Though 
      it can seem that they're listening attentively, they're unable to accurately repeat back 
      what was said to them.
 
      - Calculating how every situation might benefit (or disadvantage) them, there's almost always 
      an ulterior motive behind what they say or do.
 
      - They can be extremely mean-spirited (as in taking an almost perverse delight in raining 
      on another's parade).
 
      - They're untrustworthy: As one discussant bluntly puts it: "Don't tell them anything 
      you aren't prepared to get shoved up your butt later . . . or down your throat, or in your 
      heart in the form of a dagger. And of course there are those things you tell them that you have 
      to be prepared to have TWISTED into things they can shove…".
 
      - Despite their self-confident, 
      better-than-thou exterior, they often betray feelings of weakness, insecurity, inferiority,
      jealousy, and cowardice. 
      One commenter even sums them up as "emotional cripples."
 
      - If they're far out on the narcissistic continuum, they can't be changed-and certainly not 
      by their partners. Here's the most pointed (and painful) description of the futility of even
      trying to alter their behavior: "What I, and others on this board, have learned from 
      dealing with N bullies in our personal lives applies to terrorists. There can be no appeasement, 
      no attempting to reason with them, no attempt to "fix" them, to unseat their deep-seated hatred,
      shame and envy. 
      Sounds terribly harsh to the uninitiated, but not recognizing that can only lead to our own destruction."
 
   
   The one consolation for victims of the narcissist's "dagger" (or "vampirish teeth") is the hard-won 
   insights they eventually gain, which makes it possible for at least some of them to repudiate a relationship 
   that's been so toxic to them. Again, in their own (sadder-but-wiser) words:
   
      - "Looking back on ALL the Ns I've ever known and merged with, I see there WERE signs within 
      minutes of meeting the N that they were grossly selfish, immoral,
      sex-addicted or [that] 
      something was definitely 'off' [about them]. I didn't honour my intuition,
      gut feelings and 
      instinct. The truth is that I had almost no experience setting healthy boundaries." 
 
      - "Staying with an N, or making contact with an ex-N, is like putting your hands directly on 
      a hot stovetop to warm them. It will "work" for five seconds before it scalds you." 
 
   
    
Notable quotes:
"... The entitlement surge of subtle narcissism is a bit like the normally happy drunk suddenly     becoming surly and going on a bender, cleaning out the liquor cabinets and storming off to buy     more booze. ..."
"... Your partner begins complaining about the messy house after your pregnancy,     feeling he works hard enough that he deserves to come home to a clean house....  ..."
 
   ...narcissism is marked by an entitlement surge-those moments when a normally understanding 
   friend or partner or coworker angrily behaves as if the world owes them. It's usually triggered 
   by a sudden fear that their special status has been threatened in some way. Until this point, 
   their need for the world to revolve around them is mostly under wraps, because it hasn't been 
   called into question. Kevin didn't ask for Sherry's support or even try to understand how hard 
   her year after her mother's death had been. In his mind, he deserved her full understanding 
   because he felt so close to his dream of a becoming a law partner.
   The entitlement surge of subtle narcissism is a bit like the normally happy drunk suddenly 
   becoming surly and going on a bender, cleaning out the liquor cabinets and storming off to buy 
   more booze. Your usually affable boss suddenly tears into you, worried that the latest 
   project (his idea) is failing. Unbeknownst to you, he's secretly had plans to become the CEO ever 
   since he arrived. Your partner begins complaining about the messy house after your pregnancy, 
   feeling he works hard enough that he deserves to come home to a clean house.... 
   ... ... ... 
   To read more about subtle (and dangerous) narcissism, including specific, research-backed 
   strategies to protect yourself from it, order  Rethinking 
   Narcissism     (link is 
   external) today.
 
Notable quotes:
"...  The other narcissist is my mother. For years I lived in terror of her rages, and how        the family pretty much revolves around her. I didn't understand how a parent could be so        cruel, and assume everyone else was a bad person. ..."
"... As far as healthy narcissism goes, it's something I'm working on. My mother has stripped        all of our self-esteem, as she relishes putting loved one's fault under the microscope as        often and loudly as possible. I grew up with massive amounts of fear and anxiety assuming        everyone was very concerned about every minor mistake I made. I wish I had worked on this        earlier. Mom taught me how to make a mountain out of a tiny molehill. ..."
"... It's true, many children who've lived with extremely narcissistic        parents--and I count myself among them--grow up to struggle with a more generous self-image. ..."
 
   Narcissism has never been an official mental health disorder. Narcissist isn't a recognized 
   diagnostic descriptor either; it's shorthand for someone who scores higher than the average on 
   narcissism measures and may or may not be disordered
   ...It's a mistake to talk about "symptoms of narcissism." What people usually mean is symptoms 
   of pathological narcissism or NPD. 
   Anonymous on February 17, 2016 - 9:04am 
   
      I have two narcissists in my family. One borders on sociopathy so I avoid her, she scares 
      me. The other narcissist is my mother. For years I lived in terror of her rages, and how 
      the family pretty much revolves around her. I didn't understand how a parent could be so 
      cruel, and assume everyone else was a bad person.
      But now that can attach a label to the problem and get a better understanding of what is 
      happening and why, I can create much better boundaries and sit back and watch the crazy 
      unfold. My mother is pretty frustrated that her usual tricks aren't having the impact on me 
      that they once did.
      As far as healthy narcissism goes, it's something I'm working on. My mother has stripped 
      all of our self-esteem, as she relishes putting loved one's fault under the microscope as 
      often and loudly as possible. I grew up with massive amounts of fear and anxiety assuming 
      everyone was very concerned about every minor mistake I made. I wish I had worked on this 
      earlier. Mom taught me how to make a mountain out of a tiny molehill.
   
   Craig Malkin PhD on February 19, 2016  
   
      It sounds like you've been through hell
      And come back. It's true, many children who've lived with extremely narcissistic 
      parents--and I count myself among them--grow up to struggle with a more generous self-image. 
      It's like we swallow that parent whole, their voice plaguing us at every turn. It's hard work 
      silencing that inner critic. But that's the task -- well worth undertaking-- of overcoming 
      echoism and finding our voices. I wish you well in continuing to find yours. 
   
Notable quotes:
"... In fact, one of their central defenses (or stratagems) is to endlessly project     onto others the very flaws (and fears!) they're unable, or unwilling, to allow into awareness. ..."
"... "Narcissists are great con-artists. After all, they succeed in deluding themselves! As a     result, very few professionals see through them." ~  ..."
"...  most therapists learn quickly enough the     signs and signals that give away a narcissistic patient (e.g., regularly blaming others for their     problems, taking very little responsibility for why their lives aren't working, telling  them      how to do  therapy ,         ..."
 
   Curiously, deep, deep down-and undoubtedly unconscious to them-they know they're not really what 
   they project. In fact, one of their central defenses (or stratagems) is to endlessly project 
   onto others the very flaws (and fears!) they're unable, or unwilling, to allow into awareness. 
   As critical as they are about others' shortcomings, they're amazingly blind to their own. (And in 
   this respect, the reader might take a look at my earlier piece, "The 
   Narcissist's Dilemma: They Can Dish It Out, But . . . ").
   ... ... ... 
   "To love oneself is the beginning of a life-long romance." ~ Oscar Wilde
   
      Although as stated, this quote is undoubtedly ambiguous, the term "romance" leads me to believe 
   that Wilde's notion of self-love leans toward the pathological-and maybe the auto-erotic as well. 
   But healthy self-love really has very little to do with the romantic: it's grounded in positive self-regard 
   and an acceptance of one's flaws and frailties. On the contrary, being "in love with" oneself (as 
   implied by Wilde's quote) suggests a self-absorption that can only be detrimental to narcissists 
   in their relationships with others. In fact, one of the most common descriptions of unhealthy narcissism 
   emphasizes their inability to care about other people-apart, that is, from how these others might 
   satisfy the demands of their (insatiable) egos.
      "Half the harm that is done in this world is due to people who want to feel important. They 
   don't mean to do harm, but the harm [that they cause] does not interest them. Or they do not see 
   it, or they justify it because they are absorbed in the endless struggle to think well of themselves." 
   ~ T. S. Eliot
      This quote makes a vital distinction between narcissists' being malevolent (cf. the sociopath) 
   and their simply lacking concern about how their behaviors might adversely affect others. It's yet 
   another way of drawing attention to their supreme self-absorption, which makes it impossible for 
   them to empathically identify with another's feelings, Most of the time they don't consciously intend 
   to take advantage of others. Such exploitation is merely a side effect of their overriding need to 
   feel more important and better than others-and so feel "good enough." Nonetheless, their insensitivity 
   to the wants and needs of those around them can at times be nothing less than astonishing.
   
   ... ... ... 
   "Narcissists are great con-artists. After all, they succeed in deluding themselves! As a 
   result, very few professionals see through them." ~ anonymous.
   
      This statement seems somewhat exaggerated to me. For most therapists learn quickly enough the 
   signs and signals that give away a narcissistic patient (e.g., regularly blaming others for their 
   problems, taking very little responsibility for why their lives aren't working, telling them 
   how to do therapy, 
      etc.). 
      Still, the quote is instructive in pointing out not only the enormous self-deception in the way 
   narcissists see themselves, but also their singular expertise in deceiving others. Speaking with 
   bogus authority, they typically have an excellent track record in getting others to see things as 
   they do, even though the result to those so taken in can be disastrous (e.g., being persuaded to 
   make a truly ill-considered investment).
      All of which is to say that-on many different levels-getting involved with a narcissist can be 
   as dangerous as a snake bite. And the unexpected sting of it all can, alas, last a good deal longer.
   
   Note 1: In examining literally hundreds of quotes for this post, I came across 
   many that centered not anywhere so much on the narcissist as on their hapless victims. Consequently, 
   my next post will explore the damage that narcissists-especially those far out on the narcissistic 
   continuum -do to those who unwittingly put their trust in them. It's called
   
   "The Vampire's Bite: Victims of Narcissists Speak Out." 
   Note 2: If you'd like to explore other posts I've written on narcissism, here 
   are the links:
   
   Note 3: If you'd like to check out other posts I've done for Psychology Today 
   blogs generally-on a broad variety of topics-click
   here.
      
