May the source be with you, but remember the KISS principle ;-)
Home Switchboard Unix Administration Red Hat TCP/IP Networks Neoliberalism Toxic Managers
(slightly skeptical) Educational society promoting "Back to basics" movement against IT overcomplexity and  bastardization of classic Unix

User Private Groups

News Unix permissions model Recommended Links The /etc/group file Groups administration tutorial UID policy
System Groups Primary Group Wheel Group User Private Groups Managing user accounts in Perl  
System Accounts Solaris RBAC Unix History Admin Horror Stories Humor Etc

Unix introduced a simple model of file permissions in the 70's which has proven to be quite effective and easy to understand. In recent times, there was an attempt to extend it using ACLs, that are used in Windows  but very few organization have adopted this approach on Unix servers due to the complexity. Existence of two models also confuse administrators and represent a serious security risk. 

In the original Unix model, each file has three access categories of user: User (u), Group (g) and Other (o). Group is essentially a role and primary group is a primary role. Any user can be a member of any number of groups.

There is also auxiliary concept of  system groups which is similar to the concept of privileged ports. For example, all groups with GID below 100 are considered to be system groups.  System groups has special properties, and designed mainly for partitioning of permission space. For example in most users which have system group as primary group have no legitimate shell (/bin/noshell or /bin/false is used instead; the former logs in access attempts), so nobody can login as such a user.

The most severe limitation of this model is that a file can only be a member of one group. That can be partially rectified by usage of "metagroups" -- groups that are just and aggregations of existing groups, but that solution  requires additional efforts and discipline (in this case /etc/group need to be automatically generated from some template with macros).   If we assume that the number of group allowed is large (approximately the same as the number of files/directories)  metagroup approach is as powerful as ACL model and is much simpler.  It requires relatively simple modification of the /etc/group file.

One interesting step toward this model is the concept of  User Private Groups (UPG) introduced in Red Hat around year 2000( they are present in Red Hat Linux 7.0). But later Red Hat abandoned the idea and there is no UPG behavior of useradd function in RHEL 6.5 and later

UPG scheme makes UNIX groups  easier to use. It does not add or change anything in the standard UNIX way of handling groups. This is simply a new convention for handling classic Unix groups Whenever you create a new user, by default, he or she has a unique group. The idea is very simple and effective:  Each user has their own primary group, of which only they are a member.

It is a better idea then setting umask = 022. Of couse umask is 022 also prevents other users and other members of a user's primary group from modifying a user's files. but you can't distinguish between human and non-human account. If every "human" user has their own private group "group protection" is not needed. At the same time for applications this allow to create directories access to which is share between the members of primary group. The umask is typically set in /etc/profile.

A complementary capability that we should mention here is setgid bit on Directories. Since each user's home directory is owned by the user and their private group, it is recommended to set the setgid bit on the home directory. That is especially useful for system administrators who are often work as root and ftp files back and forth from their PC.  It is also useful for application directories where is important that the whole subtree belongs to the same group.

You can imitate USG-behaviors of useradd typical for versions of RHEL before 6.5 on SUSE or Solaris using shell function or Perl scripts. In the most simplified form it can look like

function uadd {
    groupadd -g %1 %2
    useradd -u %1 -g %1 -m %2

The rest of parameters can be set separately using usermod or more complex function can be used.User Private Group Rationale

UPG is used in Red Hat Linux since version 5 or even earlier. Currently it is not used on any other Linux distribution. The following is the rationale for the scheme.

At this point, by making the default umask 002 and giving everyone a private default group, you can easily set up groups that users can take advantage of without doing any magic. Just create the group, add the users, and do the above chown and chmod on the group's directories.

Recommended Links

Google matched content

Softpanorama Recommended

Top articles


32.5. User Private Groups

[Solved] HOWTO - Disable User private group (UPG) scheme in ...

user private group (UPG) - Linux -

Users, Groups and User-Private Groups

Filesystem permissions - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The How and Why of User Private Groups in Unix Security

Group identifier - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Using Unix Groups



Groupthink : Two Party System as Polyarchy : Corruption of Regulators : Bureaucracies : Understanding Micromanagers and Control Freaks : Toxic Managers :   Harvard Mafia : Diplomatic Communication : Surviving a Bad Performance Review : Insufficient Retirement Funds as Immanent Problem of Neoliberal Regime : PseudoScience : Who Rules America : Neoliberalism  : The Iron Law of Oligarchy : Libertarian Philosophy


War and Peace : Skeptical Finance : John Kenneth Galbraith :Talleyrand : Oscar Wilde : Otto Von Bismarck : Keynes : George Carlin : Skeptics : Propaganda  : SE quotes : Language Design and Programming Quotes : Random IT-related quotesSomerset Maugham : Marcus Aurelius : Kurt Vonnegut : Eric Hoffer : Winston Churchill : Napoleon Bonaparte : Ambrose BierceBernard Shaw : Mark Twain Quotes


