The White House Senior Medical Advisor Anthony Fauci stated Sunday that the coronavirus
pandemic has revealed that the US is a fundamentally racist country.
Speaking to graduates of Emory University, Fauci declared that the virus has revealed the
"undeniable effects of racism in our society."
"Covid-19 has shone a bright light on our own society's failings," said Fauci, arguing that
African Americans, Hispanics, and Native Americans are all more susceptible to the virus
because of pre-existing health conditions stemming directly from social factors including
"access to healthcare" and "availability of an adequate diet."
"Very few of these comorbidities have racial determinants," Fauci claimed, further stating
"Almost all relate to the social determinants of health dating back to disadvantageous
conditions that some people of color find themselves in from birth regarding the availability
of an adequate diet, access to healthcare and the undeniable effects of racism in our society.
"
Watch:
https://www.youtube.com/embed/w6EkSceuErQ
Meanwhile, Senator Rand Paul has continued to criticise Fauci, urging Friday that he is a
"little dictator" who "acts like an ignoramus every day" where mask mandates are concerned.
Appearing on Fox News, Paul stated that Fauci "probably has the highest IQ for someone who
actually acts like an ignoramus every day of the week."
After Fauci decreed that kids should
keep wearing masks , leading to the CDC head echoing his calls, Paul countered "Kids don't
get this disease. When they do get it, it's a mild form. They don't transmit it well. We've got
two years worth of evidence on this."
"They [the CDC] still have their camp provision. They want them going around camp wearing
a mask, doing the 6-foot stuff," Paul continued, adding " There's no science behind it. It's
all conjecture, it's all Tony Fauci, his way or the highway."
"Mr. Little Dictator . . . If Fauci wants kids to mask up and wear masks everywhere, he
should show us the science," Paul emphasised.
According to the current knowledge, the virus SARS-CoV-2 has a diameter of 60 nm to 140 nm
[nanometers (billionth of a meter)] [16], [17], while medical and non-medical facemasks'
thread diameter ranges from 55 µm to 440 µm [micrometers (one millionth of a
meter), which is more than 1000 times larger [25]. Due to the difference in sizes between
SARS-CoV-2 diameter and facemasks thread diameter ( the virus is 1000 times smaller ),
SARS-CoV-2 can easily pass through any facemask
-The average diameter of a single bacterium is 4.25 micrometers. A micrometer is one
thousandth of a meter. A meter is 39.37 inches. The average diameter of a coronavirus is 90
nanometers. A nanometer is a billionth of a meter.
- There are roughly two orders of magnitude (100 times) difference between a single
bacterium and a virus. We can see a single bacterium with a very powerful optical microscope.
We cannot see viruses with optical microscopes. We need very powerful electron microscopes to
resolve a virus.
-Most doctors are very good in medicine but have very little understanding of physics. The
same holds true for virologists and other researchers in the field.
As a rationale for masks this fails because it does not mention a necessary prior element.
In order to work, masks have to attenuate the guilty aerosols. The individual aerosols
involved could be only a micrometer or few micrometers in size. The individual virions are in
the range of 50-130 nanometers.[6] I have looked at a number of cloth masks that one can
purchase and found their pore sizes to be 0.05 to 0.15 millimeters. This is 1000 times larger
than virions and hundreds of times larger than small aerosols.
Dr. Lee Merritt, Dr. Tenpenny, Dr. Richard Fleming and Dr. Vanden Bossche have trying to
warning people about the risks of the experimental gene therapies for sometime.
They don't deal with data, that's just the point and the media is even worse, they don't
deal with reality. Occult bots, all they are.
Not Your Father's ZH 2 hours ago (Edited) remove link
Fauci (Which means "jaws" in Italian, BTW) may be right on this racism angle: Gates is
American and has sickened and maimed and killed millions of Africans with his "vax"
programs.
Yeah one wonders if perhaps Fauci has noticed the rate of obesity among Blacks and
Hispanics.
Non-Hispanic Black adults (49.6%) had the highest age-adjusted prevalence of obesity,
followed by Hispanic adults (44.8%), non-Hispanic White adults (42.2%). People that are
morbidly obese will tend to have a litany of other serious comorbidities, leading to more
risk.
Fauci has a long sordid history of involvement in Gain of Function meddling! Having him as
an advisor to the US about the abominable efforts to make a virus jump from bats to humans
which they achieved in the Wuhan lab is truly the fox guarding the henhouse. He DID fund that
lab through a huge contribution to another source that then sent that money to Wuhan.
Fauci: "We didn't fund the Wuhan lab." Paul: "Funding was laundered through a middle man,
Eco Health." Fauci: "Let me explain why we funded the Wuhan lab..."
Dual Use = scientific and military application ! We can NEVER allow these loons to be in a
position to make crucial decisions way outside of their lanes.
Fauci's defence is according to the lefts' playbook -- semantics. Fauci is in up to his
neck and is trying to weasel his way out of any tie to corona virus 🦠 research.
1:57
Fauci: "Let me explain to you why that was done: the SARS CoV-1 (severe acute respiratory
syndrome coronavirus) *originated in bats in China*. It would have been irresponsible of us
if we did not investigate the bat viruses and the serology to see who might have been
infected." For all those who say the virus didn't come from China . . . Fauci just admitted
that the virus came from China.
Krystal, did you really say Biden Admistration is committed to finding the origin of
virus? They are investigating themselves. Let me guess conclusion," we have investigated
ourselves and we found we did nothing wrong", please......
Fauci trying to say that it's not gain of function reminds me of north Korea saying they
don't have concentration camps because "we don't use that term, so we don't have them."
I have to give Krystal and Saagar credit for staying focused and not distracted by who ever is stomping around with heavy
boots on a hardware floor...or whatever is happening because it's blowing up my ADHD!
Gain of function funding* was reinstated in 2019 after having been suspended on 2014 ( or 2015 - I read this recently but don't
quite remember the exact date of the original suspension )
I believe the place I first heard about the University of North Carolina working on gain of function with China was on the
Anonymous YT channel. I believe there was a female epidemiologist saying covid 19 is clearly a manipulated virus, would've taken
10,000 years for a virus to naturally evolve to the level of virulence. That video was posted in late January or February 2020.
They think the American people are completely ignorant. They think that we as a people cannot put the pieces of the puzzle
together and see that the picture reveals there is something awful that happened in Wuhon, China and it appears that the U. S.
Funded it in some way. It's not a coincidence that this virus started in the same town where these disease processes are
studied.
It's hard to believe that WHO chief who quoted that there is no evidence of "Human to Human transmission of the virus"
in Jan 2020 is still in charge of that organisation which has failed the world miserably
He is a criminal, India my heart breaks for you, I want to send my prayers to the people, allot of us here in America
are very sad. God be with all of you and your beautiful country.
This was known last year. the government of many countries funded that lab. They will have to face the judgement from
Lord of Lord when they die and stand before the judgement seat.
In order to get uncensored and unbiased news about my country the United States I have to get my news from Sky News
Australia and WION. Mad world. Ty for your objectivity WION.
Palki Sharma is an amazing journalist and a reporter. A brave woman who speaks with facts and she knows her scope well.
And yes! Dr. Fauci knows everything about this virus but he will not say the shocking obvious about it to the world.
Thats all.
"turning down and closing the entire economy has been devastating...that's a fact!" That IS an indisputable fact . When will Fauci
be asked "why did you send COVID research to Wuhan'. Where was Dr. Fauci’s caution when he authorized and funded gain of function research
on coronavirus in Wuhan?
Fauci is not a scientist, he is a neoliberal. Paid big money for pushing globalists’ agenda. He needs to be investigated
for illegally funding the gain of function research in Wuhan Biolab!
Senator Rand Paul, R-KY, says he strongly believes Obama 'gave orders' on Michael Flynn case, and weighs in on heated argument
with Dr. Fauci in Senate hearing. #FoxNews
"Heated argument". I found the whole thing quite disappointing. Fauci was never asked about his funding decisions related to
Wuhan. Nor about his clear conflicts of interest with regards to available cures and vaccines. There were no scientist asking
questions about the health effects of lockdowns or asking critical questions about the earlier prediction and computer models
who clearly were way off. Non of it. These were no hearings! These were just a few people having a monologue battle. I found the
whole hearing amounted to nothing. Nothing new was disclosed or brought to light that has not been reported in the mainstream
media before. I am very disappointed in Rand Paul. I expected so much more of him.
Is Fauci really a physician, does he see patients. When was the last time he was in practice. He's an academic. He shouldn't
have as much public access as he does. Spreading false information.
I have one argument with Senator Paul: his statement that Dr. Fauci "is a good person." Dr. Fauci is NOT A GOOD PERSON in my
opinion. One need look no further than Fauci's underhanded dealings with Dr. Judy Mikovits as shared by her on the Thomas Paine
Podcast - Mike Moore EPISODE 19, 21st April 2020. Rand Paul's statement that Fauci is a "good person" holds no more validity than
Donald Trump's statement that Bill and Hillary Clinton are "good people."
"The nation has endeavored over the past ten years to become better prepared for the
medical consequences of catastrophic events such as bioterrorist events and pandemic
influenza. During that time period Project BioShield, The National Strategy for Pandemic
Influenza, and the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority have emerged to
support the development and acquisition of medical countermeasures (MCMs) and the domestic
manufacturing capacity to prepare for and respond to an emergency. "
Paging Dr. Bright, looks like that pandemic you spent four years preparing for is
here.......
"support the development and acquisition of medical countermeasures (MCMs)" That's the
strategy, what say you Dr. Rick? Are we ready
"Dr. Rick Bright is an internationally recognized expert in the fields of immunology,
therapudic intervention, vaccine and diagnostic development. He is also one of the nations
leading experts in pandemic preparedness and response and in the design of diagnostic
tools required to track pandemics..."
Okay boys and girls, how about a job performance appraisal. Dr. Rick's performance on
BARDA's strategy for:
" domestic manufacturing capacity to prepare for and respond to an emergency."
A) "internationally recognized expert" level
B) "nations leading experts in pandemic preparedness" level
C) Grossly incompetent and should be in jail
D) Let's blame Trump instead
Dr. Rick's performance on BARDA's strategy for:
"development and acquisition of medical countermeasures"
A) "internationally recognized expert" level
B) "nations leading experts in pandemic preparedness" level
C) Grossly incompetent and should be in jail
D) Let's blame Trump instead
You should read his complaint, it's a great insight into just how much red tape and green
money there is in drug approval. If anybody in the House is reading, please let Nancy, when
she's done with her ice cream break, know that we need an investigation. I hear there are
some experienced lawyers out of work, maybe she can call Bob Mueller and see who he can
recommend to investigate this one.
Recipients of grants from Dr. Anthony Fauci's National Institute of Allergy and Infectious
Diseases headlined a Wuhan Institute of Virology conference focusing on "gain of function
research and gene editing," The National Pulse can exclusively reveal.
The May 2017 event was "co-organized
by U.S. National Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Wuhan Institute of
Virology (WIV), CAS and Hubei Society for Microbiology."
According to the Wuhan lab, the event had five academic sessions, the first of which was
"gain of function research, gene editing, targeting and delivery and other novel
biotechnology."
Among the Americans in attendance as special guests were Professors Linda Saif, James LeDuc,
and David Relman. Together, the three professors have received nearly 200 grants from the
National Institutes of Health (NIH), with 75 coming from Fauci's National Institute of Allergy
and Infectious Diseases (NIAID).
LeDuc, whose earliest grant can be traced to
2006, has received 32 grants from the NIAID, according to the NIH registry. He runs the Galveston
National Laboratory, which was " constructed
under grants awarded by the NIAID/NIH."
Saif, who counts funding from
NIAID since 1985, has received a total of 56 grants from the NIH, 43 of which came from Fauci's
NIAID.
And Relman, who's been funded by the NIH since 1996, has received 90 grants from the NIH.
He has also received the NIH's Pioneer Award and
the Transformative
Research Award.
The unearthed conference follows a heated
exchange between Fauci and Senator Rand Paul, where the NIAID Director denied providing
funding to the Wuhan Institute of Virology to conduct gain of function research.
NIH grant records reveal, however, that money sent to the New York-based EcoHealth Alliance
was used for research conducted
at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
The opening ceremony was chair by Prof. Zhiming Yuan, the Director of Wuhan National
Biosafety Level 4 (P4) Laboratory. Prof. Xinwen Chen, the Director General of WIV, delivered
the opening address, in which he pointed out that as a qualified academic exchange activity,
this workshop will definitely put forward new ideas for the research on emerging viral diseases
control, biosafety laboratory and global health security. The workshop is divided into five
academic sessions, including (1) gain of function research, gene editing, targeting and
delivery and other novel biotechnology; (2) public health response to outbreaks and issues; (3)
emerging infectious diseases and global health security; (4) high-level biosafety laboratory:
construction, commissioning, and sustainment, and (5) biosafety, biosecurity and bioethics.
Experts delivered 23 speeches in the workshop, and mainly discussed policies in response to
emerging infectious diseases. Prof. Linda Saif (academician) from Ohio State University, Prof.
David Relman (academician) from Stanford University, Prof. James LeDuc, the Director of
Galveston National Laboratory, and Prof. George F. Gao (academician) from Institute of
Microbiology, CAS attended the workshop as special guests. y_arrow
Lordflin 1 hour ago
I said some time back this creature was running for cover...
He was starting to realize... too late I suspect... that when people started looking for
heads his would be one of the very first offered up...
nmewn 1 hour ago (Edited) remove link
"The unearthed conference follows a heated
exchange between Fauci and Senator Rand Paul, where the NIAID Director denied providing
funding to the Wuhan Institute of Virology to conduct gain of function research.
NIH grant records reveal, however, that money sent to the New York-based EcoHealth
Alliance was used for research conducted
at the Wuhan Institute of Virology."
As Rand Paul said "He lied.". He said he never funded gain of function research, but
merely funded research into SARS-1. You're not researching SARS-1 without gain of function
research. That's what they were doing, to try and devise a vaccine for SARS-1...which became
SARS-2 or COVID-19...and escaped the Wuhan Lab.
I wonder it 60 Minutes will rescind it's glowing Fauci profile segment.
radical-extremist 1 hour ago (Edited) remove link
As soon as the virus hit in January 2020, Fauci's first reaction was to get way ahead of
the story before it could be traced back to him. People of authority who create messes often
do this...so they can then be the hero.
You don't run from the problem, you get right in the middle of it so you can control the
messaging. It's obvious that's what he's been doing...and our lapdog media fell right into
his vortex of charm and absolute certainty.
MASTER OF UNIVERSE 1 hour ago
Dr. Anthony Fauci is the world's biggest Epidemiological Research funding chair in the
entire existence of global university research into anything Epidemiology. He has been in
full control of the funding arm of Epidemiological Research for decades, and he, as well as
Gates et al. think that they are untouchables.
This is how Gates & Fauci were able to align with DARPA, CIA, Fort Detrick U.S. Army,
and the global research networks of Epidemiology.
The United Kingdom is heavily linked to this and the main Epidemiological BSL-4 in Britain
also deployed a bioweapon for the UK variant mix that both M-I6, CIA, Mossad, Five-Eyes
lackeys all intended on attacking the world with so that they had control via Fourth
Generation Biowarfare given that Western Intelligence knows it is effin' screwed via whole
system insolvency.
CIA are douchebags.
MOU
sbin 38 minutes ago remove link
Wuhan lab was a patsy.
charlieparker 1 hour ago (Edited) remove link
Fauci never struck me as an evil genius. Just a mediocre, greedy administrator with no
empathy or conscience. His true role is that of a fall guy. He's only got one plan left, now
he is this exposed.
1. Lie through his teeth.
2. If that doesn't work, blame Daszak.
After the way my entire life has been ruined by this Covid-19 farce, it will be some
compensation to see these two c****s go down. Imagine having nearly the entire world blame
you for starting a pandemic, whether it is real or fake! Silly sods must have thought that
the people pulling their strings would protect them.
George Bayou 1 hour ago
Notice how Fauci always talks in statistics? That's because to him the individual doesn't
matter. "GoF is worth the risk." He is willing to risk millions in the chance that he will be
viewed as a heroic scientist.
Jack Offelday 1 hour ago remove link
Just show us the smoking gun: Fauci's signature on the grant documents.
Max21c 10 minutes ago
Together, the three professors have received nearly 200 grants from the National
Institutes of Health (NIH), with 75 coming from Fauci's National Institute of Allergy and
Infectious Diseases (NIAID).
The Pentagon is guilty, the CIA is guilty, the National Security Council is guilty. Fauci
is just the front man.
Clearing 28 minutes ago
As I have said many times on this site, and as Chris Martenson said well over a year ago
(see his Youtube videos), Fauci approved this funding to help his chums. It's simply criminal
negligence. He knew "gain of function" "research" was simply witchcraft and BS. And how many
people have died because his Dr. Strangelove friends decided to goose SARS? Fauci and his
friends are simply criminal scum.
Londo 1 hour ago (Edited) remove link
Fauci has nothing to do with it. Pentagon has a secret bio weapon unit operating as a
branch of NIH, CDC. Fauci and the rest of NIH, CDC have no authority ,oversight over it.
Which is very interesting, why is the Pentagon funding bio weapons research,call it gains
of function if you like, in Wuhan ?
I could be wrong. It might be a CIA operation. Time frame when Pompeo was CIA director.
Everything fits.
Max21c 13 minutes ago
Together, the three professors have received nearly 200 grants from the National
Institutes of Health (NIH), with 75 coming from Fauci's National Institute of Allergy and
Infectious Diseases (NIAID).
Fauci may be guilty of collaborating with the secret police and state security apparatus
but the intelligence community knew about this and was likely onboard in backing and
supporting the intelligence/spying operation...
Max21c 15 minutes ago (Edited)
Together, the three professors have received nearly 200 grants from the National
Institutes of Health (NIH), with 75 coming from Fauci's National Institute of Allergy and
Infectious Diseases (NIAID).
And this likely was initially concealed from the public and covered up by the official
media because it likely points to the Obama era intelligence community and Obama era National
Security Council and Obama era Pentagon... These types of intelligence community operations
are generally not ad hoc and require considerable lead time... So anything funded in 2017 was
being planned in the years beforehand...
Jack Offelday 1 hour ago
Fauci has all the earmarks of a psychopath.
Somebody from Berlin 59 minutes ago (Edited)
He is one, plain an simple. That is not a smear or derogative term for him, that is the
objective truth.
Max21c 8 minutes ago
Summary: Washington & Washingtonians instead of acting appropriately and encouraging
China not to engage in gain of function research instead wanted to play silly little spy
games and funded the actual biological warfare programs of the PLA that they should have not
collaborated in and should have stood steadfastly against.
The Industrial accident may not have been their fault but all the horrible mismanagement
of the pandemic afterwards is on Washingtonians. What came after the industrial accident is
entirely the fault of Washingtonians. They made a mess of things. They mishandled it. They
were inept, incompetent, incoherent, and ineffective. Taiwan has 12 deaths as of today. The
USA has 500,000 deaths. Quality of government matters as does quality of leadership and
bureaucracy and political class competency all upon which Washingtonians miserably fail.
wootendw PREMIUM 14 minutes ago remove link
"LeDuc, whose earliest grant can be traced
to 2006, has received 32 grants from the NIAID, according to the NIH registry. He
runs
the Galveston National Laboratory, which was " constructed
under grants awarded by the NIAID/NIH."
Saif, who counts funding from
NIAID since 1985, has received a total of 56 grants from the NIH, 43 of which came from
Fauci's NIAID.
And Relman, who's been funded by the NIH since 1996, has received 90 grants from the
NIH. He has also received the NIH's Pioneer Award
and the Transformative Research Award."
Lock each of them up in a no-human-contact, padded cell for the rest of their lives,
feeding them dog food and water through a hole at the bottom of the door.
twh99 26 minutes ago
Gene editing might be useful, especially if you are researching benign viruses and want to
see how they work.
But doing Gain of Function work on dangerous viruses should be illegal. There is no
possible good outcome with that type of research. In fact I would hazard that the only people
who want that research are those who are developing bio weapons.
Posa 40 minutes ago
Dr David Relman, who attended the 2017 conference has been publicly skeptical for many
months. He recently told the NYPost :
"We're reasonable scientists with expertise in relevant areas and we don't see the data
that says this must be of natural origin."
