They Killed Our President

They Killed Our President 63 Reasons to Believe There Was a Conspiracy to Assassinate JFK Jesse Ventura, Dick Russell

Almost Great, but then He Fumbled October 9, 2013

By Alan Dale Daniel VINE VOICE

Format:Kindle Edition|Amazon Verified Purchase

They Killed Our President by former governor Jesse Ventura has a very direct approach to covering the assassination of President Kennedy. Mr. Ventura sets forth the fact or facts he wishes to prove and then directs the reader to online sources to expand the proof. This approach saves the reader from traversing oceans of explanations on trivia and focus the attention on facts rather than speculation; however, that only lasts through the first two sections of the book. The last section is almost total speculation and should have been left out. His conclusions are mostly political diatribe and have nothing to do with history or the Kennedy assassination. Too bad, because up to that point the book was very good.

I have read numerous books on the Kennedy assassination, and most of them are junk. Posner and Bugliosi's books are terrible. Posner attempts to look into the mind of Oswald and speculates endlessly while Bugliosi simply argues off a few favorable facts rather than present facts in an objective fashion. One of the best books to read, outside of this one, is Impossible, The Case Against Lee Harvey Oswald by Barry Krusch Impossible: The Case Against Lee Harvey Oswald (Volume One). His three volume work extensively examines how the evidence was gathered and the problems with the evidence presented - and forgotten - by the Warren Commission. Mr. Krusch destroys the Warren Commission's report as few others have. However, his work is somewhat unfocused. Here is where Mr. Ventura's work excels, it is VERY focused.

I have always had a number of problems with the Warren Commission's report. I have read the summary, but not the 96 (?) volumes of the actual report. What is clear to anyone going over the evidence is that the evidence has been subject to tampering. The discovery that the brain matter retained was not President Kennedy's is enough to put anyone on notice that the evidence isn't to be trusted. Any trial attorney, and I was one, will tell you that if any evidence is tainted in a case ALL the evidence becomes doubly questionable. Because we know evidence was stolen and replaced by false evidence we must be more diligent about what is accepted as proof in the case. And there are other problems with the investigation that are basic. The washing out of the car shortly after the attack, and the rebuilding of the vehicle a few days later, is astounding. That is destruction of evidence. Because of this one act, which is undeniable, other acts must be more closely questioned. There is little doubt the photos of Kennedy in the hospital which were released to the public are not correct, and the entry wound in the back information was also incorrect or altered. Mr. Ventuara's book proves those points, and many more, beyond any doubt.

The key factor in the Kennedy assassination, in my mind, was the type of bullet that hit Kennedy. They Killed Our President is the only book that has looked into this matter with any kind of thoroughness. There is no doubt, and I mean none, that Kennedy was hit by a hollow point or soft nosed bullet that expanded violently on impact. Full metal jacketed bullets do not do this. I have personally tested, as a reloader, these kinds of bullets and a full metal jacketed bullet does not explode on impact (our military 223s keyhole on impact which is a different phenomenon) as the bullet that hit Kennedy clearly did.

The so called expert testimony in the Warren Commission Report on this matter is an outright lie. The Z-film leaves no doubt Kennedy was pushed backward by the bullet strike. If the vehicle acceleration pushed him backward why isn't anyone else in the car being pushed in the same manner? Kennedy's head jerks backward violently.

This was a bullet strike and not vehicle acceleration. This is why the missing brain is so important. IF that brain was authentic it could be tested for the microscopic matter that results from a hollow point or soft point bullet strike.

That would prove the bullet that hit Kennedy was not a full metal jacket bullet. But, the brain matter is gone. It was critical evidence. Mr. Ventura could have taken an extra step to prove this.

By simply setting up a few watermelons and shooting them with full metal jacketed bullets and hollow point bullets he could have shown the difference. The difference is striking. A 243 would be a good substitute for the 6.5 if one was not available.

It is clear the car was washed out immediately after its arrival at Parkland, and then rebuilt three days later, and that Kennedy's brain matter was switched in the archives. It is also clear that the Z-film's release was fought by the Federal Government. It took a ruling by the US Supreme Court to get it released. It is also clear that clips from the film were reversed in the Warren Commission Report making it appear that Kennedy's head went forward after the bullet strike. There are a lot of other undeniable problems with the evidence in the Kennedy assassination which call the Warren Commission Report into question. Incompetent is the best one could say about the report.