         
         In the 1970s, Ronald Reagan villainized a Chicago woman for bilking the government. Her 
         other sins-including possible kidnappings and murders-were far worse.
         Jack Sherwin knew he'd seen her before. It was Aug. 8, 1974, and the Chicago burglary detective 
         was working a case on the city's South Side. Though her name and face didn't look familiar, 
         Sherwin recognized the victim's manner, and her story. She'd been robbed, Linda Taylor explained, 
         and she was sorry to report that the burglar had good taste: $14,000 in furs, jewelry, and 
         cash were missing from her apartment. Thank heavens, most of it was insured.After listening 
         to her tale of woe, Sherwin asked Taylor if she'd mind getting him some water. When she returned, 
         the detective kept the glass as evidence.
         The fingerprints collected from Taylor's kitchen helped jog Sherwin's memory. Two years 
         earlier, the same woman had been charged with making a bogus robbery claim-that time, the thieves 
         had supposedly made off with $10,000 worth of valuables. Sherwin knew Linda Taylor because, 
         out of pure happenstance, he'd been called on to investigate both of these alleged burglaries. 
         She was living in a different part of town, using a different name, and sporting a different 
         head of hair. But this was the same woman, pulling the same stunt.
         Sherwin cited Taylor, again, for making a false report. But the 35-year-old police officer, 
         a former Marine and a 12-year veteran of the force, didn't stop there. "The more I dug into 
         it, the more I found that just wasn't right," he remembers. First, he learned that she was 
         getting welfare checks under multiple names. Then he discovered Taylor's husbands-"Oh, I guess 
         maybe seven men that I knew of," Sherwin says. The detective and his partner, Jerry Kush, got 
         to work tracking down this parade of grooms, and they found a few who were willing to talk. 
         Sherwin's hunch had been right: This woman was up to no good.
         In late September 1974, seven weeks after Sherwin met Taylor for the second time, the detective's 
         findings made the Chicago Tribune. "Linda Taylor received Illinois welfare checks 
         and food stamps, even tho[ugh] she was driving three 1974 autos-a Cadillac, a Lincoln, and 
         a Chevrolet station wagon-claimed to own four South Side buildings, and was about to leave 
         for a vacation in Hawaii," wrote
         Pulitzer 
         Prize winner George Bliss. The story detailed a 14-page report that Sherwin had put together 
         illuminating "a lifestyle of false identities that seemed calculated to confuse our computerized, 
         credit-oriented society." There was evidence that the 47-year-old Taylor had used three Social 
         Security cards, 27 names, 31 addresses, and 25 phone numbers to fuel her mischief, not to mention 
         30 different wigs.
         As the Tribune and other outlets stayed on the story, those figures continued to 
         rise. Reporters noted that Linda Taylor had used as many as 80 names, and that she'd received 
         at least $150,000-in illicit welfare cash, the numbers that Ronald Reagan would cite on the 
         campaign trail in 1976. (Though she used dozens of different identities, I've chosen to call 
         her Linda Taylor in this story, as it's how the public came to know her at the height of her 
         infamy.) Taylor also gained a reputation as a master of disguise. "She is black, but is able 
         to pass herself off as Spanish, Filipino, white, and black," the executive director of Illinois' 
         Legislative Advisory Committee on Public Aid told the Associated Press in November 1974. "And 
         it appears she can be any age she wishes, from the early 20s to the early 50s."
         For Bliss and the Tribune, the scandal wasn't just that Taylor had her hand in 
         the till and had the seeming ability to shape-shift. The newspaper also directed its ire at 
         the sclerotic bureaucracy that allowed her schemes to flourish. Bliss had been reporting on 
         waste, fraud, and mismanagement in the Illinois Department of Public Aid for a long time prior 
         to Taylor's emergence. His stories-on doctors who billed Medicaid for fictitious procedures 
         and overworked caseworkers who failed to purge ineligible recipients from the welfare rolls-showed 
         an agency in disarray. That disarray didn't make for an engaging read, though: "State orders 
         probe of Medicaid" is not a headline that provokes shock and anger. Then the welfare queen 
         came along and dressed the scandal up in a fur coat. This was a crime that people could comprehend, 
         and Linda Taylor was the perfectly unsympathetic figure for outraged citizens to point a finger 
         at. 
         ... ... ...
         
         The 21-year-old sailor was working in the dental clinic at Chicago's Great Lakes Naval Training 
         Center when a beautiful woman walked in to get her teeth cleaned. Something about her was totally 
         fascinating, Jones remembers. "I met her because she was pretty and I was shooting game to 
         her," he says. "I guess her game must've been stronger than mine, because I met her that Monday 
         and [got] married that Saturday."
         
         Jones thought he was lucky to get hitched to the 35-year-old Linda Sholvia. She was beautiful, 
         with the smoothest skin he'd ever seen. She also gave him $1,000 as a wedding present, and 
         he had his pick of fancy new cars. But Lamar and Linda's marriage lasted only a little longer 
         than their five-day courtship. A few weeks after they exchanged vows, Linda was arrested. When 
         Jones paid her bond, his new wife fled the state. To make things worse, she stole his color 
         TV.
         
         The young Navy man realized that something was amiss with his new bride even before the television 
         went missing. When she showed him a degree from a university in Haiti, he noticed that it said 
         Linda Taylor, not Linda Sholvia. Jones says Linda had five mailboxes at her residence at 8221 
         S. Clyde Ave., and she'd get letters in all five, addressed to different names. He got a bit 
         uneasy when Linda told him, after they were married, that he was her eighth husband. She also 
         had a "sister" named Constance who seemed more like her adult daughter.
         ... ... ...
         A month after his wife was brought back from Arizona, Lamar Jones testified against her 
         in front of a Cook County grand jury. Jones says that around the time of that proceeding, he 
         was shuffled into a car with another witness and told they had something in common: They were 
         both married to Linda (or maybe it was Connie) at the same time. That was a surprise to Jones. 
         His wife had told him that husband No. 7 was dead.
         ... ... ...
         Isaiah Gant, who has been an attorney for nearly four decades, says his onetime client "was 
         a scam artist like I have never run across since." Gant, now an assistant federal public defender 
         in Nashville, Tenn., says Taylor could change personalities in an instant. "If she wanted to 
         be a ho, she could be a ho. If she wanted to be a princess, she could be a princess," he says. 
         "The woman was smooth."
         ... ... ...
         
         It got stranger from there. Constance told the Defender that Rose Kennedy, Lawrence Wakefield's 
         purported common-law wife, was no such thing. She also accused Kennedy of trying to poison 
         her, saying, "The doctors said I had swallowed enough strychnine to kill a dozen people." And 
         in just the last few weeks, she reported, police had captured two white men trying to break 
         into her house; a "swarthy Italian" had threatened to kill her; and her bodyguard had narrowly 
         thwarted an attempt to blow up her 1964 Cadillac. A few days after that, the Associated Negro 
         Press wrote that Constance Wakefield Steinberg-she was a "light-skinned Negro woman with a 
         'Jewish' surname"-"reported to police that her 11-year-old son, John, had been kidnapped and 
         that she had received a number of threatening calls."
         
         Whether she was going by Constance Wakefield, Linda Taylor, or any other name, the future welfare 
         queen never went for subtlety. She was a woman of great ambition, and she conjured a universe 
         in which the forces arrayed against her were equally extraordinary. Someone was always trying 
         to kill her, or steal from her, or kidnap her, or take her children. These stories rarely checked 
         out. Her son John, the Chicago Sun-Times would report, hadn't been kidnapped. He was found 
         by FBI agents wandering near his house, and explained that he'd run away after a fight with 
         his sister. Census records and Lawrence Wakefield's own death certificate reveal that Edith 
         Jarvis was not Wakefield's wife, as Taylor had asserted-she was his mother. When Taylor went 
         to probate court to press her claim to the Wakefield fortune, even more of her story fell apart.
         
         Constance Wakefield was many people, but she probably wasn't Constance Wakefield.
         
         In this and many of her other battles, Linda Taylor's weapons were documents, paperwork of 
         uncertain provenance that buttressed her version of events. Though her birth to Lawrence and 
         Edith did not appear in contemporaneous records, she procured a delayed birth certificate from 
         the doctor who she claimed had delivered her. She also furnished a pair of Lawrence Wakefield's 
         heretofore-undiscovered wills. The first, which dated to 1943, included a description of Wakefield's 
         daughter that matched her own, "specifically describing a scar and a mole and their location 
         on her body," the Tribune reported. The second will, from 1962, indicated that Wakefield had 
         $2 million, that the vast majority of that lucre should go to his daughter, and that Rose Kennedy-who 
         Taylor maintained was Lawrence Wakefield's housekeeper, not his common-law wife-was entitled 
         to precisely $1. "She is no good and will try to take everything from my baby," the will read, 
         according to the Tribune. "She has stoled enough from me since the death of my Edith."
         None of this evidence-the delayed birth certificate, the will that conveniently trashed 
         her primary rival-convinced Cook County Assistant State's Attorney Gerald Mannix that he was 
         dealing with Lawrence Wakefield's real daughter. A long way from Chicago, he found someone 
         who could help him prove it.
         "A surprise witness testified in Probate court yesterday that Miss Constance Wakefield, 
         who claims to be the illegitimate daughter of the late Lawrence Wakefield, policy king, and 
         thus heir to his fortune, actually is Martha Louise White," the Tribune reported on Nov. 10, 
         1964. Hubert Mooney, who claimed to be Martha's uncle, explained that his niece was born in 
         Summit, Ala., around 1926, making her about 38 years old-nine years older than she'd claimed 
         to be in the guise of Constance Wakefield. Martha, Mooney said, was the daughter of his sister 
         Lydie and a man named Marvin White. The court didn't have to take his word for it. Hubert's 
         84-year-old mother came from Tennessee to testify that she'd assisted in her granddaughter 
         Martha's birth.
         Mooney said he'd seen his niece most recently in Arkansas-the state where "Constance Wakefield" 
         had grown up, according to her interview with The Chicago Defender. He'd also run into her 
         in Oakland, Calif. On that occasion, she'd asked her uncle to bail her out of jail. According 
         to the Chicago Sun-Times, the assistant state's attorney produced fingerprints and "police 
         records from Oakland, which he said were those of Miss Wakefield, listing arrests for prostitution, 
         contributing to the delinquency of a minor, and assault." A police expert testified that those 
         fingerprints matched those of Beverly Singleton, a woman who'd been arrested the year prior 
         for assaulting a 12-year-old girl. Constance Wakefield, it seemed, was many people, but she 
         probably wasn't Constance Wakefield.
         This dramatic testimony didn't clear everything up. For her part, "Constance Wakefield" 
         said she knew Hubert Mooney but that she was not Martha Louise White. She also denied that 
         she was the woman identified in all those criminal records, though she did confess that she'd 
         been charged with assault in Oakland.
         Weighing all the evidence, Judge Anthony Kogut cited Taylor for contempt of court and sentenced 
         her to six months in jail. She wouldn't get any of Lawrence Wakefield's money, the balance 
         of which would go to Rose Kennedy, the policy king's common-law wife.
         ... ... ...
         
         There's almost no chance that Sandra was really kidnapped. Two years prior, Taylor had falsely 
         reported that Johnnie had been abducted. He says now that his mother likely just wanted the 
         cops to do the hard work of tracking him down after he'd left home of his own volition.
         
         In 1967, she'd try the same line again, telling Chicago police that another of her children 
         had been taken. When the cops investigated, they found that the child wasn't missing. They 
         also discovered that the kid didn't belong to her.
         ... ... ...
         In another Tribune story, Bliss and Griffin noted that Linda Taylor had been arrested twice 
         in the 1960s for absconding with children, though she wasn't convicted in either case because 
         the little ones were returned. The reporters also laid out a possible motive. "Chicago's welfare 
         queen," they wrote, "has been linked by Chicago police to a scheme to defraud the public aid 
         department during the mid-1960s by buying newborn infants to substantiate welfare claims."
         ... ... ...
         This theory is a little hard to believe. Given Taylor's ability to fabricate paperwork, 
         acquiring flesh-and-blood children seems like an unnecessary risk if all you're looking to 
         do is pad a welfare application. Her son Johnnie believes his mother saw children as commodities, 
         something to be acquired and sold. He remembers a little black girl-he doesn't know her 
         name-who stayed with them for a few months in the early 1960s, "and then she just disappeared 
         one day." Shortly before Lawrence Wakefield died, Johnnie says, a white baby named Tiger showed 
         up out of nowhere, and then left the household just as mysteriously. I ask him if he knew where 
         these kids came from or who they belonged to. "You knew they wasn't hers," he says.
         ... ... ...
         