Pretty explosive set of interview arguing from artificial origin of COVID-19...
Includes C-span footage of confrontation of Ron Paul and Fauci as well very interesting
interview of Dr. Richard M. Fleming as well as pretty reveling interview of Dr. Peter Daszak - EcoHealth
Alliance who was financed mainly by the Department of Defense and serve as intermediary for
Wuhan labs financing from Fauci.
People who have been fully vaccinated should still follow precautions in doctor's
offices, airports, nursing homes, the agency recommends
Fully vaccinated people don't need to wear a mask or physically distance during outdoor or
indoor activities, large or small, federal health officials said, the broadest easing of
pandemic recommendations so far.
The fully vaccinated should continue to wear a mask while traveling by plane, bus or train,
and the guidance doesn't apply to certain places like hospitals, nursing homes and prisons, the
U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said Thursday.
The fully protected can, however, resume doing many of the things they had to give up due to
the pandemic, CDC Director Rochelle Walensky said.
"We have all longed for this moment, when we can get back to some sense of normalcy," Dr.
Walensky said. "That moment has come for those who are fully vaccinated."
The CDC considers people fully vaccinated either two weeks after receiving their second dose
of an mRNA vaccine, such as the one from Pfizer Inc. PFE 1.03% and partner BioNTech SE
or Moderna Inc.,
MRNA
-1.84% or two weeks after getting the single-shot vaccine from Johnson & Johnson .
Senator Rand Paul continued to slam White House medical advisor Thursday, saying that
Anthony Fauci could be culpable for the entire coronavirus pandemic.
Paul was attacked by leftist media Wednesday for merely questioning Fauci's extensive role
in granting funding to the Wuhan Institute of Virology at a Senate hearing.
CNN's Anderson Cooper declared that Paul should "have more respect at least for medical
science."
Now in a further appearance on Fox And Friends , Paul has gone even deeper, accusing Fauci
of being personally to blame for the global pandemic.
" The person they hired to investigate the lab for the WHO perspective is the guy who gave
the money ," Paul urged.
" So NIH gave the money to EcoHealth. The head of EcoHealth – they got him to
investigate whether Wuhan was doing anything inappropriate in their lab. But if they were then
wouldn't he be culpable? " The Senator questioned.
" Doesn't he have a self interest in smoothing things over ," Paul continued, adding "I'm
not saying he did cover things up but you wouldn't appoint someone who is in the line of the
supply chain of giving the money to them."
"Ultimately here's the rub. I don't know whether it came from the lab. But who could be
culpable? Dr. Fauci could be culpable for the entire pandemic!" Paul emphasised.
As Infowars
reported in April 2020 , the NIH awarded a $3.7 million grant to the Wuhan Institute of
Virology to conduct coronavirus gain of function research.
Paul alleged that the National Institutes of Health (NIH) had used a middle-man to funnel
money to the Wuhan Institute of Virology via EcoHealth Alliance - which worked with the lab on
bat coronavirus projects.
Paul specifically referenced so-called "gain-of-function" research which in this case has
been focused on how to make animal viruses more transmissible to humans - specifically bat
coronaviruses .
"Government scientists like yourself who favor gain of function research," Paul
began...
...only to have Fauci interject "I don't favor gain of function research in China," adding
"You are saying things that are not correct."
Paul pushed back - continuing:
"[Those who favor gain of function] say that COVID-19 mutations were random and not
designed by man."
"I do not have any accounting of what the Chinese may have done," Fauci shot back, adding
that he's in favor of further investigation, but that the NIH had nothing to do with the
origins of COVID-19.
"We have not funded gain of function research on this virus in the Wuhan Institute of
Virology," he added.
"No matter how many times you say it, it didn't happen."
More from Sen. Paul via Twitter:
Senator Rand Paul @RandPaul ·
May 11, 2021 Dr Fauci dissembled or tried to hide his long time support for
'gain-of-function' research which creates super-viruses that jump from animals to humans.
ohm 4 hours ago (Edited) remove link
You can't sit on your thumbs and run year long investigations and background checks
while thousands are dying .
But that's just the point, thousands were not dying . Instead of seeking out opposing
viewpoints, he relied on the bogus Ferguson model that predicted 2 million deaths presented
by Fauci and Birx. Plenty of qualified opposing voices were out there - John Ionnides of
Stanford for instance. Trump needs to own up to his mistakes and vow not to repeat them.
nodhannum 3 hours ago
How many renminbi do they pay you comrade...as in be "han" or be gone. I've been to a
number of seminars given by Fauci back in his HIV days but he is a lying sob now. It's
getting hard for the fellow to cover hisw *** now even with the Maserati marxists in power
here.
"We are not prepared for a pandemic," Biden tweeted on Oct. 25, 2019, saying the country
needs leadership that "mobilizes the world to stop outbreaks before they reach our
shores."
this_circus_is_no_fun 4 hours ago
At first Fauxi denied the allegation. Then, after Paul cornered him with facts, Fauxi said
something like "this is why we did that". So, he admitted that he did what he was denying
just a few seconds before . He is literally incapable of telling the truth. I guess he's not
called Fauxi for nothing.
adonisdemilo 5 hours ago
Fauci has known from day one what's going on and going wrong. He's up to his neck in it
and taking a good look at his body language under questions from Rand Paul, HE'S CONTINUING
TO LIE.
chinese.sniffles 5 hours ago
Dr. Fauci:
Have you or your team send or granted permission for work projects to Wuhan or China?
What were those projects?
Why did you send them?
Why did you not do these projects in the USA?
Were any of these projects illegal in the USA?
etc. simple line of questioning, let him perjure himself.
thezone 5 hours ago
Fauci (the politician) knew to not write a check out to the lab directly. It was great to
hear Dr Paul bring up EcoHealth. A shell company to facilitate.
surfer4444 5 hours ago
Exactly, blame it on the sub contractor....an old game and the elite are using it well
radical-extremist 5 hours ago remove link
Fauci knows full well the story in the Democrat State News media will be about how he was
ATTACKED by Rand Paul, and not about him lying under oath about funding the Wuhan Lab.
chiquita 5 hours ago
This information has been out for a while if you follow War Room, Steve Hilton, and some
other sources. Peter Navarro has been hammering at Fauci relentlessly for the last few months
and now the MSM is going after Navarro, trying to discredit him. Gee, I wonder why when it
looks like the truth about Fauci is falling apart.
What a mess_man 4 hours ago (Edited)
Tucker blew this wide open last night. Of course lots of us here knew all this many months
ago. Fauci is lying through his teeth here, and both he and Daszak are deep in the Chicom's
pockets. As Tucker said, in a functioning world there would be a criminal investigation.
Instead Biden and Co. kiss his *ss and make him our foremost authority on Covid and vaccines.
Clown world for sure.
Meatballs 3 hours ago (Edited)
Actually, Saagar beat Tucker to the punch. Either way, the unraveling has begun.
Don't let the bioweapon profiteer, Daszak, off the hook.
Both greedy psychopaths should hang for their crimes against humanity.
Furthermore, we have no business sharing infectious disease technology with China, even if
they could run a lab properly.
Itinerant 4 hours ago
This story is about 14 months old, though not for the MSM.
Actual documentation of the grants from the NIH via the Eco Alliance have been circulating
in the public domain for all that time. In it they exactly describe the gain-of-function
research that is being outsourced to China, the viruses involved, the methods, the type of
experiments, and the aims of the research ... exactly and technically.
There is no room for caveats, or 'allege' or interpretation or anything like that.
The evidence is rock hard and crystal clear.
toady 4 hours ago
Yet there are no prosecutions.
dogbert8 5 hours ago remove link
Finally, the unmasking (pun intended) of Fauci has started.
bsdetector 5 hours ago
Just listened to the questions and answers. Fauci qualifies his answers with information
that was not sought in the questions. His answers change the character of his denials... "we
did not fund GOF research on this virus in the Wuhan Institute of Virology."
OK Dr. Fauci, please identify the viruses that you did fund for GOF research at the
Institute.
Jack Mayorhaufer 5 hours ago
master gaslighters once they reach certain status and paygrade on the Hill
novictim 2 hours ago remove link
"I don't know how many times I can say it? We did not fund gain of function research to be
done in the Wuhan Institute of Virology ...(under his breath) because we funded Eco Health
Alliance/Peter Daszak which granted the research funding to do gain of function research in
the Wuhan Institute of Virology."
CleeTorres 2 hours ago
A simple internet search shows Fauci is lying about funding for this research. But he
knows the media won't do their jobs.
Onthebeach6 2 hours ago (Edited) remove link
Let me assist Dr Fauci with the truth.
Why US outsourced bat virus research to Wuhan
Dr Christina Lin
April 2020
"A U.S. NIH-funded $3.7 million project was approved by Trump's Covid-19 advisor Dr.
Anthony Fauci in 2015, after the Obama White House imposed a ban on 'monster-germ' research.
In October 2014, the federal government declared a moratorium on gain-of-function research to
weaponize viruses related to influenza, Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) and severe
acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). As a result, the research was outsourced to China's Wuhan
Institute of Virology, which is currently at the center of scrutiny for the Covid-19
pandemic."
Fauci looks very nervous . Perhaps why he has been so adamant about constantly moving the
goalposts? If you were guilty of something wouldn't you keep changing the focus and appear to
be very helpful and concerned?
Max21c 3 hours ago (Edited) remove link
Which people in & around the National Security Council, CIA, and Pentagon are involved
in this attempt to gain access, penetrate and spy on the PLA Biological Weapons/Warfare
programs via funding mechanisms route? Which people had contact with this institute and
programs and what if anything did the spy games produce?
When are they in Washington going to establish civilian rule over the US military and CIA
and National Security Council?
When are they going to knock off these silly spy games and spy world operations off and
stop this nonsense which produces zero positive results?
What did the gangsters on the Intelligence/Spy Committees in Congress know? What did the
gangsters atop the Pentagon, CIA, National Security Council know?
Which Washingtonian assholes are going to go to prison for this boomerang disaster?
How many other groups similar to "EcoHealth Alliance" operate as part of the US/UK
intelligence "community" and what other stupid stuff are the idiots mixed up in?
TheRapture 3 hours ago remove link
There is a great deal of evidence (NIH, State Dept grants to offshore USA bioweapons
research, Bat Lady was the protege of Dr. Ralph Baric at UNC who has been doing coronavirus
bioweapon research for more then twenty years, initial and simultaneous infections in Wuhan
at different locations suggesting an intentional release, etc., etc., etc.) And of course,
Trump had motive, opportunity and means to stage a false flag to destroy China's economy and
damage China's political relations with other countries.
It is likely the USA, no doubt using a CIA proxy, released SARS-CoV-2 in simultaneously in
multiple locations in Wuhan. The evidence is substantial. But most Americans can't bring
themselves to stare down that particular rabbit hole.
WorkingClassMan 3 hours ago
I'd rather an honest CCP commie ruling the roost than those traitors anyway.
"If I had but one bullet and were faced by both an enemy and a traitor, I would let the
traitor have it."
― Corneliu Zelea Codreanu, For My Legionaries
sarret PREMIUM 3 hours ago
Fauci is such a liar, pulling school kid mentality out of a hat to answer serious
questions. Likely in his mind he knows it all to be true but since the correct name is
中国科学院武汉病毒研究所
then unless you say that name, or the exact name of the exact subsidiary that was funding or
was being funded, then it is not correct and therefore he can answer the question incorrectly
without calling himself a liar internally and without saying what the error was in the
question that led him to be able to this.
In all respects he just disregards the spirit of the question when he knows full well that
he is in the wrong, but denies it every single time based on some concocted fabrication in
his mind that the question is not precise enough to nail him to the cross.
Completely disingenuous, can't trust a word he says.
Fish Gone Bad 4 hours ago
Lawyer speak:
We have not funded gain of function research on this virus
They funded all kinds of gain of function on all kinds of permutations of the virus, just
not THIS virus.
radical-extremist 5 hours ago remove link
Fauci is also responsible for the deaths of hundreds of men in San Francisco by covering
up Bath Houses as the origin of the spread of AIDS...for Mayor Diane Feinstein's political
career. No one dares talk about this today.
the Mysterians 5 hours ago
"I did not have sex with that woman!"
Flying Monkees 5 hours ago (Edited)
What could possibly be the reason for gain-of-function research if not bio-warfare?
These evil, irresponsible, arrogant a-holes need to pay.
Posa 5 hours ago
The Eco-Alliance grant from Fauci's NIAID states
We will use S [ie the Spike Protein that makes the SC-2 virus highly infectious] protein
sequence data, infectious clone technology, in vitro and in vivo infection experiments and
analysis of receptor binding to test the hypothesis that % divergence thresholds in S
protein sequences predict spillover potential.
That has been interpreted as a commitment to Gain of Function research on the Spike
Protein which is the key to turning SARS into a virulently transmissible pathogen.
surfer4444 5 hours ago remove link
Exactly...im just baffled how this PoS can blatantly lie to a Senate committee and get
away with it...there is zero accountability in our government...end times
Posa 5 hours ago
Fauci can lie because his audience is a convention of lazy, cowardly , illiterate dunces.
If Rand Paul were serious he would have had the damn grant in front of him and read the same
quotes as I provided in this post. PAul would have held these hearings last year when his
Party controlled the Senate.
Posa 4 hours ago
NOTE: This post was censored by The Hill. Typical free speech in America.
George Bayou 5 hours ago
"11 labs in the US create these super-viruses in the US and one of them collaborated with
Wuhan Virology Inst -- Fauci has supported NIH funds for all these labs!"
Why is this a-hole still working?
notfeelinthebern 4 hours ago (Edited)
Yap, yap,. yap. Another dog and pony show and the show is painfully old. They parade
personage after personage before congress and ask lots of questions. The swamp rats in the
hot seat lie by omission and with sleight of hand answers and when done with the act walk
away with smug faces....The show must go on.
George Bayou 5 hours ago
Here's an interesting article on Dr. Baric and what he was doing, mutating virus using
serial passaging so that the virus are able to infect a completely different species:
Take, for instance, this paper from 1995:
"High Recombination and Mutation Rates in Mouse Hepatitis Viruses Suggest That
Coronaviruses May Be Potentially Important Emerging Viruses." It was written by Dr. Ralph
Baric and his bench scientist, Boyd Yount, at the University of North Carolina. Baric, a
gravelly voiced former swim champion, described in this early paper how his lab was able to
train a coronavirus, MHV, which causes hepatitis in mice, to jump species, so that it could
reliably infect BHK (baby-hamster kidney) cell cultures. They did it using serial
passaging: repeatedly dosing a mixed solution of mouse cells and hamster cells with
mouse-hepatitis virus, while each time decreasing the number of mouse cells and upping the
concentration of hamster cells. At first, predictably, the mouse-hepatitis virus couldn't
do much with the hamster cells, which were left almost free of infection, floating in their
world of fetal-calf serum. But by the end of the experiment, after dozens of passages
through cell cultures, the virus had mutated: It had mastered the trick of parasitizing an
unfamiliar rodent. A scourge of mice was transformed into a scourge of hamsters. And there
was more: "It is clear that MHV can rapidly alter its species specificity and infect rats
and primates," Baric said. "The resulting virus variants are associated with demyelinating
diseases in these alternative species." (A demyelinating disease is a disease that damages
nerve sheaths.) With steady prodding from laboratory science, along with some rhetorical
exaggeration, a lowly mouse ailment was morphed into an emergent threat that might
potentially cause nerve damage in primates.
GeneKelly 5 hours ago remove link
"We have not funded gain of function research on this virus in the Wuhan Institute of
Virology,"
Sociopaths can lie without registering on a detector by simply defining terms differently
in their cerebral cortex and then answering -- from their perspective truthfully -- "no"
because the question doesn't match their internal definition.
So Fauci wasn't funding "gain of function". He was actually funding "increasing the
virulence of pathogens" or "enhancing the pathogens' ability to infect different
species".
Rand and others will have to ask the question a hundred ways to force Fauci to spill the
beans.
DeeDeeTwo 1 hour ago remove link
Tucker finally called Fauci a "criminal" at least twice and said, "In any functioning
society Fauci would be investigated."
Txjac 5 hours ago
Fauci also owns the patents on the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines
Everybody All American 5 hours ago remove link
How is it that only one Congressman dare questions Dr. Fauci? One tough questioner. These
cowards all need to hang for the crimes they are allowing. If they think we are just going to
sit back and watch this man for much longer lead us they are sadly mistaken.
Downhill from here 5 hours ago
Being an MD, Paul has some credibility on the topic. At least educationally and by
training, Fauci and Paul are peers.. More than likely other R's are letting him take
point.
replaceme 5 hours ago (Edited)
I forgot, that's the same dr daszak that sent the letter to the lancet saying that covid
didn't come from Wuhan, and that he had no reason to falsely say this. THAT Dr daszak. Got
it.
"We [NIH/Fauci] did not fund gain of function research to be done in Wuhan." What the
weasel didn't say is that the NIH did in deed fund Dr Baric who was working in collaboration
with Wuhan with gain of function experiments on the SARS virus. Baric worked with Ft Dettrick
and Univ NC researchers who in turn were collaborating with Canada and Wuhan.
Fauci can parse words but he's a traitor and ought to be held responsible along with all
others involved with this.
scraping_by 5 hours ago (Edited) remove link
One amendment to the story --
Carlson was quoting a story by Nicholas Wade, former science editor to the NYT. Published
in Medium. So it's not just a talking head repeating newsroom copy, as in CNN.
zorrosgato 14 minutes ago remove link
Fauci is part of a flawed system and don't be fooled in believing he is part of any
solution. His endorsing of impractical mask mandates along with mandatory vaccinations of the
population, using unproven genetically engineered drugs is proof enough.
There is no or very little (depending of type of vaccine) immunity from South African mutation in the USA for people who
already were vaccinated.
From comments: "Herd Immunity or Heard on the Street immunity? COVID was way over-played in order to get Biden in the WH. Now
the shoes on the other foot and the Herd Concept is eroding pretty darn fast"... "Here in the US, it's undeniable that the quantity
of covid cases were intentionally over counted -- likely for political reasons."
"If the re-infection rate is near zero and those who are the most vulnerable are 95% inoculated why should the remaining
unvaccinated (mostly youth) be needed to reach herd immunity? Their reaction to COVID-19 is either undetectable or no worse than a
mild cold. Some people, journalists, just do not want to think and/or act logically."
Notable quotes:
"... For example, there is no herd immunity from South African mutation in the USA for those who were immunized with the Moderna vaccine and Johnson and Johnson vaccine ..."
"... And more mutations will follow this and the next year. So the concept of "herd immunity" when applied to coronaviruses looks to me fuzzy; in this sense this is the goal that the nation probably can't achieve. Remember the "flattering of the curve" fiasco in NYC. Quarantine measures were completely decimated by Floyd-gate riots and authorities were forced to swallow the bitter pill. Measures they advocated proved to be useless and economically damaging. ..."
"... Coronaviruses like C19 are a moving target. Moreover, there are large swats of the US population that have weakened immune system (including some seniors) who that does not respond to vaccination, creating no protection. In large cities like NYC they will serve as the reservoir of virus mutations vaccination, or no vaccination. ..."
"... We have Fauci making unfounded statements that confuse everyone and now economists are going to tell us when herd immunity will become operative. Can't do any worse than the 'media docs'. ..."
Some view herd immunity -- the point at which a critical mass of a population become immune to a disease-causing virus or bacteria -- as a
key factor in determining when Covid-19 will be conquered and economies will return to normal. Until herd immunity is reached, some
say, governments will restrict activities to prevent the disease's spread, resulting in fewer goods and services being produced and
consumed.
Other economists say businesses can reopen and economic activity can rebound without full herd immunity, and likely will.
Part of the challenge for economists is that it is hard to know exactly when a given place will achieve herd immunity, if ever.
For
Covid-19
, epidemiologists generally believe it will require having at least 60% to 80% of a population develop antibodies,
curbing the virus's ability to spread.
... ... ...
Economists at
Goldman
Sachs Group
Inc.
have
tried to incorporate immunity estimates into their forecasts by looking at daily vaccination progress around the world and take
account of estimates of how many people have already been infected.