But, as Mr. Ventura points out, what they left out is just as critical as what they put in. What is not said is often much more important than what is said. Choosing to leave out critical information, such as Oswald having a Coke in his hand, is telling in many ways. Mr. Ventura does a good job of pointing out the most obvious omissions.

So I like the method of writing the book and its sharp focus in the first sections. I do not like the speculation in the last sections or speculation on who killed Kennedy. If one sticks to the fact that the Warren Commission Report was a lie we can stop. By going too far afield he damages the credibility of the solid work he has done. We also do not need to get political. Stick with the clearly provable facts and he has a winner. He didn't, and that harms his work. Because he fumbled the ball short of the end zone I give the book 3 stars, but he was close. So very close.

AD2

The "unranked" list of 63?, November 2, 2013

By Herbert L Calhoun "paulocal" (Falls Church, VA USA) - See all my reviews (REAL NAME)

This review is from: They Killed Our President: 63 Reasons to Believe There Was a Conspiracy to Assassinate JFK (Hardcover)

Governor Ventura is an "emerging JFK assassination scholar." One that all patriotic Americans should keep a careful eye on. As an ex-Navy Seal, we know instinctively that when he latches on to a bone he is unlikely to easily let go. However, it must also be said that his recent forays into the JFK assassination milieu, if anything has been little more than a careful indexing of his own personal growth in the assassination field: a measure of the gap between his heart (which is certainly in the right place) and his scholarship, if you ask me.

At first, his JFK books were as innocent as they were sloppy, so much so that for a while I thought he was just another CIA shill -- another "high profile" cog added to the constantly churning Langley JFK assassination disinformation machinery.

However, here he "makes his bones." It now appears that Governor Ventura actually finally understands the real nature of the JFK assassination game: that a lot of serious scholars have given their blood toiling quietly but deeply into the bowels of this matter so pivotal to the very sanctity of our democratic way of life. More than anyone else, they know that delving into the causes of the JFK assassination is very high-level, very serious patriotic work -- perhaps as serious as one can get in these much troubled times.

Thus, they know the difference between the lightweights, the Johnny-come-lately's, the truly innocent, and the CIA disinformation shills. They also know who is just trolling for "quick bucks."

It is still too early to know just which one of these categories the governor will finally settle into. But what we can say is that this book is a more honest effort if for no other reason than that it matches Ventura's heart up with the level of his scholarship.

There is a lot to be said for being able to list and then analyze with a reasonable amount of facility, 63 reasons why there was a conspiracy in the JFK assassination. And although this book does not add anything new, nor does it reflects a high level of mature analysis, the next step, a much more important one in the Governor's JFK scholastic development program, should be to "rank order" these reasons in terms of their importance to understanding and explaining why there was indeed a conspiracy to assassinate our 35th President. Had he "rank-ordered" the causes in this book, it would have indicated an entirely different capability, one higher up the rung of the JFK assassination scholarship ladder.

By placing the frontal head shot from the grassy knoll as the first in his list, it certainly led the reader to think that his list indeed was going to be a rank-ordered list? However, that did not prove to be the case. The list presented here seems to have trailed off into throwing everything in but the kitchen sink? In my view, this greatly weakened the analysis. Three Stars

Can you say "Military Coup de Etat"?, October 31, 2013

By A. Borrelli "FIZZY" (SUBURBAN PHILADELPHIA) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)

This review is from: They Killed Our President: 63 Facts That Prove a Conspiracy to Kill JFK (Kindle Edition)

After a half century one can only say that with the overwhelming evidence that the Military Industrial Complex in accordance with extreme right wing Cuban Nationals who got their wealthy aristocratic asses kicked by Castro, and Mafioso who wanted desperately to regain their casinos, whore houses, and other vices, and the American businesses like United Fruit joined together to murder the president of the USA in such a way as to strike fear into the hearts of every President, Congressman and Judge who would come along after-that whoever believes that Lee Harvey Oswald sat on a box of books and using a $12.00 Italian surplus bolt action rifle fired three rounds and put two into a moving head from six stories up is either an idiot, a government stooge, a writer trying to get rich being a "Devil's Advocate", or scarred shitless that he/she will end up like the more than 50 eyewitnesses who died under mysterious circumstances within three years of the event.

Even doctored up by right winger Henry Luce of Life magazine who snatched up the film, the Zapruder tape still shows undeniable proof to even a fool that JFK's head was hit from the front and the back of his head blown OUT in an undeniable and typical ballistic reaction.