Vol 25, No.12 (December, 2013) Rational Fools vs. Efficient Crooks The efficient markets hypothesis : Political Skeptic Bulletin, 2013 : Unemployment Bulletin, 2010 :  Vol 23, No.10 (October, 2011) An observation about corporate security departments : Slightly Skeptical Euromaydan Chronicles, June 2014 : Greenspan legacy bulletin, 2008 : Vol 25, No.10 (October, 2013) Cryptolocker Trojan (Win32/Crilock.A) : Vol 25, No.08 (August, 2013) Cloud providers as intelligence collection hubs : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2010 : Inequality Bulletin, 2009 : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2008 : Copyleft Problems Bulletin, 2004 : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2011 : Energy Bulletin, 2010 : Malware Protection Bulletin, 2010 : Vol 26, No.1 (January, 2013) Object-Oriented Cult : Political Skeptic Bulletin, 2011 : Vol 23, No.11 (November, 2011) Softpanorama classification of sysadmin horror stories : Vol 25, No.05 (May, 2013) Corporate bullshit as a communication method  : Vol 25, No.06 (June, 2013) A Note on the Relationship of Brooks Law and Conway Law


Fifty glorious years (1950-2000): the triumph of the US computer engineering : Donald Knuth : TAoCP and its Influence of Computer Science : Richard Stallman : Linus Torvalds  : Larry Wall  : John K. Ousterhout : CTSS : Multix OS Unix History : Unix shell history : VI editor : History of pipes concept : Solaris : MS DOSProgramming Languages History : PL/1 : Simula 67 : C : History of GCC developmentScripting Languages : Perl history   : OS History : Mail : DNS : SSH : CPU Instruction Sets : SPARC systems 1987-2006 : Norton Commander : Norton Utilities : Norton Ghost : Frontpage history : Malware Defense History : GNU Screen : OSS early history

Classic books:

The Peter Principle : Parkinson Law : 1984 : The Mythical Man-MonthHow to Solve It by George Polya : The Art of Computer Programming : The Elements of Programming Style : The Unix Haterís Handbook : The Jargon file : The True Believer : Programming Pearls : The Good Soldier Svejk : The Power Elite

Most popular humor pages:

Manifest of the Softpanorama IT Slacker Society : Ten Commandments of the IT Slackers Society : Computer Humor Collection : BSD Logo Story : The Cuckoo's Egg : IT Slang : C++ Humor : ARE YOU A BBS ADDICT? : The Perl Purity Test : Object oriented programmers of all nations : Financial Humor : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2008 : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2010 : The Most Comprehensive Collection of Editor-related Humor : Programming Language Humor : Goldman Sachs related humor : Greenspan humor : C Humor : Scripting Humor : Real Programmers Humor : Web Humor : GPL-related Humor : OFM Humor : Politically Incorrect Humor : IDS Humor : "Linux Sucks" Humor : Russian Musical Humor : Best Russian Programmer Humor : Microsoft plans to buy Catholic Church : Richard Stallman Related Humor : Admin Humor : Perl-related Humor : Linus Torvalds Related humor : PseudoScience Related Humor : Networking Humor : Shell Humor : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2011 : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2012 : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2013 : Java Humor : Software Engineering Humor : Sun Solaris Related Humor : Education Humor : IBM Humor : Assembler-related Humor : VIM Humor : Computer Viruses Humor : Bright tomorrow is rescheduled to a day after tomorrow : Classic Computer Humor

The Last but not Least Technology is dominated by two types of people: those who understand what they do not manage and those who manage what they do not understand ~Archibald Putt. Ph.D

Copyright © 1996-2021 by Softpanorama Society. was initially created as a service to the (now defunct) UN Sustainable Development Networking Programme (SDNP) without any remuneration. This document is an industrial compilation designed and created exclusively for educational use and is distributed under the Softpanorama Content License. Original materials copyright belong to respective owners. Quotes are made for educational purposes only in compliance with the fair use doctrine.

FAIR USE NOTICE This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to advance understanding of computer science, IT technology, economic, scientific, and social issues. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided by section 107 of the US Copyright Law according to which such material can be distributed without profit exclusively for research and educational purposes.

This is a Spartan WHYFF (We Help You For Free) site written by people for whom English is not a native language. Grammar and spelling errors should be expected. The site contain some broken links as it develops like a living tree...

You can use PayPal to to buy a cup of coffee for authors of this site


The statements, views and opinions presented on this web page are those of the author (or referenced source) and are not endorsed by, nor do they necessarily reflect, the opinions of the Softpanorama society. We do not warrant the correctness of the information provided or its fitness for any purpose. The site uses AdSense so you need to be aware of Google privacy policy. You you do not want to be tracked by Google please disable Javascript for this site. This site is perfectly usable without Javascript.

Last modified: March 12, 2019