According to their calculations, 60% of the population in the U.S. and U.K. are already immune to Covid-19; the biggest economies
of Europe will get there by August.
Serg Bezrukov
I agree with Umesh Patil.
For example, there is no herd immunity from South African mutation in the USA for those who were immunized with the Moderna
vaccine and Johnson and Johnson vaccine
.
And more mutations will follow this and the next year. So the concept of "herd immunity" when applied to coronaviruses looks
to me fuzzy; in this sense this is the goal that the nation probably can't achieve. Remember the "flattering of the curve"
fiasco in NYC. Quarantine measures were completely decimated by Floyd-gate riots and authorities were forced to swallow the
bitter pill. Measures they advocated proved to be useless and economically damaging.
Coronaviruses like C19 are a moving target. Moreover, there are large swats of the US population that have
weakened
immune system
(including
some seniors) who that does not respond to vaccination, creating no protection. In large cities like NYC they will serve as the
reservoir of virus mutations vaccination, or no vaccination.
Rick Schaler
SUBSCRIBER
3 hours ago
We have Fauci making unfounded statements that confuse everyone and now economists are going to tell us when herd
immunity will become operative. Can't do any worse than the 'media docs'.
Dr. Henry Ealy and his team started looking at CDC data on COVID-19 cases and
fatalities in mid-March 2020, quickly realizing the agency was vastly exaggerating
fatalities
Over-reporting of fatalities was enabled by a March 2020 change in how cause of death
is reported on death certificates. Rather than listing COVID-19 as a contributing cause in
cases where people died from other underlying conditions, it was to be listed as the
primary cause
As of August 23, 2020, the CDC reported 161,392 fatalities caused by COVID-19. Had the
long-standing, original guidelines for death reporting been used, there would have only
been 9,684 total fatalities due to COVID-19
The CDC violated federal law, as the Paperwork Reduction Act requires data collection
and publication to be overseen by the Office of Management and Budget. Proposed changes
must be published in the Federal Register and be open to public comment. None of these
transparency rules were followed
We don't yet know who was responsible for altering the reporting rules in violation of
federal law. To identify the culprits, formal grand jury investigation petitions have been
sent to all U.S. attorneys and the U.S. Department of Justice, requesting a thorough,
independent and transparent investigation; a direct public effort to gather signatures also
commenced on the one-year anniversary of the CDC reporting change
This is starting to look really like staging of "Brave new world..." Today's society is
closer to Huxley's "Brave New World" than to Orwell's "1984". But there are clear elements of
both. If you will, the worst of both worlds has come true today.
In 1949, sometime after the publication of George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four , Aldous
Huxley, the author of Brave New World (1931), who was then living in California, wrote to
Orwell. Huxley had briefly taught French to Orwell as a student in high school at Eton.
Huxley generally praises Orwell's novel, which to many seemed very similar to Brave New
World in its dystopian view of a possible future. Huxley politely voices his opinion that his
own version of what might come to pass would be truer than Orwell's. Huxley observed that the
philosophy of the ruling minority in Nineteen Eighty-Four is sadism, whereas his own version is
more likely, that controlling an ignorant and unsuspecting public would be less arduous, less
wasteful by other means. Huxley's masses are seduced by a mind-numbing drug, Orwell's with
sadism and fear.
The most powerful quote In Huxley's letter to Orwell is this:
Within the next generation I believe that the world's rulers will discover that infant
conditioning and narco-hypnosis are more efficient, as instruments of government, than clubs
and prisons, and that the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting
people into loving their servitude as by flogging and kicking them into obedience.
Aldous Huxley.
Could Huxley have more prescient? What do we see around us?
Masses of people dependent upon drugs, legal and illegal. The majority of advertisements
that air on television seem to be for prescription drugs, some of them miraculous but most of
them unnecessary. Then comes COVID, a quite possibly weaponized virus from the
Fauci-funded-with-taxpayer-dollars lab in Wuhan, China. The powers that be tragically deferred
to the malevolent Fauci who had long been hoping for just such an opportunity. Suddenly, there
was an opportunity to test the mRNA vaccines that had been in the works for nearly twenty
years. They could be authorized as an emergency measure but were still highly experimental.
These jabs are not really vaccines at all, but a form of gene therapy . There
are potential
disastrous consequences down the road. Government experiments on the public are
nothing new .
Since there have been no actual, long-term trials, no one who contributed to this massive
drug experiment knows what the long-term consequences might be. There have been countless
adverse injuries and deaths already for which the government-funded vaccine producers will
suffer no liability. With each passing day, new side-effects have begun to appear: blood clots,
seizures, heart failure.
As new adverse reactions become known despite the censorship employed by most media outlets,
the more the Biden administration is pushing the vaccine, urging private corporations to make
it mandatory for all employees. Colleges are making them mandatory for all students returning
to campus.
The leftmedia are advocating the "shunning" of the unvaccinated. The self-appointed
virtue-signaling Democrats are furious at anyone and everyone who declines the jab. Why? If
they are protected, why do they care? That is the question. Same goes for the ridiculous mask
requirements . They protect no one but for those in operating rooms with their insides
exposed, yet even the vaccinated are supposed to wear them!
Months ago, herd immunity was near. Now Fauci and the CDC say it will never be achieved? Now
the Pfizer shot will necessitate yearly booster shots. Pfizer
expects to make $21B this year from its COVID vaccine! Anyone who thinks this isn't about
money is a fool. It is all about money, which is why Fauci, Gates, et al. were so determined to
convince the public that HCQ and ivermectin, both of which are effective, prophylactically and
as treatment, were not only useless, but dangerous. Both of those drugs are tried, true, and
inexpensive. Many of those thousands of N.Y. nursing home fatalities might have been prevented
with the use of one or both of those drugs. Those deaths are on the hands of Cuomo and his
like-minded tyrants drunk on power.
Months ago, Fauci, et al. agreed that children were at little or no risk of getting COVID,
of transmitting it, least of all dying from it. Now Fauci is demanding that all teens be
vaccinated by the end of the year! Why? They are no more in danger of contracting it now than
they were a year ago. Why are parents around this country not standing up to prevent their kids
from being guinea pigs in this monstrous medical experiment? And now they are " experimenting
" on infants. Needless to say, some have died. There is no reason on Earth for teens, children,
and infants to be vaccinated. Not one.
Huxley also wrote this:
"The surest way to work up a crusade in favor of some good cause is to promise people they
will have a chance of maltreating someone. To be able to destroy with good conscience, to be
able to behave badly and call your bad behavior 'righteous indignation' -- this is the height
of psychological luxury, the most delicious of moral treats ."
Perhaps this explains the left's hysterical impulse to force these untested shots on those
of us who have made the decision to go without it. If they've decided that it is the thing to
do, then all of us must submit to their whims. If we decide otherwise, it gives them the
righteous right to smear all of us whom they already deplore.
As C.J. Hopkins has
written , the left means to criminalize dissent. Those of us who are vaccine-resistant are
soon to be outcasts, deprived of jobs and entry into everyday businesses. This kind of
discrimination should remind everyone of ...oh, Germany three quarters of a century ago. Huxley
also wrote, "The propagandist's purpose is to make one set of people forget that certain other
sets of people are human." That is precisely what the left is up to, what BLM is planning, what
Critical Race Theory is all about.
Tal Zaks, Moderna's chief medical officer, said these new vaccines are "hacking the
software of life." Vaccine-promoters claim he never said this, but he did. Bill Gates called
the vaccines " an operating
system " to the horror of those promoting it, a Kinsley gaffe. Whether it is or isn't
hardly matters at this point, but these statements by those behind the vaccines are a clue to
what they have in mind.
There will be in the next generation or so a pharmacological method of making people love
their servitude and producing dictatorship without tears , so to speak, producing a kind of
painless concentration camp for entire societies so that people will in fact have their
liberties taken away from them but will rather enjoy it.
This is exactly what the left is working so hard to effect: a pharmacologically compromised
population happy to be taken care of by a massive state machine. And while millions of people
around the world have surrendered to the vaccine and mask hysteria, millions more, about 1.3
billion, want no part of this government vaccine mania.
In his letter to Orwell, Huxley ended with the quote cited above and again here because it
is so profound:
Within the next generation I believe that the world's rulers will discover that infant
conditioning and narco-hypnosis are more efficient, as instruments of government, than clubs
and prisons, and that the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting
people into loving their servitude as by flogging and kicking them into obedience.
Huxley nailed the left more than seventy years ago, perhaps because leftists have never
changed throughout the ages. 61,497 173
Fat Beaver 14 hours ago (Edited)
If i am to be treated as an outcast or an undesirable because i refuse the vax, i will
immediately become someone that has zero reverence for the law, and i can only imagine 10's
of millions will be right there with me.
strych10 14 hours ago
Welcome to the club.
We have coffee in the corner and occasional meetings at various bars.
Dr. Chihuahua-González 13 hours ago
I'm a doctor, you could contact me anytime and receive your injection.
Fat Beaver 13 hours ago (Edited)
I've gotta feeling the normie world you think you live in is about to change drastically
for the worse...
sparky139 PREMIUM 10 hours ago
You mean you'll sign papers that you injected us *wink *wink? And toss it away?
bothneither 2 hours ago
Oh geez how uncommon, another useless doctor with no Scruples who sold out to big Pharma.
Please have my Gates sponsored secret sauce.
Unknown 6 hours ago (Edited)
Both Huxley and Orwell are wrong. Neoliberalism (the use of once office for personal
gains) is by far the most powerful force that subjugates the inept population. Neoliberalism
demolished the mighty USSR, now destroying the USA, and will do the same to China. And this
poison dribbles from the top to bottom creating self-centered population that is unable to
unite, much less resist.
Deathrips 15 hours ago (Edited) remove link
Tylers.
You gonna cover Tucker Carlsons show earlier today on FOX news about vaxxx deaths? almost 4k
reported so far this year.
Is the population of india up in arms or is the MSM?
Nelbev 10 hours ago
Facebook just flagged/censored it, must sign into see vid, Tuck also failed to mention
mRNA and adenovirus vaxes were experimental and not FDA approved nor gone through stage III
trials. Beside deaths, have blood clot issues. Good he mentioned how naturally immune if get
covid and recovered, better than vaccine, but not covered for bogus passports. Me personally,
I would rather catch covid and get natural immunity than be vaccinated with an untested
experimental vaccine.
Dr. Jayanta Bhattacharya; Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche; Dr. Ron Brown; Dr. Ryan Cole; Dr.
Richard Fleming; Dr. Simone Gold; Dr. Sunetra Gupta; Dr. Carl Heneghan; Dr. Martin Kulldorff;
Dr. Paul Marik; Dr. Peter McCullough; Dr. Joseph Mercola; Dr. Lee Merritt; Dr. Judy Mikovits;
Dr. Dennis Modry; Dr. Hooman Noorchashm; Dr. Harvey Risch; Dr. Sherri Tenpenny; Dr. Richard
Urso; Dr. Michael Yeadon;
Dr. Jayanta Bhattacharya; Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche; Dr. Ron Brown; Dr. Ryan Cole; Dr.
Richard Fleming; Dr. Simone Gold; Dr. Sunetra Gupta; Dr. Carl Heneghan; Dr. Martin Kulldorff;
Dr. Paul Marik; Dr. Peter McCullough; Dr. Joseph Mercola; Dr. Lee Merritt; Dr. Judy Mikovits;
Dr. Dennis Modry; Dr. Hooman Noorchashm; Dr. Harvey Risch; Dr. Sherri Tenpenny; Dr. Richard
Urso; Dr. Michael Yeadon;
His making of the gamma and delta workforce was quite prescient. We are seeing it play out
now, we all know gammas and delta. There was a really good ABC tv movie made in 1980 Brave
New World. Excellent show, it shows the Alphas and names them Rothchild and so on. Shows what
these people specifically want to do to the world. I wonder if the ruling psychopaths
actually wait for science fiction authors to plan the future and then follow their
script.
Mineshaft Gap 10 hours ago
If Huxley were starting out today no major publisher would touch him.
They'd tell him Brave New World doesn't have a diverse enough of cast. Even the mostly
likable totalitarian guy named Mustapha turns out to be white! A white Mustapha. It's soooo
triggering. Also, what's wrong with a little electronic fun and drug taking, anyway? Lighten
up , Aldous.
Meanwhile his portrait of shrieking medieval Catholic nuns who think they're possessed in
The Devils of Loudun might remind the leftist editors too uncomfortably of their own recent
bleating performances at "White Fragility" struggle sessions.
Leftists reacted with fury after Fox News host Tucker Carlson said people who wear masks
outside should be mocked and that parents who made their kids wear them were engaging in "child
abuse."
Carlson noted that masks were "purely a sign of political obedience like Kim Il-Sung pins in
Pyongyang" and that the only people who voluntarily wear masks outside are "zealots and
neurotics."
He then asserted that the tables should be turned on Biden voters who have been harassing
conservatives for almost a year for not wearing a mask in public.
"The rest of us should be snorting at them first, they're the aggressors – it's our
job to brush them back and restore the society we were born in," said Carlson.
"So the next time you see someone in a mask on the sidewalk or on the bike path, do not
hesitate. Ask politely but firmly, ' Would you please take off your mask? Science shows there
is no reason for you to be wearing it. Your mask is making me uncomfortable, " he added.
"We should do that and we should keep doing it until wearing a mask outside is roughly as
socially accepted as lighting a Marlboro on an elevator."
The Fox News host went on to call mask wearing "repulsive" while asserting that forcing
children to wear masks outside should be illegal.
"Your response when you see children wearing masks as they play should be no different from
your response to seeing someone beat a kid in Walmart. Call the police immediately. Contact
Child Protective Services. Keep calling until someone arrives," Carlson said.
"What you're looking at is abuse, it's child abuse, and you are morally obligated to attempt
to prevent it," he added.
As expected, Carlson immediately began trending on Twitter, with hysterical leftists
hyperventilating over Tucker once again challenging their cult. Many called for the Fox News
host to be fired while others ludicrously described him as a "national security threat."
As we
highlighted yesterday , even Dr. Fauci now admits that the risk of vaccinated people
spreading COVID outside is "minuscule," and yet some health professionals are pushing for the
mask mandates to be made permanent.
The transmission of COVID-19 outdoors is almost non-existent, making mask mandates merely a
political tool of population control.
In a recent open letter to the German government and state premiers, five leading members of
the Association for Aerosol Research (GAeF) wrote, "The transmission of SARS-CoV-2 viruses
takes place indoors almost without exception. Transmission outdoors is extremely rare and never
leads to cluster infections as can be observed indoors."
Why the us government did not fund this type of mask for all is telling what the overall
strategy is.
Controlling you, your neighbor, and others that think for themselves.
Its not about the virus
Robert Neville 7 hours ago
Actually, M95 masks filter out 95% of particles over 4 microns in diameter in perfect
conditions. In the real world it is much less effective than that. Viruses are generally less
than one micron in size so they are ineffective for most viruses. Also, the masks are so hard
to breath through that some version have an exhale valve so they do nothing to protect others
if you are infected. Most masks don't protect your eyes. The only thing that works is a space
suit that is decontaminated before you remove it. The rest is virtue siganling.
Properly fitted n95's do protect against virus and the science proves it.
Dickweed Wang 10 hours ago (Edited)
This is an excerpt from the "Stanford Study" from November 2020 (that's been making the
rounds in the alternative media and conservative media space recently) about the uselessness
of masks in preventing "the virus":
A meta -analysis among health care workers found that compared to no masks, surgical
mask and N95 respirators were not effective against transmission of viral infections or
influenza-like illness based on six RCTs [28] . Using
separate analysis of 23 observational studies, this meta -analysis found no protective
effect of medical mask or N95 respirators against SARS virus [28] . A recent
systematic review of 39 studies including 33,867 participants in community settings
(self-report illness), found no difference between N95 respirators versus surgical masks
and surgical mask versus no masks in the risk for developing influenza or influenza-like
illness, suggesting their ineffectiveness of blocking viral transmissions in community
settings [29] .
It's predictable that the usual suspects have come out of the woodwork to "fact check" and
disparage the entire paper (do an internet search for 'Stanford Mask Paper' and you'll see
what I'm talking about). Their main criticism is 'that wasn't published by Stanford', while
they totally ignore the claims made in the paper. When you look at the people and
organizations doing the fact checking it really shows that the entire mask issue is a
political/control ploy. Here's the link to the entire paper if anyone is interested:
Anthony Fauci steps off a small boat floating in a river at the bottom of a great cavern. A
lamp cuts into the darkness and illuminates a small table and two chairs. Fauci walks to the
table and sits down. He is joined by his old mentor, whose name is unknown.
It’s been a long time, Anthony. Remember me?
Of course. But why am I here?
You need a refresher, Anthony. You’ve been wobbling badly. Apparently
you’ve forgotten our first lesson.
I was in medical school then. That’s when we promised you significant
rewards if you performed well for us. That day, I told you: you need to lie with
CONSISTENCY.
Yes, sir. And I’ve obeyed your order.
No you haven’t. You’ve cooked a goose and a cake in
the same pan. You’ve said it was raining and not raining.
You’ve worn only a jock strap and spread sunscreen on your body in the
Arctic, and you’ve bundled up at the Equator. You’re a
mess.
I didn’t mean to be a mess.
I’m not interested in excuses. I’m going to straighten
you out. I want you to pay close attention. Otherwise, you go in the Lake of Fire.
I’m VERY sorry, sir…
You said masks were useless. Later you said people should wear two. You admitted the
vaccine was experimental, implying the people were guinea pigs. Then you said the vaccine was
absolutely safe and effective. You said asymptomatic people never drive an epidemic by
transmitting a virus. Then you said millions of asymptomatic people who merely tested positive
were a major source of transmission. You said running the PCR at 35 cycles or higher yielded
meaningless results. But labs all over the world are running the test at 40 cycles.
You’ve turned into a buffoon. A clown.
I’ve made a few mistakes. I’ll correct them.
It’s too late. The cat is out of the bag.
Then what can I do?
Ignore your past contradictions. As if they never happened. You’re a
matinee idol to millions of soccer moms. They’re bubble brains. They
can’t think their way out of a wet paper bag. Climb back on the straight and
narrow. Claim the test is very accurate, the case and death numbers are alarming, more
lockdowns will be necessary, new mutations of the virus are here, and people must take vaccine.
And THAT’S ALL. Don’t try to EXPLAIN things.
That’s when you screw the pooch. You’re not a medical
genius, Anthony. You’re our agent. Just do your job.
Let's travel back in time to March of 2020. It was then that predictions of mass death
related to the new coronavirus started to gain currency. One study, conducted by Imperial
College's Neil Ferguson, indicated that U.S. deaths alone would exceed 2 million.
The above number is often used as justification for the initial lockdowns. "We knew so
little" is the excuse, and with so many deaths expected, can anyone blame local, state and
national politicians for panicking? The answer is a resounding yes.
To see why, imagine if Ferguson had predicted 30 million American deaths, and hundreds of
millions more around the world. Imagine the global fear, which is precisely the point. The more
threatening a virus is presumed to be, the more superfluous government force is. Really, who
needs to be told to be careful if a failure to be could reasonably result in death?
Death predictions aside, the other justification bruited in March of 2020 was that brief
lockdowns would flatten the hospitalization curve. In this case, the taking of freedom
allegedly made sense as a way of protecting hospitals from a massive inflow of sick patients
that they wouldn't have been able to handle, and that would have resulted in a public health
catastrophe. Such a view similarly vandalizes reason. Think about it.
Really, who needs to be forced to avoid behavior that might result in hospitalization?
Better yet, who needs to be forced to avoid behavior that might result in hospitalization at a
time when doctors and hospitals would be so short staffed as to not be able to take care of
admitted patients?
Translated for those who need it, the dire predictions made over a year ago about the
corona-horrors that awaited us don't justify the lockdowns; rather they should remind the
mildly sentient among us of how cruel and pointless they were. The common sense that we're to
varying degrees born with, along with our genetic predisposition to survive, dictates that a
fear of hospitalization or death would have caused us to take virus-avoidance precautions that
would have well exceeded any rules foisted on us by politicians. Goodness, masks and hand
sanitizers were selling out in Germany at a time when politicians were still downplaying the
virus.
