Solaris vs. Linux: Framework for the Comparison

by Dr Nikolai Bezroukov

3. Four major areas of linux and Solaris deployment

Generally we need to distinguish between several major areas of linux and Solaris applicability:

1. Development workstation. Here linux dominates (due to absence of virtualization capabilities it is often used under VMware and now with newer CPUs under Xen3) because this is its area of specialization. Solaris for Intel can be used but this is an uphill battle that it lost. The ability to run Windows is an essential requirement for most development workstations and with the current dual quad-core CPUs there is no reason not to run two OSes on the same desktop or even laptop (which due to Windows 7  requirements is now often configured with 6GB of memory). That's were VMware was extremely successful and it is actually sad that Sun brass failed to buy the company and it was snapped by EMS, the company with which it have less synergy. Workstations are the area were virtualization is becoming standard tool of the trade in a large enterprise environment. We will discuss it in more details below.
    
2. Low end servers: We will define this category as single socket servers (or dual socket servers configured with one CPU) with the cost less then $5K (servers with the cost less then $5K often are considered to expense in large enterprise environment, so the price of $5K+ is the minimum under which you can capitalize and depreciate them). Modern Intel server can carry tremendous amount of memory at this price, say, up to 48GB of RAM. Linux is now the king of the hill of low end servers  as this is its main base. After its acquisition by Oracle Sun stopped competing in this area.   One significant drawback of Solaris in this area is a very weak integration with Microsoft server infrastructure.  Novell Suse beats Solaris in this area and that fact along might spell troubles for the future of Solaris on low end despite its real or imaginable advantages.  This segment also includes blades althouth they can now come closer to midrange server with two sockets and large RAM capacity.
    
3. Midrange servers  We will define those as 2 and 4  socket servers, which means up to 40 cores) and total cost less then $50K. Sparc used to have traditionally strong presence in this segment and was the development platform for 64-bit Oracle (home field advantage), but with the release of the newest line of Intel CPUs it faded. Price/performance wise Linux on Intel beats Solaris 10 on UltraSparc by a considerable margin (often two UltraSparc servers can be replaced by one similarly configured Intel server).  The fact that Oracle now promotes its own Linux distribution also tip the scales in favor on linux.  Still Solaris is definitely more stable on high loads and works better then Linux with larger memories (starting probably with 64G of RAM) and with large number of  cores (over 8).  Price/performance Solaris X86 is competitive with linux and might even be superior in such metric an stability under high load.
    
4. High end servers (more then four sockets with the cost starting from over $50K). This sector is traditionally called "mainframes" although in a narrow meaning mainframes are descendants of famous IBM/360 series that for twenty years (1960x-1980x) dominated the computer landscape. As of 2011 Linux started really fast penetration into this area, althouth this area is dominated by WMware and tranditional Unixes. Such servers as HP DL80 G7 (which costs approximatly $70K with 8 CPU and  256GB of RAM) start affecting Solaris, AOX and HP high end market. The Linux kernel is much less tested with those configurations and as such there are still dounts beside proce/performce issues, but process started and Linux is growing in this segment too. Still major vendors like IBM and HP promote thier own lines for this segment.    Solaris  under Oracle management also is a major player in this segment. But no longer it the king of the hill in this deployment area. 

There is also new fashionable area called  virtualization that falls in between those classes. It is essentially and attempt to imitate functionality of multiple low end servers on a mid-range or high-end server.  It is connected with the trend to consolidation of  servers with extremely low load (circulating air in large corporation IT jargon) that is in a dialectical way signifies the return of good old mainframes on a new level. Actually IBM mainframes survived all adversities and now, more then 40 years after their launch, can proudly host Linux servers. This shrewd IBM move helped to save classic VM/CMS operating system which naturally became VM/Linux.

Currently AIX and VMware are the most popular choice for virtualization based server consolidation but recently Xen made inroads into VMware turf (although the development was financed by Microsoft, it is now supported by IBM).

 Generally comparing servers the following two factors should be considered for all classes of servers:

• Home field advantage
• General conservatism of the large enterprise environment

Home field advantage

Modern applications are extremely complex with huge code bases.  In a sense they are modern engineering marvels. Most of them including Oracle, Java, Apache are quite old. That means that other things equal the key to right selection of the platform is the selection of hardware platform and OS that is used for development of a particular application. If application is developed on a particular platforms and OS then this OS has an important advantage that we will call "home field advantage". 