         Nine days later, a newborn child was kidnapped by a woman dressed in a white nurse's uniform. 
         Dora Fronczak told police that the mystery woman whisked away her son Paul Joseph, telling 
         the new mother that her baby boy needed to be examined by a doctor. Witnesses said the ersatz 
         nurse carried the infant through a rear exit and disappeared.
         The Fronczak case transfixed Chicago and the nation. The Tribune, the Sun-Times, and the 
         national wire services printed eyewitness accounts, sketches of the suspect, diagrams of the 
         kidnapper's probable path, and the family's pleas for their child's safe return. Within a day, 
         500 policemen were working the case, including 50 FBI agents. They were looking for a woman 
         between her mid-30s and mid-40s, around 5-foot-4 and 140 pounds, with close-set brown eyes. 
         Nine months after the kidnapping, the Tribune reported that a staggering 38,000 people had 
         been interviewed in connection with the case, and that 7,500 women had been eliminated as suspects. 
         Still, the baby-snatching nurse remained at large.
         Did Linda Taylor pull off one of the most notorious kidnappings of the 1960s? In early 1975, 
         law enforcement officials got a tip from one of Taylor's ex-husbands that she "appeared one 
         day in the mid-1960s with a newborn baby, altho[ugh] she had not been pregnant." Her explanation, 
         the Tribune said, was that "she hadn't realized she was pregnant until she gave birth that 
         morning."
         ... ... ...
         In 1977, a man named Samuel Harper told police prior to Taylor's sentencing for welfare 
         fraud that he believed she had kidnapped Paul Joseph Fronczak. He explained that he was living 
         with her at the time, that several other white infants were in her home, and that she left 
         the house in a white uniform on the day of the kidnapping. Johnnie Harbaugh confirms that Harper, 
         who was 69 years old in 1977 and likely died many years ago, lived with his mother for a period 
         in the 1960s. If anyone was in a position to know what Linda was up to, Johnnie believes, it 
         was Sam Harper.
         ... ... ...
         
         Jack Sherwin, who retired from the Chicago Police Department in the mid-1990s, says he saw 
         a composite drawing of the Fronczak kidnapper in an FBI office. "I looked at it for a second 
         and knew it was her," he says. In police reports from the 1970s, Taylor is listed at 5-foot-1 
         and 140 pounds with brown eyes-not that far off from the suspect's description. Sherwin says 
         she also had a station wagon at that time that matched the description of the potential getaway 
         car. He believes she was "guilty as hell."
         
         And yet, Linda Taylor was never charged in the kidnapping of Paul Joseph Fronczak. Ron Cooper, 
         a retired FBI agent who worked on the Fronczak case in the 1970s, says that they "had no cooperation 
         from people around her." Everyone who talked "would tell you a story and it would just sort 
         of be a flim-flam thing, and it wouldn't make any sense." If she had taken Paul Joseph in 1964, 
         he was long gone.
         ... ... ....
         Jack Sherwin, the fight to take down Linda Taylor was a multifront war. Some battles were 
         contested face to face. "At one point the arrestee Linda Taylor stated that no matter how much 
         money it took she was going to get my badge and me," the detective wrote in one police report. 
         "She then blurted out that she had a bullet for me. [There] were other things said such as 
         she would tell my wife about all the 'Black Ass' I had." Taylor also waged a disinformation 
         campaign, calling Sherwin's superiors to complain that the detective had it in for her. She 
         even took the fight to the astral plane, jabbing sharp pins into a voodoo doll, one she told 
         Sherwin that she'd made especially for him.
         
         Sherwin did the digging that led to Taylor's arrest for welfare fraud, and his testimony helped 
         send her to prison. But four decades after he first met Linda Taylor, the 74-year-old retired 
         detective can't help but feel that she beat him. She was his prize catch, but Sherwin ended 
         up getting snared in her net.
         ... ... ...
         For the Chicago burglary detective, Linda Taylor was never really the welfare queen. He 
         believed she was a kidnapper and a baby seller. Maybe something worse.
         ... ... ...
         
         Mrs. Parks, who was also named Patricia, earned her living as a schoolteacher. Her daughter 
         describes her as polished, a woman with a master's degree who hung out with college-educated 
         types. Parks-Lee says that Linda Taylor, by contrast, looked weathered, like she'd done a lot 
         of hard living. "She didn't associate with people like that," says Parks-Lee, who's now 48. 
         She believes her mother must have hired Taylor to keep house and watch the kids, nothing more. 
         She says that Linda Taylor was the worst nanny they ever had.
         
         Taylor took up residence with the Parks family in 1974. At that point, Patricia Parks was a 
         healthy woman with three young children. Less than a year later, she was dead. At the time, 
         Taylor was out on bail, awaiting her welfare fraud trial. The Tribune explained that she was 
         now under investigation yet again after authorities "learned that Mrs. Parks reportedly had 
         willed her home to Miss Taylor and had made her the beneficiary of 'several' insurance policies 
         and the guardian of her three children."
         ... ... ...
         Taylor told the funeral director that Patricia Parks had cervical cancer. When her blood 
         was drawn at the funeral home, however, the sample contained a high level of barbiturates. 
         On Parks' death certificate, the coroner indicated that she had died of "combined phenobarbital, 
         methapyrilene, and salicylate intoxication." There is no indication that she had cancer.
         "She killed my mother," Parks-Lee says. She's so sure about what Linda Taylor did that she 
         says it three more times: "She killed my mother. She killed my mother. I just, I mean-she killed 
         my mother."
         ... ... ...
         As in the Fronczak kidnapping, Taylor was never charged with killing Patricia Parks. James 
         Piper, the prosecutor in the welfare fraud case, also looked into the alleged Parks homicide. 
         He tells me that he "was satisfied personally that there had been chicanery." But Piper says 
         that he wasn't able to acquire blood samples from the hospital where Parks had been pronounced 
         dead. He believed that without the samples there was no "connector"-nothing to convince a jury 
         that Taylor had administered a lethal drug cocktail to Parks. Piper says that his decision 
         wouldn't have prevented the Chicago police from continuing their investigation. He believed, 
         though, that indicting Taylor for murder would have created the perception that he was looking 
         for more publicity for the welfare fraud case-a case with clearer evidence, and one that he 
         didn't want to jeopardize.
         ... ... ...
         Other than Sherwin, nobody seemed all that motivated to learn the full extent of Linda Taylor's 
         crimes. Though the Tribune wrote about Taylor's purported connections to the Fronczak kidnapping 
         and the Parks homicide, the paper treated her kid-snatching and voodoo spells as colorful details-odd 
         facts to embellish the shocking welfare queen story. In 1975, the Tribune reported the allegation 
         that Linda Taylor was "buying newborn infants to substantiate welfare claims." Somehow, though, 
         the welfare claims remained the bigger story, not the allegations of black-market baby trafficking.
         ... ... ...
         
         In the aftermath of Ray's death, the National Home Life Insurance Company requested a complete 
         coroner's report from Illinois' Kankakee County. Byron Keith Lassiter, who looked into the 
         case on behalf of the insurance firm, says such a contestable death claim investigation would 
         have been routine. With no charges filed against Loyd, the money from Sherman Ray's life insurance 
         policy would be paid out to his wife, Linda.
         A month after Sherman Ray's death, Taylor bought a parcel of land in Holmes County, Fla. 
         Her name is listed on the deed as "Rev. Linda Ray." In the Sunshine State, public records reveal, 
         she'd use at least six names and six different Social Security numbers. She wasn't there alone. 
         Her companion was her husband's killer, Willtrue Loyd.
         This is Linda Taylor's life in microcosm: a series of tangled connections, a death that 
         serves as a potential windfall, a quick move, and a new start in a faraway place. Sherman Ray, 
         the former Marine with emotional problems, was a man in uniform-a classic Taylor mark. Paul 
         Stull Harbaugh, the man listed as her son Paul's father on the child's birth certificate, was 
         in the Navy. So was another supposed husband, Paul Steinberg-the Tribune alleged that in the 
         1960s she was "obtaining federal support" as the widow of both Harbaugh and Steinberg.
         ... ... ...
         In 1978, one of her lawyers wrote that Linda Taylor was likely psychotic, that she "was 
         incapable of knowing whether or not she was telling the truth." Johnnie Harbaugh is certain 
         that's not the case. "She was cold," he says. "She knew what was right and wrong, but she was 
         choosing wrong."
         
         
         or Linda Taylor, people were consumable goods, objects to cultivate, manipulate, and discard. 
         Once she'd extracted something of value-an identity, a check, a life insurance claim-she'd 
         move on to someone else. No matter her circumstances, and no matter her surroundings, there 
         was always a new target.
         
         What kind of person behaves this way? In the 1970s, psychologist Robert Hare developed a checklist 
         to assess a given subject's personality. The symptoms on Hare's list read like a catalog of 
         Linda Taylor's known behaviors and personal characteristics: glib and superficial charm, pathological 
         lying, manipulativeness, lack of empathy, parasitic lifestyle, frequent short-term relationships, 
         and criminal versatility.
         