Vital Signals Get Lost
To which some will reply with something along the lines of "Not everyone has common sense.
In truth, there are lots of dumb, low-information types out there who would have disregarded
all the warnings. Lockdowns weren't necessary for the wise among us; rather they were essential
precisely because there are so many who aren't wise." Actually, such a response is the best
argument of all against lockdowns.
Indeed, it cannot be stressed enough that "low information" types are the most crucial
people of all during periods of uncertainty. Precisely because they'll be unaware of,
misunderstand, or reject the warnings of the experts, their actions will produce essential
information that the rule-followers never could. In not doing what the allegedly wise among us
will, low information citizens will, by their contrarian actions, teach us what behavior is
most associated with avoidance of sickness and death, and more important, what behavior is
associated with it.
One-size-fits-all decrees from politicians don't enhance health outcomes as much as they
blind us to the actions (or lack thereof) that would protect us the most, or not. Freedom on
its own is a virtue, plus it produces crucial information.
But wait, some will say, "how elitist to let some people act as Guinea Pigs for the rest of
us." Such a statement is naïve. Heroin and cocaine are illegal, but people still use both.
Thank goodness they do. How could we know what threatens us, and what doesn't, without the
rebellious?
Economic Growth Is the Best Medicine
Still, there's the question of "elitism," or comment about it. The view here is that the
lockdowns were the cruelest form of elitism, by far. The implied statement about the lockdowns
was that those who had the temerity to have jobs that were destinations would have to lose
them. The lockdowns destroyed tens of millions of destination jobs, destroyed or severely
impaired millions of businesses, not to mention the hundreds of millions around the world who
were rushed into starvation, poverty or both as a consequence of nail-biting politicians in
rich countries that chose to take a break from reality. Talk about elitist actions, plus the
very idea of wrecking the economy as a virus-mitigation strategy will go down in history as one
of the most abjectly stupid policy responses the world has ever endured.
That's the case because economic growth is easily the biggest enemy death and disease have
ever known, while poverty is easily the biggest killer. Economic growth produces the resources
necessary so that doctors and scientists can come up with answers to what needlessly sickens us
or shortens our lives altogether.
If anyone doubts the above truth, it's useful to travel back in time to the 19th century. A
broken femur then brought with it a 1 out of 3 chance of death, while those lucky enough to
survive the break had only one option: amputation. A child born in the 19th century had as good
a chance of dying as living. A broken hip was a death sentence, cancer most certainly was, but
most didn't die of cancer because tuberculosis and pneumonia got them first.
So what happened? Why don't we get sick or die as easily as we used to? The answer is
economic growth. Business titans like Johns Hopkins and John D. Rockefeller created enormous
wealth, only to direct a lot of it toward medical science. What used to kill us became
yesterday's news.
Even though freedom is its own wondrous virtue, even though freedom produces essential
information that protects us, and even though free people produce the resources without which
diseases kill with sickening rapidity, panicky politicians erased it in 2020 on the supposition
that personal and economic desperation were the best solution for a spreading coronavirus.
Historians will marvel at the abject stupidity of the political class in 2020.
* * *
John Tamny is Vice President at FreedomWorks, editor of RealClearMarkets , and author of the new
book "When Politicians Panicked: The New Coronavirus, Expert Opinion, and a Tragic Lapse of
Reason."
takeaction 16 hours ago (Edited)
No politician panicked...
Everything going as planned...NOW.
First we have Trump accidentally beating Hillary(The cheating machine goofed). This was
the Dems ultimate f&^k up. He was NEVER supposed to win. Then the plan was taken off the
shelf. We must destroy Trump...economy is booming, and he will win re-election if we don't do
something fast. So then came the cheating plan. Create a pandemic (Make the next wave of
normal flu into a huge boogie man)...this will force mail in ballots, which we can stuff and
fake....and then we can clean up and Joe is in. While we are at it...let's crush the
economy...hand out money like crazy and raise taxes. We want more people depending on just
the government and wipe out small business. While we are at it...let's see how far the people
will follow...Masks....Social Distancing etc. and then try to force an untested vaccine on
the pleabs. The plan is much more integrated and complex then this...but this is how I feel
it is going down.
NOTE: Starting yesterday here in Portland Oregon all restaurants are no longer to have
indoor dining. Gyms...no matter how big are only allowed 6 people. We are being locked down
again...Our Governor is insane. Remember...We have had "Cheat by Mail" since 1998 in Oregon
and it is very clear what has happened and is going on with our elections. Oh yeah...Tonight
is the May Day Antifa Riots downtown. More fun.
One final note...remember when they said "We just have to flatten the curve". Well...that
was a lie...as with most other claims from anybody with power.
Hypocritical lying pieces of s^%t. All of them. And what is really sad is the majority of
folks following orders. Sorry for the long rant. Just super pissed.
mijev 15 hours ago remove link
Imagine that you'd spent a year in the wilderness with no access to tv or the internet and
you get told that there's been a pandemic. So you ask what happened in the most densely
populated country in the world, Singapore, which is basically a massive cruise ship. "Oh,
they had 35 deaths."
LetThemEatRand 15 hours ago
I would rethink the part about Trump not being part of the plan. Remember it is Trump
himself who wants the vaccine called the Trumpcine. It is kind of bizarre how so many people
believe the entire virus thing is part of a NWO plan but still think Trump was riding a white
horse to save us. He was one of the four horsemen, maybe.
sleeping on a volcano 14 hours ago
Trump is not only a vaccine pimp. His cabinet was the swamp personified. He hired bill
barr (check out his history with ruby ridge and waco), he hired chris wray (check out his
investments in russia via king & spaulding). Trump ABANDONED the people HE INVITED to the
capitol. Trump, the lifelong democrat, his progeny are also dems, is either complicit or even
dumber than the MSM claims he is. I think it's pretty obvious.
NoDebt 16 hours ago (Edited) remove link
The view here is that the lockdowns were the cruelest form of elitism, by far.
What do you mean WERE? They are still happening and being rapidly reintroduced in many
areas they had previously been lifted.
And I'm going to let you in on a little secret: They'll happen again. Over and over as
political expediency dictates. They will NEVER end. And nobody in the elites will EVER admit
they are a mistake because they aren't. They are a PLAN.
adr 15 hours ago remove link
For the first time in history, nobody anywhere in the world died of the Flu.
The United States officially recognized 1713 cases of the flu from September 1st 2020 to
April 30th 2021.
Did you know that every single Covid PCR test can't tell the difference between Covid and
Influenza A, B, H1N1 and all other variants?
Go look up the technical documents. It is written on the first page under the bold type,
FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ONLY, NOT TO BE USED AS A DIAGNOSTIC TEST.
Fauxchi has never answered the question, can the PCR test be used to diagnose an
infection?
GoodyGumdrops 15 hours ago
I know people who agreed with the lockdowns and the mask mandates. I now know their true
character Their livelihood wasn't affected by these draconian rules, so they had no problem
turning a blind eye to those who were being affected.
When the lockdowns started, that's when I knew this wasn't about a cold/flu virus. It made
absolutely no sense to shut down businesses worldwide and to force people to lose their
income. The consequences of these lockdowns in the near future will be incalculable.
During a Wednesday appearance on NBC's "Today," White House chief medical adviser Dr.
Anthony Fauci discussed the new mask guidelines that allow vaccinated people to go outside
without masks.
Host Savannah Guthrie asked Fauci when kids are going to be able to play without masks.
Mea culpa: I spent a lot of time on these here digital pages defending Dr. Anthony Fauci. Brother, was I wrong. Fauci is a
stone-cold liar. And if he's not a stone-cold liar, his only defense is that he is a fraud. Either way, shame on him and me.
For months Fauci has been everywhere, all over TV, urging Americans to lock themselves down, to abandon their jobs, their sick and
dying family members, the small businesses they spent their lives getting off the ground; he urged us to drive our economy into the
dirt, pull children who desperately need structure out of school, forgo once-in-a-lifetime graduations and graduation parties,
cancel weddings and vacations
Fauci's message was clear, militant, terrifying, and relentless: If you don't do these things, if you don't sacrifice these things,
if you don't give up your liberty and prosperity, you are no better than a serial killer. The coronavirus is a unique and deadly
killer, a particularly infectious and fatal disease unlike anything we've seen in more than a century.
And because Fauci became America's trusted scientific (and moral) authority, because he assured us he spoke only as a scientist and
infectious disease expert, because he assured us he would always tell us like it is, and do so at any cost because public health was
his only priority, look at what happened
A woman was arrested for reopening the business that fed her family. Christians were persecuted for attending church in the safety
of automobiles. Teens were held up to national ridicule for behaving like teens in Florida and the Ozarks. Countless Americans
suffered untold anguish after hospital visits were forbidden and funerals canceled. Everyday Americans were relentlessly demonized
for daring to speak out or even question the Holy Writ of Fauci
And God help those who came out to protest the lockdowns, because bitter, power-hungry tyrants such as Gov. Gretchen Whitmer (D-MI)
and the hate-filled media that empower her, waved the Holy Writ of Fauci to justify smearing these Americans as racists and
punishing them with lockdown extensions.
Heh, heh, heh Take that, Deplorables!
All this was allowed, all the inhumanity, all the flagrant violations of our Constitutional rights, all these Kafka-esque rules that
protected Big Businesses like Walmart and further empowered massive corporations like Amazon, while small business withered and
died. Democrat New York Mayor Bill de Blasio was finally allowed to
openly
practice
his antisemitism All this was excused and even made virtuous by the Holy Writ of Fauci and the Cult of Personality he
allowed to build up around his heroic fidelity to facts, science, and public health.
Well, we now know Fauci is either a fraud or liar.
We know this because for ten whole days Fauci said nothing as the Perfect Infection Storm hit America, as massive violations of
social distancing and lockdowns took place all across the country (including the Ground Zero of New York City). There it was,
everywhere Fauci's nightmare scenario come to vivid life: crowd after massive gathering after mob after parade Protesters and
rioters shouting, shoulder to shoulder -- and Fauci said nothing And when he did finally speak out, it was to squeak
on
some
local radio station.
Worse still, Fauci said nothing as the very same sanctimonious health care workers and "experts" who used the
emotional
blackmail
of "We're at work for you, stay home for us" came out in
full-throated
support
of leaving home and gathering in massive crowds.
Was all his talk about concern for public health, his duty to tell it like it is no matter the personal or political fallout, just a
big lie? Is he a fraud who still believes these mass gatherings are a nightmare scenario, but is unwilling to use his massive public
platform to say so out loud because shaming protesters who hold the "approved" views among America's hideous elite would risk Fauci
feeling the disapproval of those elites?
Or is he a liar, does he in fact know the coronavirus is nowhere near as deadly as he played it up to be? Is he a liar who misled us
into agreeing to destroy our amazing economy in order to undermine the Bad Orange Man's re-election?
Either way, Fauci's a sociopath. Either he's a sociopath who furthered his political ambitions and abused his authority and public
trust to talk hundreds of millions of Americans into shattering their own lives and mental wellbeing when there was no real danger,
or he's a sociopath who chooses the good opinion of elites over raising the alarm to save the lives of thousands and thousands of
protesters, and the countless millions those thousands will infect.
What kind of man
raises
the
alarm about the fact the black population is disproportionately killed by this virus and then remains silent as the black population
gathers en masse, and remains silent as his fellow healthcare workers openly encourage the mass gathering of black America?
I'm almost as disgusted with myself for trusting Fauci as I am with him.
Never again will I trust the "experts."
Fuck them.
Fuck them all forever.
Follow John Nolte on Twitter
@NolteNC
.
Follow
his Facebook Page
here
.
Fortunately, the public no longer has to listen to daily briefings by Fauci and Birx, two of
the most incompetent doctors in the U.S. In my opinion, both should lose their jobs and Fauci
should lose his medical license (Birx no longer holds a medical license) because they used bad
information provided by unreliable sources to make policy recommendations that resulted in
death and devastation throughout the U.S. Many people might refer to this as malpractice.
Suicides and overdose deaths increased exponentially as people became despondent over
factors like isolation, economic ruin, and food insecurity. Child and spousal abuse increased.
Murders increased. Nursing home patients died as a result of neglect when family members no
longer could visit and supervise their care. People died who could not access medical treatment
while hospitals and other facilities were closed and all resources were set aside for the COVID
patients who never showed up.
The debacle starts with a model developed by Neil Ferguson of the Imperial College of London
which predicted that tens of millions of people would die due to COVID-19 infection. COVID-19
was compared to the Spanish flu, which killed approximately 50 million people in 1918.
Ferguson's report stated that the only way to prevent massive deaths would be for the entire
population of the planet to be locked down and for people to remain separated for 18 months
until a vaccine was available. Total isolation would be needed because the isolation of just
vulnerable populations like the elderly would only reduce deaths by half. [1]
Ferguson's report was deemed so convincing that the World Health Organization, which had
previously stated that lockdowns were not effective for containing infectious diseases,
recommended that the world follow China's example, which included mandatory lockdowns and
contact tracing. [2]
It seems that nobody, including Fauci and Birx, checked out Ferguson's background. In 2002,
he predicted that 150,000 people would die from Mad Cow Disease, but only 2704 died. His
estimation was 55 times higher than the real number. A few years later he predicted that 65,000
people would die of swine flu, and only 457 people died – his estimation was 142 times
higher than the real number. [3] And his prediction of deaths
from bird flu was 200,000,000 and only 455 people died – a prediction 439,560 times
higher than the real number. [4]
As of June 8, total deaths worldwide had reached 410,000 – not tens of millions
– and even this number is questionable. This time Ferguson was off not by thousands or
hundreds of thousands – but by millions. And the average age at death was 80, with almost
all who died having multiple co-morbidities. This hardly justifies destroying the lives of
hundreds of millions of people by locking them down.
It seems that people who claim to be as smart as Fauci and Birx might think to check out the
track record of the person who recommended such extreme measures prior to taking action. I'm
regularly told by my critics that I'm not nearly as smart as Fauci, yet we do this type of
checking in our office as standard procedure. One might also assume that the World Health
Organization would check out Ferguson's track record prior to making decisions that would
affect over seven billion people. Apparently not. Yet there are those who still listen to and
revere these doctors and the WHO. Amazing!
A group of researchers at Stanford Prevention Research Center published an article on June
11 expressing significant concerns about both the models, some of which were not accompanied by
any disclosure concerning methodology, and the actions taken in response. What resulted was a
misallocation of hospital resources, and unjustified delayed healthcare for non-COVID patients.
The researchers also point out the negative impact on mental health, increased unemployment,
the loss of health insurance, prospect of starvation, and the potential spread of other
infectious diseases as just some of the negative consequences of the grossly incompetent
actions of Fauci and Birx and their brainwashed followers.
Here are some examples of the disparities cited between predictions and reality in
individual states:
New York
Prediction: up to 140,000 hospital beds and 40,000 intensive care units with ventilators
would be required
Reality: 18,569 hospitalizations and 4908 intensive care units required. (Predictions almost
87% off on both)
Tennessee
Prediction: 15,500 hospital beds, 2500 ICU beds and 2000 ventilators would be needed to keep
people alive
Reality: 1232 hospital beds, 245 ICU beds and 208 ventilators required 92% and 90% off
respectively), projected loss of $3.5 billion in revenue by Tennessee hospitals by June 30 as a
result of cessation of non-COVID patient care.
California
Projection: up to 1.2 million beds would be required.
Reality: COVID patients occupy less than 5% of California hospital beds, and less than 20%
of ICU beds
Georgia
Massachusetts General Hospital projected over 23,000 deaths in Georgia within a month of
opening the economy and the actual number was only 896 (almost 96% off).
The Stanford Group listed reasons for this debacle which included lack of expertise;
groupthink and the bandwagon effect; and selective reporting (otherwise known as lying). In
other words, top health officials in the U.S. and in many states were incompetent and willing
to blindly follow what others said without question, and then lied about it.
The researchers also note that this is not a new problem and expressed surprise that
forecasting is still used given its "dubious track record." One of the reasons, they say, is
that there are no serious consequences for people who make these bad decisions. To this point,
as of the writing of this article, Fauci and Birx have not been criminally indicted for the
death and destruction they have caused, and have not even been fired from their jobs.
The Stanford group goes on to write that even if a calamity the size of which the models
predicted were to occur, policies like lockdowns have little impact on the death rate and
generally do more harm than good, and add that exaggerated forecasts " may cause more harm than
the virus itself." [5]
It's somewhat amazing that in view of his colossal failure, Fauci now has the nerve to say
that the problem is not him or his incompetence. It's Americans. Instead of an apology, he
takes us all to task in a recent podcast, stating that " for reasons that are inconceivable and
not understandable – they just don't believe science and they don't believe authority."
He goes on to say that "science is truth," which is true, but Fauci has not used science
– he used information provided by a known charlatan who had been grossly mistaken before.
Not able to help himself, he likens those of us who listened to him lie every day on national
television and determined that he was a fraud to "anti-vaxxers" who do not want to be
vaccinated even though, according to Fauci, the science clearly supports their safety. He never
backs down, never admits he's wrong. [6]
We must do everything possible to make sure that Fauci, Birx, state health directors, and
elected officials will at some point stand trial for their crimes against humanity. And we must
take back our freedoms and liberties and our government so that this can never happen
again.
[1]
Ferguson NM, Laydon D, Nedjati-Gilani G et al. "Report 9: Impact of non-pharmaceutical
interventions (NPIs) to reduce COVID-19 mortality and healthcare demand." Imperial College
COVID-19 Response Team March 16 2020
[2]
World Health Organization, Non-Pharmaceutical Public Health Measures for Mitigating the Risk
and Impact of Epidemic and Pandemic Influenza , October 2019; World Health Organization,
"Considerations for Quarantine of Individuals in the Context of Containment for Coronavirus
Disease (COVID-19)," March 19, 2020.
[3]
National CJD Research and Surveillance Unit. "Disease in the UK (By Calendar Year." University
of Edinburgh May 4 2020
[4]
Sturcke J. "Bird flu pandemic could kill 150,000." The Guardian Sept 30 2005
I never liked Dr. Fauci, his diminutive stature, gravelly voice or Napoleonic, tough guy
attitude. He seemed to me the consummate phony. His actions have all but confirmed this to be
true.
When the pandemic first began in earnest, Fauci was packaged up and sold to the president
and worried American populace as "the foremost epidemiologist in America" and innumerable other
permutations of this outright falsehood.
Based on the past year, Anthony Fauci is nothing of the sort; he's not even close to the
"foremost," "most prominent" or "most respected" epidemiologist this country has.
Those titles would go to Dr. Ian Lipkin at Columbia University, who traveled to China to
investigate the Wuhan virus in February of 2019 when Dr. Fauci was still calling cable media
outlets scheduling his countless appearances.
Or, Dr. Jay Bhattacharya of Stanford University, whose been questioning and shattering
Fauci's flip-flopping and dangerous advice to Americans from the beginning. Dr. Bhattacharya is
also a co-author of the Great Barrington Declaration which is a foundational document laying
out precisely how the cure was worse than the virus and why we have been taken to the cleaners
in listening to those only wanting to keep us inside, masked up and economically decimated.
Dr. Martin Kulldorff is another infectious disease expert and professor of Medicine at
Harvard University, who has consistently spoken out against Fauci's advice and
prognostications.
Dr. Harvey Risch of the Yale School of Public Health is yet one more of the brave warriors
fighting the tidal wave of lies, disinformation and propaganda inflicted on worried Americans
in crisis. He went after Fauci like a centurion on the hydroxychloroquine swindle Fauci peddled
for the last year.
These four examples of actual doctors who could've likely helped the world in this emergency
have been real researchers and actual, live hands-on doctors with stethoscopes working with
actual COVID patients.
When was the last time Fauci saw a patient and provided treatment, if ever? Even today, I
have yet to see evidence he ever set foot in a COVID ward and showed any interest whatsoever in
what Americans were going through. You can be sure there'd have been a media circus if he
did.
This person, so instrumental in terrifying 330 million Americans for the last year is
clearly some kind of a charlatan, empty vessel clearly reminding us of someone else with
new-found, unlimited power.
We were told Fauci had been a fairytale hero of the AIDS crisis in the 1980s. We were told
he was a savior of the SARS virus. And we were told repeatedly by a complicit press that he was
just the man to beat the daylights out of COVID-19. Again, here he was nothing of the sort.