The speech that JFK never gave that day to the Texas Business Mart contained two crushing statements:

1) An end to American involvement in Vietnam and

2) Reinstatement of normal relations with Cuba.

After threatening to nationalize the steel industry for violating a promise to not raise prices in return for no wage increase for the United Steel Workers, and firing Allen Dulles as head of the CIA and threatening to disband the organization that along with the NSA now runs our government - NEED I SAY MORE?

A fantastic read even if a bit repetitive near the end, October 30, 2013

By Neg8iveZero - See all my reviews

Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)

This review is from: They Killed Our President: 63 Facts That Prove a Conspiracy to Kill JFK (Kindle Edition)

Like him or hate him, Jesse has facts and sources for all of his claims in this book and it makes a FANTASTIC case for the conspiracy to kill President Kennedy. The Warren Commission's story is suspicious at first glance and laughable after reading this book.

Jesse starts with the smoking gun and just keeps slamming you with brow-raising facts, left and right. The guy puts a beating on the official line so hard that I don't think our government can believably cling to it any longer. The punches, however, are pulled a bit towards the end (chapters ~45-60) and the book begins to repeat itself at such a rate that I actually skipped a few pages (something I NEVER do). This seems entirely unnecessary given the quality and quantity of information in the previous chapters. Ventura could have easily condensed this book down to 50 facts that prove a conspiracy to kill JFK. It would have been a cleaner title and it would have avoided the repetition. I suppose he wanted to include everything possible and I commend that to a degree but be sure you have some patience in the final act of the book.

I find Jesse's concluding chapter to be the best part of the book and it is the main reason why I gave this book 5 stars. Read this book and buy it for a friend, if for no other reason than to stir up some great conversation and debate- but I have hope that this book might change a lot of minds out there.

In conclusion, yes, I recommend this book. It is a quick, thrilling, fact-filled, trial that shines light on one of America's greatest tragedies.

Mostly Accurate, Jesse needs to temper opinions., October 30, 2013

By W. Nichols (De Witt, IA USA) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME) 

Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)

This review is from: They Killed Our President: 63 Facts That Prove a Conspiracy to Kill JFK (Kindle Edition)

Recommend the book as he hits the main "facts" well.

Lived in Dallas in 1963. Learned much about the grassy knoll and most of the facts he lists are accurate from my research.

On the single bullet theory, as a scientist, the energy (physics) needed does not add up. Not even close. Leave it at that. Warren Commission is an example of a government gone astray.

View is he is too timid on LBJ. Yes, a "coup" likely did take place. Those who believe in parties and ideology versus "We The People" get the government they deserve.

Agree with a significant majority of the 63 facts he lists. He could have used radiant energy, doppler acoustics studies. His chapter on LBJ...tho sobering...maybe could be added to (other conservations?).

Are we really free? Decide for yourself and when will real change that empowers all of us start? Truth is the only empowerment for mankind and IT NEVER TAKES FROM ANYONE.

POWER ALWAYS CORRUPTS.

Jesse's temperment is his greatest limitation. Though mostly subdued, he delves into opinion and emotions too much and does so even more in person.

Come from a similar military background as Jesse. More? Much of what he postulates was known/proved several decades. Much, more?

Jesse is a real patriot for his desire for the truth and an attempt to inform people on this critical issue.

The situation is more dire in sustainability than even Jesse briefly communicates here.

Can freedom...fear and blame coexist? History is clear on this. Will we learn?

The good news though is always the truth in the form of transparency and accountability.

Could most of our elected officials be self serving, unqualified and self serving ideological groupthink zombies? My 40 years in numerous high level government projects on this is quite clear.

Hence, We all lose. Read Eisenhower's farewell address, it is a start toward solutions. Sadly, this vital speech is about the power of institutions, of which government is always the ultimate institution, the military-industrial complex is one of 2 examples he gives (he states government pervasiveness is ubiquitous). In some ways, a bigger and greater example given is the arrest of real science by the elite. The universe is not based on gravity (both Einstein/Newton are quoted as stating this)...it is closer to a poor conceptual understanding of charge or differential. But our toxic blend of ignorance and institutions is hiding much greater truths (as is always the case in our human history). Why? Maybe it would destroy some belief systems of authority. Science is not complex...it is the reality we see in nature everyday...or common sense and no...it is not mathematics. Just observe...then applying real basic science principles as our founding fathers believed and are quoted. Solutions and a way forward to true "self-governance" on this and other issues also a minor quibble which he could pursue further to arrest the inherent human vices of power. Jesse should know how to address this as his military and governorship experiences should be of value. Perplexed a bit why he doesn't.

