|Home||Switchboard||Unix Administration||Red Hat||TCP/IP Networks||Neoliberalism||Toxic Managers|
May the source be with you, but remember the KISS principle ;-)
Bigger doesn't imply better. Bigger often is a sign of obesity, of lost control, of overcomplexity, of cancerous cells
|News||Sociology of organizations||Corporatism||Best books about bureaucracy||Recommended Links||Bureaucracy as a Political Coalition||The Deep State|
|Big Fukushima Debate||Bureaucratic alienation||Bureaucratic ritualism||Military Bureaucracy||Bureaucratic inertia||Bureaucratic avoidance of responsibility||The Lifecycle of Bureaucracy|
|The Fiefdom Syndrome||Audacious Oligarchy and "Democracy for Winners"||The Iron Law of Oligarchy||The Pareto Law||The Peter Principle||Parkinson Law||Military Incompetence|
|Groupthink||Lysenkoism||Mayberry Machiavellians||Obama Bait and Switch||The authoritarian personality|
|Does the Government Bureaucracy Stifle Innovation?||Bosos or Empty Suits (Aggressive Incompetent Managers)||Office Stockholm Syndrom||Two Party System as Polyarchy||Pluralism as a myth||Myth about intelligent voter||Double High Authoritarians|
|Principal-agent problem||Elite Theory||The psychopath in the corner office||Analogy between corporate and psychopathic behavior||Meetings mania||Humor||Etc|
Yesterday I discussed the doubling, tripling and quadrupling of the "big ticket" household expenses: property taxes, public college tuition and healthcare costs. ( Inflation Is Rampant in Tuition, Healthcare and Property Taxes).
Correspondent Andrew T. asked:
Why are those things going up so drastically in cost? Cui bono? (To whose benefit?)
The common thread I could immediately see after the first few sentences was the public sector employees and their unions who inhabit those entities.
Andrew writes from Canada, where healthcare is overtly a public/Central State service. But in the U.S., if you tote up Medicare and Medicaid, the Veterans Administration healthcare system (over $1 trillion per year for the three agencies) and all 2,300 pages of regulations on the so-called "private" healthcare system (profits are privatized, costs are socialized), then what you have is a defacto government-controlled healthcare system with all the fraud, fiefdoms, waste, duplication, and resistance to efficiency of a government bureaucracy.
Before we get to the lifecycle of bureaucracy, I want to be clear this is not a slam on people who dutifully work in bureaucracies. Bureaucracies arise to serve a social or political need (or perceived need) in an organized fashion, and systems of management, accounting, oversight and so on are required.
But just as bureaucracies arise, they also ossify, devote their energy to self-preservation and then implode.
We can see how this works in this chart of the University of California system's count of faculty and administrators. I suspect this phenomenon is universal in state-funded universities: bureaucratic staff that have nothing to do with the classroom, research or teaching grow to dominate the payroll and the budget.
Much of this is human nature: if the budget can be expanded to serve my department or agency, then it will be expanded. There are other organizational tropisms as well: ENA, for example: "everyone needs an assistant," including the current assistant.
When an economy is growing rapidly, then the waste, fraud, duplication, inefficiency and bloat go unnoticed because tax revenues and the budget are rising even faster than the bloat and inefficiency. The problem arises when tax revenues fall. Then the bureaucratic impulse to never-ending growth is stymied, and the various bureaucracies turn inward as they muster their forces to wage internecine warfare with other protected fiefdoms.
(That's straight from the Survival+ critique.)
Self-preservation become the paramount concern, and the original purpose of the bureaucracy is buried beneath the urgent priority of saving perquisites, benefits, staffing, and budgets.
When cuts are required, the actual service provided is slashed to maintain bureaucratic bloat. Thus the Administration of a university suffers simulacrum cuts (a "hiring freeze," etc.) while the teaching and graduate-student teaching assistant staff levels are slashed and burned.
"Tip of the spear" military forces and readiness are left twisting in the wind while the thousands of senior officers in the Pentagon and Services jostle for promotions. At the point of implosion, there are more captains, colonels and generals than actual war-fighters. (There are plenty of barbers, cooks, waiters and assistants, though, to serve the senior officers.)
Benefits for the survivors are left basically untouched while new hires are fired to preserve the budget for those with seniority.
At some point, the mission of the bureaucracy is completely lost, and the citizens' patience with institutional incompetence and self-aggrandizement finally runs out. Although it seems "impossible" in an era where the Federal Reserve just conjures up $1 trillion and the Federal governments sells $1.3 trillion in bonds every year to fund its ballooning deficit, bureaucracies can and will implode.