The real truth about Dr. Fauci is that he did very little to solve the AIDS or SARS problems
and actually made them worse. His real goal, it seems, was conducting vast media campaigns
touting his own imaginary triumphs to be used later for more false hopes in a medical
crisis.
Just look at the last year of his consistently wrong pronouncements, demands and admittedly
outright lies to the American people such as flip-flopping on masks, lockdowns, treatments, and
so on.
Likewise, his continual stabs to discredit the idea of herd immunity was bizarre, and his
advice has led to tens of millions of American students being sequestered for a year or more
with his inanity.
Whether intentional or not, Fauci has been a willing and intentional pawn of the Marxist
Left in this country. Regardless of his intent, he's been a failure in every respect.
And of course, he still had false adulation ladled on him by our mainstream media like a
well-basted Thanksgiving turkey throughout all his decades of quiet fiascoes.
Yet, in spite of it all, Fauci is the highest paid government employee in the country --
more than the president -- and his lightning-quick conversion to "chief medical advisor to
President Biden," shows not only his utter lack of any loyalty but that his previous decrees
were highly suspect.
As Fauci's reign of blundering and misinformation comes to an end, there's little doubt that
all Americans have a tough lesson to be learned from all this chicanery.
Don't automatically trust or assign any credibility whatsoever to a doctor or politician. Is
this case, Fauci was both.
Bill Robinson has appeared on Fox News, CNN, PBS, Bloomberg, BBC and had his own segment on
SKY News. For seven years was the only Conservative columnist for the insufferably Liberal
Huffington Post. Bill may be reached at :[email protected] Read Bill
Robinson's reports -- More Here.
At a time when the US urgently needs a trusted voice of authority in the fight against
Covid, it has instead received a smooth-talking snake oil salesman hawking politically tainted
advice to an unsuspecting public.
Despite my best efforts to resist such sentiments, there is something bizarrely likeable
about Anthony Stephen Fauci, 80, who serves as the chief medical adviser to the US president.
And judging by his amazing staying power, millions of other Americans seem to feel the very
same way.
Fauci comes off as the charismatic uncle who's always the center of attention at the dinner
table with stories so fantastic that you want to believe they are true. It's that sort of
mesmeric charm that could explain why this man has been so successful at sweet-talking America
into medically-induced bondage for the next year, or decade, or maybe even forever? Who knows?
Certainly not Anthony Fauci, that's for sure – the man who has turned flip-floppiness
into a veritable field of science.
For example, who else but Washington's famous Covid guru could have convinced Americans,
already at their wits' end over lockdowns, social distancing and an infernal mask regime, to
roll up their sleeves for a vaccine, while also telling them it will do nothing to free them
from lockdowns, social distancing and the infernal mask regime? To be perfectly blunt, selling
that 'used car' to the public would require some superhuman bulls**tting abilities, with which
Fauci seems to be inordinately endowed.
"I would recommend to people to not to abandon all public health measures just because
you've been vaccinated," Fauci
told CNN with a perfectly straight face. "Because even though for the general population it
might be 90 to 95 percent effective, you don't necessarily know for you how effective it
is."
America just shrugged its weary shoulders, unquestioningly accepting the gibberish as gospel
because it came out of the mouth of Anthony Fauci. There was one person, however, who was not
fooled by the silver-tongued fox, and that was US Senator Rand Paul. In an epic exchange during
a Senate hearing on Covid, Paul, himself a medical doctor, told Fauci that continuing to wear a
mask after infection or vaccination was mere "theater."
https://www.youtube.com/embed/ff-PJp1f5v4
"You've been vaccinated and you parade around in two masks for show," Paul told Fauci in a
dressing down long in the making. "You are defying everything we know about immunity by telling
people [who have been vaccinated or previously infected] to wear a mask Do you want to get rid
of 'vaccine hesitancy'? Tell them to quit wearing the mask after they get the vaccine! Give
them a reward instead of telling them that the nanny state is going to be there for three more
years and you got to wear a mask forever."
Fauci disagreed, saying, "masks are not theater, masks are protective."
Whatever the case may be, Paul's challenge to the formerly unassailable Fauci seems to have
given others courage to speak out, because days later, the Wall Street Journal published an
opinion piece
by Dr. Marty Makary, a professor at the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, who dared mention the
elephant in the hospital room – herd immunity.
Makary took exception with Fauci and his argument that the country needs to vaccinate 70 to
85% of the population to reach herd immunity from Covid-19. Why? Because Fauci, a strong
advocate for vaccines, "inexplicably ignores natural immunity" which occurs when people are
exposed to the disease.
"Undercounting or removing the many Americans with natural immunity from any tally of herd
immunity is a scientific error of omission," Makary wrote. "When people wonder why President
Biden talks about limiting Fourth of July gatherings, it's because [Anthony Fauci] has
dismissed the contribution of natural immunity, artificially extending the timeline."
After a year of examining "millions of Covid-19 cases in the US, it's clear that
reinfections are rare," he continued. "Natural immunity is real and shouldn't be ignored."
Amid this tepid yet growing pushback from the US political and medical communities, you
would think that Anthony Fauci would practice some moderation, perhaps even ease up on his
draconian proposals. In fact, just the opposite is happening. Over the weekend, in an
interview on CBS' 'Face the Nation', Fauci said that children, who have shown a remarkable
natural ability to fight off Covid, should wear masks around each other – even outdoors
in the fresh air.
"When the children go out into the community, you want them to continue to wear masks when
they're interacting with groups or multiple households," he said.
When asked whether children can return to summer camp and playgrounds this summer, Fauci
refused to give a definite answer, even though Covid infections are dropping across the
country, saying only that it was "conceivable that will be possible."
Fauci's comments come even as it is being demonstrated how ineffective masks are in
preventing the spread of the disease. On March 10, Texas Governor Greg Abbott
announced the termination of coronavirus restrictions in his state, much to the dismay of
health officials. Two weeks later, however, the average number of daily new cases of the
coronavirus in Texas decreased by 42.5%.
Such optimistic news, far from providing hope that a return to some semblance of normalcy is
on the horizon, only gives people like Fauci more incentive to push on with measures that fly
in the face of science and common sense. In short, they are tyrannical measures being pushed by
would-be tyrants drunk on power.
Depriving children of the best years of their life against an almost nonexistent threat
cannot be justified as anything other than an abuse of power – 'child abuse', to be more
precise.
Anthony Fauci should be exposed as the charlatan he is. America needs someone who truly
respects science, as opposed to merely someone who hides behind it for ulterior motives that
have nothing in common with public health.
And where was his institute with its multimillion budget. Why
they did not research the problem and adopting this idiotic 6 feet rule. Such a charlatan.
The United States' top pandemic advisor said Sunday that authorities were considering
cutting social distancing rules to three feet (one meter), a move that would change a key tenet
of the global fight against Covid-19.
Anthony Fauci, a world-respected figure during the coronavirus crisis, said experts at the
Centers for Disease Control (CDC) were examining a Massachusetts study that found "no
substantial difference" in Covid cases in schools observing six-foot and three-foot rules.
Asked on CNN's "State of the Union" show whether that meant that a three-foot separation was
sufficient, Fauci replied, "It does, indeed."
While cautioning that the CDC was still poring over the new data and conducting tests of its
own, he said its findings would come "soon."
The six-foot social distancing rule has been a widely-adopted global measure to prevent the
spread of the coronavirus, along with mask-wearing and hand-washing.
School officials across the world are under enormous pressure to fully reopen as soon as
safely possible, but many say the six-foot requirement makes it extremely difficult without
adding portable classrooms or shortening the school day.
Many teachers unions have also insisted on six-foot distancing.
Policies on reopening schools and businesses have varied sharply across the US and around
the globe as government try to balance quelling infections with a return to normal life.
The study led by the Beth Deaconess Medical Center in Massachusetts, surveying 251 school
districts, found "no substantial difference in the number of cases of Covid-19 among either
students or staff" between those observing the three- and six-foot rules when all wore
masks.
The findings, published in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases, add to a growing body
of evidence that Covid-19 transmission rates are low in schools.
...A three-foot rule would have an enormous impact on prospects for fully reopening schools,
offices and even public areas such as sports venues.
Joe Rogan: "I think it's safe to get vaccinated, but if you're 21 years old ... if you're a
healthy person and you're exercising all of the time and you're young and you're eating well, I
don't think you need to worry about this." https://twitter.com/i/status/1387077145156063234
It is unclear how Fauci response correlates with the fact that existing vaccines are less
effective or (in case of Pfizer and South African strain) ineffective against new mutations. Does
he acts as Big Pharma lobbyist, or what ?
Also, you have to be skeptical of pharmaceutical companies and the fact that they cannot be
sued if something goes wrong with the vaccine.
White House
health adviser Dr. Anthony Fauci and communications director Kate Bedingfield have made a point
of belittling and attacking podcaster Joe Rogan for daring to have a mixed opinion on Covid-19
vaccines.
As Rogan has skyrocketed over the years to arguably the most influential and successful
podcaster around, he has also turned into an intensely controversial figure, mainly for
liberals who fear his willingness to give a platform to right-wing figures like Alex Jones and
his less-than-PC takes on everything from transgender athletes to Covid-19 vaccines.
The latter is what landed the former 'Fear Factor' host in the hot seat this week as a clip
from a recent episode of 'The Joe Rogan Experience' made its way across social media and
critics painted Rogan as an anti-vaxxer spreading disinformation.
The controversy stems from Rogan saying, during a conversation with fellow comic Dave
Smith, he would not recommend that a healthy person in their early 20s get a Covid-19 vaccine
as they are not as vulnerable to the virus as older generations (who account for the majority of Covid
deaths in the US) and people with preexisting medical conditions.
The Spotify podcaster also said pushing for kids to be vaccinated is "crazy," citing his
own childrens' history with getting Covid-19, as both recovered relatively quickly.
Critics painted Rogan's comments as an angry anti-vaxx rant, urging his millions of
listeners to avoid getting inoculated against Covid-19. However, they ignored the fact that
Rogan says in the clip (and has said in the past) that getting vaccinated seems mostly safe
and is indeed "important" for certain people.
Criticism of Rogan reached a bizarre new level on Wednesday when the White House appeared to
launch a coordinated effort to disparage and belittle the podcaster, completely dismissing his
opinions.
In multiple interviews, Fauci blasted Rogan for ignoring "societal responsibilities,"
arguing even young and healthy people should get vaccinated as asymptomatic individuals can
still spread the virus.
The infectious disease expert also believes "kids of all ages" will be vaccinated by the
end of the year – there are no vaccines on the market in the US approved for anyone under
16 – and everyone should "absolutely" get inoculated.
Bedingfield also dismissed Rogan's opinion in a CNN interview where she said Rogan not being
a doctor basically strips his words of any merit.
"I guess my first question would be, did Joe Rogan become a medical doctor while we
weren't looking?" she asked. "I'm not sure that taking scientific and medical advice
from Joe Rogan is perhaps the most productive way for people to get their information."
Initial social media criticism of Rogan is one thing, but the White House pitting themselves
against a private citizen having an open and frank discussion on a podcast is concerning. It's
alarming enough that White House officials busy with vaccination efforts and a still-fresh
administration would take the time to debate Rogan on the subject, but the responses to his
discussion also show that administration officials are fearful of open debate and conversations
about the vaccines. If one even strays from the belief that vaccines are 100% safe and every
single person, regardless of age or health, should take them, they are attacked, at least if
you have the following that Rogan has.
Rogan's discussions on Covid-19 vaccines do not boil down to a debate on whether getting
inoculated against the virus is good for everyone or not. The recent viral clip even opens with
the podcaster saying vaccines are safe, and he acknowledges that what he says about children
and young, healthy people is not true across the board. He merely expresses concerns as a
father and gives a personal opinion that in no way discourages everyone from getting a
vaccine.
Looking at Fauci and Bedingfield's responses, it appears they aren't even debating what
Rogan actually said.
Fauci, who has been a controversial figure himself and
accused of flip-flopping multiple positions during the pandemic, argues that it is the
potential transmission of the virus from one person to another that is the reason everyone
should be vaccinated. Rogan never talks about the risk of transmission though. He simply makes
the argument that a healthy individual who is younger may not need a vaccination to protect
themselves from the deadlier aspects of Covid.
Bedingfield's argument is even lamer as she says without a "Dr." title, Rogan simply
can't have concerns about vaccinations for children and others. She argues no one should take
"medical advice" from a podcaster, setting Rogan up as a man who presented himself as
some kind of expert on vaccines, dishing out advice to his listeners, who apparently aren't
intelligent enough to make up their own minds, according to these critics.
Fauci and Bedingfield and any other White House official who decides to paint Rogan as the
face of anti-vaxxers should be ashamed of themselves. Their personal attacks are an
opportunistic way to take a shot at someone who has somehow become a near-pariah on the left,
and to discourage open and frank discussions about vaccines. Their swift dismissal of a
comedian who is not quite waving the flag for every single person to be vaccinated shows that
they don't want discussion from citizens they want compliance and for people to keep nodding
their heads at their ever-changing talking points and guidelines.
It really doesn't matter who is right in the White House versus Joe Rogan debate because
there shouldn't be a White House versus Joe Rogan debate. Ironically, Fauci and Bedingfield
have probably made more people aware of Rogan's comments by addressing them. They and other
officials have taken questionable criticism of a fairly harmless conversation and used it to
create a false narrative about one man to strike fear into anyone who would dare consider what
he or anyone else would say above what they do.
A comprehensive analysis of adverse events during clinical trials and over the course of
mass vaccinations with the Sputnik V vaccine showed that there were no cases of cerebral venous
sinus thrombosis (CVST).
All vaccines based on adenoviral vector platform are different and not directly comparable.
In particular, AstraZeneca’s ChAdOx1-S vaccine uses chimpanzee adenovirus to
deliver the antigen, consisting of S-protein combined with leader sequence of tissue-type
plasminogen activator. The vaccine from Johnson&Johnson uses human adenovirus serotype Ad26
and full-length S-protein stabilized by mutations. In addition, it is produced using the PER.C6
cell line (embryonic retinal cells), which is not widely represented among other registered
products.
Sputnik V is a two-component vaccine in which adenovirus serotypes 5 and 26 are used. A
fragment of tissue-type plasminogen activator is not used, and the antigen insert is an
unmodified full-length S-protein. Sputnik V vaccine is produced with the HEK293 cell line,
which has long been safely used for the production of biotechnological products.
Thus, all of the above vaccines based on adenoviral vectors have significant differences in
their structure and production technology. Therefore, there is no reason and no justification
to extrapolate safety data from one vaccine to safety data from other vaccines.
The quality and safety of Sputnik V are, among other things, assured by the fact that,
unlike other vaccines, it uses a 4-stage purification technology that includes two stages of
chromatography and two stages of tangential flow filtration. This purification technology helps
to obtain a highly purified product that goes through mandatory control including the analysis
of free DNA presence. In addition, the volume of nucleic acid is several dozen times lower in
adenoviral vectors compared to Pfizer and Moderna vaccines (1 to 2 mcg vs 50 to 100 mcg,
correspondingly).
A study published in The New England Journal of Medicine on April 9, 2021, discusses that
the cause of the thrombosis in some patients vaccinated with other vaccines could be
insufficient purification that leads to the emergence of significant quantities of free DNA.
Insufficient purification or use of very high doses of target DNA/RNA can result in adverse
interaction of a patient’s antibodies that activate thrombocytes with
elements of the vaccine itself and/or free DNA/RNA, which can form a complex with the PF4
factor.
The Gamaleya Center is ready to share its purification technology with other vaccine
producers in order to help them minimize the risk of adverse effects during
vaccination.
Loss of legitimacy of the US medical establishment and Fauci personally is quite evident from
the comments.
Looks like Anthony "surprise outbreak" Fauci took just 13 months to go full circle from no
masks needed outside https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PRa6t_e7dgI to
everyone should wear two masks, to no mask needed outside. The man is a national embarrassment to
anyone paying attention
For many months now, Dr. Anthony Fauci has advocated that people remain masked outdoors to
help prevent the spread of COVID-19.
"When you are indoors, make sure you have a mask. When you're outdoors, keep the mask on,"
he
said back in August, though he acknowledged that being outdoors was significantly safer
than being indoors.
Now, Fauci is saying that he believes the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
will provide updated guidance on wearing face masks outdoors, and says it's "common sense" to
reconsider the guidance.
I call it science, but I'll take it.
Fauci also concedes that the risk of contracting COVID-19 while engaged in outdoor
activities is "minuscule."
"What I believe you're going to be hearing, what the country is going to be hearing soon, is
updated guidelines from the CDC," Fauci said on ABC's This Week .
"The CDC is a science-based organization. They don't want to make any guidelines unless they
look at the data and the data backs it up."
"But when you look around at the common sense situation, the risk is really low ,
especially if you're vaccinated," he added.
You think? Why did it take so long to figure this out?
You think? Why did it take so long to figure this out?
https://www.youtube.com/embed/e8PyIIe00fw
Dr. Fauci's credibility has taken some severe hits, particularly in recent weeks. When Texas
Governor Greg Abbott axed the state's mask mandate and other COVID-related restrictions on
businesses and people, Dr. Anthony Fauci called it "risky" and "potentially dangerous." But
no surge happened .
Earlier this month Fauci struggled to explain how Texas defied his own predictions during an
appearance on MSNBC, arguing at the time that there might be a "lag." Three weeks later,
there's still no surge in cases in Texas.
Sorry, anyone pushing universal 'vaccinations' is still an enemy of humanity.
BouncingCat 2 hours ago
100% vaccination makes as much sense as 0% vaccination, but, wait, Pfizer is pushing for a
third round.
BinAnunnaki 2 hours ago
So is Moderna
Bacon's Rebellion 1 hour ago (Edited)
""But when you look around at the common sense situation, the risk is really low ,
especially if you're vaccinated," - Fauci
What? The vaccine DOES NOT prevent you from becoming infected, getting sick, hospitalized
or dying...it "reduces the likelihood of a severe case"..and I've yet to find solid data of
this reduction percentage of severe cases!...GTFO!
""Because in a certain situation, one can get vaccinated, have no clinical disease at all,
but get infected and not even know it and have replication of virus in your nasopharynx and
inadvertently transmit it to somebody else who might actually be unvaccinated and get ill." -
Fauci
#############
Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness Study Results
~44,000 Participants
1,594 "cases" in the vaccine group
1,816 "cases" in the placebo group
(12% effective at "reducing cases"...lol...junk science)
ZERO DEATHS! ( 1 person died 3 days after injection; wasn't Covid or the vaccine
though...no mention of what killed the person..lol..yeah, right;)
Vaccinated or not...NO...ONE...DIED!
No data was provided on the severity of the "cases". Read the document, they define a
"case"; saying you don't feel good, and you test positive, qualifies as a "case".
Kentucky, March 2021
CDC Findings
COVID-19 Outbreak
Skilled Nursing Facility After Vaccination Program
Note: " Skilled Nursing Facility" = you are very near the end of your life due to
illness/age.
Findings Summary: If you're not old and/or near death, Covid WAS NOT a threat to your
life.
Vaccination Rates:
52.6% of the 116 employees fully vaccinated
90.4% of the 83 residents were fully vaccinated.
"Cases":
46 COVID-19 cases total
26 residents (18 fully vaccinated) – 69% of the resident "cases" were fully
vaccinated!!!
20 employees (4 vaccinated )
48% of "cases" were in people that were "fully vaccinated"!
Deaths:
2 unvaccinated residents died
1 vaccinated resident died.
So, 3 people, OUT OF 83, or 3.6%, whom were near the end of their life at the start, died of
complications from a flu virus..shocking!
ZERO EMPLOYEES DIED
ZERO EMPLOYEES WERE HOSPITALIZED
20 EMPLOYEES HAD THE SNIFFLES!
The New England Journal of Medicine
Large Scale Study of BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine
>>Estimated vaccine efficacy for severe Covid-19 is 92%
>>WOW! Fantastic! We're all saved!
Devil in the details...