         Of the 20 items on the Hare Psychopathy Checklist–Revised, nearly every one describes the welfare 
         queen to some degree. Dr. Steve Band, a behavioral science consultant and an expert on criminal 
         behavior, says "people with that personality know right from wrong." Dr. James Fallon, a professor 
         of psychiatry and human behavior at the University of California at Irvine and the author of 
         The Psychopath Inside, says that Taylor "screams psychopathy." Along with deriving pleasure 
         from criminal behavior, he says, psychopaths "really like getting away with it"-that "the ones 
         who have intelligence, they don't want to get caught."
         Despite the striking synchronicity between this checklist and Taylor's behavior, diagnosing 
         someone as a psychopath isn't as easy as ticking a set of boxes. As Dave Cullen wrote for Slate 
         in 2004, it took an elite group of mental health experts to establish Columbine shooter Eric 
         Harris' psychopathic "pattern of grandiosity, glibness, contempt, lack of empathy, and superiority."
         If a similar team of psychologists scrutinized the welfare queen, Hare's checklist would 
         be a logical place to start. For her part, Taylor's daughter-in-law Carol Harbaugh has 
         a simpler list, one with just three points: "She was brutal. She was mean. She was terrible."
         ... ... ...
         Some of Taylor's victims were spared her worst behavior-they just learned an expensive lesson 
         and got on with their lives. Kenneth Lynch, who's now in his early 80s, bought a property with 
         Taylor in Holmes County, Fla. Lynch remembers her saying that her husband had been killed by 
         mobsters in Chicago. He also says that Taylor never came up with her share of the money, though 
         she did pilfer Lynch's last name. Reta Hunter, who lives in Live Oak, Fla., says "Linda Lynch" 
         led her to stop trusting people. Taylor told Hunter she was a psychic who'd descended from 
         Caribbean royalty, and that she could help remedy her relationship with her daughter. "The 
         last time I seen her it cost me $80 for about 20 minutes," Hunter says. "She could take you, 
         honey. She was a slick talker."
         Not all of Linda Taylor's relationships ended so harmlessly. Sherman Ray took a shotgun 
         blast to the chest. Patricia Parks' life ended in her daughter's bedroom with her body pumped 
         full of phenobarbital. And an elderly African-American woman named Mildred Markham died in 
         Graceville, Fla., far away from her home and loved ones.
         Taylor and Markham met in Chicago in the early 1980s. Markham's husband James, a retired 
         Pullman porter, earned a good salary in his day. Soon after he passed away, Taylor convinced 
         the railroad man's widow that she was her long-lost daughter. "All [Mildred] used to do was 
         talk about this Linda," recalls Markham's granddaughter, Theresa Davis, who is 75 and still 
         lives in Chicago.
         By the time she fell under the sway of her new "daughter," Mildred Markham was well into 
         her 70s. Davis and her mother tried to convince Markham that Taylor was a con artist, but she 
         wouldn't listen. Markham went with Taylor to Momence, Ill. From there, they moved to Florida. 
         All the while, according to Davis, "my grandfather's money was going out the bank." She says 
         that as much as $50,000 went missing, along with Markham's furniture, sewing machine, jewelry, 
         and mink coats. And in 1985, Mildred deeded away 185 acres of Markham family land in Mississippi. 
         The grantees were Linda Lynch and her son Clifford. For his part, Clifford says he had no idea 
         that his name was on the deed, and that he played no part in this land deal.
         ... ... ...
         Once, when the Harbaughs were in Florida for a visit, Markham begged them to take her back 
         to Chicago. Carol says Taylor was verbally abusive, and that she watched her lock Markham in 
         a room. Markham also told them that she wasn't being fed. "She was forced to be there against 
         her will," Carol says.
         They did not rescue Mildred Markham. Johnnie says that he was determined to take her but 
         that she changed her mind at the last minute and decided to stay. In Carol's recollection, 
         Taylor told Johnnie, "You even think about it, and I'll blow your head off." She says her husband 
         took the threat seriously, and he decided not to get involved.
         Mildred Markham died on Oct. 5, 1986. Her death certificate says she passed away of "presumed 
         natural causes," and that she had previously suffered a stroke. The Graceville police department 
         reported that her husband, Willtrue Loyd, found her body in bed.
         Carol Harbaugh says she thought Loyd and Markham had gotten married. Florida records suggest 
         that was probably the case. In March 1986, Loyd married a woman named "Constance Rayner" in 
         Marianna, Fla. The marriage application says Constance's home state is Louisiana; Theresa Davis 
         says that's where her grandmother, Mildred Markham, was born. The bride signed her supposed 
         maiden name, Constance Wakefield, in a looping script. It's a shaky signature, one that doesn't 
         much resemble Linda Taylor's tidy penmanship.
         Taylor always took something from her prey. But this marriage record, with the telltale 
         Wakefield surname, shows that even as she sucked this older woman dry, Taylor was grafting 
         parts of herself onto Mildred Markham.
         ... ... ...
         As in the cases of Patricia Parks and Sherman Ray, Taylor stood to gain financially from 
         Mildred Markham's death. Mildred's medical examiner's file includes letters from Union Fidelity 
         Life Insurance and Gulf Life Insurance, both of which were looking to verify the claims of 
         one "Linda Lynch," the decedent's daughter. The file also contains a note in which someone, 
         presumably the medical examiner's assistant, writes that Markham's daughter "took out insurance 
         policies at varied times using different names (marriages)." The daughter needed a letter to 
         clear up this misunderstanding, and the medical examiner complied. "To the best of my knowledge 
         Mildred Constance Raner Loyd, Constance Loyd, and Mildred Rayner are one in the same person," 
         he wrote. 
         That wasn't the only confusion about Mildred Markham's death. On May 15, 1987, Dr. D. Bruce 
         Woodham sent a letter to the medical examiner's office saying that his patient did not die 
         of natural causes. Woodham, a neurological surgeon, wrote that Markham hadn't suffered a stroke. 
         Rather, she'd fallen and hit her head. "I believe that Ms. Loyd's death was the result of an 
         injury, she fell, she sustained a subdural hematoma, and she herniated from this, and that 
         caused her demise," the doctor explained.
         On account of Dr. Woodham's letter, Markham's death was reclassified as an accident. Regardless, 
         Taylor probably collected on those life insurance policies-so long as there were no accusations 
         of foul play, the companies more than likely paid up.
         Dr. Woodham, who is still practicing, says that although he wrote that Mildred Markham fell 
         and hit her head, there's no way he can know with certainty. He's not a forensic pathologist, 
         and he doesn't have the expertise to distinguish between injuries that are consistent with 
         a fall or ones that might come from a car accident or a blunt instrument. Dr. Woodham says 
         he doesn't remember the particulars of this case, but in general he goes by what he's told-information 
         provided by a paramedic, or possibly a family member.
         Theresa Davis does not believe her grandmother fell and hit her head. She is convinced that 
         Mildred Markham was murdered, and that Linda Taylor is somehow responsible.
         Six years after Mildred Markham's death, her widower Willtrue Loyd died in Florida at age 
         72. The medical examiner's report says he succumbed naturally, to heart disease. Loyd's next 
         of kin is listed as Linda Lynch, his granddaughter. Taylor was only about seven years younger 
         than her "grandfather." Nevertheless, as Loyd's supposed heir, she presumably stood to receive 
         the World War II veteran's benefits. Another death, another check.
         ... ... ... 
         For Linda Taylor, documents were never simple accountings of the truth. Pieces of paper 
         always told a story-about her identity, her husbands, her children, her parentage, what was 
         owed to her, and who owed it-and that story was usually self-serving, contradictory, and false. 
         That didn't change just because she was dead.
         Her death certificate, compiled from information provided by her daughter Sandra Smith, 
         is a blend of truth, lies, and conjecture. The welfare queen's name is rendered as Constance 
         Loyd, which it wasn't. Her date of birth is listed as Dec. 25, 1934. It wasn't. She's described 
         as a homemaker, which she wasn't. Her father and mother are given as Lawrence Wakefield and 
         Edith Elizabeth Jarvis. They weren't. Her race is white-the same as in the 1930 and 1940 census. 
         Among her itemized medical conditions is bipolar disorder. That may be true, or it may be a 
         fabrication.
      
      
 
 
   Are you high maintenance? Some people seem to always be on the edge of becoming upset. They require 
   a lot of attention, approval, and maybe reassurance. Often such individuals take offense easily at 
   being overlooked or somehow not recognized. These individuals enjoy being in control of a relationship. 
   They can be easily overwhelmed with stress and responsibility and often feel as though they are the 
   most put upon in a relationship. They may see themselves the victim of their mate's insensitivity 
   and distraction.
   Maybe you are married to someone who is high maintenance. You constantly find yourself the object 
   of criticism and it seems as though you can never do anything to the other's satisfaction. Spouses 
   of high maintenance individuals often find themselves in no-win dilemmas. No matter what they do 
   they will incur the disapproval, if not wrath, of their spouse. The high maintenance spouse often 
   claims their expectations are normal and any reasonable caring loving spouse should anticipate what 
   to them are the most basic of considerations. Spouses of high maintenance partners can feel as though 
   they are walking on egg shells waiting for the next failure to occur and they once again are the 
   source of hurt, injury and pain to their spouse. 
   Sound familiar at all? Many relationships can be described as one member being more "high maintenance" 
   than the other. In some relationships this is a long standing pattern and contributes to erosion 
   of affection and commitment over time. In other relationships the "high maintenance" tag gets shared 
   depending on changing circumstances and felt needs. One week it is the wife who is high maintenance, 
   the next week it is the husband. It is conceivable that a relationship might occur in which both 
   spouses are high maintenance and the relationship dynamics revolve around competition over whose 
   'felt need' is greatest at any given time. 
   If you honestly recognize you can be "high maintenance" take heart, be encouraged there is good 
   news. One, the simple fact you recognize you can be demanding and easily offended puts you in a position 
   to change. Many high maintenance individuals are oblivious to the pain and suffering they inflict 
   upon those around them. Self-objectivity, the ability to look at oneself honestly and objectively 
   is a characteristic of maturity and essential to personal change. If you are unsure about whether 
   you can be high maintenance, your spouse and loved ones can probably tell you. But, don't ask until 
   you are really ready to hear their input. A part of being high maintenance is being defensive when 
   others are critical. If you ask for this feedback, challenge yourself to hear the person out without 
   rebuttal. Maybe take notes and set them aside for a few days, then go back and review the notes before 
   responding to the feedback.  
   Secondly, be encouraged because your sensitivity which leads you to be high maintenance is also 
   a gift. High maintenance persons are often capable of deep emotional connection and appreciation. 
   What may be judged as high maintenance may actually be an undeveloped sense of emotional sensitivity 
   that can be harnessed and directed for deep emotional connection with others. High maintenance individuals 
   are often capable of deep empathy and compassion. Their sensitivity affords them the recognition 
   of how circumstances, events, and behavior can impact people emotionally. This is valuable insight 
   and can be cultivated for great connection and support with others. 
   The problem with being high maintenance lies with the expectations which we can attach to our 
   felt wants and desires in relationship. If you are high maintenance, learning how to recognize how 
   expectations develop in you and how to hold your wants and desires more lightly may help soften the 
   disappointment when a spouse does not recognize how important something is to you. Most importantly, 
   beware of looking to a spouse for the significance and security you should be finding in your relationship 
   with God. High maintenance conflict may be due to demanding some attention, approval, and affirmation 
   from a spouse which first should be found in our relationship with God and ourselves. If we are secure 
   in how God sees us, how He loves and cares for us, then the care, attention and affirmation of a 
   spouse is a gift. We may be disappointed if our spouse neglects us in some way but this is way less 
   distressing than if we tell ourselves we must have our spouse notice and provide our need. 
   Feeling entitled to something from our spouse is a sure sign we are becoming "high maintenance."
   
   Being open about desires and wants can go a long way toward helping our spouse understand what 
   impacts us and contributes to our feeling loved and supported. Recognizing and being grateful when 
   a spouse is attentive and affirming is especially rewarding and encourages a spouse to be attentive 
   and affirming in the future. Spouses may not understand the power of reassurance, attention, and 
   support. Often times they are making efforts to be accommodating but do not recognize the effort 
   is not in a manner desired or hoped for. Communication about feelings, hopes, and wants beforehand 
   can go a long way to avoiding conflict when you're prone to be "high maintenance." 
   If you are married to a high maintenance person you too can be encouraged as well. The cycle of 
   disappointment and conflict can be sometimes diminished through some basic relationship skills. Giving 
   your spouse a full hearing when they are distressed will often go a long way to dissipating the emotional 
   intensity they may be feeling. Remember, listening and validating their feelings do not require anything 
   to be fixed or changed. It's just an opportunity to offer understanding and care in the way of attention 
   and presence. The high maintenance spouse can often use judgmental and accusatory language. If one 
   can listen past the personal criticism to the hurt, disappointment, anxiety and/or fear behind the 
   attack it may be possible to have compassion for their emotional distress. This is challenging, but 
   spouses who learn not to take personally the distress in their mate even when it is delivered as 
   a personal attack learn how to diffuse a great deal of conflict. 
   Letting the high maintenance spouse know when the attack is crossing over to becoming abusive 
   and exiting a conversation will also be helpful. A person may lose awareness in the midst of their 
   negative emotional spin and a caring, calm confrontation and firm "time out" temporary withdrawal 
   will sometimes help that person become more aware of how their words and tone are not helpful. Above 
   all, avoid responding in kind to a high maintenance person who is discharging their disappointment 
   and hurt with a lot of intensity. By remaining calm and not escalating with the other person, a spouse 
   can often ride out the initial emotional venting, to arrive at a place where genuine emotional connection 
   can occur. 
   The emotional distress surrounding disappointment and unmet expectations can be at the center 
   of so much conflict in relationship. Sorting out one's own emotional expectations and how they are 
   operating in a moment is key to managing the pull toward becoming "high maintenance." Being able 
   to absorb some emotional intensity and remain patient and loving with a spouse who is distressed 
   is a valuable discipline to working through disappointment in relationship. Hopefully these comments 
   and observations will give you and your spouse some food for thought and maybe some occasion for 
   conversation. Be careful not to judge each other too harshly about being "high maintenance." Remember, 
   there is an upside to most personal qualities that initially may seem problematic or annoying, "high 
   maintenance" is no exception. 
   Please post a comment to enter a conversation about this column. I so much enjoy the responses 
   folks are sending to this column. I will contribute to the conversation as well. Let me know if you 
   have a concern or question which could be addressed in a future column.  You can also email 
   concerns and questions to me at [email protected]. 
   God Bless You, and know we at National Institute of Marriage are praying for you.
    
      Dr. Robert K. Burbee
      Licensed Psychologist, Intensive Therapist
      National Institute of Marriage 
    
      The site is down as DNS name expired....
      