On a small scale, we are seeing this process in action as small-town police forces are disbanded. This process will eventually be seen in smaller cities merging with adjacent cities to cut costs.
I have prepared this visual representation of the bureaucratic lifecycle:
More dreaming. Bureaucracy doesn't implode, it goes down swinging. Envision the StaPuff Marshmellow man in ghostbusters. We're all gonna get messed up.Herd Redirectio...
Speaking of bureaucracy...
Policemen and firemen here in Southern California are still some of the highest paid in the nation.
Result? They are still the first ones on the block to get the brand new Ford F-350 crew cab on the block, and the first to get the $180,000 RV or the $80,000 wakeboard boat each year.
Total gravy train, with no end in sight.Dr. No
Sh*t, they should live it up. Their future employment prospects include: Security guard. Gang member. Hit man. Hired Muscle. Mad Max California, coming your way in the next 3 to 4 years.
Firemen will be private businesses, who set your house on fire, then demand extortion payments to put it out. Whoops, hope I didn't give any firefighters ideas!
PsychoNews: Exposing the Oligarchy, one Psycho at a time.Herd Redirectio...
Gangs of New York. History repeats.1100-TACTICAL-12
I just hope the public realizes which idiots were most responsible, when things do come crashing down. The public have a tremendous propensity to believe what they want to believe, and as a result easily have their anger directed towards scapegoats (China will be the scapegoat, not the CEOs who de-industrialized America, or the bankers, who devalued the currency)
The 'Public sector' is going to look very different in 20 years, IMO.
PsychoNews: Exposing the Oligarchy, one Psycho at a time.max2205
They will also be some of the first to go down, In my experience they aren't to bright & all they have, has a note attached, My father in law is a retired FF has has not one GLD/SLV coin to his name.Rainman
Smiths sell call blown up this week.... Govt has always been this way and as termites on the country will bloat till there's no wood left. They will make sure there is always enough wood. I give up on the idea it can be fixedChanceIs
....seems like we gots protected and served real good. Good thing Jerry's coming back to straighten this mess out.....snarkTheMonetaryRed
There was a rather inconsequential fire in the "hood" (Silver Spring, MD) about a year back - kitchen curtains caught on fire above the toaster. I believe I counted eight emergency vehicles - 2 medical rescue; four regular fire engines, AND 2 HOOK AND LADDER TRUCKS. You know...hook and ladders are used for those 30 story condo buildings. The house in question however was a single floor rancher. I figured that the foot print of the emergency vehicles was three times that of the house. We could throw in three police cars to boot.
Cutback in services in Montgomery County Maryland!?!?! The only people who would feel the pinch would be the firmen and police - so long as they didn't lay off more than 80% of the force.
Got an email from the County Exec about six months back. A special energy tax is coming my way. Why??? The County is a gigabuck in the red on a four gigabuck budget. Unblievable. A four gigabuck budget for a pissant county!!!!!! I should think that Montana's state budget isn't even a gigabuck - no offense intended to Montanans. I might go there and raise dental floss when the s*&t really hits the fan.tmosley
Yeah, but apparently none of this applies to the private sector because we all know there is no such thing as self-protecting, self-propagating, private sector bureaucracy because of all that vigorous, purifying competition out there.
The author's thesis does explain nicely why bureaucracy typically increases under RepubliKeynesian administrations. They come in, put in a lot of Keynesian Deficit Tax Cuts, talk a lot of nonsense and bluster and "cutting the size of government", and leave behind the best-connected, best-protected, best-lobbying bureaucracies. And since they don't give a damn how well or badly government actually performs, well you guess the result.TheMonetaryRed
And Democrats aren't any different?
You think the author is a Republican?
You think corporations get their funding to fuel bureaucracy growth by gunpoint?Iam Rich
The tax man has yet to point a gun at me, tmosley.
They mostly just leave ballot boxes around.
You want to see taxes collected at gunpoint? Go to the Libertarian Paradise of Somalia.
Until then, why don't you go easy on the dramatics. You don't like paying taxes. Nobody does. Welcome to the world.MrPalladium
Well, you do pay then. Don't pay your taxes. The tax man will point a gun at you.cxl9
"Yeah, but apparently none of this applies to the private sector because we all know there is no such thing as self-protecting, self-propagating, private sector bureaucracy because of all that vigorous, purifying competition out there.
Of course corporate bureaucracies in the private sector are "self-protecting" and "self propagating," but the means by which they self protect and self-propagate are quite different from those employed by public sector bureaucracies. Public sector bureaucracies propagate by allowing crises to get worse - that is how they extort budgets from the legislature. If a public sector bureaucracy ever solved the problem or crisis they would unemploy themselves. Thus you will never see the education crisis solved. Test results will get worse, deepening the crisis, and deepening the demand for educational "services."