No matter whether you like of hate Java or like or hate Solaris for Java applications Solaris should be considered the No.1 platform as the quality of implementation of Java on Solaris is the highest due to the fact that it is the development platform for Sun Java developers.  For Java applications T1/T2 based servers provide an unmatched performance beating much more expensive systems including IBM P5 550 4 core 2GHz Power 5+ in SPECjjb2005 benchmark.  It has interesting implications that were first noticed by Paul Murphy in his paper "The megahertz myth and the UltraSPARC T1"[Merphy2006]: 

There are some interesting implications here. One of the most subtle, and most important, relates to the competitive advantage the Java Virtual Machine offers Sun in appealing to developers - because, by using its own JVM and Java server software on their test machine Sun demonstrated that the JVM could be used as an easily accessible intermediate technology to let developers take advantage of CMT hardware without doing much additional coding.

For the same reason for most open source application linux is the preferable platform as it serves as a development platform.

Another relatively important factor is the level of interest of the vendor in open source applications. Actually open source applications are extremely important for Sun as the best of their low end CPUs (T1 chips) are multicore and usage of open source application allow completely bypass the issue of paying for multiple cores. This is not true for many commercial applications. As such chips are becoming more and more mainstream they might help to drive the level of support of open source applications and scripting languages in Sun.  Sun now support more then a dozen open source applications installed by default ( "out-of-the box" ) on Solaris with the most recent addition of Postgress [Sun2006a]:

Fully integrated into Solaris 10 with flexible support offerings from Sun, Postgress on Solaris 10 is the open source enterprise database platform of choice. 

For all "tier-1" open source applications the level of  support is equal to the level of support its Sun's own software. And that is a very positive development.

General conservatism of the large enterprise environment

The fact that it in large enterprise environment linux is used only for rather narrow set of roles with web server farms as the most prominent. Beyond this role it its growth is very slow. In many cases RISC-based servers (not necessary Sun) are so entrenched that to replace them with Linux of Intel (or Solaris on Opteron) is very costly and can be done only during big corporate earthquakes like mergers and acquisitions.

I would like to stress it again  that in large enterprise environment low end UltraSparc based servers with Solaris are competitive both with linux servers and Solaris on Opteron for several reasons unrelated to CPU, relative quality of those two OSes, or even transactional benchmarks. The main reason for such situation is that proliferation of Unix flavors negatively affects large enterprise environment. And usually linux increases the diversity of enterprise environment not by one unit but by two as very seldom old flavors of Unix are completely displaced and there is a real  danger that both Suse and Red Hat will become eventually deployed. 

All naive or crooked stories about how corporation ABS saved a couple of million dollars by deploying linux are what it is: naive or crooked. In reality introduction of linux is often dictated by fashion and/or by the inability of higher management to distinguish between real cost cutting measures and fake one: the cost of adding another flavor of Unix in a large enterprise mix easily nullifies any savings in hardware unless one or two existing Unix flavors (for example HP-UX and AIX or HP-UX and Solaris) are completely eliminated from the mix.  In this particular area large enterprise environment is quite different from Internet startups; unlike startups large enterprises has history of Unix deployments and significant (and often expensive) installed base of classic enterprise flavors of Unix (AIX, HP-UX and Solaris; often all three of those).

As I noted before this problem in less severe form exists for Solaris too: Solaris SPARC and Solaris on Opteron is still two different OSes (not then much as Red Hat and Suse, but still there are differences because hardware platform are so different). For example Open PROM is not available on Opteron. So objectively there is a cost of introduction additional flavor of Solaris on Opteron into Unix ecosystem too. It is just less then in case of linux.  In fact my impression is that the more administrator is qualified in Solaris on UltraSparc the more painful are those small differences that exist between Solaris on UltraSparc and Solaris on Opteron.

That means that large corporate environment generally favors Solaris on SPARC to Solaris on Opteron and paradoxically many Sun Opteron server are used with either Windows or linux as both those OSes have a tattoo on their foreheads: "made for X86 platform". 

Of course this is a conservative position and it does not take into account price/performance differences between UltraSparc and Opteron that is another driver of change.  But if  integer or floating point performance is not crucial for a particular application (which is true for all I/O bound applications) and benchmarks are close there is very little reason to jump the UltraSparc boat: there is nothing in Intel X86 architecture that is intrinsically attractive other then the combination of low cost and high performance bought by hundred of billions spend by AMD and Intel on keeping alive the technology which belongs to late 70th of the last century. I hope that in 2007 Sun eventually will add  new  CPUs to its lineup as a result of its join product development agreement with Fujitsu.  With the Fujitsu PrimePower UltraSparc systems outperforming Sun's SunFire systems (PRIMEPOWER450 (1870MHz)  has SPECint2000=1344) and matching Opteron systems this merger of technologies sounds very reasonable and timely.