BTW..FWIW...been involved in 4 areas in government worth trillions of dollars (Future flying weapon systems, Climate Change, Energy, Scientific Research). It is worse than most of you know.

Important Missing Piece of the Book Discussion - Executive Order 11110, October 26, 2013

By One Reader (Scottsdale, AZ) - See all my reviews

This review is from: They Killed Our President: 63 Facts That Prove a Conspiracy to Kill JFK (Kindle Edition)

This is from the john-f-kennedy site, directly quoted:

"On June 4, 1963, a little known attempt was made to strip the Federal Reserve Bank of its power to loan money to the government at interest. On that day President John F. Kennedy signed Executive Order No. 11110 that returned to the U.S. government the power to issue currency, without going through the Federal Reserve.

Mr. Kennedy's order gave the Treasury the power "to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury." This meant that for every ounce of silver in the U.S. Treasury's vault, the government could introduce new money into circulation. In all, Kennedy brought nearly $4.3 billion in U.S. notes into circulation. The ramifications of this bill are enormous.

With the stroke of a pen, Mr. Kennedy was on his way to putting the Federal Reserve Bank of New York out of business. If enough of these silver certificats were to come into circulation they would have eliminated the demand for Federal Reserve notes. This is because the silver certificates are backed by silver and the Federal Reserve notes are not backed by anything. Executive Order 11110 could have prevented the national debt from reaching its current level, because it would have given the gevernment the ability to repay its debt without going to the Federal Reserve and being charged interest in order to create the new money. Executive Order 11110 gave the U.S. the ability to create its own money backed by silver."

Certainly seems this would be enough motivation for an assassination. JFK was killed 5 months after this Kennedy Executive Order

A flawed but engaging and illuminating reflection of the seminal event of the past 43 tyears, October 25, 2013

By William J. Bobzin "bill the skeptic" (La grange, Il USA) - See all my reviews (REAL NAME) 

This review is from: They Killed Our President: 63 Reasons to Believe There Was a Conspiracy to Assassinate JFK (Hardcover)

Books about the Kennedy assassination tend to come in two flavors, the Conspiracy crowd who already have determined WHY Kennedy was killed and WHO ordered the hit. In this category we find the usual suspects, the Military-industrial complex crowd,The Mafia revenge killing group, the Pro-Castro, freedom bunch and of course, the Obscenely wealthy right wing zealots, usually oil men from Texas. In doing so they pick out those things which amplify their own theories and present them as undeniable Generating more heat than light.

The other category approaches the crime with open eyes and a clear mind examining the evidence and highlighting the anomalies of the official reports and conclusions. This is the group that follows the evidence and then draws a conclusion. In that sense they treat as a murder investigation, using each clue as a stepping stone to clarity. Ventura makes good use of this method in arriving at his final conclusion, which is not to say that he avoids falling into the same trap that hobbles the conspiracy group. On many occasions he goes off the rails into the arena of speculation, allowing his feelings and preconceived notions to muddy the waters. Thankfully he limits himself somewhat and does a yeoman's job of sticking to the facts.

Much of what Ventura reveals is not new, his co-writer, David Wayne also co-wrote Hit List with Richard Belzer, yes that Richard Belzer, as a result portions of the reading of Ventura's book feel like deja vu. Having said that, what he achieves is a new look at old material, a look that both clarifies and examines what came before. An example is the discussion of the rifle Oswald is said to have used.

Few, if any, of the many books written about the assassination paid more than token references to the Mannlicher-Carana that was identified as the weapon that killed the President. Ventura does what should have done before, which is to state, in his words, that the rifle was a "piece of junk". That alone blows some very large holes in the "Single Shooter" school of thought. The rifle in question was manufactured in 1919, 43 years before the assassination, it was regarded by gun collectors as a poorly constructed weapon of dubious accuracy.

Not to mentioned that Oswald, the purported assassin, was far from the highly regarded Marine Marksman that the media reported him to be. He was in reality poor to mediocre shooter.