596,618 in the vaccinated group
596,618 in the not vaccinated group
229 people...0.00019... OUT OF 1,193,236 PEOPLE...developed a "severe case" of Covid19
55 in the Vax group
174 in the Un-Vaxed group
99.9999% in Vaxed group did not experience severe Covid19
99.9970% in Un-Vaxed group did not experience severe Covid19
41 people...0.00003...OUT OF 1,193,236 PEOPLE...DIED of Covid19
9 in the Vax group (9 out of 55 severe cases = 16.4% died)
32 in the Un-Vaxed group (32 out of 174 severe cases = 18.4% died)
.000015 of all the fully vaccinated people died
.000054 of all the un-vaccinated died
Looks like "The Science" is saying your odds of dying from Covid19 are pretty slim whether
or not you are vaccinated.
Have you read the document you linked yourself? Quickly glanced over it and it doesn't say
what you says it does.
The numbers you quote are from page 41:
"Among 3,410 total cases of suspected but unconfirmed COVID-19 in the overall study
population, 1,594 occurred in the vaccine group vs. 1,816 in the placebo group."
These are "suspected cases of symptomatic COVID-19 that were not PCR-confirmed".
On page 4 you will find the actual result:
"Vaccine efficacy for the primary endpoint against confirmed COVID-19 occurring at least 7
days after the second dose was 95.0% with 8 COVID-19 cases in the vaccine group compared to
162 COVID-19 cases in the placebo group."
These are PCR confirmed covid-19 cases.
See table 6 for these numbers per age-group.
On page 40 the 6 (not 0, not 1) deaths during this study are looked at in more detail.
"cardiac arrest 62 days after vaccination #2 and died 3 days later"
"pre-existing atherosclerotic disease and baseline obesity and died 3 days after
vaccination #1"
For placebo group: "myocardial infarction (n=1), hemorrhagic stroke (n=1) or unknown
causes (n=2)".
Did you link another document then you wanted to link? Or you didn't read/understand what
you linked?
Yea, but typically I'm getting general anesthesia because I'm about to have surgery that
is necessary to save my life or fix something that is seriously broken or not working
correctly. The experimental jab fits neither of those two criteria.
Follow the money. Jabs mean $$$ for the politicians and the drug companies. The more jabs
the merrier. It is always all about the benjamins. Meet the new boss, same as the old
boss.
MAGAMAN 59 minutes ago remove link
The jabs are nothing compared to the medical bills that can be run up, in the wake of the
damage.
For example, Statin drugs R cheap and the cost of pushing them on the public is a loss
leader, but once someone used statin drugs for 5-8 years, they'll be on 8 or so very
expensive drugs.
chunga 2 hours ago remove link
I heard on the radio experts saying it's just fine to get Dystopia Virus shot number two
up to three months later. This tells many people who got shot number one have decided they
made a mistake and don't want shot number two.
BinAnunnaki 2 hours ago
They hear how sick people got after the second one. Colleague got a stinging red rash up
and down his legs
BinAnunnaki 2 hours ago
They hear how sick people got after the second one. Colleague got a stinging red rash up
and down his legs
End Times Prophecy 2 hours ago
You can hate Trump all you like be he was right on the money with his assessment of Fraud
Fauci.
orangedrinkandchips PREMIUM 2 hours ago remove link
i like Trump but "cmon man"....calling Fauci out was easy.
he's political hack.
homeskillet 47 minutes ago
Trump did nothing to remove Fauci and is a fan of vaccine - Fraud.
Heroic Couplet 1 hour ago
Trump is a fool, with or without Fauci.
JRobby 2 hours ago
The man displays none of the characteristics of a scientist and all of the characteristics
of a politician/career bureaucrat
gmak 2 hours ago (Edited)
It's not that he flip-flops. Data and information that is available can change and one
needs to adjust. It's that he has admitted that he LIES TO MANIPULATE the general population
because he doesn't believe that they are open to hearing the data and information nor capable
of managing their own individual risks.
He believes that he knows what is good for us better than we do in our individual lives.
He believes that it is OK to lie and manipulate to achieve a result that HE BELIEVES is
necessary.
He is a LIAR and a MANIPULATOR when we need true LEADERS. That is why so many are
responding to De Santis, BTW.
boyplunger7777 2 hours ago
Most expensive govt employee at $430,000/year. Done more damage to the nation than anyone
in recent history. Bought and paid for by big pharma. Trump was a fool to give this clown a
platform.
Fiscal Reality 2 hours ago (Edited) remove link
If you haven't mentally determined that Fauci is an IDIOT and a medical carnival barker,
you're hopeless.
Mask up, vax up and stay terrified forever, sheep. COVID is ONLY 99.99% survivable. A dog
bite is more dangerous.
Mrs. Fiscal is in an unnamed South American Country. They are hopelessly hypnotized by the
COVID hysteria. Masks EVERYWHERE, even while riding bicycles or motorcycles or riding alone
in a car.
Just like like Oregon, CA or NY.
Pigeon 2 hours ago
Same quack who played up the "heterosexual risk of AIDS" as high as gay sex, IV drug use
risk.
Nona Yobiznes 1 hour ago
Fauci is a trainwreck. He has destroyed the credibility of the CDC, and no amount of media
fluff pieces is going to change that.
OrazioGentile 2 hours ago (Edited) remove link
More from the Ministry of Disinformation! What constitutes outside and inside? If you are
on the plains of Iowa, you definitely are outside...but if you are walking down a street in
NYC with sidewalk cafes full of people without masks are you really outside? If you take the
vaccine are you really immune to catching the Virus or is the vaccine more of a therapeutic
that will lessen the symptoms if you do catch Covid? If you take said vaccine can you still
pass it to others even if you are "immune"? Perhaps Dr. Tony could clarify these questions as
opposed to giving advice on other topics....? At least Dr. Birx seemed to be more straight
forward than this guy.
Dumpster Elite 51 minutes ago remove link
"The CDC is a science-based organization. They don't want to make any guidelines unless
they look at the data and the data backs it up."
Also, there were no suitcases full of ballots underneath desks at the State Farm arena,
the Steele Dossier is totally truthful and fact-based, and Hunter Biden has never committed a
criminal act.
A. Lee Ess 1 hour ago
I believe that Zerohedge had a story a while back on a track coach that got fired for not
requiring his kids to mask up while practicing. He should put up a billboard asking for an
apology.
Nona Yobiznes 1 hour ago (Edited) remove link
I hope he sues. Fired for trying to protect kids from harmful masks during physical
exertion. We must protect them from a virus that doesn't affect them, using a tool that
doesn't work, in an environment where they are extremely unlikely to spread germs. Our world
has gone nuts.
BitchesBetterRecognize 59 minutes ago
If people in the USA just bothered backtracking the endless lies, inconsistencies,
contradictions & misinformation provided by Fauci, CDC & MSM while putting the pieces
together, then the Plandemic should have been over by last summer
I still can't fathom why people keep participating in the Plandemic hoax, given all the
irrefutable evidence that already exist to repel it completely.
Nelbev 1 hour ago remove link
Fvck Facuci. If the vaccine is so safe, then why does big pharma refuse to sell it in any
country unless governments grant full legal immunity against vaccine injury liability torts.
They skipped animal trials, normal vaccine phase III testing will not be finished till
2023.
Double mask, no mask outside, who is this idiot? 300 TV interviews last year and highest
paid gov employee, how much time to read the growing hundreds of pier reviewed and published
scientific papers, some from NIH, which say masks, lockdowns, social distancing do not work.
If they did, you would see a drop in covid deaths a week or two after imposed by states or
countries and can statistically test, but even without statistics can just look at data at a
state like Texans and neighbors or Sweden and see.
His rec that young kids get vaccinated is idiotic. Data shows people under 30 are
basically immune from death and if asymptomatic not spreaders. Their chance of being mauled
to death by a local pet dog is greater than covid, same for car accidents, same risk logic to
be safe should ban driving in cars and execute all dogs and cats. If you are under 30 or have
already have had covid, you are crazy to to get vaccinated.
They got their mail in ballots and took the election. Why keep this meme going? I guess as
soon as data out vaccinated people dying of covid, they will have to have everyone vaccinated
every 6 months for rest of life and no civil liberties as new strains mutates like the common
cold or seasonal flu.
They want me to get vaccinated so I do not spread to other non-vaccinated people, well
non-vaccinated people have chose not to take risk of experimental vaccination, should not
force upon us, no work, no travel, mask, social distance, stay home, stores closed, more
propaganda.
Fauci is like J. Edgar Hoover? He has too much dirt on too many people to be fired? He
certainly seems to have gotten a life-time appointment.
GoodyGumdrops 1 hour ago
"But when you look around at the common sense situation, the risk is really low ,
especially if you're vaccinated," he added.
Yeah, because after getting injected with an experimental Covid shot, and you now have a
cocktail of toxins altering your body's cells, you'll definitely have more serious things to
worry about than just getting Covid.
play_arrow
MAGAMAN 1 hour ago remove link
It amazes me how people follow a man that is so totally corrupt.
lawofone 2 hours ago
REPORT: Pfizer Vaccine Confirmed To Cause Neurodegenerative Diseases – Study
untested gene therapy experiment. what a disaster.
PrivetHedge 2 hours ago remove link
Some people don't seem to understand that Fauci is a corrupt clown, a jester, just put
there to laugh and make fun of us. No one should listen to anything he says.
The CDC is a corporation who has it's own agenda, currenyly infused with Gates's agenda od
death for all. No one should listen to anything it says.
Biden, in advanced dementia and a globalist puppet, is also there to laugh at us and make
fun of us, while our friends and family take the death jab, and infect the rest of us with
mRNA shedding and spike proteins that guarantee infertility. No one should listen to anything
he says.
We don't need the parasitic government and the mainstream media. It's the same gang, who
want to kill us. In 2-3 years time tens of millions will be dead of ADE from the jab. The
birth rate will be non existent.
We are losing this war.
hanekhw 33 minutes ago (Edited)
The widespread distrust of this man is well earned. Centuries of effort to create trust of
the entire medical profession has been wiped out in little over a year. THAT damage is much
worse than the pitiful few deaths from a Pandemic that was a fraud from the beginning
perpetrated entirely for political power.
The Vel 2 hours ago
So, why are morons wearing masks outside?? Of course, the question is rhetorical.
Enraged 4 minutes ago remove link
The CDC represents Big Pharma, so the mission to recommend vaccines and drugs for
profit.
I would say Fraudci is losing credibility, but he never had it.
Londo 2 hours ago
Another misleading title. Quoting Fauci out of context. Its about crowding . Disease will
spread if you have crowding outdoors. LIke the Indian Diwali festival. Or the marathon runner
in Italy last March. One runner spread it to 100.
Wearing facemask mechanically restricts breathing by increasing the resistance of air
movement during both inhalation and exhalation process [12] , [13] . Although,
intermittent (several times a week) and repetitive (10–15 breaths for 2–4 sets)
increase in respiration resistance may be adaptive for strengthening respiratory muscles
[33] , [34] , prolonged
and continues effect of wearing facemask is maladaptive and could be detrimental for health
[11] , [12] , [13] . In
normal conditions at the sea level, air contains 20.93% O 2 and 0.03% CO
2 , providing partial pressures of 100 mmHg and 40 mmHg for these gases in the
arterial blood, respectively. These gas concentrations significantly altered when breathing
occurs through facemask. A trapped air remaining between the mouth, nose and the facemask is
rebreathed repeatedly in and out of the body, containing low O 2 and high CO
2 concentrations, causing hypoxemia and hypercapnia [35] , [36] , [11] ,
[12]
, [13] . Severe hypoxemia
may also provoke cardiopulmonary and neurological complications and is considered an important
clinical sign in cardiopulmonary medicine [37] , [38] , [39] ,
[40]
, [41] , [42] . Low oxygen
content in the arterial blood can cause myocardial ischemia, serious arrhythmias, right or left
ventricular dysfunction, dizziness, hypotension, syncope and pulmonary hypertension
[43] . Chronic
low-grade hypoxemia and hypercapnia as result of using facemask can cause exacerbation of
existing cardiopulmonary, metabolic, vascular and neurological conditions [37] ,
[38]
, [39] , [40] , [41] ,
[42] . Table 1
summarizes the physiological, psychological effects of wearing facemask and their potential
long-term consequences for health.
CDC website continues to recommend cholorquinine as a good choice when traveling to malaria
prone countries. The same drug CDC-Fauci claims will "kill you" if you are in "covid"
countries.
Science says that masks don't stop viruses but wearing them can lead to sickness and death.
Fauci follows that science -- in his mission to kill.
US National Library of Medicine
National Institutes of Health
Facemasks in the COVID-19 era: A health hypothesis
Conclusion
The existing scientific evidences challenge the safety and efficacy of wearing facemask as
preventive intervention for COVID-19. The data suggest that both medical and non-medical
facemasks are ineffective to block human-to-human transmission of viral and infectious
disease such SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 , supporting against the usage of facemasks. Wearing
facemasks has been demonstrated to have substantial adverse physiological and psychological
effects. These include hypoxia, hypercapnia, shortness of breath, increased acidity and
toxicity, activation of fear and stress response, rise in stress hormones, immunosuppression,
fatigue, headaches, decline in cognitive performance, predisposition for viral and infectious
illnesses, chronic stress, anxiety and depression. Long-term consequences of wearing facemask
can cause health deterioration, developing and progression of chronic diseases and premature
death. Governments, policy makers and health organizations should utilize prosper and
scientific evidence-based approach with respect to wearing facemasks, when the latter is
considered as preventive intervention for public health.
Oh well, apparently all that hand wringing about surfaces was a tad overdone. Last week
the CDC announced that the risk of contracting the virus by touching a "contaminated" surface
was somewhere in the neighborhood of 1 and 10,000. Another myth born of Covid-hysteria has
bitten the dust.
enough of this 3 hours ago remove link
Dr. Foh Chi is always wrong but never in doubt.
chunga 3 hours ago
This Fauci character is a deranged medical terrorist. He became a fake doctor to avoid the
draft. See: Yellow Berets.
onemorething 3 hours ago (Edited)
I once attended a polo match in the UK.
there was a long line of people waiting to use porta-potties, but I noticed the hunt
club's restrooms had only three people waiting there, so my girlfriend and I sauntered over
to the shorter line.
i asked GF, " I wonder why everyone's waiting in line over there, when over here are
shorter lines and better bathrooms? "
An older woman in mink, dripping in diamond jewelry, was in line ahead of us.
She turned around and haughtily exclaimed
because people... are sheep.
CheapBastard 3 hours ago
Fauci refuses to comment on the maskless, unvaccinated flood of illegals coming across the
border, while at the same time he trashes restaurants and Churches.
justyouwait 2 hours ago
The contradictions in how they enforce their lies is mind bending. Last summer BLM/Antifa
were somehow immune to the disease while they attacked and burned America to the ground. The
real powers behind this whole scam thought their actions were great and were thus sanctioned
as they thought they would throw a bad light on Trump. Peacefully going for a walk down the
same streets was seen as spreading death from one end to the other.
Once again, riot season has started and the powers that are in charge of the scam are back
to avoiding those uncomfortable conversations about the peaceful protesters out there. They
had told us that the EXPERIMENTAL DRUGS would get us back to normal once most of the
population had taken them. Now they are talking about booster shots forever (you know, the
gene altering treatments that surely won't have any dangerous side effects). They are also
now starting to tell us that masks and distancing will never go away (they haven't put it in
those terms but if the shots we are getting now won't get us off masks and distancing then
neither will the boosters). This is the "new normal" folks.
fanbeav 3 hours ago
I work with idiots who wash their hands every time they touch a public surface. Wear their
face diapers to walk from their car to the office with no one around. Then remove the face
diaper at work. Replace the mask when deliveries come into the office. When delivery person
leaves, they remove the mask. Put it back on when the days is over and they walk back to
their car.....alone!
Now they are bragging about getting the "jab" like they are in some super dupper
club.
1 play_arrow
HeyThere 2 hours ago
Do you like anagrams? FAUCI >>>> CIA FU.
HC-CZ 3 hours ago
Saw a woman at Home Depot a few days ago.
Face shield, mask, gloves, and hair wrapped up in plastic. Outside.
DesertEagle 3 hours ago
"I work with idiots who wash their hands every time they touch a public surface. Wear
their face diapers to walk from their car to the office with no one around.
Now they are bragging about getting the "jab"
These brainwashed airheads are like cult members - the Cult of Covid...
MCDirtMigger 3 hours ago
Fauxi is the 21st century version of the 16th century Pope declaring the world to be flat.
Because, you know, the 'consensus ' tells him it is so.
For over a year well-to-do Americans have quite literally been "quarantining" packages
shipped to them, and that were dropped off at their residences by "science-denying" untouchables who lacked the means to
similarly "shelter-in-place."
The package-terrified have usually waited 48 hours before handling said box and contents.
What about the Clorox wipes that were never in stock thanks to frantic science
believers clearing the shelves of them? Some never left their homes.
Of course, when the corona-fearful actually ventured outside, they wore gloves while still not touching anything. They jumped
out in the street when passing another human since, well, you know, the very humans who've driven all progress for millennia
were suddenly a lethal menace to one another. But the main thing is that if they had to risk their lives by being in public,
the science reverent more than masked up: they wiped down everything they came near.
Even though airlines were sending out texts ahead of boarding meant to comfort the nail-biting about plane interiors that had
been thoroughly scrubbed, passengers still brought their own wipes on planes; that, or they accepted wipes from flight
attendants in order to double up on the work done by maintenance. At present, Hilton essentially co-brands its rooms with
Lysol .
Oh well, apparently all that hand wringing about
surfaces was a tad overdone.
Last week the CDC announced that the risk of contracting the virus by touching a
"contaminated" surface was somewhere in the neighborhood of 1 and 10,000. Another myth born of Covid-hysteria has bitten the
dust.
Since it has, the reasonable in our midst can only hope that Corona-celebrity Anthony Fauci is asked to comment on the new
findings. They're very telling, and not solely because what was once believed deeply has turned out to be so wrong.
But since all the hysteria about surfaces has been revealed as much ado about nothing,
it's worth starting there
. More realistically, it's worth traveling back in time nearly 40 years to 1983. It was then
that Fauci asserted in a paper that "routine close contact, as within a family household" could spread AIDS. To say that Fauci
was wrong brings new meaning to understatement.
At the same time, Fauci's false assumptions in '83 don't indict him.
Back then
little was known about AIDS. Doctors were flying blind as it were, so they worked tirelessly to learn more.
Applied to the present, all-too-many on the left have hysterically criticized the "science-deniers" in their midst who are
only deniers insofar as they haven't always accepted the present consensus about the coronavirus. As opposed to deniers, these
skeptics were just being reasonable. Think about it. It's not "science" if there isn't doubt.
And as Fauci's incorrect assumptions from long ago yet again remind us, there's so much
we don't know.
There's so much we get wrong in the early days as we're
learning
.
In the 1980s the view from the NHS experts in England was that one in five Brits would contract AIDS for which there was no
cure. Even in hyper-lefty Hollywood, homosexual actor Tony Perkins went to great lengths to hide his AIDS diagnosis given his
reasonable belief that he would never work again. Hollywood had overreacted. By many miles. How little we knew.
That so many got AIDS so wrong not too long ago should hopefully cause the hysterical of the moment to perhaps dial down their
certainty. What you believe likely won't age well, which is the point. It explains why so many of us were so horrified by
lockdowns.
You see, we weren't solely against lockdowns because we deny science or that we don't
care about the virus, or didn't believe it existed. In truth, we were against the lockdowns because freedom produces abundant
information in addition to being a virtue on its own.
We were also against the lockdowns simply because force is superfluous if something threatens; particularly if the threat is
thought to be lethal. About Covid's lethality, doesn't the latter explain why some of the science-worshipful were so
terrified, and so desperate to "quarantine" packages, wipe down doorknobs, and avoid human contact? OK, but if you were that
scared,
then what was the point of forced lockdowns
?
Indeed, as has been made plain, the fearful were already going to great lengths to do what they thought would protect them
from the virus. The latter yet again explains the lack of Clorox wipes, masks, etc. It's a reminder that people didn't need to
be forced.
No doubt the fear expressed by the scrubbers and washers has proven overdone and
unwarranted in retrospect, which speaks to why freedom of action during "crises" is so important. In other words, those who
threw caution to the wind and who couldn't be bothered to disinfect everything were just as important as the corona-obsessed
when it came to finding answers. Arguably more important. The "deniers" provided information about virus spread that the
"believers" could not. Get it?