         
         I spent the first year after the relationship ended uncovering these lies. Hundreds and 
         hundreds of them. I now realize that his personality is so fake, that I cannot believe a single 
         thing that he ever told me. I realize that I was an enjoyable sexual partner for him, but I 
         cannot trust that he ever cared for me in any other way.
         In order to carry on his two sexual relationships and his various illegal activities, the 
         amount of lie which he told to me and to his other girlfriend is staggering.
         He is not a person with a soul or a conscience. He is a being who pursues pleasure. 
         When anything or anyone might inhibit his pleasure, he simply lies his way around it or them. 
         His morality is formed around the opinions of his friends, who are also 'Cluster B' types. 
         He and his 'buddies' are pathological liars and addicts; they are grown men who behave like 
         children in a candy store. Porn, intoxication, loose sex and getting high are their thrills 
         which they pursue daily.
         Knowing that these thrills are unacceptable to their wives and girlfriends, they lie about 
         them.
         Once I was able to unravel all of his lie to me during our thirty month 'reunion' I could 
         see how he didn't exist a a person. He is nothing besides whatever urge he is fulfilling at 
         the moment.
      
      
      If you think that this is too much, think again: "false restrictions stay away order, two 
      false drug possession charges, and a police investigation on me for being a drug dealer!"
      
         jay September 
         17, 2015
         
            its as if you just read me the story of my last 8 months. she did the gifts, paying, 
            for everything, cooking, massages, i love yous, the promises, the lot and all over the top!!! 
            after literally 4 months to the day all the good things were replaced with dishonesty, lies, 
            deceitfulness, cheating, abuse, manipulation, mirroring, mimicking etc etc etc long story 
            short…. now I find myself facing false charges of assault & battery, false restrictions 
            stay away order, two false drug possession charges, and a police investigation on me for 
            being a drug dealer! 
            All from slander, lies, character assassination and absolute bullshit stories. 8 
            months ago I was a tax paying, mortgage holder and business owner. now I'm potentially a 
            violent drug dealer and prison inmate. 
            oh and she is HIV+ from intravenous drug use and/or sex work and didn't mention it ever 
            in 8 months! my test results came back clear so far but wont know for 6 months for certain.
            
            i was blissfully unaware that such despicably evil women existed . the devil is alive 
            and well that's for sure, she is living in the suburbs of Sydney Australia….
         
         Adam – July 16, 2015 
         
            Let me tell you this, this site is my refuge from my past this a sociopath woman. Every 
            chapter I read in here, matches what I have experienced. I wish, I have known about this 
            site while I was dating that sociopath woman. Let's talk about seduction stage, oh boy. 
            When a woman buys you expensive gift, cloths, shoes and pays for everything, you HAVE to 
            stop and ask the question: WHY? 
            I was swept away by all of this and her story was: I am in love with you, I have never 
            loved before and you are my first real LOVE ever. There were even bigger (ofc turn out to 
            be empty) promises of a Range Rover SUV (100 K+) , a 6 months long trip to Europe, all paid 
            by her. I was in heaven and was thinking WOW, this is love life. 
            Little I knew that she was setting me up to use me to do her dirty money scam, to use 
            my account to transfer huge amount of $(God know from whom and from where). I am so lucky 
            to stop that. I am sure she would have blamed me for that as well, if anything would have 
            gone wrong. Do not be fooled by seduction, NEVER!
         
         Tela – July 16, 2015 
         
            Adam, your Female Sociopath sounds exactly what Greg {I refuse to use my ex} as I want 
            no association to him, did. All the gifts, the flowers, the "I love you" within 3 weeks~ 
            ugggggg, red flags waving all around.
         
      
      
      "... She goes into detail and examines the relationship of Pablo Picasso and one of his 
      main women with whom they had two children. She takes this woman's story, published long ago, 
      and dissects it in a way in which we understand psychopathic seduction and the subsequent, universal 
      "bait and switch" and eventual discard, that define the psychopath and his motives and actions. 
      ..."
      "... if you're looking for a book that dissects in the most fascinating way how people 
      become ensnared with disturbing personalities like psychopaths, and what can make it so immensely 
      hard to disentangle oneself from destructive, devastating individuals and relationships, look 
      no farther, this is your stop --this is the book for you ..."
      
         
         
         
         set free on October 25, 2011
         
         
            Another excellent book about psychopaths 
            Claudia's book about psychopaths, "Dangerous Liaisons" is yet another exquisite and most 
            helpful read in understanding the experiences with an emotional predator.
            What I found most intriguing about this book, was her insertions of the many examples 
            of others work and spelling it out for the reader in discerning the patterns and behaviors 
            of psychopaths with her own wonderful "voice" as an author.
            For example: She goes into detail and examines the relationship of Pablo Picasso 
            and one of his main women with whom they had two children. She takes this woman's story, 
            published long ago, and dissects it in a way in which we understand psychopathic seduction 
            and the subsequent, universal "bait and switch" and eventual discard, that define the psychopath 
            and his motives and actions. Claudia takes her own insights and perspectives of having 
            been with a psychopath herself, and brilliantly lays out the groundwork of understanding 
            to help others who may be searching for answers about their experiences.
            Her work here is excellent in weaving together the painful picture of how a pathological 
            bond develops, what the psychopath is, what he says and what he does and the traits and 
            behaviors that are so commonly associated with pathology.
            This book, coupled with her fiction novel, "The Seducer" about a pathological relationship, 
            brings us full circle from Claudia's perspective about what makes the exploiter tick and 
            how victims/survivors respond to the bond and how to heal from such a trauma. 
         
         Becker, July 9, 2015
         
            
            
            A Fantastic Probing Into Dark Terrain
            This is a great book, not surprisingly, as Moscovici writes about psychopathic personality 
            and psychopathic relationship dynamics as probingly as anyone out there. No one combines, 
            as she does, her formidable erudition with her striking clarity of prose. So if you're 
            looking for a book that dissects in the most fascinating way how people become ensnared 
            with disturbing personalities like psychopaths, and what can make it so immensely hard to 
            disentangle oneself from destructive, devastating individuals and relationships, look no 
            farther, this is your stop --this is the book for you. Moscovici can't help going very 
            deep into subject matter that interests her, and to our benefit, she can't help exploring 
            it in a most captivating, illuminating way. I always learn so much from her books.
         
      
      
      false restrictions stay away order, two false drug possession charges, and a police investigation 
      on me for being a drug dealer!/em> 
      
         jay September 
         17, 2015
         
            its as if you just read me thestory of my last 8 months. she did the gifts, paying, for 
            everything, cooking, massages, i love yous, the promises, the lot and all over the top!!! 
            after literally 4 months to the day all the good things were replaced with dishonesty, lies, 
            deceitfulness, cheating, abuse, manipulation, mirroring, mimicking etc etc etc long story 
            short…. now I find myself facing false charges of assault & battery, false restrictions 
            stay away order, two false drug possession charges, and a police investigation on me for 
            being a drug dealer! 
            All from slander, lies , character assassination and absolute bullshit stories. 8 months 
            ago I was a tax paying, mortgage holder and business owner. now I'm potentially a violent 
            drug dealer and prison inmate. 
            oh and she is HIV+ from intravenous drug use and/or sex work and didn't mention it ever 
            in 8 months! my test results came back clear so far but wont know for 6 months for certain.
            
            i was blissfully unaware that such despicably evil women existed . the devil is alive 
            and well that's for sure, she is living in the suburbs of Sydney Australia….
         
         
         Adam – July 16, 2015 
         
            Let me tell you this, this site is my refuge from my past this a sociopath woman. Every 
            chapter I read in here, matches what I have experienced. I wish, I have known about this 
            site while I was dating that sociopath woman. Let's talk about seduction stage, oh boy. 
            When a woman buys you expensive gift, cloths, shoes and pays for everything, you HAVE to 
            stop and ask the question: WHY? I was swept away by all of this and her story was: I am 
            in love with you, I have never loved before and you are my first real LOVE ever. There were 
            even bigger (ofc turn out to be empty) promises of a Range Rover SUV (100 K+) , a 6 months 
            long trip to Europe, all paid by her. I was in heaven and was thinking WOW, this is love 
            life. Little I knew that she was setting me up to use me to do her dirty money scam, to 
            use my account to transfer huge amount of $(God know from whom and from where). I am so 
            lucky to stop that. I am sure she would have blamed me for that as well, if anything would 
            have gone wrong. Do not be fooled by seduction, NEVER!
         
         Tela – July 16, 2015 
         
            Adam, your Female Sociopath sounds exactly what Greg {I refuse to use my ex} as I want 
            no association to him, did. All the gifts, the flowers, the "I love you" within 3 weeks~ 
            ugggggg, red flags waving all around.
            
         
      
      
      
         
         When it comes to relieving stress, more giggles and guffaws are just what the doctor ordered. 
         Here's why. 
         By Mayo Clinic 
         Staff
         Whether you're guiltily guffawing at an episode of "South Park" or quietly giggling at the 
         latest New Yorker cartoon, laughing does you good. Laughter is a great form of stress relief, 
         and that's no joke. 
         Stress relief from laughter
         A good sense of humor can't cure all ailments, but data are mounting about the positive 
         things laughter can do. 
         Short-term benefits
         A good laugh has great short-term effects. When you start to laugh, it doesn't just lighten 
         your load mentally, it actually induces physical changes in your body. Laughter can: 
         
            - Stimulate many organs. Laughter enhances your intake of oxygen-rich 
            air, stimulates your heart, lungs and muscles, and increases the endorphins that are released 
            by your brain.
 
            - Activate and relieve your stress response. A rollicking laugh fires 
            up and then cools down your stress response and increases your heart rate and blood pressure. 
            The result? A good, relaxed feeling.
 
            - Soothe tension. Laughter can also stimulate circulation and aid muscle 
            relaxation, both of which help reduce some of the physical symptoms of stress.
 
         
         Long-term effects
         Laughter isn't just a quick pick-me-up, though. It's also good for you over the long haul. 
         Laughter may: 
         
            - Improve your immune system. Negative thoughts manifest into chemical 
            reactions that can affect your body by bringing more stress into your system and decreasing 
            your immunity. In contrast, positive thoughts actually release neuropeptides that help fight 
            stress and potentially more-serious illnesses.
 
            - Relieve pain. Laughter may ease pain by causing the body to produce 
            its own natural painkillers. Laughter may also break the pain-spasm cycle common to some 
            muscle disorders.
 
            - Increase personal satisfaction. Laughter can also make it easier to 
            cope with difficult situations. It also helps you connect with other people.
 
            - Improve your mood. Many people experience depression, sometimes due 
            to chronic illnesses. Laughter can help lessen your depression and anxiety and make you 
            feel happier. 
 
         
         Improve your sense of humor
         Are you afraid you have an underdeveloped - or nonexistent - funny bone? No problem. Humor 
         can be learned. In fact, developing or refining your sense of humor may be easier than you 
         think. 
         
            - Put humor on your horizon. Find a few simple items, such as photos 
            or comic strips that make you chuckle. Then hang them up at home or in your office. Keep 
            funny movies or comedy albums on hand for when you need an added humor boost.
 
            - Laugh and the world laughs with you. Find a way to laugh about your 
            own situations and watch your stress begin to fade away. Even if it feels forced at first, 
            practice laughing. It does your body good.
 
            - Share a laugh. Make it a habit to spend time with friends who make 
            you laugh. And then return the favor by sharing funny stories or jokes with those around 
            you.
 
            - Knock-knock. Browse through your local bookstore or library's selection 
            of joke books and get a few rib ticklers in your repertoire that you can share with friends.
 
            - Know what isn't funny. Don't laugh at the expense of others. Some forms 
            of humor aren't appropriate. Use your best judgment to discern a good joke from a bad, or 
            hurtful, one.
 
         
         Laughter is the best medicine
         Go ahead and give it a try. Turn the corners of your mouth up into a smile and then give 
         a laugh, even if it feels a little forced. Once you've had your chuckle, take stock of how 
         you're feeling. Are your muscles a little less tense? Do you feel more relaxed or buoyant? 
         That's the natural wonder of laughing at work. 
      