Ventura says all of this far better than I and in doing so raises serious questions concerning the expertise and judgement of the Warren Commissions' experts.
Overall this is a good read that makes a mockery of much of the findings of the Commission and raises serious doubts, not only about the assassination but also American foreign policy over the past 43 years.

The "Cliff Notes" version of the assassination, October 21, 2013

By yescolleen - See all my reviews

Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)

This review is from: They Killed Our President: 63 Facts That Prove a Conspiracy to Kill JFK (Kindle Edition)

Thank you Jesse for your "Cliff's Notes" version of the facts surrounding the assassination. For anyone who wants to get deeper into the details, that's what the footnotes are for.

Jesse does a citizen's service in reducing complex, copious and scholarly evidence to a quick and understandable assessment of the facts. I disagree with one commentator who said Jesse probably hasn't read most of the books he cites --- I would bet you he has read close to every source he cites.

Jesse's book is similar to Len Osanic's "50 Reasons for 50 Years" short videos. These are 3 to 10 minute videos presented by scholars and researchers each week for one year touching various aspects of the Kennedy case. I think Jesse is scheduled to present one of the videos. http://www.blackopradio.com/archives2013.html 

In 2013 the majority of the American public remain unconvinced by the conclusions of the official Warren commission report, October 21, 2013

By Ctwilliams "goblin" (UK) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME) 

This review is from: They Killed Our President: 63 Reasons to Believe There Was a Conspiracy to Assassinate JFK (Hardcover)

In 2013 the majority of the American public remain unconvinced by the conclusions of the official Warren commission report on the JFK assassination and Ventura's book will effectively add fire to the conspiracy arguments. `They killed our president' by Jesse Ventura (with contributions) is a real page turner or `shifter' in the case of the Kindle, even for those tired of `JFK conspiracy' theories. I read the Kindle Fire edition with its full sources, footnotes and direct web connections to the text.
Jesse Ventures stylistic voice is always apparent in this direct, accessible and convincing read on the events surrounding the JFK assassination. In part one Ventura uses documented sources, materials and witness testimony throughout (with some unpublished new material) to sustain his main argument that the USA security services, mafia and Cuban exile forces and others conspired to assassinate JFK. Ventura in part two argues the official Warren Commission's report on the assassination was part of a media cover up that focused public attention on the theory of lone gunman assassin Lee Harvey Oswald. Furthermore the Warren Commission omitted or retro fitted evidence to prove its lone gunman case. Ventura in part three analyses the principal characters and their conspiracy in the cause, event and aftermath of the assassination. Ventura notes in conclusion how the full JFK story has yet to be written, not least due to the amount of withheld documentation concerning the events and its lead characters for reasons of ongoing `national security' - 50 years after the event!
34 of 38 people found the following review helpful

5.0 out of 5 stars The Conspiracy Continues Alive and Well, October 13, 2013

By Ron Castle "Ron Castle" (Tennessee USA) - See all my reviews

Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)

This review is from: They Killed Our President: 63 Facts That Prove a Conspiracy to Kill JFK (Kindle Edition)

Kudos to Jesse and team for compiling 50 years of information into a clarifying and orderly examination of the conspiracy that resulted in the assassination of JFK.

The assassination has always held great interest for me. I was raised in Dallas. The fatal day of the president's visit three of my high school buddies and I left high school to see the president. We decided to go to Love Field to see his arrival rather than go to the parade downtown. The president passed within 15 feet of where I was standing along the fence separating the exit ramp of the plane from the parking lot where he and Jackie boarded the limo.

Early on the morning of November 24 a school mate and I drove out to Mount Vernon 100 miles east of Dallas to "get the hell out of dodge" and visit my grandfather, Warren Penn Castle, Sr., who had retired a couple of months earlier as an assistant district attorney working for Dallas DA Henry Wade. We arrived a few minutes after Jack Ruby shot Oswald on national television. My grandfather was on the phone with his former colleagues at the DA's office and the Dallas Police Department in a more agitated and emotional state than I had ever witnessed. Long story short, his conclusion was several weeks later and until he died was that something was terribly and totally wrong. He knew Jack Ruby and of his mob connections. My grandfather's conclusion until the time he passed away was that maybe someday the truth about what happened would come out.

New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison did a better job than anyone of exposing the plot. The government conspiracy machine did all they could to discredit his efforts. It's is amazing to me that he was not assassinated like so many others. Garrison died of cancer in 1992.