In this case, the deniers who lived their lives were correct. Avoiding all contact proved idiotic. The "doubters" had science
on their side.
It's all yet again a reminder that hysterical certitude isn't the same as knowledge.
Emotion is its own form of denial.
3 hours ago
Fauci = Big Pharma Whore
The End Game
3 hours ago
"
What
was the point
of forced lockdowns?"
Is
that really even a question anymore? If it is, then you have not been paying attention!
mikka
3 hours ago
It
would be funny if it wasn't true.
Sir Edge
1 hour ago
CDC
/ Fauci / Gates - Epidemic created Fear is FIRST about control and then second about the profits from the
drugs or vaxes... so they have more resources to do it AGAIN... as in now the vaccinated may 'NEED' a
third shot ?
xious
3 hours ago
(Edited)
Trump
did nothing to stop covid scam. He is one of them.
This
is way bigger than Trump, you should know that by now.
Savyindallas
2 hours ago
very true. I will be so happy when Trump apologists finally realize we were conned by "Con Don--crisis
actor extraordinaire. After being an early and avid supporter, it took me about two years to finally
admit the Truth. The rest of you need to come to terms with this fact and move on-- otherwise, we are
truly screwed.
Billy the Poet
2 hours ago
I thought Trump was a convenient monkey wrench to toss in the works and he was. Trust in government,
media, academia and corporations is at an all time low. It's an anarchist's dream.
This is a much better point to be moving forward from than if it hadn't happened.
It's a shame you can't see that.
CheapBastard
2 hours ago
(Edited)
"We're
all in this together."
Billionaires made $3.9 trillion during the pandemic
Very
simple. The 85-90% of the population not at high risk for serious Covid illness were locked up to prevent
natural "herd immunity" from developing. In order to force the warp speed "vaccines" on everyone. And then
to implement tracking and control of the sheep via Vaccine Passports and ultimately micro chipping of
everybody but the elites running the Covid psyop.
EnoughBS21
3 hours ago
This
idiot is a complete Deep State fraud and should be brought up on charges of crimes against humanity and
hanged!
JoeyChernenko
PREMIUM
3 hours ago
Do a
fundraiser. Kind of like those fundraisers where you get to hit an old car with a baseball bat. We could pay
off the national debt. I'd pony up $10,000 or so.
desertboy
2 hours ago
remove
link
In
Fauci's defense: he's not simply neurotic; he had a very real profit motive.
Jack Offelday
3 hours ago
Fauci
will infamously be remembered as the face of COVID. What a legacy.
whatisthat1
2 hours ago
This
post and other evidence demonstrate dr Fauci is a fraud and nefarious career bureaucrat....
Bunter Hiden
3 hours ago
I
stopped taking any kind of precautions about 1 month after the hysteria started. No masks, no gloves, no
quarantining, etc. I've gone about my life as normal, well as normal as you can with 80% of the population
freaking out.
Fauxchi is a quack. Look at what he said about SARS-1 and SARS-2. Totally contradictory.
When
something doesn't pass the sniff test, throw it away.
williambanzai7
1 hour ago
Dr
Fauci and his cohorts seem to be having great difficulty understanding anything about this virus other than
it's money making attributes.
liberty2
3 hours ago
"Nobel
Prize-Winning Inventor Said Dr. Fauci Is A Complete Fraud"
Fauci
has been a charlatan forever. A Grifter who gets tons of money from the likes of Bill Gates and Big
Pharma. Don't forget he pushed immunity from legal liability for vaccine makers through Congress back in
the '80's.
dustnwind
46 minutes ago
Why is
the focus on Fauci instead of the politicians giving him so much power? Deflection perhaps?
5G-Powered Nanobots
36 minutes ago
Because he's a virologist with decades of experience
"... Dr. Kaplan is a faculty member at the Stanford School of Medicine Clinical Excellence Research Center and the UCLA Fielding School of Public Health. He has served as associate director of the National Institutes of Health and chief science officer at the U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. ..."
Distrust of the establishment plays a role in vaccine hesitancy, but it's probably time to
back off on the prevailing commentary suggesting that those avoiding vaccines are
irresponsible, uninformed or politically manipulated. Achieving herd immunity requires that
about 70% of Americans are vaccinated or contract Covid and develop natural immunity, which
official numbers place around 10% of the population. Polls consistently show that 21% say they
will definitely not get the vaccine and about a third rate their chances of taking the vaccine
as less than 50%. It's better to address common fears and concerns respectfully and
informatively than with hectoring and condescension.
Dr. Kaplan is a faculty member at the Stanford School of Medicine Clinical Excellence
Research Center and the UCLA Fielding School of Public Health. He has served as associate
director of the National Institutes of Health and chief science officer at the U.S. Agency for
Healthcare Research and Quality.
In 2017, a subagency of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) - headed by
Dr. Anthony
Fauci
- resumed funding a controversial grant to
genetically modify bat
coronaviruses
in Wuhan, China
without
the approval of a government oversight
body, according to the
Daily
Caller
.
For context, in 2014, the Obama administration temporarily suspended federal funding for
gain-of-function
research
into manipulating bat COVID to be more transmissible to humans. Four months prior to that decision, the NIH
effectively shifted this research to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) via a
grant
to
nonprofit group EcoHealth Alliance, headed by Peter Daszak.
The first
$666,442
installment
of EcoHealth's $3.7 million NIH grant was paid in June 2014, with similar
annual
payments
through May 2019 under the "
Understanding The Risk Of Bat Coronavirus
Emergence
" project.
Notably,
the WIV "had openly participated in gain-of-function research in partnership
with U.S. universities and institutions"
for years under the leadership of Dr. Shi 'Batwoman' Zhengli, according to
the
Washington
Post
's
Josh Rogin.
In 2017, however, the "
Potential
Pandemic Pathogens Control and Oversight
(P3CO) Framework was formed within the Department of Health and Human Services
(HHS),"
which was tasked with evaluating the risks involved with enhancing dangerous
pathogens,
as well as whether proper safeguards are in place, before a grant into 'gain-of-function' or similarly
risky research can be issued.
Fauci's National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) - the subagency which funded EcoHealth -
didn't
think the grant needed review
, and resumed their relationship with Daszak
without
flagging it for the P3CO committee
, an NIH spokesperson told the
Caller
.
"
This is a systemic problem
," says Rutgers University professor of chemical
biology, Richard H. Ebright, referring to the loophole in the review process - and adding that NIAID and NIH have
"systematically thwarted–indeed systematically nullified–the HHS P3CO Framework by declining to flag and forward proposals for
review."
The NIH, however, says that the grant wasn't flagged for review because "NIAID determined research in the grant was not
gain-of-function research because it did not involve the enhancement of the pathogenicity or transmissibility of the viruses
studied," the spokesperson told the
Caller
, adding: "We would not submit research
proposals that did not meet the definition, because otherwise we would need to submit everything."
We'll just have to take their word for it, as the P3CO framework didn't require the HHS review committee to take a second look
at the NIAID's claim that the EcoHealth grant doesn't cover gain-of-function research.
How Federal Oversight Of Gain-Of-Function Research Is Bypassed
The Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) is at the center of widespread speculation that COVID-19 could have accidentally leaked
from a lab into the human population. EcoHealth's grant to study bat-based coronaviruses in China included the transfer of
$600,000 to the WIV.
Had EcoHealth's grant been subjected to P3CO review,
an HHS panel would have
independently evaluated the grant and, if necessary, recommended additional biocontainment measures to prevent potential lab
leaks -- or even recommended that the grant be denied entirely
.
The WIV is a biosafety level 4 laboratory, the highest level biocontainment certification, but U.S. Embassy officials issued
two diplomatic cables warning about inadequate safety at the lab after a visit in 2018. One of the cables warned that the
lab's work on bat-based coronaviruses represented the risk of a new SARS-like pandemic, according to
The
Washington Post
.
An
annex
to
the World Health Organization's COVID-19 origin report released Tuesday describes the WIV's work using "recombinant viruses"
in tests involving bat coronaviruses,
which Ebright said are descriptions of
gain-of-function research
.
The U.S. government paused funding of gain-of-function research in 2014 after lab workers were accidentally exposed to anthrax
by the Centers for Disease Control, according to
The
New York Times
. The incident came on the heels of widespread scientific outcry in 2011 when it was revealed that
laboratories in Wisconsin and the Netherlands were intentionally modifying the H5N1 bird flu virus so it could more
effectively jump between ferrets.
Federally funded gain-of-function research resumed in 2017 after new oversight procedures were implemented. The review
framework split oversight responsibilities between two groups -- the funding agency (the NIAID in the case of the EcoHealth
grant) and the P3CO Review Committee, an interdisciplinary group convened by HHS.
The committee is responsible for recommending whether a research grant involving gain-of-function needs to include any
additional risk mitigation measures, an HHS spokesperson told the DCNF
.
But the
committee is kept in the dark on any grant until the funding agency flags one for its review.
The P3CO Framework doesn't require the HHS review committee to take a second look at the NIAID's determination following its
review that the EcoHealth grant did not involve gain-of-function research.
The NIH spokesperson said it would be "misleading and inaccurate" to suggest NIAID was required to notify the HHS review
committee of its determination.
An HHS spokesperson confirmed that the department's P3CO Review Committee only reviews research grants that are flagged for
additional review by funding agencies such as NIAID. The spokesperson did not answer when asked if the review committee had
knowledge of the EcoHealth grant.
Ecohealth has a history of manipulating bat-based coronaviruses. The group's president,
Peter
Daszak
, said as much during a podcast interview filmed in Singapore just weeks before the first reported cases of COVID-19
in Wuhan in December 2019.
"You can manipulate them in the lab pretty easily," Daszak said. "Spike protein drives a lot of what happens with the
coronavirus. Zoonotic risk. So you can get the sequence, you can build the protein -- and we work with Ralph Baric at [the
University of North Carolina] to do this -- and insert the backbone of another virus and do some work in the lab."
Ebright told the DCNF that NIAID was wrong to determine that the EcoHealth grant did
not involve enhancing the transmissibility of Chinese bat-based coronaviruses. He said the project's
abstract
for
the 2019 fiscal year, which referenced "in vitro and in vivo infection experiments" on coronaviruses, "*unequivocally*
required risk-benefit review under the HHS P3CO Framework."
Other scientists have said EcoHealth's NIH-funded work in China involved gain-of-function research on bat-based coronaviruses.
"It is hard to overemphasize that the central logic of this grant was to test the pandemic potential of SARS-related bat
coronaviruses by making ones with pandemic potential, either through genetic engineering or passaging, or both," Drs. Jonathan
Latham and Allison Wilson
wrote
in
June.
The NIH terminated the EcoHealth grant in April 2020. NIH deputy director for extramural research,
Michael
Lauer
, told the group in a letter that the agency "does not believe that the current project outcomes align with the
program goals and agency priorities."
Fauci said during a hearing before the House Energy & Commerce Committee in June that the EcoHealth grant was canceled
"because the NIH was told to cancel it."
"I don't know the reason, but we were told to cancel it," Fauci said.
Fauci told
Politico
following
the hearing that former President Donald Trump's White House ordered the NIH to cancel the grant.
They reuse masks, they touch their masks all day, they adjust htem, they don't have them
properly fitted ( this is a big one ).
All of these things are liable to reduce the efficacy of a mask. None of them could possibly
lead to a negative efficacy.
I will provide data, but first, I want to really assess why you're truly skeptical of the
idea.
The mask is not collecting other peoples' droplets. It's collecting yours. So why would you
think that you misusing your mask is going to increase your chances of getting the disease vs.
not wearing one at all?
That's like arguing that "the real world is messy, I wouldn't be a bit surprised to learn that
pulling out was actually morel likely to get a girl pregnant than not!"
I'd argue that there have been large-scale test cases which seem to show that masks do lower
transmissibility. Those tests were conducted in South Korea, Japan, and Taiwan. The United
States was the control group.
What you see from the numbers is that those countries had far lower covid rates than the
United States and also were countries where inexpensive surgical masks are widely available in
mini-marts and people willingly wear them as well. In addition, all of those countries are very
crowded and you' Re:Sarah Palin (
Score: 4 ,
Informative) by dgatwood ( 11270
) on Thursday April 01, 2021 @02:04PM ( #61225048 )
Homepage
Journal
The question that isn't being asked, but should be, is, "Are masks lowering the
transmissibility?". Looking at the dataset, I don't believe so.
I'd argue that there have been large-scale test cases which seem to show that masks do lower
transmissibility. Those tests were conducted in South Korea, Japan, and Taiwan. The United
States was the control group.
That's an okay approach, but IMO a better approach with fewer confounding factors is
comparing cases at the county level within the United States
[cdc.gov]. The 24 counties in Kansas that implemented a mask mandate showed a 6% drop in cases
between a week-long period in early July and a week-long period in mid-August. The 105 counties
that did not implement a mask mandate showed a 100% increase in cases over that same time
period.
Reply to This Parent Share Flag as InappropriateNot a controlled
experiment [Re:Sarah Palin] Not a controlled experiment, sorry.
Correct. There are differences between countries other than mask wearing.
Re:
That is not a proper control group. There are plenty of studies which look at
infection trends before and after mask mandates and lockdowns, which all show a decrease in
infections. So no need to point to research which tries to compare different countries with far
too many other factors to mitigate. Re:Sarah Palin (
Score: 5 ,
Informative) by SpankiMonki (
3493987 ) on Thursday April 01, 2021 @01:04PM ( #61224726
)
The question that isn't being asked, but should be, is, "Are masks lowering the
transmissibility?".
That question has been asked since early in the pandemic, and there have been many
observational studies performed showing mask use lowering transmissibility to one degree or
another. Like this early
study [bmj.com] of mask use in China:
Face mask use by the primary case and family contacts before the primary case
developed symptoms was 79% effective in reducing transmission
Now mod me down because this goes against the local dogma. Must not question the
narrative!
There is no way you have looked at any relevant data if you have come to that
conclusion. There have been studies tracking transmission rates before and after mask mandates,
and transmission rates did significantly drop. It is even more true for lockdowns. You can look
at any trend-line for any US state/county or any country and identify when either increased
mask mandates or lockdowns were put in place because a week or two later the case rate goes
down dramatically.
In the US you could see case rates slowi Re: Those are
interesting data points, but they're not really indicative of anything simply due to how many
factors can influence CFR between 2 countries/societies Also not a controlled
experiment [Re:Sarah Palin] Also not a controlled experiment. Comparing two countries
that have social, geographical, and population density differences makes it impossible to tell
what the effect of which variable is.
Correct. There are differences between countries other than mask wearing.
I am particularly skeptical about analyses that pick compare countries without
a very good reason to explain why those two. There are 195 countries in the world. Out
of the 18,915 possible comparisons of two countries, why did you pick those parti Re:
How is it people who are supposed to be smart (slashdot readers) can be so uneducated?
Re: Sarah
Palin
We had a customer who was a paratrooper in Normandy, and my brother made that stupid
comment for some reason. Dick immediately reamed him a new asshole and said, "More atheists are
made in fucking foxholes than anywhere else, since no god worth worshiping would allow shit
like that to happen!"
J
Jeffrey Mason SUBSCRIBER 29 minutes ago The last straw for me on CV19 and these vaccines was
when I heard Fauci talk about how he wants to vaccinate kids at the age of 6 months in 2022.
Absolutely ridiculous. Like thumb_up 1 Reply reply Share
link Report flag
W William Long SUBSCRIBER 23 minutes ago If the goal is herd immunity and suppressing
creation of new variants, then you have to vaccinate kids. Absolutely essential. Nothing
ridiculous at all.
Like thumb_up 2 Reply reply Share link Report
flag
J Jeffrey Mason SUBSCRIBER 20 minutes ago An unproven vaccine in a 6 month old baby?? Not
my kid Anthony Aaron SUBSCRIBER 1 hour ago 12-15 year olds -- those who
actually get the Fauci flu -- already have a 99.9999% survival rate so, given the small sample
size, their 100% survival rate is likely statistically meaningless.
B Brendan Fieger SUBSCRIBER 5 minutes ago Infants are at almost no risk from Covid. Anyone
who would give their six-month old an experimental vaccine should not be a parent. It's
unconscionable.
D Don Tezza SUBSCRIBER 31 minutes ago I realize that some people are mathematically
challenged, but hypothetically speaking, if a virus claims 1,000,000 lives within a population
of 330,000,000 people, the survival rate would calculate at 99.70%. How exactly are we
measuring the effectiveness of the vaccine; are we looking for a jump to 99.80%?
Like thumb_up Reply reply Share link Report
flag
W William Long SUBSCRIBER 28 minutes ago The whole point of vaccination is that is reduces
the death rate to essentially zero. If you, or a close relative, die from COVID, you don't give
a rip about the total population. Like thumb_up 1 Reply reply
Share link Report flag
J Jeffrey Mason SUBSCRIBER 25 minutes ago (Edited) I have the same chance of getting struck
by lightning and surviving as I do dying of COVID. Why should I live in fear if I have taken
care of my body and have a strong immune system?
CNN weirdo Brian Stelter announced with Glee Sunday that Dr Anthony Fauci is the subject of
a new children's book titled "Dr. Fauci: How A Boy From Brooklyn Became America's Doctor,"
prompting many to immediately label it a propaganda campaign.
... ... ...
Fauci, who has repeatedly
flip flopped and lied about the use of masks and admitted that
there is no science behind lockdowns, has been
ever present on CNN and every other pro-lockdown news bilge station for the past
year.
childhood and adolescent suicides are through the roof thanks to these "experts" and what
they have done to the planet
all covaids deaths, of course
cankles' server 2 hours ago
"The ignorance, prejudices, and groupthink of an educated elite are still ignorance,
prejudice, and groupthink -- and for those with one percent of the knowledge in a society to
be guiding or controlling those with the other 99 percent is as perilous as it is
absurd."
∼ Thomas Sowell in 'Intellectuals and Society'
Bartertown 2 hours ago
The **** who stole Christmas.............
0.1 2 hours ago
That's funny!
Sol Invictvs 2 hours ago
How a "doctor" from Brooklyn became the biggest grifter and certified con man of the 21st
century.
Plunge Protection 2 hours ago
He's a useless bureaucrat
eatapeach 59 minutes ago
He was educated by the US military, and he hasn't stopped doing their bidding. He's way up
the PsyOp pole...
Kanzen Saimin 2 hours ago
Drag queen story-time kids!
GotGalt 2 hours ago
LOL ... so true!
Onthebeach6 2 hours ago remove link
I must have stumbled into a parallel universe where doctors who help fund pandemics that
kill half a million Americans and enable a coup become role models pushed by a propaganda
spewing MSM.
I guess if he'd done something wrong he would have been treated like Dr Seuss.
0.1 2 hours ago
We live in Crazy Town! Dr. Seuss is banned, and Fauci the Fake is being published.
itstippy 1 hour ago
Fauci is "America's Doctor"? But I don't want him as my Doctor. I already have a Doctor. I
thought if I liked my Doctor I could keep my Doctor.
InnerCynic 2 hours ago
Fraudci: How A Brooklyn Born Bastard Scammed America
MrBoompi 2 hours ago
Hey kids let's all congratulate Dr. Fauci for being industrious enough to send his
gain-of-function virus research to a Wuhan, China biolab after he was shut down here in the
US!
Now he's locking us down and destroying our way of life!
What a role model!!
2willies 1 hour ago
Fauci is an obvious psychopath.
Dear Old Hedge 1 hour ago
Venal as they come, and shamelessly amoral.
Ghost of Porky 1 hour ago
Chapter 6: How I profited from the AIDS crisis
Chapter 7: How I profited from the EBOLA crisis
Chapter 8: How I profited from the SARS crisis
Chapter 9: How I profited from the COVID crisis
JamesJOMeara 2 hours ago
First Cuomo, now Fauci... also, every traitor who "leaves" DC writes a book of lies:
Mueller, Comey, Brennan... plus all those "statesmen" like both Clintons, now Obama... what
is it with Liberals and their stupid "books"? They can't read or write anything sensible,
they cancel anything worthwhile (even Dr Seuss!) but they love immortalize themselves with
******** "books" that they don't write and no one buys, and have other Liberals gush about
them on the TV. It truly is a cargo cult.
sparky139 PREMIUM 1 hour ago
They write books that nobody reads (or buys) so that their bribe money can be whitewashed
as advance money.