      
      
         Freud pointed out a century ago that humor offers us a healthy means of coping with life stress. 
         George Vaillant, in his book, Adaptation to Life, reported that in-depth interviews revealed 
         that humor was a very effective coping mechanism used by many professional men under stress. 
         Gail Sheehy reported the same thing for both men and women in her book, Pathfinders.A key 
         idea emerging in both of these books is that you need to actively use your sense of humor in 
         dealing with the hassles and stresses in your life to get the coping benefits. You can have 
         a good sense of humor, but still have your sense of humor abandon you when things begin to 
         go wrong. On your good mood days, you can have quick and easy access to a playful attitude, 
         be the one who comes up with clever quips or finds a funny side to things that happen, and 
         be able to poke fun at yourself. But this won't help you in managing the stress in your life 
         unless you can do the same thing on the tough days.
         
            "If it weren't for the brief respite we give the world with our foolishness, the world 
            would see mass suicide in numbers that compare favorably with the death rate of lemmings." 
            (Groucho Marx) 
         
         This view was supported by a Canadian study that found that even if you're someone who finds 
         a lot of humor in everyday life, it doesn't help you cope with stress unless you also make 
         an effort to actively use humor to deal with that stress.126 So even though you 
         have a great sense of humor when all is well, you'll be just as stressed out as the next person 
         on your bad days.
         People who have access to their sense of humor in the midst of stress are much more 
         resilient than the rest of us. They are emotionally more flexible, and can bend without breaking 
         in the midst of the most difficult circumstances. If you're lucky, and have parents who showed 
         a good sense of humor in the midst of stress, chances are you've already got some of those 
         qualities within yourself. You just need to refine and strengthen them. One study showed that 
         even a 5-session humor workshop was enough to improve adults' use of humor to cope with life 
         stress.127
      
      
>[Jul 14, 2015]
      
      Importance of physical exersize 
      Out brains are deeply connected to our bodies. One way to improve your mental stability and 
      the capacities to endure stress is to use vigorous exercise regiment. This is the point that implicitly 
      was made by prominent neuroscientist Wendy Suzuki in her book
      
      Healthy Brain, Happy Life A Personal Program to Activate Your Brain and Do Everything Better. 
      It looks like aerobic exercises are important for mental stability and the ability to cope with 
      stress. Of cause, an important warning attributed to
      Talleyrand "Not too much zeal" 
      is applicable here too. Some additional ideas might be extracted from the following reviews:
      
      "... "Exercise is responsible for the majority of the positive brain changes seen with 
      environmental enrichment.""
      
         A neuroscientist transforms the way we think about our brain, our health, and our personal 
         happiness in this clear, informative, and inspiring guide-a blend of personal memoir, science 
         narrative, and immediately useful takeaways that bring the human brain into focus as never 
         before, revealing the powerful connection between exercise, learning, memory, and cognitive 
         abilities.
         Nearing forty, Dr. Wendy Suzuki was at the pinnacle of her career. An award-winning university 
         professor and world-renowned neuroscientist, she had tenure, her own successful research lab, 
         prestigious awards, and international renown.
         That's when to celebrate her birthday, she booked an adventure trip that forced her to wake 
         up to a startling reality: despite her professional success, she was overweight, lonely, and 
         tired and knew that her life had to change. Wendy started simply-by going to an exercise class. 
         Eventually, she noticed an improvement in her memory, her energy levels, and her ability to 
         work quickly and move from task to task easily. Not only did Wendy begin to get fit, but she 
         also became sharper, had more energy, and her memory improved. Being a neuroscientist, she 
         wanted to know why.
         What she learned transformed her body and her life. Now, it can transform yours.
         Wendy discovered that there is a biological connection between exercise, mindfulness, and 
         action. With exercise, your body feels more alive and your brain actually performs better. 
         Yes-you can make yourself smarter. In this fascinating book, Suzuki makes neuroscience easy 
         to understand, interweaving her personal story with groundbreaking research, and offering practical, 
         short exercises-4 minute Brain Hacks-to engage your mind and improve your memory, your ability 
         to learn new skills, and function more efficiently.
         Taking us on an amazing journey inside the brain as never before, Suzuki helps us unlock 
         the keys to neuroplasticity that can change our brains, or bodies, and, ultimately, our lives.
         
         
         
         Bassocantor
         
         TOP 50 REVIEWER on May 19, 2015
         
            
            
            We Have An Enormous Capacity To Change Into The Very Best Version Of Ourselves
            HEALTHY BRAIN, HAPPY LIFE is a fun read, filled with all kinds of exciting ways to expand 
            your brain power. My favorite parts of the book are these little sections that the author 
            calls "Brain Hacks." These sections are lists of easy ways to really supercharge your brain 
            and make use of the latent power in it.
            Here's the theme in a nutshell: "One thing I know for sure is that brain plasticity endows 
            us with an enormous capacity to change into the very best version of ourselves that we can 
            be." Dr. Suzuki explains that she uses 20 years of research in neuroscience to apply these 
            same principles to her own personal life. She admits that she "Went from living as a virtual 
            lab rat --an overweight middle aged woman would had achieved many things in science, but 
            who could not seem to figure out how to also be a healthy, happy woman..."
            One of her main discoveries is the powerful mind-body link. The author emphasizes how 
            powerful exercise is. "Exercise is responsible for the majority of the positive brain changes 
            seen with environmental enrichment." And so, Dr. Suzuki invests much time talking about 
            the power of the brain-body connection. Towards that end, she combines physical workouts 
            as a way to energize your brain: "The body has a powerful influence on her brain functions 
            and conversely but the brain has a powerful influence over how are bodies feel and work 
            and heal." Exercise causes definite changes in your body--it boosts the level of three key 
            chemicals that affect mood.
            The key is to make your workouts intentional. Towards that end, the author suggests ways 
            to do this--for example, proclaiming affirmations out loud. "Intentional exercise happens 
            when you make exercise both aerobic and mental...You are fully engaged in the moment and 
            trigger a heightened awareness of the brain body connection." In the Brain Hacks suction, 
            the author lists different exercises that would best fit you.
            Another great section is the section on creativity. You can actually improve your creative 
            thinking; it is "a particular version of regular thinking they can be practiced and improved 
            like any other cognitive skill." Once again, the author lists great suggestions in the Brain 
            Hacks section on ways to jumpstart your creativity. The key point is to learn something 
            new and "Try to use as many senses as you can." For example, one fun suggestion is to "Sit 
            outside and blindfold yourself for 4 minutes. Then, listen to the world sounds in a new 
            way."
            All in all, HEALTHY BRAIN, HAPPY LIFE is a fun, inspiring read. The author is full of 
            great, uplifting ideas. My favorite chapter is the one on creativity. The end of the book 
            contains an extensive Reference section, in which the author documents the various points 
            she makes.
            Highly recommend!
            Advance copy for impartial review
         
      
      
         
         
         love2dazzle on June 10, 2015
            
            
            Happy Life" by Wendy Suzuki is all about focusing on ...
            "Healthy Brian, Happy Life" by Wendy Suzuki is all about focusing on expanding your brain 
            power. Our bodies and mind have a very powerful link. Dr. Suzuki has invested her life to 
            focusing on the brain. She goes on to state that "Exercise is responsible for the majority 
            of the positive brain changes seen with environmental enrichment." Dr. Suzuki is making 
            the point that we need to exercise to work our brain to its fullest potential. She goes 
            on to make the point that you want to make sure the exercise is intentional because that 
            is what exercise you both mentally and aerobically.The second best way to expand your 
            brain is by creativity. The point of creativity is to learn new things that will improve 
            your brain and your senses. One is able to find different ways to help build and exercise 
            their brain. The author calls some of the tips she gives "Brain Hacks" so I thought this 
            was a great learning tool.
            I thought "Healthy Brain, Happy Life" was very insightful. I thought this book had a 
            lot of good tips and was also able to explain the brain and how things worked really well. 
            I did enjoy reading it and learning new things on how I am able to improve my brain function.
         
         Bruny Hudsonon June 13, 2015
         
            Interesting theory for improving one's life
            The book "Healthy Brain, Happy Life" by Wendy Suzuki is about a success story, about 
            the author's life. It's entertaining and enriching but sometimes out of touch with reality. 
            Considering that the author is a neuroscientist, her line of reasoning sounds dubious in 
            parts of the book, especially her generalizing concepts of life. Just because an effort 
            has worked for her, it does not mean it will work for someone else. Nevertheless, the book 
            deserves a five-star rating because of the author's pleasant writing style and the well-explained 
            examples of research in neuroscience.
         
         Transporter chair reviewer, on July 9, 2015
         
            Mainly autobiographical
            I saw her interviewed on CBS and found her a charming and energetic person. I am not 
            sure what take aways I have from the book, though it interested me since I am also an Asian 
            American woman who is an over achiever, and many of her experiences resonated. I enjoyed 
            the read. I am not sure what type of person I would recommend it to . I am also a doctor. 
            It was fun to review some of the neurobiology and learn some new things.
         
      
      
      
         
         Editor's Note: Yesterday, Lovefraud posted a story from a reader whom we'll call "Maura." 
         She describes how a female sociopath latched on to her recently widowed father, took over his 
         life, and tried to hasten his demise.
         