The government conspiracy machine is still alive and well, new players in the same old game. War makes big money. The United States has been at war with somebody somewhere since the end of WW2 and there is still no end in sight. Jesse's book is a cogent examination of what can happen. History continues to repeat itself.

Should Be Required Reading for all Americans, October 10, 2013

By Phillip - See all my reviews

 

This review is from: They Killed Our President: 63 Reasons to Believe There Was a Conspiracy to Assassinate JFK (Hardcover)

This book packs quite a punch and I applaude the authors for writing it and am pleased that it is available in mainstream bookstores. The majority of political assassinations throughout history have been the result of conspiracies but somehow this cannot occur in America. Another fine example of absurd American exceptionalism. This book is a collection of short, concisely written chapters detailing all the relevant and new evidence in the JFK Assassination and completly dispells the government myth of a lone gunman and should be required reading for anyone who agress with the actor in the film "Parkland" who gave a recent interview where he says that the belief in a conspiracy to assassinate JFK is a moral sickness at the heart of American society. The majority of the American people do not believe in the lone gunman myth because the official government explanation is filled with so many inconsistencies, implusibilities, and contradictions as to be absurd. The governemnt reconstruction of the shooting depends on delayed reactions to gunshot wounds, magic bullets, contradictions of the second law of thermodynamics, neuromuscular effects and Jet propulsion effects to explain a shooting preformed by a man who was considered a poor shot in the marines and which has never been duplicated by no other professional marksman. This fact alone makes a mockery of the official government conclusion in the JFK assassination. Each of this books chapters is a well wriiten, concise summary of the evidence for conspiracy and I applaud Jesse Ventura and his co-authors for making this public available to people. Is'it at all interesting that on November 25, 1963 the Attorney General's office issued a memo stating that the public must be convinced of Oswald's sole guilt on the same day the New York Times has a headline "President's Assasin murdered in Dallas and only two days after a recorded conversation between Lyndon Johnson and J. Edgar Hoover where Hover says that the case against Oswald is'nt very strong, in other words he was convicted by the government and the media before any real investigation was ever conducted and a year latter the government publishes a 900 page report with the same conclusion? I hope everyone reads this and each chapter is explored on "Mythbusters" on cable. One other thing for those interested in Legal issues. A government committee and two open court juries all ruled that there was a conspiracy. The jury for a mock trial for the ABA ruled 7 to convict Oswald and 5 to acquit. I wonder how this would have gone if all this information in this book was presented.
Half a century later, the world still suffers from the Coup D'Etat of 1963, October 9, 2013

By Kameelyun (Ohio) - See all my reviews

 

This review is from: They Killed Our President: 63 Reasons to Believe There Was a Conspiracy to Assassinate JFK (Hardcover)

That many historians and lay citizens reject the notion that Oswald acted alone is nothing new. There have been a countless number of books written about the JFK assassination. So many, in fact, that it can be very difficult for a neophyte to know where to begin. (I am one such neophyte, regarding books on the subject, though I've watched several presentations on YouTube on the subject, and had already seen the Zapruder film along with the video of the Secret Service stand down.) This book, however, is unique because it's delivered through the charismatic voice of Jesse Ventura, and it's done in a style that is not dry or "academic." I can't imagine a more perfect first book on the subject for anyone to read.

As a disclaimer, I'm only about 50 pages into the book, i.e. the 15th of the 63 reasons for why there was a conspiracy. However, I'm comfortable writing this review before finishing the book because I can say that ALREADY Jesse has proven, beyond a shadow of doubt, that Oswald didn't kill Kennedy. From this point, it's just a matter of 48 more layers on the pearl.

As many footnotes and referenced videos are internet entities, Ventura has an official Facebook page where readers can click on the various links as they go through the book, and check the sources for themselves. This saves fact-checkers the awkward task of looking in the book and typing long, complicated URLs into the address bar. Ventura's team gets extra marks for going the extra yard here.

Finally, it should be noted that Ventura has challenged any and all supporters of the "official version" of the assassination to live debate. If the individuals who think Oswald acted alone are confident in this position, they should have no problem taking Ventura up on this challenge. People who avoid debate are the ones who know that their position will be exposed as factually bankrupt. So, to Gerald Posner, Bill O'Reilly, and Vincent Bugliosi, are any of you man enough to step up to the plate?

Grand slam home run once again, Gov. Ventura!


Old News ;-)

Recommended Links

Top articles

Sites


Last modified: July 28, 2019