Etc

Society

Groupthink : Two Party System as Polyarchy : Corruption of Regulators : Bureaucracies : Understanding Micromanagers and Control Freaks : Toxic Managers :   Harvard Mafia : Diplomatic Communication : Surviving a Bad Performance Review : Insufficient Retirement Funds as Immanent Problem of Neoliberal Regime : PseudoScience : Who Rules America : Neoliberalism  : The Iron Law of Oligarchy : Libertarian Philosophy

Quotes

War and Peace : Skeptical Finance : John Kenneth Galbraith :Talleyrand : Oscar Wilde : Otto Von Bismarck : Keynes : George Carlin : Skeptics : Propaganda  : SE quotes : Language Design and Programming Quotes : Random IT-related quotes :  Somerset Maugham : Marcus Aurelius : Kurt Vonnegut : Eric Hoffer : Winston Churchill : Napoleon Bonaparte : Ambrose Bierce :  Bernard Shaw : Mark Twain Quotes

Bulletin:

Vol 25, No.12 (December, 2013) Rational Fools vs. Efficient Crooks The efficient markets hypothesis : Political Skeptic Bulletin, 2013 : Unemployment Bulletin, 2010 :  Vol 23, No.10 (October, 2011) An observation about corporate security departments : Slightly Skeptical Euromaydan Chronicles, June 2014 : Greenspan legacy bulletin, 2008 : Vol 25, No.10 (October, 2013) Cryptolocker Trojan (Win32/Crilock.A) : Vol 25, No.08 (August, 2013) Cloud providers as intelligence collection hubs : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2010 : Inequality Bulletin, 2009 : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2008 : Copyleft Problems Bulletin, 2004 : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2011 : Energy Bulletin, 2010 : Malware Protection Bulletin, 2010 : Vol 26, No.1 (January, 2013) Object-Oriented Cult : Political Skeptic Bulletin, 2011 : Vol 23, No.11 (November, 2011) Softpanorama classification of sysadmin horror stories : Vol 25, No.05 (May, 2013) Corporate bullshit as a communication method  : Vol 25, No.06 (June, 2013) A Note on the Relationship of Brooks Law and Conway Law

History:

Fifty glorious years (1950-2000): the triumph of the US computer engineering : Donald Knuth : TAoCP and its Influence of Computer Science : Richard Stallman : Linus Torvalds  : Larry Wall  : John K. Ousterhout : CTSS : Multix OS Unix History : Unix shell history : VI editor : History of pipes concept : Solaris : MS DOS :  Programming Languages History : PL/1 : Simula 67 : C : History of GCC development :  Scripting Languages : Perl history   : OS History : Mail : DNS : SSH : CPU Instruction Sets : SPARC systems 1987-2006 : Norton Commander : Norton Utilities : Norton Ghost : Frontpage history : Malware Defense History : GNU Screen : OSS early history

Classic books:

The Peter Principle : Parkinson Law : 1984 : The Mythical Man-Month :  How to Solve It by George Polya : The Art of Computer Programming : The Elements of Programming Style : The Unix Hater’s Handbook : The Jargon file : The True Believer : Programming Pearls : The Good Soldier Svejk : The Power Elite

Most popular humor pages:

Manifest of the Softpanorama IT Slacker Society : Ten Commandments of the IT Slackers Society : Computer Humor Collection : BSD Logo Story : The Cuckoo's Egg : IT Slang : C++ Humor : ARE YOU A BBS ADDICT? : The Perl Purity Test : Object oriented programmers of all nations : Financial Humor : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2008 : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2010 : The Most Comprehensive Collection of Editor-related Humor : Programming Language Humor : Goldman Sachs related humor : Greenspan humor : C Humor : Scripting Humor : Real Programmers Humor : Web Humor : GPL-related Humor : OFM Humor : Politically Incorrect Humor : IDS Humor : "Linux Sucks" Humor : Russian Musical Humor : Best Russian Programmer Humor : Microsoft plans to buy Catholic Church : Richard Stallman Related Humor : Admin Humor : Perl-related Humor : Linus Torvalds Related humor : PseudoScience Related Humor : Networking Humor : Shell Humor : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2011 : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2012 : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2013 : Java Humor : Software Engineering Humor : Sun Solaris Related Humor : Education Humor : IBM Humor : Assembler-related Humor : VIM Humor : Computer Viruses Humor : Bright tomorrow is rescheduled to a day after tomorrow : Classic Computer Humor

The Last but not Least Technology is dominated by two types of people: those who understand what they do not manage and those who manage what they do not understand ~Archibald Putt. Ph.D

The statements, views and opinions presented on this web page are those of the author (or referenced source) and are not endorsed by, nor do they necessarily reflect, the opinions of the Softpanorama society. We do not warrant the correctness of the information provided or its fitness for any purpose. The site uses AdSense so you need to be aware of Google privacy policy. You you do not want to be tracked by Google please disable Javascript for this site. This site is perfectly usable without Javascript.

Created Jan 2, 2005.  Last modified: March 12, 2019