         Read the story. Following are tips that Maura and her family learned the hard way.
         Our Advice On How to Protect An Elderly Relative 
         This is our advice based on our experience to best protect an elderly relative should they 
         marry a sociopath or a gold digger:
         1. Immediately hire a private investigator to do a background check on 
         the new spouse. Verify marriage status, divorce and marriage history, career history, credit 
         history, bankruptcy, ancestry, court records, previous lawsuits, registered businesses, property 
         ownership, number and names of children and siblings in the family as well as trade and university 
         qualifications. You can investigate this yourself but it takes a lot longer and you may not 
         be aware of the places you need to search or have to pay to access the site.
         2. The new spouse will probably be estranged from most members of their 
         own family and claim their family are bipolar, crazy, dead, ill or live interstate. If estranged, 
         find out these family members' names and the towns where they live and contact them as soon 
         as possible. They will be grateful you called and tell you more about the sociopath's true 
         nature. Use an alias if you have to. The ex will tell you exactly what you are up against.
         3. ... 
         4. ...Copy or scan all your family photos and keep them in a safe place 
         as they will be disappear or be destroyed. Find some pretext to get hold of the keepsakes, 
         heirlooms and mementos. Replace them with fakes if need be.
         5. ...
         6. Locate and photograph all the passwords to every account of the elderly 
         relative. You can then keep an eye on the accounts and know if they are being drained.
         7. Never believe a single word the sociopath says, no matter how charming, 
         gracious or supportive they may seem. However, to the sociopath, pretend you believe them wholeheartedly. 
         Maintain a polite, friendly demeanor and flatter them. They will look for any excuse to blacklist 
         you.
         8. Ninety-eight percent of what the sociopath will tell you is completely 
         fabricated. Always covertly check up on their stories or claims about anyone or anything and 
         question the veracity of such claims with family or friends. Communicate regularly, openly, 
         and most importantly, directly with family and friends, rather than through the disordered 
         sociopath. The sociopath will seek to create mistrust and create division by lying to you about 
         others. This is how they destroy relationships and gain control, over incoming and outgoing 
         information. Their ultimate goal is to have total control over your elderly relative.
         9. ...Type up transcripts of conversations. This is very revealing as to 
         how what they say just doesn't make sense. It also shows how devious and manipulative they 
         are in.
         10. Never confide in the sociopath or divulge any personal information 
         or feelings about yourself or anyone in your family. It will be used in a smear campaign against 
         you at a later date. Be dull and uninteresting in their presence, minimizing one-on-one conversations.
         Talk about the most mundane things. When they ask questions about you or your family be 
         vague and forgetful or change the subject.
         11. Refrain from emotional displays such as tears, anxiety, disappointment, 
         anger, hurt, or fear as that tells the sociopath what upsets you and how to hurt you further.
         12. Whenever you deal with them be cool, calm and business-like. Show no 
         fear or weakness and never apologize to them or beg and plead with them. When the sociopath 
         creates drama or pressures you for an immediate response to any issue, always say that you 
         will think about it and get back to them.
         13. Always have another person/relative present whenever you visit them. 
         That way everything can be verified by your witness.
         14. Never let the sociopath mind your house, pets or children. The sociopath 
         will snoop and rifle through every drawer and paper. They will also use this as an opportunity 
         to covertly pit your children against each other and you.
         15. Make sure that either you, other family members, the family lawyer 
         or accountant have medical and financial power of attorney for your elderly relative. Keep 
         these documents in a safe place. At some stage the sociopath will try to gain control of this 
         for their own personal gain.
         16. If you suspect the sociopath is cheating in their relationship, tail 
         them or have your friends or a private detective do so. If possible obtain photographs of the 
         liaison...
         17. If the sociopath ever wants you or your family to sign or witness anything, 
         insist on reading all the fine detail in the document first. If they pull the line "Don't you 
         trust me?," just smile and say you trust them implicitly, but that you always read the fine 
         print first as you only want what is best for them, and you would never forgive yourself if 
         they were defrauded in any way. Never be bullied with the excuse that it is urgent.
         18. Never let the sociopath have access to you or your family's computer, 
         email, address book, financial records, investments etc.
         19. Never finance, bankroll or become a business partner in any of their 
         business ventures. They will swindle or bankrupt you.
         20. Never rely on the sociopath's hearsay as to what a doctor, lawyer, 
         accountant, police, pastor etc said. Deal directly with these people and always VERIFY. Obtain 
         your own copy of this documentation and keep it in a safe place.
         21. Remember that sociopaths fear being exposed. They do not want the truth 
         about them to be known. Keep records of every interaction with them. Who, what, where and why. 
         Events, actions, words spoken, date and time and place. This will confirm your recollections 
         against their warped version. Build up an arsenal of evidence with documents, recordings, texts, 
         emails letters and transcripts. You then have a rock solid case.
         22. Always stay in touch with your elderly relative, despite the sociopath's 
         efforts to keep you away. Let the elderly relative know that you support and care about them. 
         You are just waiting to help anytime if and when needed.
         23. Sociopaths fear losing control. Love to them means ownership and control. 
         The elderly relative belongs to them. The sociopath loves this elderly relative in proportion 
         to how much they can use them. Their loyalty ends where the benefits stop. When sociopaths 
         lose their grip or control over someone, the mask of pretension will be dropped and you get 
         to experience their full on rage.
         24. Covertly videotape their rages. Install a Nanny -Cam to find out how 
         they treat your elderly relative when you aren't there.
         25. Keep copies of your elderly relative's birth certificates, drivers 
         license, bank accounts, passport, loan documents, car registration in a safe place. Backup 
         everything on your computer.
         26. Ensure that your elderly relative's will is in the form of a testamentary 
         trust. Check this regularly as the new spouse will at some stage make themselves the sole beneficiary.
         27. Find an aggressive, pit bull lawyer as soon as you suspect that the 
         new spouse is a sociopath or gold digger. This lawyer must have experience in dealing with 
         sociopaths swindling the elderly. If you are involved in legal proceedings know that the sociopath 
         will lie under oath and expect outrageous, false allegations of abuse and hostility. Expect 
         false claims of living expenses and needless delays. They see ultimatums or pressure as threats 
         or games. The sociopath does not play by the rules.
         28. Remember that the more charming the sociopath is, the more suspicious 
         you need to be.
         29. ...
         AnnettePK, June 24, 2015 at 12:52 pm 
         
            Really good advice, and much of it applies to remarriages of any age. I was widowed at 
            age 36, and remarried a gold-digging sociopath 10 years later. Exploitation is what 
            defines this disorder, at any age.
         
         
      
      
      
         
         It's All Your Fault! explains, in easy-to-understand terminology, behaviors of people who 
         have personality disorders, particularly blaming, irrational, and impulsive behaviors. This 
         is a growing problem-possibly effecting over 25 percent of the US population-and a predictable 
         one that can be managed and keep everyday problems from becoming high conflict disputes.
         Laura on April 7, 2012
         
            Extremely helpful
            I recently managed an employee who's a high conflict person (probably BPD). I learned 
            so much from this book and it actually gave me empathy for these folks and the fact that 
            you simply can't reason with them. They have such a hair trigger for danger and go into 
            some sort of serious survival mode.
            My employee tried to report a "hostile work environment" to HR, but I'd already been 
            talking to HR about her for a period of time. I, also, luckily, had a strong reputation 
            for being very empathetic, fair, and calm.
            Her survival technique was to talk to my manager and manager's manager about me, when 
            I tried to enforce any boundaries or work standards. The first time it happened, I became 
            extrememly concerned. But by using these techniques and following the advice in this book--it's 
            almost like she got frustrated that I wouldn't react and quit. She didn't like constructive, 
            simple feedback and from the point I started coaching her and working w/ HR to when she 
            quit only took about two months.
            What was scary about this perons, was that she couldn't get through a sentence without 
            twisting things or outright lieing. It's like she was contantly spinning everything to try 
            to manipulate peopel's perception. She'd lie about things it made no sense to lie about. 
            One week she'd storm at me and cry and be going to HR and the next week she'd ask to have 
            lunch as if nothing happened.
            I was definitely this person's "Target of Blame", and she did enlist a negative advocate 
            to vent to, but this person ended up being very nice to me, and we get along. I don't doubt 
            it's damaged some of my relationships, which had always been good at work.
            It was one of the draining, stressful experiences I've ever been through and this book 
            was a godsend.
            I'd say if you're dealing with a high conflict person at work...get this book, read it 
            all the way through once, and then read through slowly and really aborb the information. 
            It works. I used the E.A.R. method, and I remembered that you can never, ever let your (understandable 
            and justified) anger show. People with BPD in particular have preternatural attunement for 
            emotions, though.
            Next...document everything. Take time out of each day to note the date, and right down 
            anything and everything that happened. Never be alone with the High Conflict Person and 
            beat them to the punch. Get to HR, managers, etc. first and bring all your documentation.
            Don't let on to the person in any way that you're doing this, though.
            These people can trigger a lot of emotions, so it's important to really take care of 
            yourself, use the support systems at work for employees, and even bring this book to HR 
            or your management team to explain what's going on (be careful though, as Eddy describes 
            in the book, you only want to use this info to protect yourself). This is all easier said 
            than done, I'd wake up in the middle of the night with knots in my stomach and feel scared 
            to go to work not knowing what she'd do next.
            I also have some high conflict family members, so this book has already helped me not 
            engage or escalate drama.
            You can't change these folks, tell them they're wrong, or get them to listen to reason. 
            So save yourself years of heartache and hurt, and don't try. 
            Just protect yourself and get on with your life.
         
         Maeri VINE VOICE on February 26, 2012
         
            How to protect yourself from toxic people
            
            Bill Eddy's It's All Your Fault is a must-have book for anyone (and that is most of us) 
            who have what he calls High Conflict People in our lives. What makes this book so valuable 
            is that it isn't a psychology book, even though he does briefly write about the origins 
            of the personality disorders that HCPs suffer from. This book is about how to protect yourself 
            from becoming sucked into drama, distorted feelings and paranoia that HCPs bring into our 
            lives. The examples of HCPs that Eddy writes about are those we encounter in legal and business 
            settings. 
            HCPs waste vast amounts of taxpayer money through frivolous and bizarre litigation 
            and can cripple businesses and demoralize their fellow employees with their angry and manipulative 
            behavior. Eddy's advice seems counter-intuitive; he suggests listening to their complaints 
            with what he calls E.A.R., that is Empathy, Attention and Respect. Anything less simply 
            confirms their self-image of themselves as victims, makes their behavior worse and opens 
            us up to being what he calls a target of blame on the HCPs part. We also risk getting sucked 
            into the HCPs drama and taking their side and becoming a negative advocate and unwittingly 
            making a bad situation worse. 
            Eddy wisely writes that HCPs cannot tolerate the slightest amount of criticism and nothing 
            we can do will change them. This is great advice. 
            Other books about dealing with personality-disordered people suggest that we have 
            the capacity to change them and frankly, it's absolutely futile.
            All we can do is steer clear of them. Eddy also suggests a communication style he calls 
            B.I.F.F. This means keeping our communications with HCPs Brief, Informative, Friendly and 
            Firm and establishing strong boundaries with them (since they are incapable of establishing 
            boundaries themselves). This is an invaluable book, clearly and concisely written, and thank 
            you Bill Eddy for making your experience available to us!
         
      
      
      
         Word Crafter, May 5, 2012
         
            Great examples clearly explained
            When you have to deal with a hostile person, responding with hostility just escalates 
            the conflict. Eddy advises keeping your responses Brief, Informative, Friendly, and Firm. 
            He presents several real-life examples. Even better, he recognizes that it takes practice 
            to use the BIFF formula. Several of his examples show how to take a first attempt at a BIFF 
            reply and improve it. Eddy is an expert who knows how to explain his knowledge in a clear, 
            practical way. 
         
         al, September 30, 2013
         
            A great help.
            I am dealing with a BPD person in my life and this has helped me know how to communicate 
            in a way to end a discussion quickly with accurate understanding. I fell into the trap of 
            reasoning and defending myself in communicating with this person which used to escalate 
            the situation to no resolution and a huge amount of contention and conflict. I wish I knew 
            about this years ago, but it is saving my life at this point non the less. 
         
      
      
      
         Three Kinds of Divorces
         Two things make a High Conflict Divorce possible... Motive and 
         Means. Many people view their divorce as high conflict because it is stressful and 
         because there are conflicts and confrontation. But the truth is that very few divorces are 
         actually high conflict in the strict sense of this term. In my professional experience there 
         are three kinds of divorce scenarios.
         
            - Business-like divorce. The parties recognize that they are no longer 
            in love, maybe never were, and just want to go away. So they part amicably and unless there 
            are children they have little contact in the future. If there are children, they handle 
            things fairly and respectfully in order to provide quality parenting for their children.
 
            - Friendly divorce. This couple recognizes that they probably would have 
            made better friends than sweethearts, so the parting is amicable. Often these couples do 
            indeed remain friends and share parenting comfortably with each other and future spouses. 
            When people hear about this kind of divorce they are surprised but in truth about one third 
            of couples actually have a friendly divorce.
 
            - High Conflict divorce. Unfortunately this type of couple cannot resolve 
            their differences in either a business like manner nor in a friendly way. They create a 
            war that is costly and damaging to the children and to themselves. In fact the damage they 
            wreak spreads a wide net into their extended families and friends, and sometimes even into 
            the greater community. In the long run this couple pays the price because they may never 
            be able to restore their lives to healthy functioning.
 