In contrast, the only way for private sector bureaucracies to grow and prosper is to become more productive than competing private sector bureaucracies.
But you wouldn't know that, because you obviously have never worked in the private sector.DisparityFlux
Bureaucracies, like many systems, exhibit the behavior of life forms. They grow, they encroach, they reproduce, they respond to external threats and stimulii. They will viciously defend themselves when cornered or threatened. That is one reason why we as human beings should be so wary of creating new bureaucracies: it is so difficult to kill them once they are brought to life.
Anyway, these observations are nothing new. Everything you'll ever need to know about bureaucracies, and systems in general, is summed-up in "Systemantics: The Underground Text of Systems Lore" by John Gall [sic].Snidley Whipsnae
I believe I still have a copy of his first book. Still can't believe his observations are discounted, even with supporting evidence continuously manifested.
"Bureaucracy is undoubtedly the weapon and sign of a despotic government, inasmuch as it gives whatever government it serves, despotic power." Lord Acton....
And the good man went on to say "Power corrupts, absolutely power corrupts absolutely."
Today we have heard outrage by pols/bankers over Wikileaks, the SEC has decided that they do not need an office to receive whistle blower tips, TSA can do what they damn well want to us when we try to travel, ECB is going to print fiat paper in concert with the Fed, gold neared $1,400 and received hammer blows via tons of fiat paper, and Prosser/Plusser told us that all is well and we should go buy some Xmas gifts....because if need be the Fed will come with QE to infinity.
Nothing to see here, move along.FreedomGuy
I don't want to depress anyone but no Republican or Democrat administration will cut the bureaucracy. I watched Boehner after the Republican election victories and knew we (those who advocate minimal or at least fiscally responsible gov't) had lost already. He announced going back to 2008 budget levels. That's a nice sentiment but even Boehner doesn't understand the shark they are riding.
The reason both parties will be unsuccessful is first, virtually no Dems want to do anything but grow gov't and more importantly the Republicans will not quit asking the gov't to do "stuff". As long as the missions you give gov't remain the bureaucracy will remain and grow. That's the nature of the beast. They all grow, amass power, never work on efficiency (there's no competition, no profit motive and no necessity to make happy customers) and with union help will purposely hire useless people and give raises if they can. To truly CUT government you must eliminate the missions...whole agencies.
The dept's of Education, Energy, EPA, EO, subdepartments, etc. could be permanently cut and savings accrued. That will NOT happen. Only Libertarians would do it and there are not enough in the Republican party. The press, the Dems, unions and the numerous constituencies that suckle that particular gov't teat will all ally to provide a serious beat down to anyone that tries. Barney Frank got reelected for God's sake! He is ground zero for the Fannie-Freddie mortgage meltdown! The concentrated interests (special interests) will always defeat the diffuse interest (general public).
I like this article but I challenge anyone to name any agency outside the military that has ever taken permanent cuts. It does happen more at the state and local levels because of more rigorous budget rules, but bureaus still prevail over time.
The only way this changes is with a peaceful political revolution (i.e. elect libertarian type politicians) or if the system continues to evolve till it destroys itself. We will be impoverished and live in an autocratic society before that happens. Even the Soviets couldn't make it work with gulags and guns. It won't work here, either. However, we are going to try it.