Will the book mention that Fauci was the one that sent millions of dollars to the virus
lab in Wuhan for research into transferring coronavirus from bats to other mammals....?
Jim in MN 1 hour ago
Late in the pandemic collapse, went for a long hike with my daughter yesterday in the
distant lake areas of a blue suburban county.
Comedic confusion reigned as masked and maskless families eyed one another suspiciously
and scattered across the lovely hill nearest the lake and park visitor center (CLOSED of
course).
People walking the paths nervously. I waved, smiled and said hi to every one of them. Only
a few said anything back, many looked down miserably.
I personally detest Fauci and everything he and his masters and Rod Rosenstein's sister
(CDC infectious disease director) have done to society.
My daughter laughs when asked about taking a shot. "Maybe in ten years" she says.
lynnybee 1 hour ago
Fauci is Jesuit. It's all on the net for those who are good at searching and digging for
the truth. Don't use google search. Use DuckDuckGo or Gibiru. I read a lot and don't like his
background.
He isn't trustworthy.
Er Wang Dong 1 hour ago
One year ago, the absolute last guy I would have guessed to have his very own cult of
personality would have been this little gerbil...
NIRP-BTFD 1 hour ago (Edited)
I don't think he has a following. its just the *** media pretending he is liked. Like they
said Cuomo the ape like crature is the most sexy man alive and gave him an emmy.
Er Wang Dong 1 hour ago
You're probably right, but it's still amazing.
But don't doubt that there are many true believers out there who hang on this clown's
every word.
Hey, somebody is watching CNN...
NotTiredOfWinning 1 hour ago
Like Rush said, "If the Media builds you up they can take you down", this guy is a total
fabrication.
Lore 1 hour ago
Disgusting, subhuman figurehead, the epidemiological equivalent of Al Gore. It would be a
better world if somebody invented a vaccine that would immunize society against their
pathological ilk. We should look forward to these scum facing meaningful justice, wiped off
the face of the earth, but I fear that it will only happen after the so-called "vaccines" and
related projects have claimed the lives of millions.
Colonel Klink 1 hour ago (Edited)
Propaganda, Fauxchi is responsible for a huge number of deaths too.
Proof is what he advocated for during SARS Covid 1 -vs- what he did for SARS2 Covid (the
China virus)
His stance on hydroxychloroquin, etc.
boattrash 1 hour ago
Destroy Dr Seuss and give Dr Fauci a platform?
I don't phukkin think so!
Odin McHaggis 1 hour ago
Fourth Reich
Mantis Toboggan - M.D. 1 hour ago
Ive been saying since 03/2020...the reason Fauci never says anything positive is because
he LOVES the attention. He loves being on media every other day interviewing about "science".
Now he is a character in a children's book...he absolutely loves this. He will never want
lockdowns to end and never want less than two masks..the longer this is a crisis the longer
he is a hero.
Robert De Zero 59 minutes ago remove link
He looks nothing like the caricature. He's ugly inside and out. The POS got everything
wrong. He's a loser NWO puppet, not a role model.
Huxley's Ghost 1 hour ago remove link
M ost of us are descended from immigrants so why does that matter? That lame as s starter
still plays?
Will American sheeple ever be allowed to question the Trump Administration many failures
in fighting the pandemic - starting with Trump's bogus air travel ban and his lying about the
severity of the virus? Not likely. New York State Governor Cuomo is now being hounded out of
office with flimsy sex allegations to (IMO) prevent a review of the policy of sending people
home to "self-isolate". "Self-isolate" and the "bend the curve" goal (instead of defeat the
virus) virtually guaranteed that the pandemic would continue to spread.
The attack on Cuomo seems organized.
I don't care for the guy, seemed a political hack, but I also suspect there is a need to
eliminate effective leadership to clear the way for globalist domination - as we do to other
nations.
I believe success of AOC, De Blasio and Biden are symptom of same.
Idiot king > French Revolution > Napoleon.
Yes, clearly organized. No sympathy for him from here (sunny upstate NY).
As the second-generation son of a governor, and head of a mighty, and thoroughly
corrupt political machine, for years the state budget process was three guys alone in a
conference room. The obvious result was billions of state $ funneled to pet projects led by
cronies. He had no shortage of enemies, I'm sure.
Covering up the alarming rate of nursing home Covid fatalities was the straw that broke
the camel's back, but I suppose even that was too unsightly for the media. So instead they
suddenly discover that for years he's been a d-bag in his relations to younger women he comes
across. While that may well be true and is reason enough for him to be gone, what it really
means is they don't have the guts to air the actual issues.
I'm also a New Yorker - "Downstate". And I too have no sympathy for corrupt NY
politicians.
But I think it's very important to ask WHY he is being 'cancelled'.
Political parties usually look after their 'stars' in higher office. Cuomo is being thrown
under the bus. And it isn't because his aids fudged the numbers of dead. I see THAT as merely
the start of the effort to remove him.
So why the concerted effort to forcibly remove him? The policy that killed people in the
nursing homes was essentially nation-wide. I don't know of any effort to quarantine people in
USA. To fight the nursing-home scandal, Cuomo would point to guidance from the Federal
government (CDC, NIH, Homeland Security, and others in the Trump Administration).
Yes, it did occur to me that it might be someone wants Cuomo out of the way. It's a very
popular method, and used selectively. Nevertheless, you have to wish them Godspeed with their
"plot" against him. Perhaps one of Trump's offspring wants to run. I hear Chelsea is thinking
about it too.
There are always reasons to be against any established public official.
Probably The Cuomo regime more than most.
But still, I would be very cautious about the motivations behind it.
There is I believe a trend of removing effective, powerful leaders to be replaced by others
groomed to be compliant to other interests.
I would think that it would be reasonable to investigate who and why is behind what seems a
transparent, organized take-down. I have heard it claimed that Cuomo was becoming too
powerful in the demo party. Dirty politics is destructive and harms us all.
It would be past time for Cuomo to go, but I hate to see him replaced by someone representing
interests more corrupt.
The attack on Cuomo seems organized.
I don't care for the guy, seemed a political hack, but I also suspect there is a need to
eliminate effective leadership ...
Posted by: jared | Mar 15 2021 14:56 utc | 11
-----
Effective leadership? Are you writing about THAT Cuomo?
It seems to be organized in the following manner: let us drown credible accusation of
killing 15,000 people in nursing homes and trying to cover it up by falsifying records -- in
an endless stream of trivial 'metoo' bullshit. If I was a conspiracy theorist, I would've
concluded that Andrew Cuomo paid those accusers to make accusations and thus change the
subject.
Jrabbit @ 56 asked; "Ask yourself: Is pussy-grabber Trump a liar or a sex fiend?"
Actually, both, but then, most men, IMO, have a problem with the latter. Nature it seems,
has endowed us with the stronger urge to "repopulate the species", and when joined with an
over abundance of $, some think it's a license to act out our sexual fantasies. It isn't, but
Epstein made it a business model. Entitlement is entitlement, no matter how it manifests, and
rich and powerful men suffer from it often.
DJT and Cuomo are our latest examples. Rich, powerful, scum-bags.....
The one-time hero of the pandemic, Tony Fauci, is losing the trust of mainstream America
after flip flopping on critical #Covid19 information one too many times. His latest admission
is the final straw for many public figures, including avid pro-vaxxers.
heard fauci has a monetary connection to either pfizer or moderna. Maybe that placebo he
took will show symptoms on his opposite arm, lol. what a joke.... on us. Maybe he will mutate
into Dr Cornelius from planet of the Apes.
Or maybe he already is? Throw him a banana.
Yes Fauchi has massive conflict of interest due to patents held on the covid 19 virus and
"vaccines" (they are not vaccines, they are gene modifying devices, NEVER before been done!)
Fauchi violated federal law and engaged in gain of function studies on HIV, etc. Check out
Judy Mikovits' eye witness testimony against this murderous ghoul. These gene modifying
devices have HIV in them too. They are kill shots on so many levels. NO human should ever
take them!!
And now for the chaser; The CDC just admitted in its own report that asymptomatic and
pre-symptomatic transmission within households - a key justification for lockdowns - turns out
to be virtually nonexistent. Household transmission is the primary mode of infection for
COVID-19.
Yah. But there are still guys out there yammering about "superspreader" events and blaming
everything on the Sturgis bike rally last August.
LONDON (Reuters) - Microsoft co-founder turned philanthropist Bill Gates says he has been taken aback by the volume of
"crazy" and "evil" conspiracy theories about him spreading on social media during the COVID-19 pandemic, but said on
Wednesday he would like to explore what is behind them.
Slideshow
(
2 images )
In an interview with Reuters, Gates said the millions of online posts and "crazy conspiracy theories" about him and
about top U.S. infectious disease expert Anthony Fauci had likely taken hold in part because of the combination of a
frightening viral pandemic and the rise of social media.
"Nobody would have predicted that I and Dr. Fauci would be so prominent in these really evil theories," Gates said.
"I'm very surprised by that. I hope it goes away."
Gates, a billionaire who stepped down as chairman of Microsoft Corp in 2014, has through his philanthropic Bill and
Melinda Gates Foundation committed at least $1.75 billion to the global response to the COVID-19 pandemic. That includes
support for some makers of vaccines, diagnostics and potential treatments.
Since the pandemic began a year ago, millions of conspiracies have spread over the Internet, fuelling misinformation
about the coronavirus, its origins and the motives of those working to fight it.
They include claims that Fauci and Gates created the pandemic to try and control people, that they want to profit from
the virus' spread, and that they want to use vaccines to insert trackable microchips into people.
"But do people really believe that stuff?," Gates asked.
"We're really going to have to get educated about this over the next year and understand .. how does it change peoples'
behaviour and how should we have minimized this?"
Gates praised Fauci and Francis Collins, head of the U.S. National Institutes of Health, as "smart" and "wonderful
people", and said he looked forward to seeing them able to work effectively and speak the truth under the new
administration of President Joe Biden.
During former President Donald Trump's handling of the pandemic, Gates said, it had "sometimes felt like they were the
only sane people in the U.S. government."
"I'm excited about the team that Biden has picked" to tackle the health crisis, Gates said.
Gates said he was also pleased that under Biden, the United States has rejoined the World Health Organization, and "that
he's appointed smart people, and the fact that Dr. Fauci won't be suppressed."
Suddenly Optimistic Fauci Sees Pandemic "Plateauing," Feels "Liberated" Under Biden
Admin BY TYLER DURDEN THURSDAY, JAN 21, 2021 - 16:57
Summary:
Washington DC revives indoor dining after inauguration
French Prez warns permanent immunity should not be assumed
Biden says US cases plateauing, as Biden Admin "liberates"
EU leaders call for more lockdowns, curfews
Even Dr. Fauci has agreed that it appears US cases are "plateauing"
UK blocking entry fri ifal ris
Goldman data shows COVID hospitalizations may be trending lower
US cases, hospitalizations decline; deaths at highs
Hungary first in EU to approve Russian vaccine
UAE also approves Russian vax
Dr. Fauci confirms US commitment to Gates-backed vaccine program
Ireland latest in Europe to extend lockdown
Saudi Arabia, UAE complain of vaccine supply delays
UK suffers deadliest day yet
* * *
Update (1415ET): We've seen a flurry of new coronavirus news reported published early this
afternoon, beginning with a slight ray of hope for Washington DC residents after a difficult
week. On Friday, the inauguration-related "pause" on dining in public will be lifted, allowing
Americans to eat indoors, so long as the capacity is 25% of total.
Elsewhere, vaccine skepticism is once again the name of the game in France on Thursday,
where President Emmanuel Macron warned French politicians and the French people not to assume
that the virus will simply disappear once vaccinations are complete.
In other news, a reporter grilling Joe Biden about the US's weak vaccination targets
elicited a frustrated response from Biden, who raged "Give me a Break!" at the reporter in
question. Here's how that went down.
REPORTER: "You set the goal at 100 million vaccines, is that high enough? Should you set the
bar higher? That's basically where the US is right now." BIDEN: "When I announced it, you all
said that it's not possible. Come on. Give me a break, man".
As if the press hasn't already fawned over Biden enough...but we digress. In other news,
Biden insisted that wearing masks until April may help save 50K lives, another number
apparently pulled out of a hat.
Finally, Dr. Fauci said Thursday that it looks like new cases in the USA might actually be
plateauing, despite the holiday surge we were promised by him a few months ago. But where is
this more optimistic frame of mind based on? Well, the diminutive doctor admitted that he feels
"liberated" by Biden.
Finally, in Europe, where travel bans, curfews and lockdown extensions continue (even as
Bavaria bucks the trend in Europe) the UK is now banning arrivals from Tanzania and the
Democratic Republic of Congo. Across the continent, EU leaders are agreeing that lockdown
measures need to be strengthened, despite the growing body of evidence that they do little to
stop the spread of the virus, according to
a massive peer-reviewed study that hit recently.
They're even agreeing that across the Continent, all leisure and business travel must be
curbed, at least for now. In the Netherlands, PM Mark Rutte has unsurprisingly managed to
convince residents that a travel ban is ready,
And so much for all the mutant strains that policy makers have used to justify new lockdowns
in the US, because Bloomberg's data shows cases are now falling in the vast majority of the US.
In 42 US states, the seven-day case average has fallen more than 10% from a week earlier, while
the other four had more modest drops, according to Covid Tracking Project data. Overall, the US
seven-day average is down 20% from a week ago, to 192,825, because the drop is much greater in
some states, down 39% in Missouri, for instance.
* * *
Yesterday was a mixed bag for the US on the COVID front: After the US topped 400K COVID
deaths earlier this year, the US saw a new daily record number of deaths to coincide with
Biden's inauguration. Meanwhile, the WHO finally acknowledged that
the "conspiracy theorists" were right about the COVID "case-demic", and that Ct
overmagnification during PCR testing might be producing many false positives.
On Monday, it appears more evidence is beginning to emerge that COVID hospitalizations in
the US are seeing a trajectory-shift which should feed through to lower mortality numbers in
the weeks ahead, according to models produced by analysts at Goldman Sachs.
An analysis of how vaccinations are impacting hospitalizations shows that there is a
correlation between growing vaccination numbers, and lower hospitalizations.
Before introducing a second chart, the Goldman team writes that it "analyzed
hospitalizations for the 25 largest states (by population) representing 88% of all US
hospitalizations. We find there has been a 55% correlation between the vaccinations as of the
beginning of the year and the YTD decline in hospitalizations. This further supports the
connection between recent vaccinations and the decline in hospitalizations."
As the COVID Tracking Project data show, daily cases have continued to move lower in all
four regions of the country, while nationally hospitalizations have started to dip (a trend
that, as Goldman's charts suggest, may be extended).
It's just the latest sign that Wall Street truly believes that we have reached "the
beginning of the end" of COVID ...whether that actually turns out to be accurate, however,
is another story.
Meanwhile, after Biden officially ordered the US to halt its departure from the WHO
yesterday and rejoin its Covax vaccine-sharing program spearheaded by Bill Gates, Dr. Anthony
Fauci appeared at an early morning meeting Thursday where he reaffirmed America's commitment to
the WHO.
Dr. Fauci, who will now lead the US delegation, said "I am honored to announce that the
United States will remain a member of the World Health Organization." His words marked the
first public statement by a member of Biden's administration to an international audience - and
a sign of the priority that the new president has made of fighting COVID-19 both at home and
with world partners.
Meanwhile, over in the EU, Viktor Orban's Hungary has become the first EU country to grant
approval to "Sputnik V", the COVID vaccine developed by the Gameleya Institute and Russia's
Sovereign Wealth Fund. Orban's regime coupled the approval with a complaint that it has been
unable to procure enough (western-made) vaccines from Brussels, and so has been forced to look
elsewhere. The UAE also approved the vaccine for emergency use on Thursday.
Here's some more COVID news from overnight and Thursday morning:
Thailand approved AstraZeneca's COVID vaccine for emergency use, making way for the country
to begin inoculating its 67MM people as it endures an increase in coronavirus cases (Source:
Bloomberg).
Saudi Arabia and Kuwait said they would reschedule vaccine appointments because of supply
delays from Pfizer. Lebanon extended its nationwide lockdown, which began last week, for
another two weeks (Source: Bloomberg).
Ireland has become the latest European country to extend its lockdown, which will continue
"well into February" before the rules are "reviewed", Prime Minister Micheal Martin said
(Source: Bloomberg).
* * *
Finally, in the UK, the mutant COVID strain appears to be causing major strife as early
evidence shows the strict lockdowns - England's third, which citizens are starting to rebel
against - haven't had much near-term impact on reducing case numbers. The UK suffered its
deadliest day yet, with 1.8K deaths recorded in 24 hours, as Boris Johnson's chief scientific
adviser warned some hospitals now look "like a war zone."
Moreover
8 hours ago (Edited)
I'm sure the timing of this announcement, along with the WHO test story (posted above) and
Xiden's installation, is just a coincidence . play_arrow 49 play_arrow 1
SERReal1 8 hours ago
Nothing to see here, move along.
Bill of Rights 8 hours ago
These people have been LYING to your faces since DAY 1..
pro·le·tar·i·at 46 minutes ago
15 days to flatten the curve bro
adr 8 hours ago remove link
You only have a .3% chance of coming into contact with someone who has tested positive
within the last month.
You have around a .01% chance of coming into contact with someone who is currently
symptomatic.
4.5 million people were seriously injured last year in automobile accidents with many
leading to permanent disability.
You have a greater chance of being hospitalized from an automobile accident than coming
into contact with someone who has tested positive for Covid and could maybe be
contagious.
If you are under 60, you have a far greater chance of being killed in an auto accident
than being hospitalized for Covid. Even higher than coming into contact with someone who
tested positive and is symptomatic.
We are forced to wear masks for odds that are infinitesimal.
freedommusic 8 hours ago (Edited) remove link
It's funny, for a long time I've been hearing about all these empty hospitals and then
there are a few that are reported as overwhelmed. I was wondering what could account for this
discrepancy? I just heard yesterday directly from someone who was there, that these hospitals
are overrun with homeless and illegals claiming they are sick looking for a free meal and a
bed. Very clever, they use the homeless to steal votes from and to fill up the hospitals.
Makes perfect sense now why they have shut down all
charities attempting to feed the homeless . They are competing with the hospitals where
they need those bodies so the media can film them for their propaganda to perpetuate this
pandemic myth.
What a friggin sinister operation...
TRM 7 hours ago
Robert Kennedy Jr has been doing a lot of work with his "Children's Health Defence
Organisation".
Why is the USA counting deaths of people WITH covid-19 as deaths FROM it? Gunshots, auto
accidents are being counted as covid-19 deaths if they test positive.
- Conclusion: If it was as bad as the government says they would NOT have to inflate the
numbers.
"This week the CDC quietly updated the Covid number to admit that only 6% of all the
153,504 deaths recorded actually died from Covid-19. That's 9,210 deaths.
The other 94% had 2-3 other serious illnesses & the overwhelming majority were of very
advanced age; 90% in nursing homes. "
The Last but not LeastTechnology is dominated by
two types of people: those who understand what they do not manage and those who manage what they do not understand ~Archibald Putt.
Ph.D
FAIR USE NOTICEThis site contains
copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically
authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available
to advance understanding of computer science, IT technology, economic, scientific, and social
issues. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such
copyrighted material as provided by section 107 of the US Copyright Law according to which
such material can be distributed without profit exclusively for research and educational purposes.
This is a Spartan WHYFF (We Help You For Free)
site written by people for whom English is not a native language. Grammar and spelling errors should
be expected. The site contain some broken links as it develops like a living tree...
You can use PayPal to to buy a cup of coffee for authors
of this site
Disclaimer:
The statements, views and opinions presented on this web page are those of the author (or
referenced source) and are
not endorsed by, nor do they necessarily reflect, the opinions of the Softpanorama society.We do not warrant the correctness
of the information provided or its fitness for any purpose. The site uses AdSense so you need to be aware of Google privacy policy. You you do not want to be
tracked by Google please disable Javascript for this site. This site is perfectly usable without
Javascript.