         
         Controlling PeopleBefore getting to the motive and means behind high conflict divorce, let's 
         take a little detour to better understand the type of person who usually initiates a high conflict 
         divorce. Author Patricia Evans calls them "Controlling People."
         In a nutshell, controlling people are narcissistic and low on empathy. The narcissist acts 
         as if he or she is the center of the Universe. In his or her eyes, their beliefs are the "right" 
         ones. Their perspective is the "right one." Their actions are the "right ones."
         A natural outcome of the narcissistic personality is a lack of empathy for others. While 
         the narcissist is well aware of his or her feelings they have no concept of how the other feels. 
         When you don't know how another person feels it is extremely difficult to understand the other's 
         beliefs, perspective, or actions. Therefore, the narcissist is often negative and critical 
         of the other if they disagree.
         Loving relationships require empathy to mature. If you have empathy for your spouse you 
         know how he or she feels. This means you can relate to their beliefs, perspective and actions 
         even if you do not agree. If you can relate you can be respectful and kind. Being able to step 
         into another's shoes is vital to a healthy relationship and to your own personal growth. Because 
         they are different than us, our sweetheart in life, helps us to see things in new ways...ways 
         we could never have understood without empathy.
         While controlling people are narcissistic and do not understand you, the other ingredient 
         for a high conflict divorce is the narcissist's counterpart, a person who works for equality 
         in relationships. This type of person is often very nurturing and self-effacing, and has a 
         strong sense of justice. Thus while the controlling person works toward a win-lose solution 
         to problems, the nurturing or egalitarian person works for a win-win solution. According to 
         Patricia Evans, this places the win-win person at a disadvantage. While the egalitarian person 
         keeps empathizing with the controlling person in an effort to create a win-win solution, the 
         controlling person views this behavior as weak and an opportunity to conquer.
         Essentially the controlling person creates a power struggle with the unwitting egalitarian. 
         This keeps the egalitarian "on the hook," so to speak because they can't seem to realize that 
         they will never create a win-win solution with a controlling person. Sadly it appears to be 
         true that narcissists marry egalitarians and create high conflict divorces all too often.
         Motive and Means
         Personality alone is not enough to create a high conflict divorce. The individuals also 
         need Motive and Means. 
         "Means" generally equates to money and/or power. If one or both parties have enough money 
         to wage a war and they are not concerned with an unhealthy outcome (or not aware of this possibility), 
         this leads to a high conflict divorce. But generally healthy people will quit the conflict 
         when they recognize that they are throwing their money away. Only those snared by the narcissistic 
         power struggle will continue to the "death."
         Another source of means is power, which can come in a variety of forms. Being a divorce 
         attorney is a source of power. Having a personal relationship with the Judge is a source of 
         power. Being personally acquainted with the local police and the city prosecutor helps. Being 
         famous or having media connections is a source of power. All of these things can be used to 
         create a high conflict divorce.
         A third source of means is being irrational and tenacious. Even without money or power, 
         a person can create a high conflict divorce through simple means. There is an axiom that the 
         most irrational and inconsistent person in the system is in control of the system because...they 
         don't follow the rules. If the controlling person is uncooperative, antagonistic, and dishonorable, 
         a high conflict divorce will take shape.
         Then there is "motive." If a person feels aggrieved and they are narcissistic, they can 
         feel justified doing just about anything to trash and burn the other person. This includes 
         dragging the children into the fray. And no matter how self-effacing the egalitarian is, he 
         or she will fight back if pushed far enough. Thus the motive to protect and defend is aroused. 
         Unfortunately trying to fight a narcissist is like dousing yourself with gasoline and lighting 
         yourself on fire.
         Solutions to High Conflict Divorce
         In spite of this disheartening look at high conflict divorce, I still believe it is possible 
         to prevent or at least better tolerate a high conflict divorce. Anyone going through a life 
         changing experience like a divorce, high conflict or otherwise, should seek the support of 
         a therapist, your church, and other groups supportive of your experience. The Kanji for "Crisis" 
         equates to "danger" and "opportunity." In order to see the opportunities in something as tragic 
         as a divorce you will need a level head. While friends and family may love you, your therapist 
         will be more objective. You definitely need objectivity to stay out of the power struggles 
         that the controlling person can create in a high conflict divorce.
         If at all possible work with a mediator to craft a win-win solution to your divorce. Be 
         willing to compromise and to walk away with a "half fair deal." In the long run, walking away 
         from your money and possessions is worth it to avoid the acrimony. Remember, too, that it is 
         only your perception that you are getting an unfair deal. With the dollars you save on legal 
         fees you can free up your life to explore a new and healthier way of living.
         On the other hand if you are up against a party who refuses to negotiate honorably, then 
         you have to use another strategy. And the most important thing to consider is that your desire 
         to be reasonable and fair may be exactly what does you in. When you seek a win-win solution 
         but the other party seeks a win-lose solution, the other party is in the driver's seat, at 
         least in our current Divorce Court environment.
         So here is the simple answer if you do not wish to stoop to the underhanded level. Do your 
         best to secure a fair, mediated agreement. If you cannot swing a mediated agreement with the 
         controlling party, and in very short order, don't hesitate and hope that he or she will somehow 
         change their mind. You need to act swiftly before you are inundated. Give them what they want 
         and count your blessings that they allowed you to get away.
         Never, ever, go to Court with a controlling person who wants nothing more than to trash 
         and burn you especially if they have means (i.e. money or power). And never, ever, go to Court 
         with a controlling person if you have children to protect. The Court system is designed to 
         determine a winner and a loser, not resolve conflict amicably and certainly not to protect 
         the innocent. If you are really a win-win type of person, you are no match for a system that 
         does not hold the attacker responsible, but instead requires you to defend yourself against 
         the constant attacks of the controlling person. You just can't keep up.
         It is not easy to take the high road in these kinds of situations. Regardless of what you 
         lose in the way of material goods or even psychological status in your community, trust that 
         taking the high road means that you and your children will be able to sleep soundly at night. 
         The gift to yourself and your family is to walk away from these Divorce Wars with your integrity 
         and compassion in tact. That does count for something in God's Eyes.
         Useful Links
         Patricia Evans' website on verbal 
         abuse and controlling people.
      
      
Softpanorama Recommended
Society
Groupthink :
Two Party System 
as Polyarchy : 
Corruption of Regulators :
Bureaucracies :
Understanding Micromanagers 
and Control Freaks : Toxic Managers :  
Harvard Mafia :
Diplomatic Communication 
: Surviving a Bad Performance 
Review : Insufficient Retirement Funds as 
Immanent Problem of Neoliberal Regime : PseudoScience :
Who Rules America :
Neoliberalism
 : The Iron 
Law of Oligarchy : 
Libertarian Philosophy
Quotes
 
War and Peace 
: Skeptical 
Finance : John 
Kenneth Galbraith :Talleyrand :
Oscar Wilde :
Otto Von Bismarck :
Keynes :
George Carlin :
Skeptics :
Propaganda  : SE 
quotes : Language Design and Programming Quotes :
Random IT-related quotes : 
Somerset Maugham :
Marcus Aurelius :
Kurt Vonnegut :
Eric Hoffer :
Winston Churchill :
Napoleon Bonaparte :
Ambrose Bierce : 
Bernard Shaw : 
Mark Twain Quotes
Bulletin:
Vol 25, No.12 (December, 2013) Rational Fools vs. Efficient Crooks The efficient 
markets hypothesis :
Political Skeptic Bulletin, 2013 :
Unemployment Bulletin, 2010 :
 Vol 23, No.10 
(October, 2011) An observation about corporate security departments :
Slightly Skeptical Euromaydan Chronicles, June 2014 :
Greenspan legacy bulletin, 2008 :
Vol 25, No.10 (October, 2013) Cryptolocker Trojan 
(Win32/Crilock.A) :
Vol 25, No.08 (August, 2013) Cloud providers 
as intelligence collection hubs : 
Financial Humor Bulletin, 2010 :
Inequality Bulletin, 2009 :
Financial Humor Bulletin, 2008 :
Copyleft Problems 
Bulletin, 2004 :
Financial Humor Bulletin, 2011 :
Energy Bulletin, 2010 : 
Malware Protection Bulletin, 2010 : Vol 26, 
No.1 (January, 2013) Object-Oriented Cult :
Political Skeptic Bulletin, 2011 :
Vol 23, No.11 (November, 2011) Softpanorama classification 
of sysadmin horror stories : Vol 25, No.05 
(May, 2013) Corporate bullshit as a communication method  : 
Vol 25, No.06 (June, 2013) A Note on the Relationship of Brooks Law and Conway Law
History:
Fifty glorious years (1950-2000): 
the triumph of the US computer engineering :
Donald Knuth : TAoCP 
and its Influence of Computer Science : Richard Stallman 
: Linus Torvalds  :
Larry Wall  :
John K. Ousterhout : 
CTSS : Multix OS Unix 
History : Unix shell history :
VI editor :
History of pipes concept :
Solaris : MS DOS 
:  Programming Languages History :
PL/1 : Simula 67 :
C :
History of GCC development : 
Scripting Languages :
Perl history   :
OS History : Mail :
DNS : SSH 
: CPU Instruction Sets :
SPARC systems 1987-2006 :
Norton Commander :
Norton Utilities :
Norton Ghost :
Frontpage history :
Malware Defense History :
GNU Screen : 
OSS early history
Classic books:
The Peter 
Principle : Parkinson 
Law : 1984 :
The Mythical Man-Month : 
How to Solve It by George Polya :
The Art of Computer Programming :
The Elements of Programming Style :
The Unix Hater’s Handbook :
The Jargon file :
The True Believer :
Programming Pearls :
The Good Soldier Svejk : 
The Power Elite
Most popular humor pages:
Manifest of the Softpanorama IT Slacker Society :
Ten Commandments 
of the IT Slackers Society : Computer Humor Collection 
: BSD Logo Story :
The Cuckoo's Egg :
IT Slang : C++ Humor 
: ARE YOU A BBS ADDICT? :
The Perl Purity Test :
Object oriented programmers of all nations 
: Financial Humor :
Financial Humor Bulletin, 
2008 : Financial 
Humor Bulletin, 2010 : The Most Comprehensive Collection of Editor-related 
Humor : Programming Language Humor :
Goldman Sachs related humor :
Greenspan humor : C Humor :
Scripting Humor :
Real Programmers Humor :
Web Humor : GPL-related Humor 
: OFM Humor :
Politically Incorrect Humor :
IDS Humor : 
"Linux Sucks" Humor : Russian 
Musical Humor : Best Russian Programmer 
Humor : Microsoft plans to buy Catholic Church 
: Richard Stallman Related Humor :
Admin Humor : Perl-related 
Humor : Linus Torvalds Related 
humor : PseudoScience Related Humor :
Networking Humor :
Shell Humor :
Financial Humor Bulletin, 
2011 : Financial 
Humor Bulletin, 2012 :
Financial Humor Bulletin, 
2013 : Java Humor : Software 
Engineering Humor : Sun Solaris Related Humor :
Education Humor : IBM 
Humor : Assembler-related Humor :
VIM Humor : Computer 
Viruses Humor : Bright tomorrow is rescheduled 
to a day after tomorrow : Classic Computer 
Humor 
The Last but not Least  Technology is dominated by 
two types of people: those who understand what they do not manage and those who manage what they do not understand ~Archibald Putt. 
Ph.D
Copyright © 1996-2021 by Softpanorama Society. www.softpanorama.org 
was initially created as a service to the (now defunct) UN Sustainable Development Networking Programme (SDNP) 
without any remuneration. This document is an industrial compilation designed and created exclusively 
for educational use and is distributed under the Softpanorama Content License. 
Original materials copyright belong 
to respective owners. Quotes are made for educational purposes only 
in compliance with the fair use doctrine.  
FAIR USE NOTICE This site contains 
		copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically 
		authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available 
		to advance understanding of computer science, IT technology, economic, scientific, and social  
		issues. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such 
		copyrighted material as provided by section 107 of the US Copyright Law according to which 
such material can be distributed without profit exclusively for research and educational purposes.
This is a Spartan WHYFF (We Help You For Free) 
site written by people for whom English is not a native language. Grammar and spelling errors should 
be expected. The site contain some broken links as it develops like a living tree...
Disclaimer: 
The statements, views and opinions presented on this web page are those of the author (or 
referenced source) and are 
not endorsed by, nor do they necessarily reflect, the opinions of the Softpanorama society. We do not warrant the correctness 
of the information provided or its fitness for any purpose. The site uses AdSense so you need to be aware of Google privacy policy. You you do not want to be 
tracked by Google please disable Javascript for this site. This site is perfectly usable without 
Javascript. 
Last modified: January, 20, 2021