Groupthink : Two Party System as Polyarchy : Corruption of Regulators : Bureaucracies : Understanding Micromanagers and Control Freaks : Toxic Managers : Harvard Mafia : Diplomatic Communication : Surviving a Bad Performance Review : Insufficient Retirement Funds as Immanent Problem of Neoliberal Regime : PseudoScience : Who Rules America : Neoliberalism : The Iron Law of Oligarchy : Libertarian Philosophy
War and Peace : Skeptical Finance : John Kenneth Galbraith :Talleyrand : Oscar Wilde : Otto Von Bismarck : Keynes : George Carlin : Skeptics : Propaganda : SE quotes : Language Design and Programming Quotes : Random IT-related quotes : Somerset Maugham : Marcus Aurelius : Kurt Vonnegut : Eric Hoffer : Winston Churchill : Napoleon Bonaparte : Ambrose Bierce : Bernard Shaw : Mark Twain Quotes
Vol 25, No.12 (December, 2013) Rational Fools vs. Efficient Crooks The efficient markets hypothesis : Political Skeptic Bulletin, 2013 : Unemployment Bulletin, 2010 : Vol 23, No.10 (October, 2011) An observation about corporate security departments : Slightly Skeptical Euromaydan Chronicles, June 2014 : Greenspan legacy bulletin, 2008 : Vol 25, No.10 (October, 2013) Cryptolocker Trojan (Win32/Crilock.A) : Vol 25, No.08 (August, 2013) Cloud providers as intelligence collection hubs : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2010 : Inequality Bulletin, 2009 : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2008 : Copyleft Problems Bulletin, 2004 : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2011 : Energy Bulletin, 2010 : Malware Protection Bulletin, 2010 : Vol 26, No.1 (January, 2013) Object-Oriented Cult : Political Skeptic Bulletin, 2011 : Vol 23, No.11 (November, 2011) Softpanorama classification of sysadmin horror stories : Vol 25, No.05 (May, 2013) Corporate bullshit as a communication method : Vol 25, No.06 (June, 2013) A Note on the Relationship of Brooks Law and Conway Law
Fifty glorious years (1950-2000): the triumph of the US computer engineering : Donald Knuth : TAoCP and its Influence of Computer Science : Richard Stallman : Linus Torvalds : Larry Wall : John K. Ousterhout : CTSS : Multix OS Unix History : Unix shell history : VI editor : History of pipes concept : Solaris : MS DOS : Programming Languages History : PL/1 : Simula 67 : C : History of GCC development : Scripting Languages : Perl history : OS History : Mail : DNS : SSH : CPU Instruction Sets : SPARC systems 1987-2006 : Norton Commander : Norton Utilities : Norton Ghost : Frontpage history : Malware Defense History : GNU Screen : OSS early history
The Peter Principle : Parkinson Law : 1984 : The Mythical Man-Month : How to Solve It by George Polya : The Art of Computer Programming : The Elements of Programming Style : The Unix Haterís Handbook : The Jargon file : The True Believer : Programming Pearls : The Good Soldier Svejk : The Power Elite
Most popular humor pages:
Manifest of the Softpanorama IT Slacker Society : Ten Commandments of the IT Slackers Society : Computer Humor Collection : BSD Logo Story : The Cuckoo's Egg : IT Slang : C++ Humor : ARE YOU A BBS ADDICT? : The Perl Purity Test : Object oriented programmers of all nations : Financial Humor : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2008 : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2010 : The Most Comprehensive Collection of Editor-related Humor : Programming Language Humor : Goldman Sachs related humor : Greenspan humor : C Humor : Scripting Humor : Real Programmers Humor : Web Humor : GPL-related Humor : OFM Humor : Politically Incorrect Humor : IDS Humor : "Linux Sucks" Humor : Russian Musical Humor : Best Russian Programmer Humor : Microsoft plans to buy Catholic Church : Richard Stallman Related Humor : Admin Humor : Perl-related Humor : Linus Torvalds Related humor : PseudoScience Related Humor : Networking Humor : Shell Humor : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2011 : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2012 : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2013 : Java Humor : Software Engineering Humor : Sun Solaris Related Humor : Education Humor : IBM Humor : Assembler-related Humor : VIM Humor : Computer Viruses Humor : Bright tomorrow is rescheduled to a day after tomorrow : Classic Computer Humor
The Last but not Least Technology is dominated by two types of people: those who understand what they do not manage and those who manage what they do not understand ~Archibald Putt. Ph.D
Copyright © 1996-2018 by Dr. Nikolai Bezroukov. www.softpanorama.org was initially created as a service to the (now defunct) UN Sustainable Development Networking Programme (SDNP) in the author free time and without any remuneration. This document is an industrial compilation designed and created exclusively for educational use and is distributed under the Softpanorama Content License. Original materials copyright belong to respective owners. Quotes are made for educational purposes only in compliance with the fair use doctrine.
FAIR USE NOTICE This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to advance understanding of computer science, IT technology, economic, scientific, and social issues. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided by section 107 of the US Copyright Law according to which such material can be distributed without profit exclusively for research and educational purposes.
This is a Spartan WHYFF (We Help You For Free) site written by people for whom English is not a native language. Grammar and spelling errors should be expected. The site contain some broken links as it develops like a living tree...
You can use PayPal to make a contribution, supporting development of this site and speed up access. In case softpanorama.org is down you can use the at softpanorama.info
The statements, views and opinions presented on this web page are those of the author (or referenced source) and are not endorsed by, nor do they necessarily reflect, the opinions of the author present and former employers, SDNP or any other organization the author may be associated with. We do not warrant the correctness of the information provided or its fitness for any purpose.
Last modified: September, 12, 2017